Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hydropower
Hydropower
Alberto Bianchi
Textbook 2
file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Laymans%20Guide%20to%20Hydro_ES
HA%20(2).pdf
Introduction
7
1. VERY EASY TO BE
TRANSPORTED
2. IMPOSSIBLE TO BE
ACCUMULATED
Domestic Users Industrial Users Services
Electricity Consumption 12
Daily load diagram
Daily diagram of the hourly load in the Italian system in the 3rd Wednesday of each month
Total
ENEL
North
and
Central
South and
Islands
Electricity Consumption 18
Tariff
Electricity Consumption 20
Satisfaction of the needs
Total
Requirement
Import Thermo
Total
Production Total Hydro
Geothermal
Reservoir
PV Basin Hydro
Scholars at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences believe that the Earth's heat, which
spreads through space, can produce renewable energy. The study was published in the scientific
journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. and the idea that this can be realized
comes from the mind of the Italian Federico Capasso, who has been working in the United States for
years.
Two systems have been developed by Harvard University to capture and exploit the Earth's thermal
energy. These devices are called EEH (Emissive Energy Harvester) and are able to produce energy
by emitting thermal radiation towards the sky. What the scholars do is calculate the thermodynamic
power that is available and plot it, "using the location of Oklahoma as a case study." These are two
different devices to advance the idea that infrared thermal radiation will produce electricity for the
Earth. The first is a thermal EEH (similar to the production of solar thermal energy) and the second
is instead comparable to the operation of the photovoltaic.
Salinity gradient Energy 39
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmotic_power#:~:text=Osmotic%20power%2C%20s
alinity%20gradient%20power,rely%20on%20osmosis%20with%20membranes
Osmotic power, salinity gradient power or blue energy is the energy available from the difference in
the salt concentration between seawater and river water. Two practical methods for this are reverse
electrodialysis (RED) and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO). Both processes rely
on osmosis with membranes. The key waste product is brackish water. This byproduct is the result
of natural forces that are being harnessed: the flow of fresh water into seas that are made up of salt
water.
In 1954, Pattle[1] suggested that there was an untapped source of power when a river mixes with the sea,
in terms of the lost osmotic pressure, however it was not until the mid ‘70s where a practical method
of exploiting it using selectively permeable membranes by Loeb [2] was outlined.
The method of generating power by pressure retarded osmosis was invented by Prof. Sidney Loeb in
1973 at the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.[3] The idea came to Prof. Loeb,
in part, as he observed the Jordan River flowing into the Dead Sea. He wanted to harvest the energy
of mixing of the two aqueous solutions (the Jordan River being one and the Dead Sea being the
other) that was going to waste in this natural mixing process.[4] In 1977 Prof. Loeb invented a
method of producing power by a reverse electrodialysis heat engine.[5]
The technologies have been confirmed in laboratory conditions. They are being developed into
commercial use in the Netherlands (RED) and Norway (PRO). The cost of the membrane has been
an obstacle. A new, lower cost membrane, based on an electrically modified polyethylene plastic,
made it fit for potential commercial use.[6] Other methods have been proposed and are currently
under development. Among them, a method based on electric double-layer
capacitor technology[7] and a method based on vapor pressure difference.
Salinity gradient Energy 40
Efficiency
A 2012 study on efficiency from Yale university concluded that the
highest extractable work in constant-pressure PRO with a seawater
draw solution and river water feed solution is 0.75 kWh/m3 (2.7 kJ/L)
while the free energy of mixing is 0.81 kWh/m3 (2.9 kJ/L) — a
thermodynamic extraction efficiency of 91.0%.[12]
Methods
While the mechanics and concepts of salinity gradient power are still
being studied, the power source has been implemented in several
different locations. Most of these are experimental, but thus far they
have been predominantly successful. The various companies that
have utilized this power have also done so in many different ways as
there are several concepts and processes that harness the power
from salinity gradient.
Salinity gradient Energy 42
Pressure-retarded osmosis
One method to utilize salinity gradient
energy is called pressure-retarded
osmosis.[13] In this method, seawater is
pumped into a pressure chamber that is
at a pressure lower than the difference
between the pressures of saline water
and fresh water. Freshwater is also
pumped into the pressure chamber
through a membrane, which increase
both the volume and pressure of the
chamber. As the pressure differences Simple PRO power generation scheme
are compensated, a turbine is spun,
providing kinetic energy.]
Salinity gradient Energy 43
Capacitive method
A third method is Doriano Brogioli's[7] capacitive method, which is relatively new and has so
far only been tested on lab scale. With this method energy can be extracted out of the
mixing of saline water and freshwater by cyclically charging up electrodes in contact with
saline water, followed by a discharge in freshwater. Since the amount of electrical energy
which is needed during the charging step is less than one gets out during the discharge
step, each completed cycle effectively produces energy. An intuitive explanation of this
effect is that the great number of ions in the saline water efficiently neutralizes the charge
on each electrode by forming a thin layer of opposite charge very close to the electrode
surface, known as an electric double layer. Therefore, the voltage over the electrodes
remains low during the charge step and charging is relatively easy. In between the charge
and discharge step, the electrodes are brought in contact with freshwater. After this, there
are less ions available to neutralize the charge on each electrode such that the voltage
over the electrodes increases. The discharge step which follows is therefore able to deliver
a relatively high amount of energy. A physical explanation is that on an electrically charged
capacitor, there is a mutually attractive electric force between the electric charge on the
electrode, and the ionic charge in the liquid. In order to pull ions away from the charged
electrode, osmotic pressure must do work. This work done increases the electrical potential
energy in the capacitor. An electronic explanation is that capacitance is a function of ion
density. By introducing a salinity gradient and allowing some of the ions to diffuse out of the
capacitor, this reduces the capacitance, and so the voltage must increase, since the
voltage equals the ratio of charge to capacitance.
Renewable Resources 48
Regimes
Rivers
p V2
H = z+ +
γ 2g
VA2 /2g
H
HA
zA
VB2 /2g
pB/γ B HB
zB
z=0
p A − pB VA2 − VB2
H = (z A − z B ) + + ≅ z A − zB W = γqH
γ 2g
Traditional hydropower plants 58
Principle of operation of a hydroelectric plant
𝑊𝑊 = 𝛾𝛾𝛾𝛾𝛾𝛾 E = ∫ 𝑊𝑊 𝐝𝐝𝐝𝐝
Head
Traditional hydropower plants 60
Principle of operation of a hydroelectric plant
A q B
Specific potenial energy
Intake conservation
Transformation into
specific pressure
energy
Transformation
into mechanic C
energy
Renewable Energy Concept 63
E = G×s ?
s
Renewable Energy Concept 65
HEAD
Renewable Energy Concept 67
100.000.000 years
10.000.000 years
1.000.000 years
H2O
100.000 years
RENEWABLE
ENERGY
SOURCES
THE WATER CICLE
Overview of currents and waves with respect to 68
conversion and related hydro-machinery
+
P -
T
Ec
Ec
12 HOURS
Overview of currents and waves with respect to 69
conversion and related hydro-machinery
+
P -
T
12 HOURS
Distinctive Features of 71
Hydropower Systems
• Osmosis
Distinctive features
kgf⋅m J kWh
1 m3
H2O E 1000Hd 9810⋅1⋅Hd 2,725⋅1000-3Hd=Hd/367
E⋅η 2,125⋅1000-3Hd=Hd/470≅
780Hd 7650Hd
[η≅0,78] ≅ Hd/500
m 500
1 m3
H2O
+kWh 1=
=0,86 kcal
m 367
kWh 1
+0,86° C
W = γqH = γcAH ≈ AH = VI [ L3 ]
Hydrodynamic Value Curve
Power W
Hydrodynamic Value
4.000
16
3.500
Hydrodynamic Value VI [km3]
14
3.000
Power W [kWh]
12
× 𝛾𝛾 (𝑐𝑐 − 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀)
2.500
10
2.000
8
1.500
6
1.000
4
500
2
0
0 500 1.000
1.000 1.500
1.500 2.000
2.000 2.500
2.500
Altitude
Altitude H [m
H [m a.s.l.]
a.s.l.]
Hydroelectric use of a River basin 87
Scheme of hydroelectric plants in Alta Valtellina (A2A)
Hydroelectric use of a River basin 88
Scheme of hydroelectric plants in Alta Valtellina (A2A)
Traditional hydropower plants 96
Head [m]
• Small Q < 10
• Big W > 10
• Mini 1<W<3
• Pico W<0,1
• Basin Hydro
• Reservoir Hydro
Forbay or Headpond