You are on page 1of 14

]. periodont. Res. 1 : 1-13.

1966

Experimental gingivitis in man


II. A Longitudinal Clinical and Bacteriological Investigation

ELSE THEILADE, W . H . WRIGHT, S. BORGLUM JENSEN AND HARALD LOE •


The Departments of Microbiology, Oral Diagnosis, and Periodontology,
The Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark

After 9-21 days without oral hygiene eleven experimental subjects with previously excellent oral
hygiene and healthy gingivae developed heavy accumulations of plaque and generalized mild gin-
givitis. The individual rate of development of gingivitis was closely correlated with the rate of
plaque accumulation. Characteristic bacteriological changes were revealed in the plaque along the
gingival margin during this experiment. Initially, i.e. when the teeth were clean and the gingiva
healthy, the extremely sparse plaque flora consisted almost exclusively of gram-positive cocci and
rods. The first phase of plaque development occurred during the first 2 days without oral hygiene
and consisted of a proliferation of the gram-positive cocci and rods and an addition of about 30
per cent gram-negative cocci and rods. During the second phase (after 1-4 days) fusobacteria and
filaments appeared and increased until they each made up about seven per cent of the flora.
During the third phase (after 4-9 days) the flora was supplemented with spirilla and spirochetes,
and at the end of the period without oral hygiene each of these two groups of organisms accoun-
ted for about two per cent of the plaque flora. In specific areas the gingival condition was corre-
lated with the composition of the plaque and it was found that mild gingivitis could be diagnosed
clinieally at approximately the same time as the complex flora was established. However, sub-
clinical inflammation started much earlier, probably as a reaction to the first phases of plaque
development. When oral hygiene was reinstituted, the plaque in most areas disappeared in 1-2
days and after 7-11 days the Plaque Index for each subject was as low as before the experiment.
Correspondingly, after 1-2 days most tooth surfaces only harbored the original sparse flora of
gram-positive cocci and rods. The gingival inflammation in an area usually disappeared one day
after the plaque had been removed.

In a previous study (Loe, Theilade and Therefore, the experiment was repeated in
Jensen 1965) it was shown that withdrawal an attempt to correlate the gingival condi-
of toothbrushing in 12 healthy persons with tion of specific tooth surfaces with the
excellent oral hygiene and clinically normal bacteriological findings from the same sur-
gingiva resulted in a rapid accumulation of faces.
debris on the teeth. Marginal gingivitis
developed in all subjects in from 10 to 21
days without oral hygiene. Jn a subsequent Material and Methods
period, efficient oral hygiene was reinsta- Clinical Examination. Eleven male dental
ted and in about a week, the plaque was students (aged 21-27) in the first clinical
reduced to pre-experimental levels and year were the experimental subjects. After
healthy gingival conditions were reestab- the initial examinations, the participants
lished. During the period of plaque accu- had their teeth scaled and polished and
mulation and development of gingivitis, were instructed to practice thorough oral
characteristic changes occurred in the hygiene measures with toothbrush and
bacterial flora of the gingival margin which wood points. They were then examined
seemed worthy of further investigation. periodically until the individual Gingival
EXPERIMENTAL G I N G I V I T I S IN MAN

Index scores (Loe and Silness 1963) and veloped by Gins and Mattig (1941) was
Plaque Index scores (Silness and Loe 1964) used as described by Loe, Theilade and
approached zero. At the start of the ex- Jensen (1965). In the impression prepara-
perimental period the Gingival Index scores tions the gingival curvature can be followed
for the eleven participants ranged between accurately and specific anatomic areas can
0.03 and 0.30 (average 0.15). The Plaque be identified during microscopic observa-
Index scores ranged between 0.04 and 0.15 tion. The composition of the gingival flora
(average 0.08). The subjects were also at the mesial papillae and at the buccal
examined for periodontal disease and marginal gingivae of the upper left bicu-
pocket formation by means of the Perio- spids was assessed. The presence of cocci,
dontal Index system (Russell 1956). The fusobacteria, leptotrichia, spirilla and spi-
Periodontal Index scores ranged between rochetes was assessed using a 0 to + + +
0.07 and 0.39 (average 0.22). There were score to designate the approximate number
four periodontal pockets present in the in each observation.
experimental group.
At the start of the experimental period 2. Bacterial smears were made of plaque
the participants were instructed to cease all collected from the gingival margin of the
oral hygiene measures. Clinical examina- lower left second bicuspid with a moist
tions were performed daily for the first five wood point. Two samples were taken each
days, then every second day until the Gin- time, one from the mesial and one from the
gival Index score for each person exceeded buccal surface. In order to minimize inter-
1.0 (mild gingivitis). At this point oral ference with the plaque, very little material
hygiene measures were reinstituted and the was removed. The smears were prepared
subjects were examined daily for three days directly from the wood point by mixing
and then every second day until the indi- with a loopful of sterile distilled water on
vidual Gingival Index scores were the same 1 X 2 cm areas of the slides. Although
as the scores at the start of the experimental clumps were not entirely avoided, the
period. At the end of the study the partici- suspension made it possible to distinguish
pants were again examined for periodontal the morphology and staining reaction of
disease and pocket formation. the majority of the bacteria. Samples from
Intra-oral photographs were taken at the clean surfaces during the period of oral
beginning of the experimental period, when hygiene contained so few bacteria that they
gingival inflammation was manifest (GI = had to be spread on smaller areas ( 1 X 1
1.0), and at the end of the experiment. cm). The smears were heat-fixed and
stained with a gram staining procedure.
Bacteriological Examination. Bacteriological Differential counts were performed of the
samples were collected from the gingival following groups of bacteria according to
margin during the clinical examinations: morphological and gram staining charac-
1) on the day before the participants teristics: 1) gram-positive cocci and rods,
ceased to clean their teeth, 2) during the 2) gram-negative cocci and small rods, 3)
»no oral hygiene« period, and 3) during gram-positive and gram-negative filaments,
the subsequent period of oral hygiene. Two 4) fusobacteria (gram-negative, long, thin
methods of obtaining stained preparations rods with tapered ends), 5) spirilla (gram-
for microscopic examination were emplo- negative, curved rods i.e. vibrios and se-
yed. lenomonas), 6) spirochetes. On the basis of
1. The impression technique originally de- counts of 200 bacteria in representative
THEILADE, WRIGHT, JENSEN AND L O E

fields, the percentage distribution of these late these changes with the gingival condi-
groups of bacteria in each sample was cal- tion in the corresponding area.
culated. Bibby (1938a) showed that a diffe-
rential count of morphological groups in
smears of plaque was reliable, provided Results
great care was taken during the gram Clinical Results
staining procedure and if at least 200 orga- The preliminary scaling and instruction in
nisms were counted. oral hygiene techniques gave a group which
By these means it was possible to study exhibited uniformly excellent oral hygiene
the changes in bacteriological composition and gingival health. However, when active
of the plaque on one and the same tooth oral hygiene procedures were withdrawn,
surface over a period of time and to corre- plaque accumulated rapidly. The Gingival

day of gingivitis
(GliUMJ)

15 10 5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
.days of no oral hygiene days of oral h y g i » n » — •
group I (17-21 days)

group II (15 days)

group III (9-13 days)

day of g i n g i v i t i s
(GlilOO)

3 * 5 E 7 8 9 to
-days of no oral hygiene days of oral h y g i e n t — ^

Fig. 1. Changes in Gingival Index (top) and Plaque Index (bottom) during the period without oral
hygiene and the subsequent period of oral hygiene. Group I consisted of 3 subjects who developed
gingivitis in 17-21 days. Group II (5 subjects) developed gingivitis in 15 days. Group III (3 subjects)
developed gingivitis in 9-13 days.
EXPERIMENTAL G I N G I V I T I S IN MAN

all surfaces interprox facial oral

INCISORS

BICUSPIDS

MOLARS

H plaque index
maxilla •""

_•=•- "-"
D
s
gingival index
start of the experiment
mandible m~^ g day of gingivitis

hs + g -^.g_i e end of the experiment

Fig. 2. Plaque Index scores and Gingival Index scores broken down into scores for various groups
of teeth and surfaces (average for 11 subjects).
THEILADE, WRIGHT, JENSEN AND L O E

Index scores increased correspondingly until perimental levels (Fig. 1). Although some
the average score of each participant ex- individuals required a longer time to de-
ceeded 1.0 (mild inflammation). velop gingivitis than others, the time re-
Although the time required to develop quired to return to clinically normal condi-
gingivitis varied within the group the pat- tions was essentially the same for all the
tern was essentially the same, and the devel- subjects (7-11 days). As evaluated by the
opment of gingivitis correlated well with Periodontal Index system there did not
plaque accumulation (Fig. 1). When the rate appear to be any residual effects of the
of gingivitis development was evaluated, gingival changes which occurred during the
the participants could be divided into three experimental period.
groups. Three individuals developed gingi-
vitis in 9-13 days, five individuals in 15
days, and three in 17-21 days (Fig. 1, Top). Bacteriological Results
The group which required the longest period Impression preparations: Microscopic exa-
of time to exhibit gingivitis accumulated minations of the impression preparations
plaque at a slower rate than the group revealed changes in the bacterial composi-
which developed gingivitis more rapidly. tion of the developing plaque identical to
Regardless of the time required for the the pattern observed in the first study (Loe,
Gingival Index to exceed 1.0 the total Theilade and Jensen 1965). The change
plaque accumulation was essentially the from a predominantly coccal to a predomi-
same (Fig. 1). nantly filamentous flora took place ap-
The total plaque accumulation did not proximately two days (range 1-4 days)
differ significantly between the maxilla and after toothbrushing had stopped. Spirilla
the mandible. However, certain tendencies and spirochetes were observed after about
were noted when specific areas or surfaces seven days (range 4-9 days) without oral
were evaluated separately (Fig. 2). The hygiene. Manifestation of clinical gingivitis
interproximal surfaces consistently exhi- at the local level coincided fairly well with
bited the highest Plaque Index scores the establishment of this complex flora in
whereas the oral surfaces with the excep- the area. However, 7-8 days usually elapsed
tion of those of the mandibular molars from the time when the total complex flora
had the lowest. The incisors exhibited the was established in the area of the two upper
greatest variation with the interproximal left bicuspids until the experimental sub-
areas accumulating heavy deposits and the jects had developed a generalized gingivitis
oral surfaces acquiring considerably less. (Table I).
The Gingival Index scores did not ex- The change in the bacterial flora as re-
hibit as wide a range of variation as the lated to Plaque Index and Gingival Index
plaque scores (Fig. 2). The interproximal of the area selected for bacteriological
area scores were consistently the highest, examination is shown graphically for one
and those of the oral areas of the incisors typical experimental subject in Fig. 3. Cli-
were the lowest. Also, the scores of the nical gingivitis in this area was detected on
facial and oral areas of the maxillary molars the same day as the total complex flora had
were slightly lower than those of the corre- been established. The Gingival Index score
sponding mandibular molars. for the individual reached 1.0 eight days
When active oral hygiene procedures later.
were reintroduced, the Plaque and Gingival When oral hygiene was reinstituted, the
Index scores rapidly returned to pre-ex- gingival flora rapidly returned to pre-ex-
EXPERIMENTAL G I N G I V I T I S IN MAN

Table I
Time of the Change in Local Bacterial Flora Related to the
Appearance of Local and Generalized Gingivitis during the Period
without Oral Hygiene

Bacteriological data *) Clinical data


Experimental First day observed
subject No.
Day of local Day of total
Fusobacteria Spirilla and GI > 1 **) GI > 1
and Filaments Spirochetes

8 4 9 7 9
2 1 7 4 11
7 2 5 7 13
11 2 9 5 13
4 1 7 7 15
9 2 7 9 15
10 2 7 5 15
1 2 7. 9 15
6 2 4 7 17
5 2 9 11 19
3 1 7 7 21

Average 1.9 7.1 7.1 14.8

Range 1-4 4-9 4-11 9-21

*) Based on impression preparations from the region of the upper left


bicuspids.
**) Average of two papillary and two marginal scores frcm the region of
the upper left bicuspids.

r 2.50

DAYS

and .spirochetes <>•"--•« plaque index


filaments gingival index
cocci

Fig. 3. Changes in the bacterial composition of the plaque in the region of the upper left bi-
cuspids in subject No. 4 as seen in impression preparations during 15 days without oral hygiene
and a subsequent period of oral hygiene.
shows the local Plaque Index scores and
the local Gingival Index scores for this region.
The complex flora is established at the day local gingivitis is diagnosed.
THEILADE, WRIGHT, JENSEN AND LOE

Table II
Time of the Change in Local Bacterial Flora Related to the
Disappearance of Local and Generalized Gingivitis during the
Period with Oral Hygiene

Bacteriological data *) Clinical data


Experimental Last day observed
subject No. Day of local Day of total
Spirilla and Fusobacteria GI £ 0.2 **) GI ^ 0.2
Spirochetes and Filaments

8 0***) 0 9 11
2 0 0 7 9
7 5 5 7 7
11 0 3 5 7
4 0 1 3 9
9 0 1 5 9
10 0 0 4 7
1 0 1 3 7
6 2 5 5 7
5 0 0 3 7
3 0 7 7 7

Average 0.6 2.1 5.3 7.9

Range 0-5 0-7 3-9 7-11

*) Based on impression preparations from the region of the upper left


bicuspids.
*) Average of two papillary and two marginal scores from the region of
the upper left bicuspids.
*) 0 indicates that the organisms were observed on the final day without
oral hygiene and had disappeared on day 1 of the oral hygiene period.

perimental conditions. In nine out of eleven prised 77-100 per cent (mean 92 per cent)
subjects spirilla and spirochetes had dis- of the bacteria in the samples (Table III).
appeared within 24 hours after toothbrush- The remaining bacteria were mainly gram-
ing had started, and in seven out of eleven negative cocci and rods. Very few filaments
subjects fusobacteria and leptotrichia could and fusobacteria were observed, and spi-
not be detected after 48 hours (Table II). rilla and spirochetes were absent.
In all cases but one, cocciform bacteria The buccal gingiva of these teeth had
were the only organisms observed at the developed a mild gingivitis (GI = 1 ) after
time when clinically healthy gingival con- a period of 7-^13 days without oral hygiene.
ditions were reestablished. At that time, i.e. the day of local gingivitis,
the gram-positive cocci and rods comprised
Smears, of plaque: The gram stained smears 35-79 per cent (mean 56 per cent) of the
of gingival plaque from the mesial and buc- total flora. The percentage of gram-nega-
cal surfaces of the lower left second bicuspid tive cocci and rods as well as filaments and
confirmed the results from the impression fusobacteria had increased, and a few spi-
preparations. At the start of the experiment rilla, but no spirochetes were seen. No
the Plaque Index and Gingival Index scores further changes occurred during the re-
were zero for all buccal surfaces. The pla- maining period of no oral hygiene except
que flora at that time was predominantly that spirilla and spirochetes increased. Thus
gram-positive cocci and rods which com- the spirilla and spirochetes appeared later
EXPERIMENTAL G I N G I V I T I S IN MAN

Table III
Percentage Distribution of Bacteria in Snnears fronn Buccal
Surfaces of the Lower Left Second Bicuspid in Eleven Subjects

start of day of local day of after one day end of oral


Bacteria experiment gingivitis *) generalized of oral hygiene
gingivitis **) hygiene period

gram-positive range 77-100 35-79 42-75 88-100 87-100


cocci and rods mean 92 56 54 97 97
gram-negative range 0-20 21-40 15-40 0-6 0-11
cocci and rods mean 7 30 28 2 2
range 0-3 0-17 1-17 0-3 0-3
filaments
mean 08 7 7 0.5 0.5
range 0-1 0-12 0-16 0-4 0
fusobacteria
mean 0.3 5 7 0.4 0
range 0 0-3 0-7 0 0
spirilla
mean 0 0.6 2 0 0
range 0 0 0-19 0 0
spirochetes
mean 0 0 2 0 0

*) The day when gingivitis was first diagnosed (Gingival Index = 1) on the particular buccal surface.
**) At the end of the no oral hygiene period i.e. when the Gingival Index for the individual reached a value
of one or more.

in the smears than in the impression prepa- of bacteria similar to that observed on
rations. One day after reinstitution of oral corresponding days on the teeth which were
hygiene the percentage distribution of bac- continuously examined.
teria was identical to that at the start of To demonstrate the changes in the bac-
the experiment. This distribution remained terial flora on each tooth surface and to
unchanged throughout the oral hygiene correlate these changes with plaque and
period (Table III). gingival condition of the same surface, dia-
The changes in bacterial plaque compo- grams were made for each of the mesial
sition for the mesial surfaces were essen- and buccal surfaces examined. A typical
tially the same as those described for the example of the findings is shown in Fig. 5.
buccal surfaces. At the start of the ex- At the start of the experiment, the Plaque
periment some of the mesial surfaces Index and Gingival Index were zero and
showed plaque and a slightly more com- the smear showed 98 per cent gram-positive
plex flora than that of the buccal surfaces cocci and rods and 2 per cent gram-negative
(Fig. 4). However, this did not seem to cocci and rods. During the period without
influence the final composition of the flora. oral hygiene the quantity of plaque in-
To test the possibility that the frequent creased as seen by the Plaque Index rising
sampling had interfered with the plaque to 1 after one day and to 2 after seven days.
flora, control samples were taken on the The earliest change was an increase in
mesial and buccal surfaces of the lower numbers of gram-negative cocci and rods
right second biscuspid after seven and after during the first two days. After two or
thirteen days without oral hygiene, at the three days an increase in filaments and
end of the period without oral hygiene, and fusobacteria occurred. These two types of
at the end of the cleansing period. These organisms were usually found together in
samples showed a proportional distribution about equal numbers and are combined in
THEILADE, WRIGHT, JENSEN AND L O E

per cent
100

90 •

80 •
70 •

60 •
50
40 •
30-
20 •

10 •

0
I

per cent
100

90

80 ^

70

60-1

50

AO-

30 gramt cocci and rods

20 • gram- cocci and rods

10 - filaments and fusobacteria

0
mb mb mb mb M
mb mb mb mb m b m b
m
m b
spirils and spirochPtes

subject no. 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Fig. 4. Percentage distribution of bacteria in smears of piaque from the mesiai (m) and the buccal
(b) surfaces of the iower left second biscuspid in each of 11 subjects.
A) At the start of the experiment,
B) At the end of the period without oral hygiene,
C) After one day of oral hygiene.
10 EXPERIMENTAL G I N G I V I T I S IN MAN

30

3
a.

•1-0

Ol
c

Loo
0 1 2 3 A 5
Lno oral hygiene oral hygiene

I I gram* cocci and rods gingival index


gram- cocci and rods plaque index

filaments and fusobacteria

m^l spirils and spirochetes


Fig. 5. Changes in the percentage distribution of bacteria in smears of piaque from the mesial
surface of the lower left second bicuspid in subject No. 10 during 15 days without oral hygiene
followed by 7 days of oral hygiene.
shows the local Plaque Index scores and
the local Gingival Index scores for this surface.

the diagram. In the last phase the spirilla ninth day. In all cases gingivitis developed
and spirochetes appeared among the other within 4-9 days on the mesial and within
components of the flora. In the example 7-13 days on the buccal aspects. Thus, there
illustrated, spirilla were found in all samples seemed to be no specific correlation be-
taken on or after the ninth day, whereas tween the gingival condition and the occur-
spirochetes were not seen until the fifteenth rence of spirochetes in the smear.
day without oral hygiene. The Gingival After 1-2 days of oral hygiene the bac-
Index for this surface rose to a score of 1 terial flora again consisted predominantly
(mild inflammation) on day nine. When of gram-positive cocci and rods. The other
tooth cleansing was resumed, the Plaque groups of bacteria persisted longer only on
Index fell from 2 to zero within one day those surfaces which were insufficiently
and the bacterial flora returned to pre- cleaned. Generally, the Gingival Index re-
experimental composition in one or two turned to zero one day after the bacterial
days. The Gingival Index returned to zero plaque had been removed.
within two days.
The other surfaces examined in this way Leukocyte Accumulation: The presence or
followed the same general pattern. During absence of leukocytes and the approximate
the no-cleansing period, spirilla appeared size of any leukocyte accumulation at the
after 4-11 days and were seen regularly in gingival margin were assessed in each im-
later samples. However, spirochetes were pression preparation. Leukocytes were
seen in only some of the smears after the found to be virtually absent from all pre-
THEILADE, WRIGHT, JENSEN AND L O E 11

parations at the start of the experiment. rized by a proliferation of fusobacteria and


However, after an average of four days filamentous bacteria in addition to the or-
without oral hygiene, leukocytes were pre- ganisms already present. During the third
sent in almost all cases and gradually in- phase (after 4-9 days) spirilla and spiroche-
creased in number during the no-cleansing tes are added so that a complex flora is
period. Immediately after oral hygiene was formed. After about 7 days, the various
reinstituted the number of leukocytes fell groups have proliferated to the extent that
rapidly, and at the end of the experimental the gram-positive cocci and rods which origi-
period leukocytes were absent, or present nally predominated now only constitute
only in very small numbers. Differential about 50 per cent of the flora. This is in
counts showed that 95-100 per cent of the agreement with the findings of Carlsson
cells were polymorphonuclear leukocytes. and Egelberg (1965). During the remaining
Small lymphocytes and larger mononuclear period without oral hygiene (lasting up to
cells were occasionally observed. Polymor- 21 days in some of the subjects) no further
phonuclear leukocytes were sometimes seen changes occurred.
to have engulfed bacteria and in certain This pattern of bacterial proliferation was
areas practically all leukocytes contained observed both in impression preparations
one or more bacteria. In other areas, and in smears, and there was good agree-
however, no signs of phagocytosis could be ment between the results obtained with the
seen, and the overall impression was that two methods. However, spirilla and spiro-
only few of the enormous number of leuko- chetes tended to appear earlier and more
cytes had participated in phagocytic activity. constantly in the impressions, where these
organisms were often found in clumps
simulating pure colonies. With the smear
Discussion
technique these first few isolated colonies
Changes in Bacterial Composition with could easily be missed during sampling or
Increasing Age of the Plaque overlooked in the smear. Therefore, impres-
The present bacteriological results confirm sion preparations are probably more ac-
and elaborate the trends previously reported curate in determining the first appearance
(Loe, Theilade and Jensen 1965). Teeth of the various groups of organisms.
which are clinically free from plaque harbor
a sparse flora consisting almost exclusively Relationship between Plaque Composition
of gram-positive cocci and rods. During and Gingival Health
plaque accumulation definite changes in the Bibby (1938 b and c) found a great variation
bacterial composition of the plaque take in the percentage distribution of bacteria in
place. These changes are apparently related smears of plaque from different parts of
to the age of the plaque more than to its the oral cavity and from different indivi-
quantity, since some occur after plaque ac- duals. He failed to establish any relationship
cumulation has reached its maximum. Bac- between plaque composition and oral health
teriologically, it is possible to distinguish and suggested that this might in part be due
three phases in the development of plaque. to the lack of a definite and detailed charac-
The first phase consists of proliferation terization of clinical oral conditions. Wil-
of resident gram-positive cocci and rods liams, Parfitt and Richards (1964) also failed
and the appearance of gram-negative cocci to find a correlation between gingival health
and rods during the first 2 days. The second values for the entire mouth and the results
phase occurs after 2-4 days and is characte- of microscopic examination of tooth debris.
EXPERIMENTAL G I N G I V I T I S IN MAN

They did, however, find some correlation centage of gram-negative bacteria than was
between the gingival health rating for each observed in the present study. This may
tooth and the result of the smear from that indicate that further minor changes would
tooth. Their data further indicated that have taken place if our experimental period
microbial activity is already well advanced had been extended.
in cases of suspicious or early gingival On the other hand. Gibbons et al. (1963)
changes. and Socransky et al. (1963) using a com-
In the present study it was possible to bination of microscopic and cultural counts,
establish a correlation between the state of found no significant differences, except for
the gingiva and the bacterial composition an increased number of spirochetes, in gin-
of the plaque by using a detailed system of gival debris from individuals with periodon-
scoring the earliest clinical changes in gin- tal disease as compared to debris from per-
gival condition for individual tooth surfaces sons with healthy gingiva. They suggested
(Loe and Silness 1963). that the increased amount of gingival
In areas with healthy gingiva the tooth debris present in individuals with periodon-
surface is virtually free from plaque and tal disease, rather than a change in bacterial
shows a sparse flora of gram-positive cocci composition, was of etiologic significance.
and rods. Appearance of clinical gingivitis The findings of these authors may be ex-
in a certain area coincides fairly well with plained by the fact that even the mouths
the time when the total complex flora is deemed periodontally healthy probably had
established. However, the timing of the a few areas with plaque accumulation and
events cannot be determined exactly be- mild gingivitis. By using a pooled sample of
cause of the variability in clinical scoring debris from all teeth they may have obtain-
as well as the limitations of the bacterio- ed a sample consisting partly of debris from
logical techniques. During the period with areas of gingivitis. In this way the complex
oral hygiene it was found that the variations flora would be present also in samples from
in time required for individual gingival "periodontally healthy mouths".
areas to return to normal were correlated The present study does not provide spe-
with variations in the time necessary to cific information regarding the role of the
remove the plaque and reduce the bacterial various types of organisms in the develop-
flora to its original simple composition. With ment of gingivitis. However, certain leads
efficient oral hygiene this is achieved in 1-2 may be found concerning the initiation of
days for most surfaces. The gingiva in an gingival inflammation. Although clinical
area becomes healthy one day after the gingivitis is manifest about the time when
bacterial plaque has been removed so that the total complex flora is established, this
the tooth surface only harbors a sparse flora may be a mere coincidence. Subclinical in-
of gram-positive cocci and rods. flammation starts much earlier as indicated
Thus gingivitis is associated with an in- by the presence and increasing number of
creased number of bacteria (presence of leukocytes in the impression preparations
plaque), and a change in the flora towards already after the first few days. Flow of
a richer representation of gram-negative gingival fluid (exudate) also starts before
organisms. Similar differences between the clinical gingivitis can be diagnosed (Loe and
bacterial flora in subjects with healthy gin- Holm-Pedersen 1965). This suggests that the
giva and subjects with gingivitis were ob- initiation of gingivitis may occur as a reac-
served by Schultz-Haudt, Bruce and Bibby tion to the early changes in the bacterial
(1954). They found a somewhat higher per- flora, i. e. the proliferation of gram-positive
THEILADE, WRIGHT, JENSEN AND L O E 13

and gram-negative cocci and rods and pos- Loe, H, and J. Silness, 1963. Periodontal di-
sibly also fusobacteria and filaments. Cer- sease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and seve-
tain streptococci and diphtheroids are known rity. Acta odont. scand. 21: 533-551.
Loe, H,, Else Theilade and S. B. Jensen, 1965,
to produce enzymes such as hyaluronidase, Experimental gingivitis in man. J. Periodont.
beta-glucuronidase, and chondrosulfatase, 36: 177-187.
all of which have been thought to play a MacDonald, J, B,, S, S, Socransky and R. J,
role in the initiation of gingivitis (Schultz- Gibbons, 1963, Aspects of the pathogenesis
Haudt and Scherp 1955 and 1956). More- of mixed anaerobic infections of mucous
membranes, /, dent. Res. 42: 529-544,
over, animal experiments have shown that Mergenhagen, S, E,, E. G, Hampp and H, W,
transmissible subcutaneous infections can be Scherp, 1961, Preparation and biological ac-
produced with the mixed flora of plaque tivities of endotoxins from oral bacteria, J.
and that similar infections can be produced infect. Dis. 108: 304-310,
Russell, A, L, 1956, A system of classification
with mixtures of a few strains of gram- and scoring for prevalence surveys of pe-
positive and gram-negative rods provided riodontal disease, J. dent. Res. 35: 350-359,
Bacteroides melaninogenicus is included in Schultz-Haudt, S,, M, A. Bruce and B. G,
the mixture (MacDonald, Socransky and Bibby. 1954, Bacterial factors in nonspecific
Gibbons 1963, Socransky and Gibbons gingivitis, /, dent. Res. 33: 454-458,
Schultz-Haudt, S, D, and H. W. Scherp. 1955.
1965). Finally, it has been found that prac- Production of hyaluronidase and beta-glu-
tically all gram-negative organisms indige- curonidase by viridans streptococci isolated
nous to the oral cavity contain endotoxins from gingival crevices, /, dent. Res. 34:
(Mergenhagen, Hampp and Scherp 1961). 924-929.
Thus, some of the gram-positive and gram- Schultz-Haudt, S, D, and H. W, Scherp, 1956.
The production of chondrosulfatase by mi-
negative cocci and rods of plaque have been croorganisms isolated from human gingival
shown to be potentially pathogenic. crevices, J. dent. Res. 35: 299-307,
Silness, J, and H, Loe, 1964. Periodontal
disease in pregnancy, IL Correlation between
References oral hygiene and periodontal condition,
Bibby, B. G. 1938a. Determination of percen- Acta odont. scand. 11: 121-135.
tage occurrence of various groups of mouth Socransky, S, S, and R, J, Gibbons, 1965, Re-
bacteria, J. dent. Res. 17: 265-272, quired role of Bacteroides melaninogenicus
Bibby, B. G. 1938b. A comparison of the bac- in mixed anaerobic infections. /. infect. Dis.
terial flora of different mouths, J. dent. Res. 115: 247-253,
17: 423-429, Socransky, S, S,, R, L Gibbons, A, C, Dale,
Bibby, B. G. 1938c. The bacterial flora in L. Bortnick, E, Rosenthal and J, B, Mac-
different parts of the mouth. J. dent. Res. Donald, 1963, The microbiota of the gin-
17: 471-476. gival crevice area of man, I, Total micro-
Carlsson, J. and J, Egelberg, 1965, Effect of scopic and viable counts and counts of spe-
diet on early plaque formation in man, cific organisms. Arch, oral Biol. 8: 275-280,
Odont. Revy. 16: 112-125, Williams, N, B., G. J, Parfitt and M, D, Ri-
Gibbons, R, J,, S. S, Socransky, S, Sawyer, B, chards, 1964. A preliminary study of micro-
Kapsimalis and J. B. MacDonald, 1963, The bial smears as an aid in diagnosis of gingival
microbiota of the gingival crevice area of health, /, Periodont. 35: 197-201,
man-II, The predominant cultivable orga-
nisms. Arch, oral Biol. 8: 281-289, Addresses:
Gins, H. A, and G, Mattig. 1941, Ein Verfah- The Royal Dental College.
ren zur "topografischen" Mikroskopie des Vennelyst Boulevard,
Aarhus C, Denmark.
Zahnfleischsaumes, Zbl. Bakt. 1. Abt. Ref. Dr, W, H, Wright's present address:
146: 189-194, Department of Periodontology,
Loe, H. and P. Holm-Pedersen, 1965. Absence School of Dental Medicine,
and presence of fluid from normal and in- University of Pennsylvania,
flamed gingivae. Periodontics 3: 171-177, Philadelphia, Pa. 19104, U.S.A.

You might also like