Rizal did not retract his beliefs before his execution, contrary to claims by some authors. There is no conclusive proof that he signed a retraction paper, as the original paper was found to be a forgery after being hidden for 39 years. Additionally, those who said Rizal married Josephine after retracting could provide no marriage certificate. Rizal had previously rejected offers to retract in exchange for money and positions, and had no reason to believe retracting would save him from the death penalty handed down by the military tribunal for his writings advocating reform.
Rizal did not retract his beliefs before his execution, contrary to claims by some authors. There is no conclusive proof that he signed a retraction paper, as the original paper was found to be a forgery after being hidden for 39 years. Additionally, those who said Rizal married Josephine after retracting could provide no marriage certificate. Rizal had previously rejected offers to retract in exchange for money and positions, and had no reason to believe retracting would save him from the death penalty handed down by the military tribunal for his writings advocating reform.
Rizal did not retract his beliefs before his execution, contrary to claims by some authors. There is no conclusive proof that he signed a retraction paper, as the original paper was found to be a forgery after being hidden for 39 years. Additionally, those who said Rizal married Josephine after retracting could provide no marriage certificate. Rizal had previously rejected offers to retract in exchange for money and positions, and had no reason to believe retracting would save him from the death penalty handed down by the military tribunal for his writings advocating reform.
presented byvarious authors as to whether Rizal did or did not retract. Nonetheless, until now there is noproof or any justification to end the debate.The following assertions bring about the testimonies that Rizal did not retract before hisexecution.First was the copy of the retraction paper that was allegedly signed by Rizal that was even kept secret and was only published in newspapers. When Rizal’s family requested for the originalcopy, it was said that it was lost. Could the Jesuits be this irresponsible to not know the value ofthe paper? Or was it just hidden?Thirty-nine years later the original copy was found in the archdiocesan archives. Ricardo PascualPh. D who was given permission by the Archbishop Nozaleda to examine the document and later concluded in his book, “Rizal beyond the Grave” that the documents presented was a forgery. The common rebuttal of this argument was either Father Balaguer or Father Pi hadmade errors in reproducing another copy of the original.Another evidence as to Rizal did not retract is that when Father Balaguer came to terms that hemarried Jose and Josephine, after Jose had signed the retraction paper, however, there were no marriage certificate or public record shown that could prove Father Balaguer’s statements. Why would Rizal retract when he knows for a fact that even if he signs the retraction paper hewould still be executed? Since the Archbishop and Jesuits cannot do anything to mitigate his penalty because the judicial process involved was purely a military tribunal where civilian or church interference was uncommon and not allowed. Rizal was accused of participating infilibusterous propaganda where the penalty as provided by the Spanish Code is death. The same of what happened to the three priests who were garrotted years earlier, even though they were still a part of the church; they were still treated as rebellious and were also not given a proper burial.Furthermore, way back when Rizal was still exiled in Dapitan, Father Sanchez- Rizal’s favourite teacher from Ateneo was sent by the Jesuits superiors to try to convince his former student’s allegation towards the Catholic religion and Spanish religious in the Philippines. Father Sanchez told him to retract in exchange of a professorship, a hundred thousand pesos and an estate (Laubach, 1936) however Rizal rejected the offer.It was argued that Rizal retracted in order to save his family from further persecution, to give Josephine Bracken a legal status as his wife and to assure reforms from the Spanish. - 1