Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Criminal law
Permitted materials
Candidates are permitted to bring into the examination room the following
specified document: one copy of Core Statutes on Criminal Law 2018-19
(Palgrave Macmillan).
1. Read the following paragraphs and answer the questions that follow.
Doris is a contract killer. She has a contract to kill Vincent. She is driving
to Vincent’s house with her gun when she is involved in an accident after
a pedestrian unexpectedly runs out in front of her car. The pedestrian is
badly injured. Doris gets out of her car to discover the victim is Vincent.
Doris, pleased that she has been saved some effort and mistakenly
believing Vincent to be dead, leaves Vincent on the road. Vincent is killed
some moments later when a car, driven by Jyoti, drives over him. Jyoti
did not see Vincent on the road, because she was speaking on her
mobile phone. Jyoti gets out the car, sees Doris and shouts for help.
Wanting not to be identified, Doris aims and fires her gun at Jyoti,
intending to kill her. Jyoti is unharmed but Charles, a bystander, shocked
by the noise, suffers a heart attack and dies.
(c) If you were Doris’s defence counsel, what argument(s) could you
advance against her potential liability for homicide?
(d) If you were prosecuting counsel, how would you respond to such
argument(s)?
UL19/1093
Page 2 of 4
PART TWO
2. Alma has been married for 20 years. Her husband, Nathan, has
consistently bullied her. He refuses to allow her to take paid
employment, to go out with her friends or to take driving lessons. He also
belittles her in company and gives her only a tiny housekeeping
allowance saying that he cannot afford more. Alma discovers that
Nathan has a secret bank account containing £100,000 and that he pays
a monthly allowance of £1,000 to a secret lover. She is outraged and,
when Nathan takes his bath an hour later, she connects an electric fire
to an extension lead, enters the bathroom and throws the electric fire
into the bath, electrocuting him and resulting in his death.
Discuss whether Alma may be able to raise the defence of loss of self-
control and evaluate the applicable law.
Discuss.
UL19/1093
Page 3 of 4
6. Consider the potential liability as an accessory of Arthur, Dele, Nasser
and Greta in the following three separate scenarios:
(b) Imran and Nasser agree to kill Connor and go to Connor’s house
to do so. The agreement is to batter Connor over the head with a
baseball bat and leave him at the bottom of the stairs to make it
look as if Connor had fallen. They kill Connor as agreed. By
chance, Connor’s wife, Vera, returns home as they are leaving
the house and Imran kills Vera with a gun, which Nasser did not
know Imran was carrying.
(c) Jane asks Greta, a gunsmith, for a replica gun, which looks ‘as
authentic as possible’. Greta believes it is to be used to hold up a
bank but he sells Jane the gun anyway. In fact, Jane modifies the
gun so that it is capable of firing bullets. She kills Victor, a counter
assistant in a bank, with it.
Discuss.
END OF PAPER
UL19/1093
Page 4 of 4