DEBATE PEER EVALUATION
GROUP MEMBER (EVALUATED):
CRITERIA 5 4
DEBATE Contributed equitably to
CONTRIBUTION project; completed all assigned
tasks by deadline; work
accomplished was useful for the
project, AND worked hard to
help other team members to
accomplish their project goals
QUALITY OF WORK Submitted work of good quality;
work was valuable and directly
useable by the team with only
isolated minor errors or
omissions to address AND
worked hard to help improve
the quality of work submitted
by others
COMMUNICATION Contributed equitably to team
discussions, AND made
consistent efforts to ensure
others also contributed
equitably (e.g. asked quieter
members for others input and
more vocal members to refrain
during discussions)
TOTAL:
3 2
Contributed equitably to Contributed a smaller Did not contribute to
project; completed all portion of project than project or complete
assigned tasks by other team members, or assigned tasks by deadline
deadline; work did not complete some
accomplished was assigned tasks by deadline
complete and useful for
the project
Submitted work of good Submitted work of fair Submitted work of poor
quality; work was valuable quality; work was quality; work was slightly
and directly useable by generally helpful but helpful but other
the team with only other teammates had teammates had spent
isolated minor errors or spent a little time and considerable time and
omissions to address effort to complete it effort to complete it
and/or fix minor errors or and/or fix major errors or
omissions omissions
Contributed equitably to Contributed to most team Rarely contributed to
team discussions, and did discussions, but discussions; or prevented
not prevent others from sometimes others from being able to
doing the same undercontributed and/or contribute equitably (e.g.
sometimes dominated frequently interrupted)
discussions