Appendix B

Preliminary Project Schedule ee

 KCI LANDSIDE
TRAFFIC PLANNING

PREPARED FOR
SKIDMORE OWINGS MERRILL

Prepared by Olsson Associates

1814 Main Street
Kansas City, Missouri 64108
September, 2018
Olsson Project No. 018-0784
– THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK –
CONTENTS
SECTION 1 | INTRODUCTION 1-1
SECTION 2 | APPLICABLE STANDARDS 2-1
2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1
2.2 Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1
SECTION 3 | DATA COLLECTION 3-1
3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1
3.2 Historic Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3
3.4 Daily Design Flight Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6
SECTION 4 | DESIGN PROJECTIONS 4-1
4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
4.2 Projected Vehicle Composition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3
SECTION 5 | DESIGN PARAMETERS 5-1
5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
SECTION 6 | DESIGN ANALYSIS 6-1
6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-6
6.4 Pedestrian Widths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-9
6.5 Curb Lengths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-11
SECTION 7 | SIMULATION RESULTS 7-1
7.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1
7.2 Construction Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-2
7.1 Final Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-3

SECTION 8 | SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 8-1

8.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1
8.2 Construction Phasing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-3
8.4 Pedestrian Widths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-5
8.5 Curb Lengths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-5
8.6 Design Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-6

iii
 June 2018

CONTENTS CONTINUED...

APPENDIX A | PROJECTIONS A-1

APPENDIX B | ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS B-1
APPENDIX C | VISSIM CALIBRATION AND RESULTS C-1

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1: Eastern Access - Construction Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
Figure 1.2: Eastern Access - Final Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-2
Figure 3.1: TNC Usage by Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2
Figure 3.2: Garage Usage by Month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2
Figure 3.3: Valet Usage by Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4
Figure 3.5: 2017 Mode Split AM Peak Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-5
Figure 3.6: 2017 Mode Split PM Peak Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-5
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-7
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-2
Figure 4.2: Vehicle Composition by Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3
Figure 4.3: Projected Mode Split AM Peak Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4
Figure 4.4: Projected Mode Split PM Peak Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4
Figure 6.1: Eastern Access - Construction Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-2
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3
Figure 6.3: Eastern Access - Final Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-4
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5
Figure 6.5: Current Terminal Circulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-6
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-6
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-7
Figure 6.8: Total Daily Pedestrian Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-10
Figure 6.9: Curb Length Allocations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-11
Figure 7.1: Construction Phase Roundabout to Terminal C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-2
Figure 7.2: Construction Phase Roundabout to Terminal B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-2
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-3
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-3
Figure 7.5: Final Phase Commercial, Valet, and Employee Vehicle Exit Roundabout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-4
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-4

iv
CONTENTS CONTINUED...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-5
Figure 7.8: Simulation Results AM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6
Figure 7.9: Simulation Results PM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6
Figure 8.1: Eastern Access - Construction Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-2
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-3
Figure 8.4: Eastern Access - Final Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-4
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-4
Figure 8.6: Commercial Curb Use and Valet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-5

LIST OF TABLES
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
Table 6.1: AM LOS Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-8
Table 6.2: PM LOS Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-8
Table 6.3: Crosswalk Pedestrian Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-9
Table 6.4: Curb Length Parameters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-12
Table 6.5: Curb Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-12

v
– THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK –
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION

Section 1.1 Introduction

•
•
•
•
•
•
• Recommendations.

Figures 1.1 and 1.2 shows the Eastern Access Construction Phase and Final
Phase.

1-1
 June 2018

1-2
SECTION 2: APPLICABLE STANDARDS

Section 2.1 Introduction

•
•
•
• ACRP Report 25 Airport Passengers Terminal Planning and Design Guidebook, Volume 1 and 2, with
Spreadsheet Model and User’s Guide
•

Section 2.2 Standards

Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition (HCM)

TRB Special Report 215 (TR215)

assessment techniques and recommended guidelines that can be used by airport operators, planners, and
others who need to measure airport landisde capacity.

TCRP Report 165 (TR165)

2-1
 June 2018

ACRP Report 25 (AR25)

The Airport Passengers Terminal Planning and Design Guidebook, Volume 1 and 2, with Spreadsheet Model

ACRP Report 40 (AR40)

curbside and terminal roadways.

2-2
SECTION 3: DATA COLLECTION

Section 3.1 Introduction

• Historic Data
•
• Daily Design Flight Schedule

Section 3.2 Historic Data

•
• Garage Occupancy
• Valet Counts

Figure 3.1,

3-1
 June 2018

TNC Usage by Hour (2017)

80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Hour of Day

3.2.2 Garage Occupancy

parking around the terminal. Figure 3.2

Terminal B and Terminal C.

Garage Usage by Month (2017)

1,600,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Month of Year

Garage B Garage C Surface Lots

3-2
 Figure 3.3

Valet Usage by Hour (2017)

200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Hour of Day

• Passenger Cars
• Light trucks
• Parking Shuttles
•
• Taxis
•
•

Figure 3.4

Figures 3.5 and 3.6

3-3
 June 2018

3-4
 2017 AM Peak Hour
300 25%

250
20%

200
15%
150
10%
100

5%
50

0 0%
Private TNC Taxi / Valet Private KCI TNC Taxi / Private Valet KCATA Entry Exit Entry Exit
Auto Limo Auto Shuttle Limo Shuttle
Departure Arrival Commercial Garage Surface
Mode Split by Destination

2017 PM Peak Hour

300 25%

250
20%

200
15%
150
10%
100

5%
50

0 0%
Private TNC Taxi / Valet Private KCI TNC Taxi / Private Valet KCATA Entry Exit Entry Exit
Auto Limo Auto Shuttle Limo Shuttle
Departure Arrival Commercial Garage Surface
Mode Split by Desitnation

3-5
 June 2018

Section 3.4 Daily Design Flight Schedule

Figure 3.7
pm.

2017 Passenger Arrivals and Departures

4000

3500

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Hour of Day

Arival Departure Total

Figure 3.8

3-6
 Existing and Projected Passenger Arrivals and Departures
6000

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Hour of Day

2017 Arival 2017 Departure 2017 Total Design Scenario Arrival Design Scenario Departure Design Scenario Total

3-7
– THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK –
SECTION 4: DESIGN PROJECTIONS

Section 4.1 Introduction

Table 4.1
calculations. Figure 4.1

Design Daily Flight Schedule

Daily Total AM Peak Hour Total PM Peak Hour Total
Scenario
(Arriving/Departing) (Arriving/Departing) (Arriving/Departing)
43,551 3,512 2,951
2017

61,624 5,255 5,673

Daily Total AM Peak Hour Total PM Peak Hour Total

Scenario
(Entering /Exiting) (Entering /Exiting) (Entering /Exiting)
31,340 1,780 2,098
2017

42,688 2,620 3,918

Daily Total AM Peak Hour Total PM Peak Hour Total

Scenario
(Entering /Exiting) (Entering /Exiting) (Entering /Exiting)
7,320 390 490
2017

9,950 510 1,020

4-1
 June 2018

4-2
 Figure 4.2 demonstrates the

Projected Vehicle Composition by Mode

40%
38% 38%
37% 37%

35%

30%

25%

20%

15% 15%
15% 14% 14%

10%

5% 5%
5% 4% 4%

1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
0% 0% 0%
0%
Private Terminal Private Parking Vallet TNC Vallet Taxi/Limo KCI Bus Taxi/Limo Private Shuttles KCATA

Current Scenario 3
Design Scenario

As shown in Figure 4.2

Figures 4.3 and 4.4

4-3
 June 2018

AM Peak Hour
400 25%

350
20%
300

250
15%

200

10%
150

100
5%
50

0 0%
Private TNC Taxi / Valet Private KCI TNC Taxi / Private Valet KCATA Entry Exit Entry Exit
Auto Limo Auto Shuttle Limo Shuttle
Departure Arrival Commercial Garage Surface

PM Peak Hour
400 25%

350
20%
300

250
15%

200

10%
150

100
5%
50

0 0%
Private TNC Taxi / Valet Private KCI TNC Taxi / Private Valet KCATA Entry Exit Entry Exit
Auto Limo Auto Shuttle Limo Shuttle
Departure Arrival Commercial Garage Surface

4-4
SECTION 5: DESIGN PARAMETERS

Section 5.1 Introduction

•
•
•
•

included in this analysis:

•
•
•
•
•
• Transit
• Curbside Valet

• Construction Phasing
• Design Scenario

team.

5-1
– THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK –
SECTION 6: DESIGN ANALYSIS

Section 6.1 Introduction

users would need to use in order to reach their destination.

Figures 6.1 - 6.4

6-1
 June 2018

6-2
6-3
 June 2018

6-4
6-5
 June 2018

It should be noted that this lane

terminal. Figure 6.5 that currently

approximately 240 cars circulate per
hour at the airport terminals. In order

order to access the Terminal. In order

to address this concern it would be

Section 6.3 LOS Analysis

Figures 6.6 - 6.7

6-6
6-7
 June 2018

Tables 6.1 and 6.2

LOS per ACRP

Report 40
Departure Entrance 622 311 A
296 148 A
To Commercial Entrance 140 70 A
288 144 A
Departure Exit 661 331 B
Parking Garage Entrance 257 129 A

LOS per ACRP

Report 40
Departure Entrance 776 388 B
461 231 A
To Commercial Entrance 212 106 A
441 221 A
Departure Exit 757 379 B
Parking Garage Entrance 437 219 A

6-8
 June 2018

Section 6.4 Pedestrian Widths

either side.
These results are presented Table 6.1.

Crosswalk Pedestrian Capacity Analysis

Design Scenario
Peak 15-Minute Total Required
Pedestrians/ Required Width
2-way -
Minute way (Feet)
Passenger Flow
North Departure
277.5 18.5 1.85 7.85

South Departure
223.5 14.9 1.49 7.49

382.5 25.5 2.55 8.55

376.5 25.1 2.51 8.51

Figure 6.8

6-9
6-10
 June 2018

Section 6.5 Curb Lengths

and TNC’s. Curb allocations can be shown below in Figure 6.9

Table 6.4 presents the

6-11
 Peak 15
Length Minutes as
(Min) Stops

2.5 1 25 30%
Valet 4 1 25 30%
2 1 25 30%
2 1 25 30%
KCI Shuttles 5 1 50 30%
5 1 40 30%
KCATA Buses 5 1 40 30%

Table 6.5 shows the required curb length to

Curb Analysis
Curb Length (Feet)
Dwell
Required LOS C or
Curb Location Provided*
(LOS C) Better
(Min)
Passenger
470 2.5 880* 590 Yes
Cars
Commercial Curb KCATA Bus 8 5 240 40 Yes
KCI Shuttle 10 5 240 50 Yes
20 2 240 20 Yes

100 5 540 400 Yes

Shuttle
TNC 110 2 300 110 Yes
Passenger
Departure Curb 410 2.5 880* 510 Yes
Cars
Valet Curb 130 4 500 260 Yes
Pick-Up 240 2 Combined 240 Yes

6-12
SECTION 7: SIMULATION RESULTS

Section 7.1 Introduction

•
• Merge Areas
• Speeds
•
•

7-1
 June 2018

Section 7.2 Construction Phase

Figures 7.1 and 7.2 show the two roundabouts during the construction phase. According to modeling and pro-

7-2
Section 7.3 Final Design
Figures 7.3 - 7.7

entering the airport.

7-3
 June 2018

7-4
Figures 7.8 and 7.9

speed used to design the network.

7-5
 June 2018

7-6
SECTION 8: SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

Section 8.1 Introduction

Section 8.2 Construction Phasing

Figures 8.1 and 8.2

8-1
 June 2018

8-2
reducing complexity. This can be seen in Figure 8.3. See Figures 8.4 and 8.5

garage uninterrupted.

8-3
 June 2018

8-4
Section 8.4 Pedestrian Widths

Section 8.5 Curb Lengths

Figure 8.6

8-5
 June 2018

Section 8.6 Design Considerations

8-6
APPENDIX A - PROJECTIONS

A-1
Total
Flights Arriving Departing Total
2017 175 174 349
Design
Volumes 231 230 461

Passenger Volumes (Enplaning/Deplaning only, no connecting) % Passenger Volumes (Enplaning/Deplaning only, no connecting)
2017 Design Volumes 2017 Design Volumes
Hour Arrivals Departures Total Arrivals Departures Total Arrivals Departures Total Arrivals Departures Total
0 278 0 278 553 0 553 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100%
1 244 0 244 231 0 231 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100%
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
5 159 1380 1539 159 1755 1914 10% 90% 100% 8% 92% 100%
6 111 3401 3512 108 5147 5255 3% 97% 100% 2% 98% 100%
7 344 2173 2517 487 2631 3118 14% 86% 100% 16% 84% 100%
8 924 1492 2416 1179 1987 3166 38% 62% 100% 37% 63% 100%
9 927 1228 2155 1406 1761 3167 43% 57% 100% 44% 56% 100%
10 1166 990 2156 1466 1452 2918 54% 46% 100% 50% 50% 100%
11 773 782 1555 1419 939 2358 50% 50% 100% 60% 40% 100%
12 1240 1248 2488 1785 2084 3869 50% 50% 100% 46% 54% 100%
13 1371 1279 2650 1552 1666 3218 52% 48% 100% 48% 52% 100%
14 948 1151 2099 1397 1468 2865 45% 55% 100% 49% 51% 100%
15 1293 1014 2307 1431 1307 2738 56% 44% 100% 52% 48% 100%
16 1100 1184 2284 2172 1555 3727 48% 52% 100% 58% 42% 100%
17 1580 1145 2725 3198 2475 5673 58% 42% 100% 56% 44% 100%
18 1158 1793 2951 1574 2245 3819 39% 61% 100% 41% 59% 100%
19 991 1235 2226 1493 1643 3136 45% 55% 100% 48% 52% 100%
20 749 171 920 509 313 822 81% 19% 100% 62% 38% 100%
21 1314 128 1442 1545 121 1666 91% 9% 100% 93% 7% 100%
22 2450 0 2450 3805 0 3805 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100%
23 2637 0 2637 3605 0 3605 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100%
Total 21757 21794 43551 31074 30549 61623

Valet Parking
% of Passengers 2017 Vehicles Design Volumes
Hour Arrival Departure Arrival Departure Total Arrival Departure Total
0 11% 0% 30 0 30 60 0 60
1 4% 0% 10 0 10 10 0 10
2 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0% 7% 0 100 100 0 130 130
6 0% 4% 0 120 120 0 180 180
7 3% 6% 10 130 140 10 160 170
8 2% 10% 20 150 170 30 200 230
9 3% 11% 30 140 170 50 200 250
10 3% 13% 30 130 160 40 190 230
11 6% 15% 50 120 170 90 140 230
12 4% 10% 50 120 170 70 200 270
13 5% 8% 70 100 170 80 130 210
14 7% 8% 70 90 160 100 110 210
15 5% 8% 70 80 150 80 100 180
16 9% 8% 100 90 190 200 120 320
17 8% 5% 120 60 180 240 130 370
18 9% 2% 110 40 150 150 50 200
19 9% 2% 90 20 110 140 30 170
20 11% 6% 80 10 90 50 20 70
21 6% 0% 80 0 80 90 0 90
22 4% 0% 90 0 90 140 0 140
23 3% 0% 80 0 80 110 0 110
Total 1190 1500 2690 1740 2090 3830
 TNC
2017 Vehicles % of Passengers Design Volumes Taxi / Limo
Hour Arrival Departure Total Arrival Departure Arrival Departure Total Arrival Departure Total
0 10 0 10 4% 0% 20 0 20 2 0 2
1 0 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 30 30 0% 2% 0 40 40 0 4 4
6 0 70 70 0% 2% 0 100 100 0 10 10
7 10 40 50 3% 2% 10 50 60 1 5 6
8 20 30 50 2% 2% 20 40 60 2 4 6
9 20 20 40 2% 2% 30 40 70 3 4 7
10 20 20 40 2% 2% 30 30 60 3 3 6
11 10 20 30 1% 3% 10 30 40 1 3 4
12 20 20 40 2% 2% 40 40 80 4 4 8
13 30 20 50 2% 2% 30 30 60 3 3 6
14 20 20 40 2% 2% 30 30 60 3 3 6
15 20 20 40 2% 2% 30 30 60 3 3 6
16 20 20 40 2% 2% 40 30 70 4 3 7
17 30 20 50 2% 2% 60 50 110 6 5 11
18 20 30 50 2% 2% 30 40 70 3 4 7
19 20 20 40 2% 2% 30 30 60 3 3 6
20 10 0 10 1% 0% 10 0 10 1 0 1
21 30 0 30 2% 0% 30 0 30 3 0 3
22 50 0 50 2% 0% 80 0 80 8 0 8
23 50 0 50 2% 0% 70 0 70 7 0 7
Total 410 400 810 600 610 1210 60 61 121

Garage Garage
2017 Vehicles % of Total Pass. Design Volumes 2017 Passengers Design Volume Passengers
Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Total Hour Arr % Dep % Arrival Departure Total Arr % Dep % Arrival Departure Total
0 40 130 170 14% 47% 80 260 340 0 100% 0% 170 0 170 100% 0% 340 0 340
1 20 50 70 8% 20% 20 50 70 1 100% 0% 70 0 70 100% 0% 70 0 70
2 10 20 30 0% 0% 0 0 0 2 0% 0% 0 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 0
3 40 10 50 0% 0% 0 0 0 3 0% 0% 0 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 0
4 170 20 190 0% 0% 0 0 0 4 0% 0% 0 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 0
5 260 80 340 17% 5% 320 100 420 5 10% 90% 40 300 340 8% 92% 30 390 420
6 180 80 260 5% 2% 270 120 390 6 3% 97% 10 250 260 2% 98% 10 380 390
7 120 50 170 5% 2% 150 60 210 7 14% 86% 20 150 170 16% 84% 30 180 210
8 200 70 270 8% 3% 260 90 350 8 38% 62% 100 170 270 37% 63% 130 220 350
9 180 140 320 8% 6% 260 210 470 9 43% 57% 140 180 320 44% 56% 210 260 470
10 160 120 280 7% 6% 220 160 380 10 54% 46% 150 130 280 50% 50% 190 190 380
11 190 130 320 12% 8% 290 200 490 11 50% 50% 160 160 320 60% 40% 290 200 490
12 210 180 390 8% 7% 330 280 610 12 50% 50% 190 200 390 46% 54% 280 330 610
13 180 230 410 7% 9% 220 280 500 13 52% 48% 210 200 410 48% 52% 240 260 500
14 150 180 330 7% 9% 200 250 450 14 45% 55% 150 180 330 49% 51% 220 230 450
15 140 170 310 6% 7% 170 200 370 15 56% 44% 170 140 310 52% 48% 190 180 370
16 180 230 410 8% 10% 290 380 670 16 48% 52% 200 210 410 58% 42% 390 280 670
17 190 250 440 7% 9% 400 520 920 17 58% 42% 260 180 440 56% 44% 520 400 920
18 150 280 430 5% 9% 190 360 550 18 39% 61% 170 260 430 41% 59% 230 320 550
19 70 230 300 3% 10% 100 320 420 19 45% 55% 130 170 300 48% 52% 200 220 420
20 50 120 170 5% 13% 40 110 150 20 81% 19% 140 30 170 62% 38% 90 60 150
21 80 130 210 6% 9% 90 150 240 21 91% 9% 190 20 210 93% 7% 220 20 240
22 110 160 270 4% 7% 170 250 420 22 100% 0% 270 0 270 100% 0% 420 0 420
23 80 240 320 3% 9% 110 330 440 23 100% 0% 320 0 320 100% 0% 440 0 440
Total 3160 3300 6460 4180 4680 8860 Total 3260 2930 6190 4740 4120 8860
 Circle/Surface Parking
2017 Vehicles % of Total Pass. Design Volumes
Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Total
0 0 20 20 0% 7% 0 40 40
1 0 10 10 0% 4% 0 10 10
2 10 0 10 0% 0% 0 0 0
3 20 0 20 0% 0% 0 0 0
4 40 0 40 0% 0% 0 0 0
5 50 0 50 3% 0% 60 0 60
6 40 0 40 1% 0% 60 0 60
7 20 10 30 1% 0% 20 10 30
8 30 10 40 1% 0% 40 10 50
9 20 10 30 1% 0% 30 10 40
10 20 10 30 1% 0% 30 10 40
11 30 20 50 2% 1% 50 30 80
12 40 30 70 2% 1% 60 50 110
13 20 20 40 1% 1% 20 20 40
14 20 20 40 1% 1% 30 30 60
15 20 20 40 1% 1% 20 20 40
16 20 30 50 1% 1% 30 50 80
17 20 30 50 1% 1% 40 60 100
18 10 40 50 0% 1% 10 50 60
19 10 30 40 0% 1% 10 40 50
20 0 20 20 0% 2% 0 20 20
21 0 20 20 0% 1% 0 20 20
22 0 30 30 0% 1% 0 50 50
23 0 40 40 0% 2% 0 50 50
Total 440 420 860 510 580 1090

Traffic Volumes s/o Paris Street

Existing Traffic Volumes Total Commercial Red / Blue KCI Shuttles KCI Rental Car Bus Private Shuttles Automobiles
Hour Entry (SB) Exit (NB) Total Entry (SB) Exit (NB) Total Entry (SB) Exit (NB) Total Entry (SB) Exit (NB) Total Entry (SB) Exit (NB) Total Entry (SB) Exit (NB) Total
0 190 390 580 50 40 90 17 15 32 8 8 16 25 17 42 140 350 490
1 60 110 170 20 30 50 7 11 18 4 4 8 9 15 24 40 80 120
2 50 60 110 20 10 30 7 4 11 4 4 8 9 2 11 30 50 80
3 140 90 230 20 20 40 7 8 15 4 4 8 9 8 17 120 70 190
4 530 360 890 50 40 90 17 15 32 4 4 8 29 21 50 480 320 800
5 770 550 1320 70 70 140 23 26 49 10 10 20 37 34 71 700 480 1180
6 630 510 1140 70 70 140 23 26 49 10 10 20 37 34 71 560 440 1000
7 540 440 980 70 60 130 23 23 46 10 10 20 37 27 64 470 380 850
8 640 500 1140 90 60 150 30 23 53 10 10 20 50 27 77 550 440 990
9 890 760 1650 100 80 180 33 30 63 10 10 20 57 40 97 790 680 1470
10 890 870 1760 100 90 190 33 34 67 10 10 20 57 46 103 790 780 1570
11 810 800 1610 90 80 170 30 30 60 10 10 20 50 40 90 720 720 1440
12 780 750 1530 100 70 170 33 26 59 10 10 20 57 34 91 680 680 1360
13 950 920 1870 100 80 180 33 30 63 10 10 20 57 40 97 850 840 1690
14 950 1000 1950 90 80 170 30 30 60 10 10 20 50 40 90 860 920 1780
15 810 870 1680 90 70 160 30 26 56 10 10 20 50 34 84 720 800 1520
16 880 940 1820 100 90 190 33 34 67 10 10 20 57 46 103 780 850 1630
17 800 900 1700 110 90 200 37 34 71 10 10 20 63 46 109 690 810 1500
18 780 850 1630 100 80 180 33 30 63 10 10 20 57 40 97 680 770 1450
19 600 810 1410 90 80 170 30 30 60 10 10 20 50 40 90 510 730 1240
20 450 610 1060 90 70 160 30 26 56 10 10 20 50 34 84 360 540 900
21 460 490 950 70 70 140 23 26 49 10 10 20 37 34 71 390 420 810
22 510 670 1180 80 70 150 27 26 53 8 8 16 45 36 81 430 600 1030
23 430 610 1040 70 60 130 23 23 46 8 8 16 39 29 68 360 550 910
Total 14540 14860 29400 1840 1560 3400 612 586 1198 210 210 420 1018 764 1782 12700 13300 26000
Note - peak split from 2pm-3pm used as basis for estimating Red/Blue KCI Shuttles and KCI Rental Car
 Private Auto Arrival and Departures
2017 Drop-Off / Pick-Up 2017 Design Volumes
Hour SB NB Total Arrival Departure Total Arrival Departure Total
0 100 158 258 100 0 100 200 0 200
1 20 10 30 20 0 20 20 0 20
2 10 30 40 0 10 10 0 0 0
3 60 60 120 0 60 60 0 0 0
4 270 300 570 0 270 270 0 0 0
5 256 400 656 30 230 260 30 290 320
6 140 360 500 0 140 140 0 210 210
7 155 299 454 20 140 160 30 170 200
8 136 318 454 50 90 140 60 120 180
9 426 477 903 180 250 430 270 360 630
10 457 597 1054 250 210 460 310 310 620
11 357 509 866 180 180 360 330 220 550
12 286 396 682 140 150 290 200 250 450
13 527 487 1014 270 260 530 310 340 650
14 577 627 1204 260 320 580 380 410 790
15 457 517 974 260 200 460 290 260 550
16 467 466 933 220 250 470 430 330 760
17 395 374 769 230 170 400 470 370 840
18 446 317 763 180 270 450 240 340 580
19 387 357 744 170 220 390 260 290 550
20 300 309 609 240 60 300 160 110 270
21 310 157 467 280 30 310 330 30 360
22 320 262 582 320 0 320 500 0 500
23 280 133 413 280 0 280 380 0 380
Total 7139 7920 15059 3680 3510 7190 5200 4410 9610

SB = Autos - Valet Drop-Off - Garage Entry - Surface Entry - TNC Departure - Taxi Departure
NB = Autos - Valet Pick-up - Garage Exit - Surface Exit - TNC Arrival - Taxi Arrival

Private Shuttles
2017 Drop-Off / Pick-Up 2017 Design Volumes
Hour SB NB Total Arrival Departure Total Arrival Departure Total
0 30 20 50 30 0 30 60 0 60
1 10 20 30 10 0 10 10 0 10
2 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 10 10 20 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 30 20 50 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 40 30 70 0 30 30 0 40 40
6 40 30 70 0 30 30 0 50 50
7 40 30 70 10 30 40 10 40 50
8 50 30 80 20 20 40 30 30 60
9 60 40 100 30 20 50 50 30 80
10 60 50 110 30 20 50 40 30 70
11 50 40 90 20 20 40 40 20 60
12 60 30 90 30 20 50 40 30 70
13 60 40 100 30 20 50 30 30 60
14 50 40 90 20 20 40 30 30 60
15 50 30 80 30 10 40 30 10 40
16 60 50 110 30 30 60 60 40 100
17 60 50 110 30 20 50 60 40 100
18 60 40 100 20 20 40 30 30 60
19 50 40 90 20 20 40 30 30 60
20 50 30 80 40 10 50 30 20 50
21 40 30 70 40 0 40 50 0 50
22 50 40 90 50 0 50 80 0 80
23 40 30 70 40 0 40 50 0 50
Total 1060 770 1830 530 340 870 760 500 1260
Traffic Volumes immediately south of Paris Street Interchange

2017
Southbound (Entry) Traffic Volumes Northbound (Exit) Traffic Volumes Grand
Hour Departure Arrival Comm. Garage Surface Total Departure Arrival Comm. Garage Surface Total Total
0 30 100 50 40 0 220 30 100 50 130 20 330 550
1 10 20 14 20 0 64 10 20 14 50 10 104 168
2 10 0 4 10 10 34 10 0 4 20 0 34 68
3 60 0 4 40 20 124 60 0 4 10 0 74 198
4 270 0 4 170 40 484 270 0 4 20 0 294 778
5 364 30 44 260 50 748 364 30 44 80 0 518 1266
6 340 0 48 180 40 608 340 0 48 80 0 468 1076
7 325 20 69 120 20 554 325 20 69 50 10 474 1028
8 294 50 80 200 30 654 294 50 80 70 10 504 1158
9 444 180 91 180 20 915 444 180 91 140 10 865 1780
10 393 250 91 160 20 914 393 250 91 120 10 864 1778
11 373 180 69 190 30 842 373 180 69 130 20 772 1614
12 344 140 92 210 40 826 344 140 92 180 30 786 1612
13 453 270 101 180 20 1024 453 270 101 230 20 1074 2098
14 503 260 81 150 20 1014 503 260 81 180 20 1044 2058
15 373 260 81 140 20 874 373 260 81 170 20 904 1778
16 463 220 102 180 20 985 463 220 102 230 30 1045 2030
17 375 230 104 190 20 919 375 230 104 250 30 989 1908
18 454 180 81 150 10 875 454 180 81 280 40 1035 1910
19 353 170 77 70 10 680 353 170 77 230 30 860 1540
20 150 240 75 50 0 515 150 240 75 120 20 605 1120
21 110 280 87 80 0 557 110 280 87 130 20 627 1184
22 90 320 120 110 0 640 90 320 120 160 30 720 1360
23 80 280 109 80 0 549 80 280 109 240 40 749 1298
Total 6661 3680 1678 3160 440 15619 6661 3680 1678 3300 420 15739 31358
Peak 453 270 101 180 20 1024 453 270 101 230 20 1074 2098

Design Volumes
Southbound (Entry) Traffic Volumes Northbound (Exit) Traffic Volumes Grand
Hour Departure Arrival Comm. Garage Surface Total Departure Arrival Comm. Garage Surface Total Total
0 60 200 90 80 0 430 60 200 90 260 40 650 1080
1 10 20 14 20 0 64 10 20 14 50 10 104 168
2 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 8
3 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 8
4 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 8
5 464 30 54 320 60 928 464 30 54 100 0 648 1576
6 500 0 68 270 60 898 500 0 68 120 0 688 1586
7 395 30 79 150 20 674 395 30 79 60 10 574 1248
8 394 60 100 260 40 854 394 60 100 90 10 654 1508
9 654 270 131 260 30 1345 654 270 131 210 10 1275 2620
10 573 310 121 220 30 1254 573 310 121 160 10 1174 2428
11 483 330 89 290 50 1242 483 330 89 200 30 1132 2374
12 564 200 132 330 60 1286 564 200 132 280 50 1226 2512
13 583 310 111 220 20 1244 583 310 111 280 20 1304 2548
14 653 380 111 200 30 1374 653 380 111 250 30 1424 2798
15 473 290 91 170 20 1044 473 290 91 200 20 1074 2118
16 683 430 162 290 30 1595 683 430 162 380 50 1705 3300
17 795 470 184 400 40 1889 795 470 184 520 60 2029 3918
18 584 240 111 190 10 1135 584 240 111 360 50 1345 2480
19 493 260 107 100 10 970 493 260 107 320 40 1220 2190
20 180 160 75 40 0 455 180 160 75 110 20 545 1000
21 120 330 97 90 0 637 120 330 97 150 20 717 1354
22 140 500 180 170 0 990 140 500 180 250 50 1120 2110
23 110 380 139 110 0 739 110 380 139 330 50 1009 1748
Total 8911 5200 2258 4180 510 21059 8911 5200 2258 4680 580 21629 42688
Peak 795 470 184 400 40 1889 795 470 184 520 60 2029 3918
 Year 2017
Departure Arrival Commercial
Private Taxi Valet Valet Private KCI Taxi Private Garage Surface
Hour Auto TNC Limo Drop-Off Pick-Up Total Auto Shuttle TNC Limo Shuttle KCATA Total Entry Exit Entry Exit
0 0 0 0 0 30 30 100 8 10 2 30 0 50 40 130 0 20
1 0 0 0 0 10 10 20 4 0 0 10 0 14 20 50 0 10
2 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 10 20 10 0
3 60 0 0 0 0 60 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 40 10 20 0
4 270 0 0 0 0 270 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 170 20 40 0
5 230 30 4 100 0 364 30 10 0 0 30 4 44 260 80 50 0
6 140 70 10 120 0 340 0 10 0 0 30 8 48 180 80 40 0
7 140 40 5 130 10 325 20 10 10 1 40 8 69 120 50 20 10
8 90 30 4 150 20 294 50 10 20 2 40 8 80 200 70 30 10
9 250 20 4 140 30 444 180 10 20 3 50 8 91 180 140 20 10
10 210 20 3 130 30 393 250 10 20 3 50 8 91 160 120 20 10
11 180 20 3 120 50 373 180 10 10 1 40 8 69 190 130 30 20
12 150 20 4 120 50 344 140 10 20 4 50 8 92 210 180 40 30
13 260 20 3 100 70 453 270 10 30 3 50 8 101 180 230 20 20
14 320 20 3 90 70 503 260 10 20 3 40 8 81 150 180 20 20
15 200 20 3 80 70 373 260 10 20 3 40 8 81 140 170 20 20
16 250 20 3 90 100 463 220 10 20 4 60 8 102 180 230 20 30
17 170 20 5 60 120 375 230 10 30 6 50 8 104 190 250 20 30
18 270 30 4 40 110 454 180 10 20 3 40 8 81 150 280 10 40
19 220 20 3 20 90 353 170 10 20 3 40 4 77 70 230 10 30
20 60 0 0 10 80 150 240 10 10 1 50 4 75 50 120 0 20
21 30 0 0 0 80 110 280 10 30 3 40 4 87 80 130 0 20
22 0 0 0 0 90 90 320 8 50 8 50 4 120 110 160 0 30
23 0 0 0 0 80 80 280 8 50 7 40 4 109 80 240 0 40
Total 3510 400 61 1500 1190 6661 3680 210 410 60 870 128 1678 3160 3300 440 420
Peak 320 20 3 90 90 503 320 8 50 8 50 4 120 260 280 50 40

Design Volumes
Departure Arrival Commercial
Private Taxi Valet Valet Private KCI Taxi Private Garage Surface
Hour Auto TNC Limo Drop-Off Pick-Up Total Auto Shuttle TNC Limo Shuttle KCATA Total Entry Exit Entry Exit
Total 4410 610 61 2090 1740 8911 5200 210 600 60 1260 128 2258 4180 4680 510 580
Peak 370 50 5 130 240 795 500 10 60 6 100 8 184 400 520 60 60

Pass/Veh 1.5 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.5 14 1.25 1.25 14 12 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Daily Passengers 6620 760 80 2610 2180 7800 2940 750 80 17640 1540 6270 7020 770 870
7000 800 100 2800 2300 8300 3100 800 100 18800 1600 6700 7500 800 900
AM Peak 540 50 10 250 60 410 140 40 0 1120 100 390 320 50 20
Adj 800 100 0 400 100 600 200 100 0 1700 200 600 500 100 0
PM Peak 500 40 0 150 250 650 140 50 10 1400 100 440 570 50 80
Adj 600 100 0 200 300 800 200 100 0 1800 100 600 700 100 100
 Passenger Flow - Design Year
To Terminal From Terminal Total 2-Way
Location % Daily AM Peak PM Peak % Daily AM Peak PM Peak Daily AM Peak PM Peak
Departure Curb 7900 900 700 7900 900 700

Arrival Curb 8300 600 800 8300 600 800

Commercial 12300 0 1200 12100 2200 1000 24400 2200 2200

North Departure Level 0% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0
South Departure Level 0% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0
North Arrival Level 55% 6765 0 660 45% 6655 1210 550
South Arrival Level 45% 5535 0 540 55% 5445 990 450

Valet 2800 400 200 2300 100 300 5100 500 500
North Departure Level 55% 1540 220 110 45% 1265 55 165
South Departure Level 45% 1260 180 90 55% 1035 45 135
North Arrival Level 0% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0
South Arrival Level 0% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0

Garage Parking 6700 600 600 7500 500 700 14200 1100 1300
North Departure Level 50% 3350 300 300 35% 3750 250 350
South Departure Level 40% 2680 240 240 45% 3000 200 280
North Arrival Level 5% 335 30 30 10% 375 25 35
South Arrival Level 5% 335 30 30 10% 375 25 35

Surface Parking 800 100 100 900 0 100 1700 100 200
North Departure Level 0% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0
South Departure Level 0% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0
North Arrival Level 0% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0
South Arrival Level 100% 800 100 100 100% 900 0 100
Total 30500 2000 2800 31100 3400 2900 61600 5400 5700
Check from DDFS 61623 5255 5673

Total Pedestrian Flow

To Terminal From Terminal Total 2-Way
Location Daily AM Peak PM Peak Daily AM Peak PM Peak Daily AM Peak PM Peak
Curbside Pick-up / Drop-Off
Departure Level 7900 900 700 0 0 0 7900 900 700
Arrival Level 0 0 0 8300 600 800 8300 600 800

Crosswalk Locations
North Departure Level 4890 520 410 5015 305 515 9905 825 925
South Departure Level 3940 420 330 4035 245 415 7975 665 745
North Arrival Level 7100 30 690 7030 1235 585 14130 1265 1275
South Arrival Level 6670 130 670 6720 1015 585 13390 1145 1255
Total Pedestrian Activity 30500 2000 2800 31100 3400 2900 61600 5400 5700
APPENDIX B - ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS

B-1
– THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK –
C-1
VISSIM Calibration
The design projected volumes and geometrics were used to create the Proposed KCI Terminal
VISSIM model to determine operation results. Geometric and speed limit information were
provided by the terminal design team, while signal timings at the interchanges were obtained from
the City of Kansas City, MO. Vehicle paths (origin-destination paths) were calculated based on
projected volumes outlined in this report. Driver type and behavior, including lane change
behavior, was coded based on a typical urban arterial roadway throughout the model per industry
standards. Adjustments to driver behavior were made to account for drop-off and pick-up locations
at the terminal.
Once coding was complete, the model was simulated and calibrated. Careful consideration was
taken during calibration to ensure consistency between the model and the projected volumes.
Calibration was performed in accordance with FHWA standards found in Volume III: Guidelines
for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Modeling Software - Chapter 5 Calibration of Microsimulation
Models. Section 5.6 within this chapter contains detailed information on desired calibration
targets. Table 1 is found within the FHWA standards and outlines acceptable calibration targets
for a given model. Table 2 depicts the existing conditions model calibration results in detail while
Table 3 shows that all calibration targets were met.
Table 1. FHWA Model Calibration Criteria
Criteria and Measures Calibration Acceptance Targets

Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed

> 85% of cases
Individual Link Flows: Within 15%, for 700 veh/h < Flow < 2700 veh/h

Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed

> 85% of cases
Individual Link Flows: Within 100 veh/h, for Flow < 700 veh/h

Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed

> 85% of cases
Individual Link Flows: Within 400 veh/h, for Flow > 2700 veh/h

Sum of All Link Flows Within 5% of sum of all link counts

GEH Statistic < 5 for Individual Link Flows > 85% of cases
GEH Statistic for Sum of All Link Flows GEH < 4 for sum of all link counts

Visual Audits
To analyst's satisfaction
Individual Link Speeds: Visually Acceptable Speed-Flow Relationship

Visual Audits
To analyst's satisfaction
Bottlenecks: Visually Acceptable Queuing

Data provided by the model was calibrated against the projected volumes provided in this report
using the following equation:

GEH = statistical formula to compare traffic volumes

 E = model estimated volume

V = Peak Hour Volume (PHV)

Table 2. AM Road Segment Model Calibration Results

GEH
GEH Statistic -
VISSIM Difference Sum of All Statistic -
By Segment DHV Individual
Projected Volume/Percent Link Flows Sum of All
Links
link Flows
Departure Entrance 622 604 18 3% 0.7
Arrival Entrance 296 270 26 10% 1.5
To Commercial Entrance 140 130 10 8% 1.1
1% 1.9
Arrivals Exit 288 270 18 7% 1.1
Departure Exit 661 604 57 9% 2.3
Parking Garage Entrance 257 260 3 1% 0.2
Table 3. AM Roundabout Model Calibration Results
GEH GEH
VISSIM Difference Sum of All Statistic - Statistic -
Intersection DHV
Projected Volume/Percent Link Flows Individual Sum of All
Links link Flows
Terminal B Roundabout 294 331 37 11% 1.4
1% 1.9
Terminal C Roundabout 759 801 42 5% 1.6

Table 4. PM Road Segment Model Calibration Results

GEH
Sum GEH
Statistic -
VISSIM Difference of All Statistic -
By Segment DHV Sum of
Projected Volume/Percent Link Individual
All link
Flows Links
Flows
Departure Entrance 776 795 19 2% 0.7
Arrival Entrance 461 470 9 2% 0.4
To Commercial Entrance 212 184 28 15% 2.0
0% 1.7
Arrivals Exit 441 470 29 6% 1.4
Departure Exit 757 795 38 5% 1.4
Parking Garage Entrance 437 400 37 9% 1.4
 Table 5. PM Roundabout Model Calibration Results
GEH
Sum GEH
Statistic -
VISSIM Difference of All Statistic -
Intersection DHV Sum of
Projected Volume/Percent Link Individual
All link
Flows Links
Flows
Terminal B Roundabout 363 384 21 5% 1.1
0% 1.7
Terminal C Roundabout 1178 1074 104 10% 0.7

Table 6. AM Summary of Model Calibration Results Within the Network

KCI Proposed
Criteria
Terminal
Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed
Individual Link Flows: Within 15%, for 700 veh/h < > 85% of cases
Flow < 2700 veh/h
Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed
Individual Link Flows: Within 100 veh/h, for Flow < > 85% of cases Pass
700 veh/h
Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed
Individual Link Flows: Within 400 veh/h, for Flow > > 85% of cases
2700 veh/h
Within 5% of sum of all link
Sum of All Link Flows
counts Pass
GEH Statistic < 5 for Individual Link Flows > 85% of cases Pass
GEH < 4 for sum of all link
GEH Statistic for Sum of All Link Flows
counts Pass
 Table 7. PM Summary of Model Calibration Results Within the Network

KCI Proposed
Criteria
Terminal
Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed
Individual Link Flows: Within 15%, for 700 veh/h < > 85% of cases
Flow < 2700 veh/h
Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed
Individual Link Flows: Within 100 veh/h, for Flow < > 85% of cases Pass
700 veh/h
Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed
Individual Link Flows: Within 400 veh/h, for Flow > > 85% of cases
2700 veh/h
Within 5% of sum of all
Sum of All Link Flows
link counts Pass
GEH Statistic < 5 for Individual Link Flows > 85% of cases Pass
GEH < 4 for sum of all link
GEH Statistic for Sum of All Link Flows
counts Pass
VISSIM Results
Table 8. AM Intersection Analysis

Overall Queuing
Intersection Delay Approach LOS Delay
LOS Results

Northbound From Terminal B A 0.69 0.09

Roundabout
A 0.97 Southbound From Arrivals A 1.37 0.12
Terminal B
Westbound From Terminal C A 0.72 0.00
Northbound From Terminal C A 2.66 0.68
Roundabout Southbound From Parking Garage A 2.19 0.30
A 2.14
Terminal C Eastbound From Terminal B A 3.69 1.03
Westbound From Cookingham Drive A 0.53 0.00
Paris Street & Southbound A 9.86 50.05
Cookingham
A 5.34 Eastbound A 5.59 62.30
Drive SB
Terminal Westbound A 3.81 63.47
Paris Street & Northbound A 6.14 89.16
Cookingham
A 7.05 Eastbound A 8.41 39.14
Drive NB
Terminal Westbound A 8.17 92.94

Table 9. AM Speed Results

Link Design Speed Vissim Percent

Projected Speed Difference
SB Cookingham Drive (Paris Street Interchange) 35 35.6 1%
NB Cookingham Drive (Paris Street Interchange) 35 38.1 3%
To Terminals C 35 25.2 10%
From Terminal B & C/ Arrivals & Departures 35 34.0 1%
From Arrivals and Departures 35 33.3 2%
To Terminals B & C 35 33.3 2%
To Terminals B 35 29.7 5%
 Table 10. AM LOS Results

VISSIM Vehicles LOS per ACRP

By Segment
Projected / Lane Report 40

Departure Entrance 622 311 A

Arrival Entrance 296 148 A
To Commercial Entrance 140 70 A
Arrivals Exit 288 144 A
Departure Exit 661 331 B
Parking Garage Entrance 257 129 A

Table 11. PM Intersection Analysis

Overall Queuing
Intersection Delay Approach LOS Delay
LOS Results

Northbound From Terminal B A 1.29 0.28

Roundabout
A 1.67 Southbound From Arrivals A 2.24 0.40
Terminal B
Westbound From Terminal C A 0.71 0.00
Northbound From Terminal C B 10.61 3.99
Roundabout Southbound From Parking Garage A 4.48 1.65
A 5.22
Terminal C Eastbound From Terminal B A 9.24 7.46
Westbound From Cookingham Drive A 0.64 0.01
Paris Street & Southbound A 8.28 87.54
Cookingham
A 5.34 Eastbound A 5.02 77.69
Drive SB
Terminal Westbound A 4.33 98.87
Paris Street & Northbound A 8.31 42.05
Cookingham
A 7.05 Eastbound A 9.34 90.47
Drive NB
Terminal Westbound A 8.11 177.34
 Table 12. PM Speed Results

Link Design Speed Vissim Projected Percent

Speed Difference
SB Cookingham Drive (Paris Street Interchange) 35 35.1 0%
NB Cookingham Drive (Paris Street Interchange) 35 38.2 3%
To Terminals C 35 24.4 11%
From Terminal B & C/ Arrivals & Departures 35 33.5 1%
From Arrivals and Departures 35 32.9 2%
To Terminals B & C 35 33.7 1%
To Terminals B 35 29.7 5%

Table 13. PM Density LOS Results

VISSIM Vehicles LOS per ACRP

By Segment
Projected / Lane Report 40

Departure Entrance 776 388 B

Arrival Entrance 461 231 A
To Commercial Entrance 212 106 A
Arrivals Exit 441 221 A
Departure Exit 757 379 B
Parking Garage Entrance 437 219 A
 TO: Gunnar Hand, SOM

Cc: Chad Luedke, CWC

FROM: Jeff McKerrow, PE, PTOE

RE: Response to HNTB Review Comments

DATE: July 09, 2018

OA PROJECT #: 018-0784

NOTES:

This memo has been prepared to address the comments provided HNTB on the KCI Landside
Traffic Planning Draft Report. The report reviewed was dated June 1, 2018, and the comments
were received from SOM on July 2, 2018.
Page 2-1, Comment: “Would be helpful to know where each of these were incorporated into the
analysis, both below and as sources in the individual sections / tables”
We will reference the standards in the relevant sections.

Page 3-3, Comment: “Also: TNC, CONRAC shuttle, limo”

The video did capture the CONRAC (Consolidated Rental Car) shuttles as well as limos,
but it could not capture TNC’s such as Uber or Lyft. The data from those sources came
from revenue sources provided by the Kansas City Aviation Department.
Page 4-1, Comment: “For one-way airport roadways the inbound and outbound is important to
cite.”
The entering volumes would reflect inbound, while the exiting volumes would reflect
outbound. That information is provided on Table 4.1.
Page 4-2, Comment: “No info in Appendix A”
Appendix A data will be provided, including pedestrian, private auto, KCI shuttles, private
commercial shuttles, garage entry/exit volumes, planning/deplaning passenger, etc. for
various future scenarios.
Page 6-3, Comment: “What V/C ratios and capacities were used to calculate the # of lanes What
LOS is used to calculate the number of lanes needed; suggest a table to clarify analysis”
The Highway Capacity Manual was utilized to calculate volume/capacity (v/c) ratios and
Level of Service (LOS). The number of lanes was based on several factors, in addition to
v/c and LOS, including but not limited to lane continuity, adequate merge/diverge areas,
driver sight distances, weave distances, driver decision spacing, etc.
Page 6-5, Comment: “What V/C ratios and capacities were used to calculate the # of lanes What
LOS is used to calculate the number of lanes needed; suggest a table to clarify analysis”

1801 McGee Street, Suite 101

Kansas City, MO 64108
www.olssonassociates.com
 June 28, 2018
Page 2 of 7

The Highway Capacity Manual was utilized to calculate volume/capacity (v/c) ratios and
Level of Service (LOS). The number of lanes was based on several factors, in addition to
v/c and LOS, including but not limited to lane continuity, adequate merge/diverge areas,
driver sight distances, weave distances, driver decision spacing, etc.
Page 6-6, Comment: “Was the impact to Paris St. reviewed – show analysis”
This information will be provided, including intersection analyses of the ramp terminals.
Page 6-6, Comment: “How is LOS defined and calculated? Suggest a table explaining LOS
criteria / definition and table for the results of the analysis”
The Highway Capacity Manual was utilized to calculate Level of Service. The results of
this analysis will be included in Appendix B. Rather than a table, we have chosen to
summarize this data graphically on Figures 6.6 through 6.8.
Page 6-10, Comment: “Show private vehicles curbs also”
We will modify Figure 6.10 to show that distance as well.
Page 6-11, Comment: “25' effective length typical for private vehicles, TNCs, Taxis - 50' for taxi
is double what is needed”
We will revise to show the impact on these revised lengths.
Page 6-11, Comment: “Calculation f number of curbside lanes required?”
No, we are following the design guidelines previously referenced. We will clarify.
Page 6-11, Comment: “What is the source of this methodology? How is LOS defined? private
vehicle curbs typically include some double parking which is incorporated into the LOS calculation
but the commercial vehicle / shuttle areas do not. If it meets the need then it is good - if not it is a
lower LOS. The TNC requirement of 30' seems low compared to others - if this is correct only 1
space is required and based on the allocation shown on the previous page the length provided
would be LOS A not C. Show available lenghts on this table to compare - private vehicle shows
a 370' required length and more than that provided in concept plan so LOS should be higher than
C”
The design guidelines previously referenced describe the methodologies and definitions.
We will clarify.
Page 7-1, Comment: “How was the model calibrated? Airport traffic is difficult to successfully
model and ensure the results are realistic = a validation / calibration is recommended to ensure
the programmed behavior is representative and the results are reliable. Include tables with the
results of the simulation at key points (e.g. weave areas, decision points)”
Since submittal there have been some modifications to the pedestrian crossings,
specifically, the addition of crosswalks at the departure level. As such, the results of the
VISSIM analysis will change slightly as this new configuration is modeled.
Scenario 3 projected volumes and geometrics were used to create the Proposed KCI
Terminal VISSIM model to determine operation results. Geometric and speed limit
information were provided by the site civil designers. Vehicle paths (origin-destination
paths) were calculated based on projected volumes outlined in the report. Driver type and
behavior, including lane change behavior, was coded based on a typical urban arterial
roadway throughout the model per industry standards. Adjustments to driver behavior
were made to account for drop-off and pick-up locations at the terminal.
Once coding was complete, the model was simulated and calibrated. Careful
 June 28, 2018
Page 3 of 7

consideration was taken during calibration to ensure consistency between the model and
the projected volumes. Calibration was performed in accordance with FHWA standards
found in Volume III: Guidelines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Modeling Software -
Chapter 5 Calibration of Microsimulation Models. Section 5.6 within this chapter contains
detailed information on desired calibration targets. Table 1 is found within the FHWA
standards and outlines acceptable calibration targets for a given model. Table 2 and 3
depicts the existing conditions model calibration results in detail for the AM and PM peak
periods, while Table 4 and 5 shows that all calibration targets were met.
A simulation model for the existing conditions at KCI was not completed, as the existing
conditions vary significantly in terms of roadway geometrics, location of drop-offs / pick-
ups, available curb space, location and usage of commercial vehicles, etc. that it was not
deemed viable for calibration.
 June 28, 2018
Page 4 of 7

Table 1. FHWA Model Calibration Criteria

Criteria and Measures Calibration Acceptance Targets

Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed
Individual Link Flows: Within 15%, for 700 veh/h < Flow < > 85% of cases
2700 veh/h
Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed
Individual Link Flows: Within 100 veh/h, for Flow < 700 > 85% of cases
veh/h
Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed
Individual Link Flows: Within 400 veh/h, for Flow > 2700 > 85% of cases
veh/h
Sum of All Link Flows Within 5% of sum of all link counts
GEH Statistic < 5 for Individual Link Flows > 85% of cases
GEH Statistic for Sum of All Link Flows GEH < 4 for sum of all link counts
Visual Audits
Individual Link Speeds: Visually Acceptable Speed-Flow To analyst's satisfaction
Relationship
Visual Audits
To analyst's satisfaction
Bottlenecks: Visually Acceptable Queuing

Data provided by the model was calibrated against the projected volumes provided using the
following equation:

GEH = statistical formula to compare traffic volumes

E = model estimated volume

V = Peak Hour Volume (PHV)

 June 28, 2018
Page 5 of 7

Table 2. AM Model Calibration Results

GEH
Sum GEH
Statistic -
VISSIM Difference of All Statistic -
By Segment DHV Sum of
Projected Volume/Percent Link Individual
All link
Flows Links
Flows
Departure Entrance 510 604 94 16% 4.0
Arrival Entrance 310 270 40 15% 2.3
To Commercial Entrance 307 362 55 15% 2.5
-2% 3.3
Arrivals Exit 272 270 2 1% 0.1
Departure Exit 504 604 100 17% 4.2
Parking Garage Entrance 271 260 11 4% 2.1

GEH
Sum GEH
Statistic -
VISSIM Difference of All Statistic -
Intersection DHV Sum of
Projected Volume/Percent Link Individual
All link
Flows Links
Flows
Terminal B Roundabout 441 341 100 29% 2.0
-2% 3.3
Terminal C Roundabout 857 771 86 11% 1.6
 June 28, 2018
Page 6 of 7

Table 3. PM Model Calibration Results

GEH
Sum GEH
Statistic -
VISSIM Difference of All Statistic -
By Segment DHV Sum of
Projected Volume/Percent Link Individual
All link
Flows Links
Flows
Departure Entrance 530 555 25 5% 1.1
Arrival Entrance 464 470 6 1% 0.3
To Commercial Entrance 448 424 24 6% 1.1
4% 1.5
Arrivals Exit 407 470 63 13% 3.0
Departure Exit 510 555 45 8% 2.0
Parking Garage Entrance 436 400 36 9% 1.4

GEH GEH
Sum of
VISSIM Difference Statistic - Statistic -
Intersection DHV All Link
Projected Volume/Percent Individual Sum of All
Flows
Links link Flows
Terminal B
47 7%
Roundabout 590 637 1.2
4% 1.5
Terminal C
2 0%
Roundabout 1322 1324 1.2

Table 4. AM Summary of Model Calibration Results Within the Network

KCI Proposed
Criteria
Terminal
Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed
Individual Link Flows: Within 15%, for 700 veh/h < > 85% of cases
Flow < 2700 veh/h
Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed
Individual Link Flows: Within 100 veh/h, for Flow < > 85% of cases Pass
700 veh/h
Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed
Individual Link Flows: Within 400 veh/h, for Flow > > 85% of cases
2700 veh/h
Within 5% of sum of all link
Sum of All Link Flows
counts Pass
GEH Statistic < 5 for Individual Link Flows > 85% of cases Pass
GEH < 4 for sum of all link
GEH Statistic for Sum of All Link Flows
counts Pass
 June 28, 2018
Page 7 of 7

Table 5. PM Summary of Model Calibration Results Within the Network

KCI Proposed
Criteria
Terminal
Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed
Individual Link Flows: Within 15%, for 700 veh/h < > 85% of cases
Flow < 2700 veh/h
Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed
Individual Link Flows: Within 100 veh/h, for Flow < > 85% of cases Pass
700 veh/h
Hourly Flows, Model Versus Observed
Individual Link Flows: Within 400 veh/h, for Flow > > 85% of cases
2700 veh/h
Within 5% of sum of all
Sum of All Link Flows
link counts Pass
GEH Statistic < 5 for Individual Link Flows > 85% of cases Pass
GEH < 4 for sum of all link
GEH Statistic for Sum of All Link Flows
counts Pass