Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mindfulness-Based Approaches With Children and Ado
Mindfulness-Based Approaches With Children and Ado
net/publication/330358657
CITATIONS READS
706 3,051
1 author:
Christine Burke
NSW Department of Education and Communities
8 PUBLICATIONS 1,574 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Christine Burke on 14 January 2019.
ORIGINAL PAPER
123
J Child Fam Stud
found elsewhere (e.g., Baer 2006; Greco and Hayes 2008; 1990, 2003; Segal et al. 2002). Requirements for MBSR
Hayes 2004; Hayes et al. 2003; Linehan 1993; Murrell and teachers (and good practice guidelines for MBCT teachers)
Scherbarth 2006). include an established and ongoing personal mindfulness
Before reviewing the research literature on interventions meditation practice, professional training, regular supervi-
with children and adolescents, I will briefly review dis- sion, attendance at teacher-led silent meditation retreats,
tinctive features of MBSR/MBCT, including the core and ongoing professional development (Center for Mind-
curriculum, requirements for teachers of MBSR/MBCT, fulness 2009; Centre for Mindfulness Research and Prac-
proposed elements and processes of mindfulness in this tice 2009). Just as swimming teachers need to be able to
context, and the current research applications with adults. swim, so do mindfulness teachers need the experiential
MBSR was originally developed in the late 1970s as knowing that comes from riding the waves, the ebb and
an 8-week group intervention, for people experiencing a flow, of their internal experiences (Segal et al. 2002).
range of medical problems including chronic pain, within a Although mindfulness-based interventions have been in
university-based medical center (Kabat-Zinn 1990). The use for over 20 years, it has only been more recently that
MBSR core curriculum was later incorporated into MBCT, mindfulness has been examined as a psychological con-
as an adaptation for preventing relapse in adults with pre- struct, with efforts to establish consensus on the operational
vious depression (Segal et al. 2002). MBSR and MBCT definition, elements and processes (Bishop et al. 2004;
include a series of mindfulness meditation practices drawn Shapiro et al. 2006). In addition, there have been concur-
from Buddhist origins applied in a secular context, offering rent advances in the development of instruments to mea-
universal applications not tied to religious or philosophical sure aspects of mindfulness, which is an obvious need to
traditions (Baer 2003; Dryden and Still 2006; Kabat-Zinn further empirical research (for an overview of available
1990). measures, see Baer et al. 2006; Feldman et al. 2007).
MBSR and MBCT are experiential learning programs Three primary elements have been proposed as compo-
that include weekly group sessions, regular home practice, nents in the process of mindfulness: attitude, attention
and the core curriculum of formal mindfulness practices and intention (Shapiro et al. 2006). Mindfulness practice is
(body scan, sitting, movement and walking meditations), grounded in particular attitudinal foundations, which
and informal mindfulness practices (where participants include non-judgment, acceptance, trust, patience, non-
intentionally bring mindful awareness to activities of daily striving, curiosity and kindliness (Bishop et al. 2004; Kabat-
living, e.g., showering, eating, gardening, shopping). Zinn 1990; Shapiro et al. 2006). Attention includes focused,
Group sessions include guided meditation practices, broad and sustained attention, and skills in switching
teacher-led enquiry, discussion of experiences, and psycho- attention from one stimulus to another. The third element of
education (includes information about universality of the conscious intention extends from an intention to practice, to
wandering mind, the role of perception, the mind/body the intentionality one brings to directing, sustaining or
association, stress reactivity, developing inner resources for switching attention. Intentional attention can be considered
coping and enhancing health). MBCT includes additional as the self-regulation of attention (Bishop et al. 2004).
psycho-education and exercises specific to depression, Shapiro et al. (2006) propose that the elements, attitudes,
while content in both MBSR/MBCT is adaptable to the attention and intention, are simultaneous, interconnected
specific characteristics of group participants (e.g., for aspects of the process that ‘‘is’’ mindfulness (p. 375). This
anxiety, eating disorders, etc.). process allows one to develop a de-centered perspective on
Through group and home practices, participants develop one’s experiences, from a non-judgmental, objective and
mindfulness skills and attitudes, including focusing, sus- non-elaborative stance; witnessing thoughts, sensations and
taining and switching attention, and accepting their present emotions as transient phenomena. This potentially leads to a
moment experience, including felt sensations in the body, shift in one’s relationship with these phenomena, from
without judgment or elaboration. Participants are encour- where one can clearly observe, recognize and disengage
aged to use the physical sensations of the breath and the from habitual patterns or mind states, and begin to respond
body as ‘‘anchors’’ for attention, when attention wanders or more reflectively, rather than reactively (Baer 2003; Segal
becomes scattered. et al. 2002; Shapiro et al. 2006).
A distinguishing feature of MBSR and MBCT, as There is significant and continued growth in the
interventions in both clinical and non-clinical settings, is empirical research base investigating the efficacy of MBSR
that the program authors are adamant that mindfulness and MBCT interventions with clinical and non-clinical
teachers must have extensive personal experience of adult populations. Clinical studies of MBSR with adults
mindfulness practice, and an embodiment of the attitudinal include management of chronic pain, stress, anxiety, pso-
foundations of mindfulness (described below), before riasis, eating disorders, fybromyalga, substance abuse and
beginning to teach the practices to clients (Kabat-Zinn with cancer patients (Baer 2003; Bishop 2002; Grossman
123
J Child Fam Stud
et al. 2004; Ivanovski and Malhi 2007; Shigaki et al. very small pool of publications to date. The aim is to
2006). MBCT was initially developed as an approach to provide a preliminary overview of all the available research
prevent relapse in depression (Segal et al. 2002; Teasdale in this newly emerging field.
et al. 2000), though now has been adapted for use with
generalized anxiety disorder (Evans et al. 2007), mixed
mood disorders (Ree and Craigie 2007), current depressed Method
treatment-resistant individuals (Kenny and Williams 2007),
and with cancer patients and their carers (Foley et al. The published articles reviewed were collected by the
2007). MBCT is currently being evaluated in prevention of author through searches of the following electronic data
recurrence of suicidal behavior (Williams et al. 2006) bases: PsychINFO, PSYarticles, BioMed Central, CSA
and for feasibility with individuals with bipolar disorder Illumina, Medline, Blackwell Synergy, JSTOR, Web of
(Williams et al. 2008). Knowledge Version 4, Science Direct, SpringerLink, Wiley
Meta-analyses of the empirical research report overall Interscience, and the Cochrane Library, or acquired directly
medium effect sizes (d = .50–.59) on outcomes measures from the author, including unpublished or submitted stud-
of physical and psychological health (Baer 2003; Grossman ies. Search terms included ‘‘mindfulness’’, ‘‘meditation’’
et al. 2004), with authors suggesting that MBSR (and ‘‘MBCT’’, ‘‘MBSR’’, ‘‘children’’, ‘‘adolescents’’, ‘‘young
MBCT: Baer 2003) may be helpful in improving psycho- people’’, ‘‘families’’ and ‘‘schools’’. Dissertation studies
logical health and well-being. The meta-analyses also and conference papers were not accessed. Only articles
highlight various methodological weaknesses in many written in English were reviewed, and only studies that used
studies, and conclude that more rigorous research, with secular contemplative mindfulness meditation techniques
large scale randomized control trials (RCTs) are required to (MBSR/MBCT based), not concentration methods (such as
empirically validate mindfulness-based interventions, transcendental meditation —TM), were included. Single
across a range of populations and problems. case and small sample studies with informal posttreatment
results were included. Fifteen studies meeting this criteria
were located and are reviewed.
Mindfulness-Based Approaches with Children
and Adolescents—A Review of Current Research
Overview of the Research Literature
There is evidence of growing interest in the application of
mindfulness-based approaches with children and adoles- Studies are grouped by the school age of children involved.
cents, in both the professional and public arenas. Examples Table 1 summarizes the one study of pre-school age;
include mindfulness interventions in pain management with Table 2, elementary school age (6 studies); Table 3, high
adolescents (Thompson and Gauntlett-Gilbert 2008), MBCT school age (8 studies). Within each table, studies are
for depressive relapse prevention with adolescents (Allen grouped by participant populations, first by clinical sam-
2006), pilot projects at the Oxford Mindfulness Centre ples, then non-clinical samples, and ordered by publication
(http://www.oxfordmindfulness.org), Mindful Awareness date within each group. Only data on child or adolescent
Research Center, University of California Los Angeles outcome measures is reported, although several studies
(MARC, UCLA; http://marc.ucla.edu.), InnerKids Founda- included parents in the intervention and analysis.
tion (http://www.innerkids.org), and the recent publication Sample sizes range from 1 to 228. In studies reporting
of a practitioner’s guide focusing on treatment of children age, range was from 4 to 19 years; in those reporting
and adolescents (Greco and Hayes 2008). Additionally, there gender, ratio ranged from 24.1 to 71% male. Reportage of
are reports (e.g., Garrison Institute Report 2005) and media demographic information was limited. Nine studies inter-
coverage that highlight the growing interest (e.g., Brown vened with clinical samples, and six studies with non-
2007; Mahr 2007; Suttie 2007). clinical samples. All studies trained participants in
Baer’s (2003) empirical review of adult interventions ‘‘mindfulness meditation practices’’, adaptations of MBSR
was used to broadly guide this review, however meta- or MBCT, however there were many variations from the
analysis or overall effect size calculation was not possible, standard MBSR/MBCT core curriculum, some interven-
due to wide variability in methodologies and data reporting tions using ‘‘elements’’ of MBSR.
across studies. Included are single case and small sample Six studies used pre-post between groups design,
feasibility studies with no objective outcome measures, four report wait-list or intent-to-treat controls, with two
some with only partial data reported, and there are multiple reporting other non-treatment activities; of the six, four
variants in implementation of the MBSR/MBCT core report randomization to these control groups, two do not
curriculum. Inclusion of this range of studies reflects the specify randomization. The remaining studies used pre-post
123
J Child Fam Stud
temperament
some objective measures of attention. Five studies report
Dependent
General Findings
Random
Yes
play period
qualitative analysis.
Overall, studies generally present with methodological
pre-post
Research
critiqued, below.
MAPs Mindful awareness practices, EF Executive function
Children
school students
44 Non-clinical pre-
Non-Clinical Sample
Participant type
123
J Child Fam Stud
Ott (2002) 1 Clinical, 9 years Outpatient Single case Mindfulness No No Reflux symptoms, No data
outpatient, clinic study meditation medication, sleep reported
gastroesophageal intervention quality
reflux
Semple et al. 5 Clinical, anxiety 7–8 years School Within MBCT-C, No No Anxiety, Trends in
(2005) symptoms participant 6 wks, wkly internalizing and results,
pre-post externalizing clinical
behavior observation
Singh, et al. 2 Clinical, ADHD 10–12 years Not stated Multiple Mindfulness No No Children’s Percentage
(2009) baseline training, 12 wks compliance data
across parent, 12 wks reported
participants chd
Napoli, et al. 228 Non-clinical school Grades 1–3 School RCT between AAP fortnightly Yes quiet Yes Attention; social Cohen’s
(2005) students groups pre- 24 wks activities/ skills; behavior d = .39–.60
post reading
Saltzman and 74 (39 chn, Non-clinical self Grades 4–6 Community Between groups Modified MBSR, 8 Yes, Not stated Attention, self Data analysis
Goldin (2008) 35 parents referred setting pre-post, wait wks, wkly waitlist compassion, incomplete
list control depression,
anxiety,
mindfulness
Lee et al. (2008) 25 Non-clinical 9–12 years Community Pre-post MBTC-C, No No Internalizing, Cohen’s
reading class based intent 8 wks, wkly externalizing d = .11–.40
reading to treat, behavior, anxiety,
clinic 2 phase depression
open trial
MBSR Mindfulness-based stress reduction, MBCT-C Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy-children, AAP Attention academy program, ADHD Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, chd Child,
chn Children, wkly Weekly, wks Weeks, develop. disabilities Developmental disabilities
123
Table 3 Mindfulness-based interventions with high school adolescents
Study N Participant Age/grade Intervention Research design Treatment group Control Random Dependent Effect size/data
type location group assignment variables reported
123
Bootzin and 55 Clinical, 13–19 years Clinic Pre-post within MBSR, 5/6 wks, No No Sleep data, p \ .05 for some
Stevens adolescents participant 6 wk cog th, substance use, sleep indices,
(2005) substance use, light th, educ., mental health, p [ .05 all other
sleep disorders stimulus worry measures
control inst.
Zylowska 32; 8 adol, Clinical, ADHD Adol mean Not stated Pre-post MAPs, 8 wks, No No Attention, anxiety, Pooled results,
et al. 24 adults or probable 15.6 years; within wkly depression p \ .01 some attn
(2007) ADHD adult mean participant meas., all others
48.5 years non-signif
Singh, 3 Clinical, conduct 13–14 years Not stated Multiple base line Mindfulness No No Aggressive Percentage data
et al. disorder across participants meditation, and non- reported
(2007) 4 wks, compliant
3 9 wkly, incidents
25 wk
mindfulness
practice
Singh et al. 1 Clinical, Prader- 17 years Home-based Within participant Multiple No No Body weight Weight change
(2008) Willi syndrome multiple baseline- components: in lbs, BMI
changing criterion mindfulness reported
design meditation
9 24 months,
exercise, food
awareness
program
Bogels 14 adol Clinical, 11–18 years Community Within participant MBCT, 8 wks, Non- Not stated Goals, behavior, Cohen’s
et al. and externalizing mental pre-post, intent to wkly random happiness, d = -0.1–1.4;
(2008) parents disorders, health treat, f/up waitlist mindfulness f/up:
mixed clinic d = -.02–1.5,
(at 8 wks)
Biegel 102 Clinical, 14–18 years Outpatient RCT, pre-post, MBSR, 8 wks, Yes, TAU, Yes Mental health, Cohen’s
et al. psychiatric psychiatric f/up within wkly and TAU waitlist GAF, stress, d = .14–1.11
(2009) disorders, clinic group psych symp, (d = pre-
mixed self-esteem test–f/up)
Wall (2005) Not Non-clinical 11–13 years School Nil Elements of No No Nil Informal
reported school students MBSR and observation,
Tai Chi comments
Beauchemin 34 Non-clinical 13–18 years School Pre-post within Mindfulness No No Anxiety, social All ps \ .05
et al. volunteers participant meditation skills, academic
(2008) performance
MBSR Mindfulness-based stress reduction, MBCT Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, f/up Follow up, MAPs Mindful awareness practices, ADHD Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,
BMI Body mass index, TAU Treatment as usual, GAF Global assessment of functioning, wkly Weekly, wks Weeks, adol Adolescents, attn meas Attention measures, cog th Cognitive therapy,
light th Light therapy, non signif Non significant, psych symp Psychological symptoms
J Child Fam Stud
J Child Fam Stud
Parent and teacher reports of executive functioning intervention that followed their parents’ 12-week mind-
(EF), social skills and temperament posttreatment indicated fulness intervention. Parents’ event recording of children’s
significant improvements in some domains of EF compliance indicated increased child compliance during
(ps \ .05; effect size: Cohen’s f2 = .37–.40) on teacher parent mindfulness training, which further increased during
ratings, but not parent ratings, and no significant differ- child mindfulness training, with some maintenance at
ences on other outcome measures. Effect size was not follow-up. Percentage increases in compliance ranged from
reported for measures that showed no significant differ- 262.7% during interventions, to 10.2% in the 24-week
ence. The small sample size and reliance on measures by follow-up period. Although the small size, design and
non-blind raters with potential bias limit the findings methodology preclude generalization of results, the inter-
beyond the intervention, however the study provides a vention’s use of mindfulness training for parents followed
preliminary indication that young children can participate by mindfulness training for children appears feasible, and
in mindfulness meditation practices in a group setting. offers a systemic approach, addressing parent-child inter-
actions through the medium of mindfulness training.
123
J Child Fam Stud
measures of attention. The study used self-report measures improvements in aspects of sleep quality for completers
of mindfulness for children and parents, though the results, (e.g., sleep efficiency: p \ 0.001; total sleep time:
type of measure, or details on its validity in the age group, p \ 0.05). Substance use increased during the intervention
are not reported in the publication. for all participants, though reported trends in 12-month
The final analysis is likely to provide more detailed follow up evaluations suggested decreasing substance use
methodology and results for review. Data on duration and in completers, and continued increased substance use in
frequency of home practice was collected, offering potential non-completers.
investigation of the moderating effect of these variables. Limitations of this study include the small sample,
Limitations include small sample size, randomization not absence of randomization and control group, and reliance
reported, potential for parent reports to be influenced by on self-reported data. The contributing effect of the MBSR
expectations of positive outcome, (as they were self- component cannot be isolated from the multiple compo-
referred co-participants), and the use of few objective nents in this study, nor were the features of the MBSR
measures and no third party (e.g., teachers) blind reports of clearly outlined, making comparisons of this study’s results
outcome measures. with other MBSR/MBCT interventions untenable.
Lee et al. (2008) report an open trial of a 12-week Zylowska et al. (2007) report a feasibility study of an 8-
MBCT-C program, using an intent-to treat two phase trial week MAPs intervention with a mixed group (N = 32) of
with no control group, with 25 non-clinical children (9– adolescents (N = 8; mean age 15.6 years) and adults
12 years), taught by experienced mindfulness instructors. (N = 24; mean age 48.5 years) with ADHD, or ‘‘probable
Significant reductions were reported in parent-rated exter- ADHD’’ (p. 5). Instructors were trained and experienced in
nalizing behaviors for completers (p = .04) but not on MAPs interventions. The within-participant pre-post no
internalizing behaviors (p = .16), or self-report measures. control group intervention included weekly 2.5 h-sessions,
Small to medium effect sizes were reported for the homework practice (5–15 min sitting meditation) and
completers, ranging from d = .19–.40. As the non-clinical specific psycho-education about attention deficit disorders.
sample did not meet diagnostic criteria at baseline, authors Pooled results for adults and adolescents indicated signif-
note that it was difficult to detect changes post intervention. icant improvements in self-reported ADHD symptoms
The study is limited by no randomization or control overall (p \ .01), and some significant changes in neuro-
group, small sample, and the reliance on parent or self- cognitive measures (p \ .01). Separate analysis of some
ratings, rather than objective or blind third party reports. adolescent and adult data was reported, e.g., time spent in
The results do not provide much quantitative evidence of home practice, where adults spent almost twice as much
treatment efficacy, and the selection of clinical measures time as adolescents (adults averaged 90.3 min per week;
for non-clinical participants is questionable. Qualitative adolescents averaged 42.6 min per week; p = .03), how-
reports indicated positive evaluations by children and ever this data was not analyzed for potential moderating
parents, and the intervention was considered feasible and effect of the variable (time spent in home practice) on
acceptable for children in this age range. outcome measures.
Zylowska et al.’s study is limited by the small sample
size, no control group or randomization, and use of self-
Mindfulness-Based Approaches with High School Age reported outcome measures, though strengthened some-
Adolescents what by the inclusion of objective neurocognitive measures
(though authors warn of potential practice effects in neu-
Clinical Samples rocognitive tests), however results cannot be used to
attribute causality, or be generalized outside the interven-
Bootzin and Stevens (2005) report the use of MBSR in a tion context. The study’s design, which combined adults
multi-component 6-week intervention with 55 adolescents (mean age 48.5) and adolescents (mean age 15.6), may
(13–19 years) who had received treatment for substance have effects on the intervention e.g., suitability of content,
abuse, and presented with sleep problems. The MBSR instructions, group cohesion, etc., that were not controlled
component (five of six sessions) included instructions for for in the analysis. Additionally, authors noted that
home meditation practice, and one of two facilitators had potential effects of group support and psycho-education
MBSR training. Other components included cognitive were not controlled for, not allowing examination of the
therapy, sleep hygiene education, bright light exposure, and mindfulness effects, per se, and suggest this is a limitation.
stimulus control instructions. The study used a within- Singh et al (2007) report a study of three adolescents
participant pre-post design, with no control group. Authors with conduct disorders (13–14 years), at risk of school
reported significant reductions in self-reported sleepiness, exclusion, who participated in a mindfulness meditation
worry and mental health distress (p \ 0.05) and significant intervention administered individually in 12 sessions over
123
J Child Fam Stud
4 weeks, followed by a 25-week practice phase with behaviors, goals, subjective happiness and mindful aware-
monthly instructor-led sessions. The dependent variable was ness, effect sizes at posttreatment ranging from d = 0.4 to
the self-reported number of aggressive and non-compliant 1.4, and at follow-up, d = 0.5–1.5. Parent reports of child
acts, which showed minimal decrease in the training variables were also analyzed, and ranged from d = -0.1
period, though more substantial decrease (up to 52%) in the (social behavior; posttreatment) to d = 1.6 (child’s goals;
follow up period, and all three students completed middle follow-up).
school without further threats of expulsion. Bogels et al.’s study provides some promising results,
The study drew on mindfulness techniques, individually intervening with a clinical group acknowledged by the
administered, and is not comparable to group MBSR/ authors as ‘‘hard work’’ (p. 205), with some high effect
MBCT interventions; and the nonrandom small sample, no sizes maintained at 8-week follow-up. However, the small
control group, self-reported data, limit the capacity for sample size, nonrandomized wait-list, and the use of
finding causality or generalization the results. The study’s behavioral reports taken from informants who participated
use of school-based data and incident recording suggests a in the intervention (rather than blind third party measures)
method for data collection that may reflect functional limit the capacity for generalization beyond the study. The
changes in behavior that are objective and meaningful, concurrent parent and child MBCT programs appears fea-
particularly in a school context. sible and promising, although the analysis did not explore
Singh et al. (2008) report a single case study of a mul- the possible interaction effects of concurrent participation.
tiple phase, changing criterion design intervention, which Biegel et al. (2009) report a RCT of an MBSR inter-
included mindfulness meditation, exercise and a food vention with 102 adolescents (14–18 years), who were
awareness program, with a male (17 years) with Prader– under current or recent psychiatric outpatient care. The
Willi Syndrome, who presented with morbid obesity. The randomized wait-list control group received treatment as
intervention was conducted within the home, with the usual (TAU), the intervention group participated in TAU
adolescent’s mother providing mindfulness training, under and an 8-week modified MBSR program, which adhered
the guidance of the study’s senior author. The adolescent’s closely to the standard MBSR curriculum and structure,
body weight data was recorded at intervals across the and was facilitated by trained, experienced mindfulness
intervention and 3-year follow-up periods. The adolescent’s teachers. Modifications included reduced home practice
body weight decreased by 13.5 lbs (256.3–242.8 lbs), from time, and content focused on issues relevant to the age and
baseline to pre-mindfulness meditation phase, and by characteristics of the group. Self-reported measures of
42.8 lbs (242.8–200 lbs) during the 24-week mindfulness perceived stress, anxiety, and several psychopathological
intervention. During the 3-year follow up period, weight symptoms all differed significantly post-test (ps \ .05;
was maintained at range of 197–190.7 lbs. effect sizes ranging from d = .15–.79), with similar results
The mindfulness meditation intervention included ele- at 3-month follow-up (effect size range of d = .28–.92).
ments of MBSR, individually administered and combined Clinical measures of mental health, made by clinicians
with food awareness and exercise, so effects of mindful- blind to treatment conditions, showed significant
ness per se cannot be extracted from these results, nor can improvement in treatment group (p \ .0001), and at
the results be generalized outside the single case context. follow-up (p \ .0001) for completers.
However, anecdotal reports suggested that the mindfulness Biegel et al. also report exploratory analysis of potential
techniques were generalized and maintained to other mal- moderating effects on outcome measures of time spent in
adaptive behaviors, once they had been taught in relation mindfulness practice, finding that more time spent in sitting
to eating behaviors, and the study offers some potential meditation practice predicted improved clinician rated
support for a parent—delivered mindfulness meditation functioning, and declines in self reported depressive and
intervention. anxiety symptoms, baseline to 3 month follow-up
Bogels et al. (2008) report a pilot study using modified (ps \ .05). Overall, this study presents reasonably sound
MBCT, with a quasi-experimental within-participant wait- methodology and analysis, with the inclusion of blind cli-
list control nonrandomized design, in a community mental nician ratings adding objectivity, and 3-month follow-up
heath setting, with fourteen adolescents (age 11–18 years) allowing initial examination of maintenance of changes. The
with externalizing disorders (ADHD, oppositional and study could be strengthened with a larger sample, longer
conduct disorders, and autistic spectrum disorders) and their follow-up assessments, and inclusion of more specific
parents in concurrent MBCT groups. Instructors were analysis of the effects of the mindfulness component, outside
experienced and trained in MBCT. Results indicated sig- of group and psycho-education effects. The findings are
nificant improvements post intervention on objective promising, in paving the way to further the empirical evi-
attention measures (p \ .05; d = .6), and at 8 week follow- dence base for mindfulness-based intervention as an effec-
up (p \ .001; d = 1.1), and self reported measures of tive adjunct to TAU in clinical populations of adolescents.
123
J Child Fam Stud
123
J Child Fam Stud
123
J Child Fam Stud
World Congress of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, Barce- Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002).
lona, Spain, July, 2007. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: A new
Garrison Institute Report. (2005). Contemplation and education: A approach to relapse prevention. New York: The Guildford Press.
survey of programs using contemplative techniques in K-12 Semple, R. J., & Lee, J. (2008). Treating anxiety with mindfulness:
educational settings: A mapping report. New York: The Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for children. In S. C. Hayes
Garrison Institute. & L. A. Greco (Eds.), Acceptance and mindfulness interventions
Greco, L. A., & Hayes, S. C. (2008). Acceptance and mindfulness for children, adolescents and families (pp. 63–87). Oakland, CA:
interventions for children adolescents and families. Oakland, Context Press/New Harbinger.
CA: Context Press/New Harbinger. Semple, R. J., Reid, E. F. G., & Miller, L. (2005). Treating anxiety
Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004). with mindfulness: An open trial of mindfulness training for
Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: A meta- anxious children. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 19, 379–
analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 35–43. 392.
Hayes, S. C. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006).
frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62,
therapies. Behavior Therapy, 35, 639–665. 373–390.
Hayes, S. C., Masuda, A., & de Mey, H. (2003). Acceptance and Shigaki, C. L., Glass, B., & Schopp, L. H. (2006). Mindfulness-based
commitment therapy and the third wave of behavior therapy. stress reduction in medical settings. Journal of Clinical
Gedragstherapie, 36, 69–96. Psychology in Medical Settings, 13, 209–216.
Hayes, S. C., & Shenk, C. (2004). Operationalizing mindfulness Singh, N. N., Lancioni, G. E., Singh Joy, S. D., Winton, A. S. W.,
without attachments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, Sabaawi, M., Wahler, R. G., et al. (2007). Adolescents with
11, 249–254. conduct disorder can be mindful of their aggressive behavior.
Ivanovski, B., & Malhi, G. S. (2007). The psychological and Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 56–63.
neurophysiological concomitants of mindfulness forms of med- Singh, N. N., Lancioni, G. E., Singh, A. N., Winton, A. S. W., Singh,
itation. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 19, 76–91. J., McAleavey, K. M., et al. (2008). A mindfulness-based health
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of wellness program for an adolescent with Prader-Willi syndrome.
your body and mind to face stress, pain and illness. New York: Behavior Modification, 32, 167–181.
Delacorte. Singh, N. N., Singh, A. N., Lancioni, G. E., Singh, J., Winton, A. S.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: W. & Adkins, A. D. (2009). Mindfulness training for parents and
Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and their children with ADHD increases children’s compliance.
Practice, 10, 144–156. Journal of Child and Family Studies (published online 26/03/
Kenny, M. A., & Williams, J. M. G. (2007). Treatment resistant 09). doi: 10.1007/s10826-009-9272-z.
depressed patients show a good response to mindfulness-based Suttie, J. (2007). Mindful kids, peaceful schools. Greater Good,
cognitive therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 617–625. Summer,4(1) 28–31. Available from http://greatergood.berkeley.
Lee, L., Semple, R. J., Rosa, D., & Miller, L. (2008). Mindfulness- edu/greatergood/archive/2007summer/suttie.pdf.
based cognitive therapy for children: Results of a pilot study. Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., Ridgeway, V. A.,
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 22, 15–28. Soulsby, J. M., & Lau, M. A. (2000). Prevention of relapse/
Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline recurrence in major depressions by mindfulness-based cognitive
personality disorder. New York: Guildford Press. therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68,
Mahr K. (2007). ADHD kids can get better. Time, 12/11/07. 615–623.
Downloaded from http://www.time.com/time/health/article/ Thompson, M., & Gauntlett-Gilbert, J. (2008). Mindfulness with
0,8599,1683069,00.html on July 7, 2008. children and adolescents: Effective clinical application. Clinical
Murrell, A. R., & Scherbarth, A. J. (2006). State of research and Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 13, 395–407.
literature: ACT with children, adolescents and parents. The Wall, R. B. (2005). Tai Chi and mindfulness-based stress reduction in
International Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Consultation, a Boston Middle School. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 19,
2, 531–543. 23–237.
Napoli, M., Krech, P. R., & Holley, L. C. (2005). Mindfulness Williams, J. M. G., Alatiq, J. M. J., Crane, C., Barnhofer, T., Fennell,
training for elementary school students: The attention academy. M. J. V., Duggan, D. S., et al. (2008). Mindfulness-based
Journal of Applied School Psychology, 21, 99–125. cognitive therapy (MBCT) in bipolar disorder: Preliminary
Ott, M. J. (2002). Mindfulness meditation in pediatric clinical evaluation of immediate effects on between-episode functioning.
practice. Pediatric Nursing, 28, 487–535. Journal of Affective Disorders, 107, 275–279.
Ree, M. J., & Craigie, M. A. (2007). Outcomes following mindful- Williams, J. M. G., Duggan, D. S., Crane, C., & Fennell, M. J. V.
ness-based cognitive therapy in a heterogeneous sample of adult (2006). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for prevention of
outpatients. Behaviour Change, 24, 70–86. recurrence of suicidal behaviour. Journal of Clinical Psychology,
Saltzman, A., & Goldin, P. (2008). Mindfulness based stress 62, 201–210.
reduction for school-age children. In S. C. Hayes & L. A. Greco Zylowska, L., Ackerman, D. L., Yang, M. H., Futrell, J. L., Horton,
(Eds.), Acceptance and mindfulness interventions for children N. L., Hale, S. T., et al. (2007). Mindfulness meditation training
adolescents and families (pp. 139–161). Oakland, CA: Context with adults and adolescents with ADHD. Journal of Attention
Press/New Harbinger. Disorders, 11, 737–746.
123