Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ashkan Fayyaz FilmAnalysis
Ashkan Fayyaz FilmAnalysis
ERP: 25077
Analysis: The scene begins with the male lead, Scottie taking up a voyeuristic role as he is
sneaking a look from the gate of the flower shop and stares at the woman from a distance. As his
eyes follow her around the shop, he is struck by her beauty and is fixated towards her. The
woman in question is oblivious to the male lead’s presence, as he watches her from a hidden
position which reinforces the concept of peeping tom. The woman is shown through the point of
view of the male lead. Her actions, movements and role are dictated by the presence of the male
lead and is subjected to his gaze. It creates a dichotomy of power, with the man being the active
observer and the woman being a passive observer. This relation enforces patriarchal conventions,
where men are supposed to be dominating and women are supposed to be submissive. The
lighting, camera techniques and colours create a sense of etherealism and depict the male lead’s
infatuation towards the woman. The camera zooms into her blonde hair and green dress and sets
her distinct from the background. The camera further eroticises her as she moves around the
store and emphasises on her role as an object to the male lead’s desire.
Scene#2: 8 ½
Analysis: The scene starts with the man, Guido, standing in a queue. He has embossed a suit
with glasses on. The man has a grim look complimented by bright light and dark shadows
cloaked on him creating a sense of mystery around him. The man glances at a glamorous woman
with angelic attributes standing at a distance from him. Differential lighting comes into play over
here, as Guido is clouded by darkened shadows while the woman effuses glow from within her
exalting a heavenly aura illustrating the dominance of the man and the sexual desirability of the
woman. Guido lowers his glasses and looks at her in a seductive way further objectifying her. As
his fantasy breaks and the woman vanishes from the scene. A working-class woman is shown
who is sweating and is visibly tired. Due to the sweat, the light reflects off her skin and makes
her ‘shine’ creating a distinction with the ideal woman who glowed from within. As sweat is
associated with manual labour, the shine implies her class and delineates that her being engaged
in manual labour sets her apart from the ideal woman. The difference in lighting imposes that the
working woman lacks the internal qualities that make the ideal woman virtuous.
Analysis: The scene begins with a drone shot that shows the mansion’s alienation from the rest
of the city. As the camera spans over the opulent mansion, it illuminates extravagance and
grandeur. The panoramic interior is made up of exquisite furnishings, high ceilings, ornate
chandeliers, and intricate details that signify otherworldliness and is a sign of wealth. It gives a
window for the audience to escape from the harsh realities of the slums, dismay and poverty
existent in the outside city. As Rahul enters the mansion, it demonstrates the traditional values of
an Indian Family as her mother and the entire family is desperately waiting for the return of the
eldest son so that he can continue the family legacy. Rahul is wearing a w estern outfit
encompassing the difference between modernity and tradition The scene cuts to a shot of women
dancing, everyone in the house is sporting a traditional dress and there are religious idols placed
in the interior of the mansion exhibiting the surface culture. His mother senses his presence
before she even sees him and is affectionate towards him emphasizing the aspect of maternal
Analysis: The scene starts with Taj Dawlat returning Behzad’s camera to him. As she serves him
tea, he remarks that “he has never seen a woman serve tea” for which Taj Daulat reprimands him
and reminds him that has he not seen her mother serving tea to anyone. Taj Daulat scolds a man
for parking his car beside the cafe. It counters the notion that women are powerless in the
countryside and challenges the assumption that patriarchy prevails in the rural space. Taj Daulat
engages in a conversation with his husband over sexism and labour. Behzad takes up this
opportunity to take pictures but Taj Daulat doesn’t allow him to do so as she is fully aware of
how a camera works and stops him from exoticizing the rural culture. This emphasizes the
coevalness of cultures and instantiates that both the urban culture and rural culture are
contemporaries. As Behzad is witnessing these instances of everyday rural life an undoing of his
own ethnography and assumption also happens. In all of these sequences, several times
characters are out of frame as they speak which is defiant of the voyeuristic nature and behaviour