Professional Documents
Culture Documents
P. MEHTA SCHOOL OF
LAW INTRA MOOT
COURT COMPETITION
MOOT PROPOSITION,
2023
11. Raj Singh has now filed a petition against the notification (No.
13(4)/2023) issued[1] by MeITy under rule 3 of IT (Intermediary
Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 for violating
his fundamental rights under Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of
Indica thus also challenging the validity of the said rule. He filed
2023-2024
another petition in the Supreme Court to set aside the Magistrate’s order of
convictiction, while challenging the constitutional validity of section 295A of
the Indican Penal Code. In a preliminary hearing, the Supreme Court, to do
complete justice, has clubbed these petitions
12. Following are the contentions of the petitioner, Raj Singh before the
Supreme Court of Indica:
a) The petitions filed by Raj Singh are maintainable as it is well within his
rights to approach the Supreme Court to get justice when there is a violation
of his fundamental rights, and also has a right to appeal when there is an
order of conviction passed against him by a subordinate court.
b) The notification (No. 13(4)/2023) issued by MeITy to take down Raj’s Post,
violates his fundamental rights under Articles 19 & 21 of the Constitution of
Indica, and Rule 3 of the IT rules, 2021 under which the notification was issued
is constitutionally invalid.
c) The lower court was not justified in convicting the petitioner for the
offences under sections 153A, 295A and 298 of the Indican Penal Code.
d) Section 295A of the Indican Penal Code is constitutionally invalid.
The Constitution of Indica and other laws of Indica are pari materia to the laws
of India. If the Parties wants, they can make sub-issues or add issues whichis
within the Jurisdiction of the current dispute.