FIRST MASTERY EXAMINATION IN RES 2 (PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2)

RESEARCH TEAM/ DISTRICT ____ Strand and Section:

Research Members: Date of Examination: 09/20/23

(make sure to follow the required way of listing the names)

Instructions:
1. As the 1ST Mastery Exam, each research team/district is required to write two (2) approved or potential research titles.
Then, the S.O.P, sub-problems, and Null Hypothesis must be formulated.
2. This activity should be type written and printed.
3. Kindly follow the required main content technicalities/ format (Times New Roman, font size 12, justified texts, and
double spacing).

(indicate the Research Title here)

Statement of the Problem

Furthermore, this study aims to answer the following sub-problems:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Statement of the Null Hypothesis

H0:
 (indicate the Research Title here)

Statement of the Problem

Furthermore, this study aims to answer the following sub-problems:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Statement of the Null Hypothesis

H0:
 PROBLEM FORMULATION
Excellent (20-16) Good: (15-11 points) Average: (10-6 points) Below Average (less than 6 points):
Excellent to superior work in Good to fair work in most Passing work, but in serious Confusing, lacks explanation or completion;
all areas as indicated in the aspects; minor deficiency in need of improvement in little conforming to instructors’ written
instructors’ written relation to instructors’ written many areas, especially expectations regarding content, writing style or
expectations; exemplary expectations regarding content, regarding form and content; procedures; overall, below professional quality
performance, participation, writing style or procedures; minimal grasp of facts, standards; not quality work
creativity and writing; fully adequate grasp of facts, analysis, analysis and application; very
addresses the criterion; and practical application; clear few clear statements or
excellent grasp of facts, statements and explanations are explanations
analysis and application; limited, but above average quality
consistently clear statements
and explanations
Criteria Points Comments
Problem Statement (Area 1) 20
It clearly states the purpose of the study without inclination to different
interpretation of meaning /The general problem/question/purpose is clearly
defined.
It also reflects the main components of the problem statement explicitly such that it
determines the test between variables.
Specific Sub-problems (Area 3) 20
Alignment to the general problem is manifested. Each sub-problems contributes to
the elucidation of the problem. Sub-problems represent the different facets of the
problem and exploratory in nature. Sub-problems are in question form and can be
empirically validated and arranged logically. The main purpose/inquiry must be
reflected as well in the sub-problems. Minimum of 3 sub-problems.
Null Hypotheses 20
The statement clearly identifies the assumption of the research. It shows the
direction the researchers need to prove.
Grammar (Area 4) 10
Adheres to the conventions of grammar such as punctuations, diction, S-V
agreement, clarity, etc.
FINAL COMMENTS
TOTAL POINTS /70

PEER EVALUATION
SCORING: 5 = Superior 4 =Above Average 3 =Average 2 = Below Average

Attributes (LAST (LAST (LAST (LAST (LAST (LAST

NAME) NAME) NAME) NAME) NAME) NAME)
The research member took part in group discussions.

The research member helped keep the group on

assignment and responsibility.
The research member contributed valuable ideas/
insights.
The research member shares quality work.

The research member has seen constant initiative.

TOTAL POINTS ____/5 ____/5 ____/5 ____/5 ____/5 ____/5

Signature of the research member (Conforme)

(Take note: The names should be listed in the same way as arranged in the header. Moreover, the average points must be out of
collaboration among members.