Professional Documents
Culture Documents
General Material conditions and historical context (particularly important because the short-lived
nature of the Burkina revolution period means a lot of our discussion must center on why it failed, how it
can be prevented in the future, whether a small amount of time was enough for women to gain a
foothold, and whether the qualitative differences in the treatment of women in first vs third world is
enough to change the tools for empowerment when the ultimate relationship of women to men remains
the same across class, race, location, and other factors.)
https://www.africaportal.org/documents/5654/BurkinaFaso.pdf
- Obvious but worth mentioning: the lack of a steady vision/leadership makes it harder for burkina
to build up its productive forces
- Only real wealth transfer happened under the CNR (Sankara’s regime), but even so it was limited
and hampered by a drought in 1984
- Cereal traders and other food merchants under the CNR had stringent price controls on how
much they could sell their stock for, and according to this paper it caused the merchants to travel
around less and may have decreased access to those in more remote locations
- Labour unions were not a power in and of themselves, rather the bargaining was meant to
happen through the CNR
Gutierrez, V. (2018). Understanding Geopolitics from a Historical Perspective: The Burkina Faso
Revolution, 1983-1987. The Toro Historical Review, 5(1). Retrieved from
https://journals.calstate.edu/tthr/article/view/2704
- Upper Volta and then Burkina Faso lacked the cash crops of its’ western and southern neighbors
and is often compared economically to the Ivory Coast and found lacking
- Ivorian government viewed the burkina revolution as a threat to its own order
- Other potential reads: Ernest Harsch, Pierre Englebert, Bruno Jaffre, Guy
Martin, and J. Tyler Dickovich
- French as culprits in Sankara’s murder, but did they instigate or was it other west African
nations? Some argue that his policies were too divisive but the lack of violence during the
revolution and continuing popular support for the CNR years after it’s dismantlement would
suggest otherwise to me. Compaore potentially obscured many government records that would
be useful in discerning this information.
- Sankara did not ally with either side in the Cold war in an attempt to avoid some of the threats
of the CIA, instead opting to attempts an Asian-African-South American alliance to fight against
“political traffickers and economic exploiters” (Gutierrez 2018:9)
- “the production of cereal, cotton and sesame production gradually increased from 1983-1987;
cereal production increased from 1,100 to 1,638 metric tons, sesame producer price
increased from 7 to 95 CFA/kg, and sesame produce price increased from 96
to 175 CFA/kg.” (Gutierrez 2018:11) -> remember this is with a drought in ‘84
- Sankara was careful about his rhetoric about imperialist nations, and focused on the removal of
the system as a whole instead of specific imperialist countries, even trying to show some
solidarity with the impoverished people of Harlem in the US
o This didn’t work super well, Burkina was seen as the enemy of the west-aligned nations.
- Much of Sankara’s popular support came from his alignment wit the rural peasants, a large
faction of the country that former leaders had distanced themselves from
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- the history of relations between the sexes may be outside of the scope of this educational but if
we want to include it, I have more sources and can do a little explainer
- On the use of women’s bodies for production despite their apparent lack of value
o “Socially they are relegated to third place, after the man and the child-just like the
Third World, arbitrarily held back, the better to be dominated and exploited.
Subjugated, the woman goes from a protective guardian who exploits her to one
who dominates her and exploits her even more.” Page 24
- On the failure of bourgeois feminism after the creation of a toothless women’s ministry:
o “So we should not be surprised that, despite the existence of this ministry, prostitution
grew, women's access to education and jobs did not improve, their civil and political
rights were ignored, and the general conditions of their lives in town and countryside
alike improved not one iota” page 26