Professional Documents
Culture Documents
__ooo0ooo__
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
________________________________________________
1Page
2020 Edition ©
===============================================================
With the fall of Rome about 300 AD. And the over-running of
Europe by the Germanic hordes from the east, the Anglo-Saxon tribes
of Europe migrated, first to Normandy and then to the island of Britain.
These tribes’ conic as refuges from oppression and their government
reflected this fact, they settled in small tribal areas which were called
tuns, or as we know them today, towns. The Anglo-Saxon system of
maintaining public order since the Norman conquest was a private
system of tithing, led by a constable to enforce the law.
➢ FRANKPLEDGE System. Policing was carried out under a
system called mutual pledge, whereby every male over 12
years old join nine (9) of his neighbors to form a
TYTHINGMEN –a group of men whose duty was to
apprehend any person who offends another and deliver that
offender for trial. Anyone who failed to join and perform this
obligatory duty was severely fined. Thus, policing
responsibility lies on the hands of the citizens.
➢ TUN Policing – a system of policing whereby all male
residents were required to guard the town (tun) to preserve
peace and protect the lives and properties of the people.
➢ Hue and Cry - a village law started in Britain which provides
for methods of apprehending a criminal by an act of the
complainant to shout to call all male residents to assemble
and arrest the suspect. This becomes the basis of what we
call today a citizen's arrest.
➢ Royal Judge System - the royal judge conducted
investigation of crimes and gives punishment fitted to the
crime committed. It also started the practice of identification
of criminals.
➢ Trial by Ordeal - an ancient method of determining the guilt
or innocence of a suspect by subject the suspect to a test or a
trial. Using this procedure, it should be said that the citizen
police were able to secure 100% convictions.
2Page
2020 Edition ©
===============================================================
This period saw a revolution in law enforcement ideas and
methods. When Norman William (William the conqueror), King of
France invaded and conquered England, a military regime of conqueror
and dictator began. He changed the concept of crime being committed
against the state.
➢ SHIRE-REEVE System. When King William Norman became the
ruler of England, he divided his kingdom into 55 military districts
known as the Shire-Reeve. SHIRE means a district while REEVE
means the ruler who made laws, pass judgment and impose
punishment. He was assisted by a group of constables, the
forerunner of the constabulary. The term Shire-Reeve
eventually became Sheriff, the title of the chief of constables or
police officers in a certain town.
➢ TRAVELLING JUDGE was held responsible in deciding cases
that were taken from Reeve due to some abuses. He travels
from one district to another to try and decide cases.
➢ LEGIS HENRIE. This law was enacted during the time of King
Henry I, which imposed the following features:
• Law violations were classified as offenses against the King
and against ordinary people
• Policemen became public officers
• The police and the citizens were given the broad power to
arrest.
• Grand Jury was created to inquire on the facts of the law.
➢ KEEPERS OF THE PEACE – in 1195, King Richard of England
appointed Knights to keep the King’s peace by standing as
guards on bridges and gates while checking the people entering
and leaving the cities and towns.
➢ MAGNA CARTA (Great Charter) was sealed by King John of
England on June 15, 1215. This became a law upon the demand
of the Knights of the Round Table. The knights forced King John
to sign the document which declared the following:
• No freemen shall be taken or imprisoned, disposed,
outlawed, or bowed except by legal judgment of his peers.
• No person should be tried for murder unless there is proof
of the body of the victim.
• There should be national and local government as well as
the national and local legislation.
3Page
2020 Edition ©
===============================================================
In 1688 the “Bill of Rights” was passed and became law. This
outlawed the “Third Degree” which had been permitted, legally since
4Page
2020 Edition ©
===============================================================
1497. The “Bill of Rights” prohibited excessive bail, excessive fines and
provide that “No cruel or unusual punishment may be inflicted”. The
“Bill of Rights” also provides the “Doctrine of Protection against
SelfIncrimination”.
5Page
2020 Edition ©
===============================================================
6Page
2020 Edition ©
===============================================================
Ancient Root
The forerunner of the contemporary police system was the
practice of barangay chieftain to select able-bodied young men to
protect their barangay during the night. Among the duties of those
selected were to protect the properties of the people in the barangay
and protect their crops and livestock from wild animal.
7Page
2020 Edition ©
===============================================================
Guardrilleros/Cuardillo
This was a body of rural police organized in each town and
established by the Royal Decree of 18 January 1836; this decree
provided that 5% of the able-bodied male inhabitants of each province
were to be enlisted in the police organization for three years.
Guardia Civil
This was created by Royal Decree issued by the Crown on 12
February 1852 to partially relieve the Spanish Peninsular troops of
their work in policing towns; it consisted of a body of Filipino
policemen organized originally in each of the provincial capitals of the
Central provinces of Luzon under the Alcalde Mayor.
Act no. 175 – entitled “An Act Providing for the Organization and
Government of an Insular Constabulary”, enacted on July 18, 1901.
Capt. Henry Allen – the first chief of the Philippine Constabulary in
1901.
Capt. George Curry – the first chief of police of the Manila Police
Department in 1901
Act no. 255 – the act that renamed the Insular Constabulary into
Philippine Constabulary, enacted on October 3, 1901
Executive Order 389 - Ordered that the Philippine Constabulary be
one of the four services of the Armed Forces of the Philippines,
enacted on December 23, 1940, Post-American period.
RA 4864 - Otherwise known as the Police Professionalization Act of
1966, enacted on September 8, 1966; created the Police Commission
(POLCOM) as a supervisory agency to oversee the training and
professionalization of the local police forces under the office of the
President; later POLCOM was renamed into National Police Commission
(NAPOLCOM)
8Page
2020 Edition ©
===============================================================
Republic Act No. 6975 - the Department of the Interior and Local
Government Act of 1990, enacted on December 13, 1990; reorganized
the DILG and established the Philippine National Police, Bureau of Fire
Protection, Bureau of Jail Management and Penology and the Philippine
Public Safety College
Republic Act No. 8551 –the Philippine National Police Reform and
Reorganization Act of 1998, enacted on February 25, 1998; this law
amended certain provisions of RA 6975.
Republic Act No. 9708 – law amending the provisions of RA 6975
and RA 8551 on the minimum education qualification for appointment
to the PNP and adjusting promotion system
Republic Act No. 11200 – New rank classification of PNP personnel.
Republic Act No. 11279 – an act transferring the Philippine National
Police Academy (PNPA) and the National Police Training Institute
(NPTI) from the Philippine Public Safety College (PPSC) to the
Philippine National Police (PNP)
9Page
2020 Edition ©
===============================================================
1Page
0
2020 Edition ©
===============================================================
__ooo0ooo__
CHAPTER 2
Law Enforcement Planning
________________________________________________
Definition of Terms
2020 Edition ©
===============================================================
Strategic Planning
12
1Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
In the process, the police administrator can use the potent tool of
alternatives. Alternatives (options) are means by which goals and
objectives can be attained. They maybe policies, strategies or specific
actions aimed at eliminating a problem. Alternative do not have to be
substitutes for one another or should perform the same function. For
example, our goal is to “improve officer-survival skills.” The plan is to
train the officers on militaristic and combat shooting. The alternatives
could be:
Alternative 1 – modify police vehicles
Alternative 2 – issuing bulletproof vests
Alternative 3 – utilizing computer assisted dispatch system
Alternative 4 – increasing first-line supervision, etc
Page
2020 Edition ©
===============================================================
Expectations in Planning
a. Improve analysis of problems
b. Provide better information for decision-making
c. Help to clarify goals, objectives, priorities
d. Result is more effective allocation of resources
e. Improve inter-and intradepartmental cooperation
and coordination
f. Improve the performance of programs
g. Give the police department a clear sense of direction
h. Provide the opportunity for greater public support
i. Increase the commitment of personnel
14
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
d. Possibility of Attainment
e. Must provide Standard of Operation
f. Economy in terms of Resources needed for implementation
Responsibilities in Planning
Approaches in Planning
A variety of approaches are employed in the planning processes.
Each is unique and can be understood as a method of operationalizing
the word planning. There are basically five major approaches to
planning which are:
15
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
a. Synoptic Approaches
It is also called the rational comprehensive approach which is the
dominant tradition in planning. It is also the point of departure
for most other planning approaches.
16
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
17
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
b. Incremental Planning
18
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
c. Transactive Approach
d. Advocacy Approach
e. Radical Approach
a. Primary Doctrines
1. Fundamental Doctrines – These are the basic principles
in planning, organization and management of the law
enforcement agency in support of the overall pursuits of
the its Vision, Mission and strategic action plan of the
attainment of the national objectives.
2. Operational Doctrines – These are the principles and
rules governing the planning, organization and direction
and employment of the law enforcement agency in the
accomplishment of basic operational mission in the
maintenance of peace and order, crime prevention and
suppression, internal security and public safety operation.
19
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
b. Secondary Doctrines
1. Complimentary Doctrines – Formulated jointly by two or
more bureaus in order to affect a certain operation with
regard to public safety and peace and order. These
essentially involve the participation of the other bureaus
and other law enforcement agencies.
2. Ethical Doctrines – These define the fundamental
principles governing the rules of conduct, attitude,
behavior and ethical norm of the law enforcement agency.
20
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
According to Time
a. Strategic or Long-Range Plan - It relates to plan which are
strategic or long range in application and it determine the
organization’s original goals and strategy. Ex. PATROL Plan 2030
21
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
22
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
23
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
2020 Edition ©
===============================================================
25
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
26
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
27
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
28
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
29
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
30
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
31
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
A. Internal Factors
a. The specificity of organization’s mission, goals and
objectives.
b. The delegation of sufficient authority to enable managers
to carry out their assigned duties.
c. The degree of autonomy given to management personnel
at different levels in the organization.
d. The leeway granted to the managers by departmental
policies, procedures, rules, and regulation.
e. The availability of valid, reliable, and objective information
on which to base decision.
f. The time and energy used to select, retain qualified
managers.
g. The nature, extent and effect of intra-organizational
conflict.
32
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
Internal and external environmental factors are never under the direct
control of the decision-maker. Effective decision-maker learns and
accepts to cope with this uncertainly, complexity, and risk.
C. Situational Variables
No two decisions are exactly the same. There are simply too
many variables. Every police problem that elicits a decision is unique in
terms of its nature and extent, difficulty, urgency, seriousness,
complexity and solution.
D. Personal Variables
33
Page
20 20 Edition ©
===============================================================
34
Page
20 20 Edition ©