Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sample Article Case
Sample Article Case
Introduction
The company Zipcar was founded by Chase and Danielson in 2000 and serves
more than fourteen states in America including London. The idea of Zipcar is a car share
style with corresponding membership fees and other costs annually including the rates of
the car per hourly basis. After a person has completed the application form, a card will be
given which will serve not only as a proof of membership but a device used to unlock the
card with Zip car compatibility fleet. The keys to the car is found tethered on the car itself
discouraging thieves from stealing. In addition, a variety of models are available ranging
company and that of a car sharing style. Car sharing are strategically situated all over the
city and in major locations for easy accessibility giving efficient ease to people who
wanted to avail of the services. The traditional renting of cars on the other hand are most
most of the time situated at airports and are on a daily minimum rates which makes the
target clients end up paying more rather than the hours spent for the cars. The second
distinguishing factor is that the vehicles can be reserved in just an hour before it will be
used.
According to Venkateswaran (2012), the companies must be able to determine the
market and where to produce them. He proposed that the answer lies on the transportation
costs and regulation of the government in order for the local product to be served on the
country's market. The overall scheme of the strategy in the geographical aspect is to be
able to respond to the opportunities that it presents and move away from less cost-
effective ones. Among the different opportunities presented are the market size, the ease
of the compatibility of operations, costs and resource availability and the issue on red
tape
In addition, the growth of Zipcar on the Western part of the world is a testament
of the positive acceptance and popularity of the idea of providing the options for
transportation around the different countries and even forging alliances with the
Universities to offer discounts to students and cars located conveniently in the campus.
This paper will discuss on the reason why Japan is chosen as the next country for Zipcar's
expansion based on the different criteria as discussed by Venkateswaran and other factors
to consider.
Japan has a large economy and is considered as home for consumers who are
income. According to the World Bank (2015), an average Japanese household has a
disposable income of more than $4000. Similarly, Japan is one of United State’s trading
partner, making it easy for Zipcar to enter the market due to the favorable trade
agreements and regulations. The presence of Zipcar in Japan as the base of its Asian
expansion is beneficial in creating a brand and adapting the experience of what its
The idea of car sharing has only been limited to the Western market and the issue
of its reception with positive implications on the regions like North America and
Europe.It is believed that the expansion must also be done in the Asian region.Japan was
the chosen country for expansion because of the innovativeness and the consideration as
specifically based on ease of compatibility of operations and the cost and resource
approach on Japan's expansion of Zipcar, the issue of Japan as being conscious on the
issues of climate change and the environment where a growing and a number of pressing
concern may stem, like for example the amount of carbon emissions of the cars
contributing to global warming on the streets of Japan. It is for this reason that the use of
Toyota Prius hybrids will be viable wherein they run on 50 miles per gallon making it
fuel efficient. Another reason for using Prius is its small and compact design made for
smaller spaces where real estate expenses can be lowered which requires barely 12
meters of land for parking. The country of Japan is already adapting the expansion on
Western regions prove that they are more conscious of the service vehicles with lesser
In this way, Zipcar's strategy will use only vehicles that are fuel efficient and
environment friendly. In addition, the cost and resource availability that can be
underscored is the actual cutting and lessening of cars on the roads running through car
sharing because it will serve as a more practical substitute rather than owning a car. The
reason is that: instead of buying a car, a practical way of actually driving to your
destination would be car sharing. It should be noted that sharing of car through Zipcar is
a good substitute for a number of people who have personal vehicles. According to Yuri
(2007), the hybrid cars running in Japan are relatively small and that it is a product of
Japan itself whereby the transportation costs will go down as more units will be
concentrated because of the different festivals namely the Spring Festival, New Year and
other events will greatly affect the services of Zipcar positively. The transportation
during the festival and seasons will bring an influx to the different systems of
transportation like the Shinkansen (bullet trains) all over Japan especially on major cities.
Due to the nature of consumers riding, it is seen as potential increase on the product
Asian region, the suitable mode of entry would be under the greenfield investment.
and literally builds a company from the ground. There are a number of advantages using
the greenfield investment namely the achievement of economic scale and scope in
production, marketing, finance and other areas. The aspect of greater control over the
operators in Japan even though proposals were made as early as 2006 by Mazda Rental
restrictions on unattended service centers all over Japan. The issue of making a strict
deem it impractical for the reason that there is still no established car share operator in
Japan. Second, the most important reason for a greenfield strategy or investment is that it
will make Zipcar to build first in Japan which is different from the usual operation in the
United States catering to the local and satisfaction of the consumers specifically for
Japan; due to the fact that Zipcar upon using the greenfield strategy will build everything
from scratch up by constructing new operational facilities and creating long-term jobs by
hiring new employees. Using this approach, the core values of the company and the
innovativeness where it was built including the technological capacity of the devices and
the cars will still be observed in addition to the preferences of Japan's needs. Bringing car
sharing in Japan will have a number of positive and favorable conditions due to the fact
that the style is new and the traditional ones on car rental services in Japan are on a
with the definition of Jerayathmm (2008), where Zipcar completly sets up everything
new the operations in a new country. Since the parent company owns all of the shares,
the risks are low even though the entire development costs are high since Zipcar would
need to be built from the ground level itself in Japan. Nonetheless, there are agreements
between Japan and the United States on the expansion of foreign investments because
they account for more than 30% of domestic products worldwide (Cooper, 2014). which
includes the agreements formed by leaders of the two countries discussing on the free
trade agreement such as the Trans Pacific Partnership. In 1996, Japan signed for the
competition entailing it to open its market for new businesses all over the world
(jetro.go.jp, 2005).
Conclusion
concept for the consumers. There are no direct competition so the innovativeness brought
by Zipcar will introduce the idea of car sharing as an alternative to owning a car at a less
minimum expense because of the issues on high fuel proving less costly than owning one.
The efficiency of Zipcar as compared with traditional car rental companies are evident on
the hourly basis rather than the daily prices and are located strategically and conveniently
18,2014).
Kageyama, Yuri. “Japanese automakers pull ahead while Big Three slash and crash.”
Montreal Gazette 11 April 2007, Final Ed.: B8. Factiva. 15 April 2007
Klug, Foster. “U.S. Treasury official urges Japan to allow entry of more foreign firms.”
Laws & Regulations on Setting Up Business in Japan. 2005. JETRO. 13 April 2007.
< http://www.jetro.go.jp/en/invest/setting_up/laws/>.
Management. Himalaya Publishing House. Mumbai, IND, pp. 165-169. [Ebrary. Note:
you don’t have to read the whole chapter – just the last five pages]
Rajagopal (2009). Chapter 6: Modes of entry in a global marketplace. Globalization
Thrust : Driving Nations Competitive. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, NY,
USA. [Ebrary]