Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Zachary Davis
CST 300 Writing Lab
7 October 2023
Promotion or Privacy
With the advancement of technology in the 21st century, advertisers have found a more
effective way of reaching their target audiences. Due to the internet, targeted advertising has
become more advanced. By a user visiting an application on the internet, advertisers have been
able to collect data on the visiting user’s preferences, interests, and habits to present the user with
specific advertisements they are more likely to interact with. With digital advertising spending
reaching over $491 billion in 2021, and the previous expectation that it would reach $500 billion
in 2022 (Froehlich 2022), targeted advertising has become a major market. However, this growth
While businesses implementing online targeted advertising collect data about their users,
some people have taken issue with the method in which their data is collected. One aspect of
targeted advertisement that makes users feel uneasy is the tracking that advertisers find necessary
to properly implement targeted advertisement in an online setting. Another aspect is the way in
which advertisers collect and analyze an individual’s online behavior. With a goal of targeted
advertising being to make advertisements more relevant to the individual viewing them, the
process in which this is achieved online makes users question their freedom online. By collecting
data points from users and analyzing them, essentially to build a user advertisement profile,
individuals begin to feel as though all their activity online is under surveillance. With the process
of collection, analysis, and tracking for targeted advertising, users ultimately begin to feel as
Targeted advertising has been an issue since the 1920s. According to Levin, “In the
1920s, advertisers began to target specific groups of people based on their age, gender, income,
and location. This allowed advertisers to create more effective campaigns that reached
their target audience more effectively” (Levin 2022). What enabled this targeting in the 1920s
was the growing popularity of radio and television. These technologies enabled communication
with a large audience across long distances, which also allowed for more precise demographic
targeting. While communication with radio and television would enable targeted advertising,
targeted advertising would become a greater issue in the 2000s with the rise of digital
advertising. With digital advertisement, it became easier for advertisers to target demographics
and ascertain their interests, preferences, and behavior. By monitoring a user’s engagement
online and collecting data about their searches or any other activity, the user could be presented
with more personalized advertisements based on the results of their analyzed data. With the mass
collection and analytics of user data online, some users take issue with the idea of advertisers
“invading their privacy” to ascertain their interests. However, others may see targeted advertising
Stakeholder Analysis
One stakeholder in this issue is companies who implement online targeted advertising on
their platform. Some of their values, stated by YouTube, are growing businesses, reaching new
customers, attaining greater customer traffic, and connecting businesses with their targeted
demographic (YouTube 2023). Other values that these stakeholders have are providing users with
relevant products and services, as well as growing and maintaining their own platform with
targeted advertising is the primary source of revenue in the internet economy …” (Milano et al.
Davis 3
2021). With digital advertisement being a key source of revenue for companies operating a
platform online, it is seen as a mutual benefit between the companies seeking and providing
advertisement space. Companies seeking space to advertise themselves can connect with
potential customers as well as provide customers with products which they believe would benefit
their lives. Additionally, with the revenue gained from customers purchasing advertisement
space, targeted advertisement serves to assist the growth and maintenance of the advertiser to
advertising claim that they provide value to their users, businesses, and individuals, by helping
them grow their business, attain customers, as well as showing users products that they like.
Another stakeholder in the issue of targeted advertising is the internet users. Some of
their values are privacy, control over data that is collected and used, and understanding of the
risks associated with collecting their data. Pew Research states, “79% of adults assert they are
very or somewhat concerned about how companies are using the data they collect about them”
(Auxier et al. 2019). The position internet users hold is that they want to ensure that their data
isn’t being collected and analyzed without their consent as well as wanting to have control over
their data. For users, it would be ideal to have complete control over which of their data can and
can’t be collected by companies. Internet users make claims of value according to their belief
that they have a right to privacy or anonymity on the internet, or the right to decide what their
data is used for. Targeted advertising is a contentious topic, which is apparent by the differing
positions held by internet users and the companies implementing targeted advertising on the
internet. While on one hand companies collect their users’ data to show more relevant
advertising, the way in which user’s data is collected and handled by these companies is eerie for
some of their users. Should companies collect users’ data to implement targeted advertising?
Davis 4
Stakeholder Arguments
argue that collecting their user’s data to implement targeted advertising is ethical. The principle
of the utilitarian framework is that what is right is determined by providing more good than bad
account of utilitarianism was developed by Jeremy Benham (Driver 2014). Using the utilitarian
framework, companies implementing online targeted advertising would stake out that collecting
the data of their users provides the most utility to their users and partners. While users provide
their data to the companies, informing advertisers which ads should target which users, this
transaction creates a positive outcome from the view of the companies. One outcome is that
individuals will have a better browsing experience on the internet due to being shown content
they are more likely to enjoy. Another outcome is that those individuals and businesses
partnering with the companies providing targeted advertising gain exposure due to their visibility
being amplified as well as being connected with a user base that is more likely to be interested in
their product. Another important outcome is that the companies providing the advertisement gain
an important source of revenue by allowing partners to pay for advertisement space or time. For
the companies providing advertising, losing the ability to collect users’ data to perform targeted
advertisement would be detrimental. Without being able to target users with the precision
afforded to them by collecting user data, companies would lose advertisement revenue. By losing
targeting effectiveness, partners would no longer want to pay for a company’s advertisement
service. Additionally, users could begin to see meaningful advertisements that would reduce their
browsing experience. By losing the ability to effectively connect businesses with their targeted
demographic, not being able to help small businesses grow through the exposure afforded to
Davis 5
them by targeted advertising, and hampering the browsing experiences of their users, it could be
seen as unethical to not collect user data for targeted advertising as it would provide the most the
Internet users would use the individual relativism framework to argue that companies
collecting data from their users to serve them targeted advertisements is unethical. The principle
of the individual relativism framework is that right and wrong is defined according to each
individual. According to Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, John Grote was most likely the
first to use relativism by writing about it in his book Exploratio Philosophica (Baghramain
2022). Using individual relativism, internet users would argue that companies should let
individual users control what data is allowed to be collected from them. In addition, they would
argue that companies should be required to be transparent about why they are collecting user data
and what it’s being used for. According to Pew Research Center, “Majority of Americans feel as
if they have little control over data collected about them by companies and the government”
(Auxier et al. 2019). Given this belief, the argument by internet users is the correct course of
action as internet users don’t want companies to farm their online data without their consent, and
believe they have the right to their own data. This argument fits into the individual relativism
framework as it complies with the principle that right and wrong is defined by each individual.
By letting users control what data is allowed to be collected, everyone is allowed to determine
what data is right or wrong for companies to collect and can take action on their own to ensure
companies are acting in a way that aligns with their ethical framework. With this course of action
internet users gain control and understanding over what their data is used for, and as a result
improved privacy. If companies continue to collect the data from their users, individuals will
Davis 6
continue to feel as though their right to privacy is being infringed upon and that they are being
watched.
Conclusion
with how they collect their user’s information. While I agree there is some benefit to seeing more
implement a policy of collecting all user data regardless of a user’s preferences. A user should
always be in control of their data, especially when their data is being used to potentially
influence consumer behavior. While I place some onus on users to ensure they are taking steps to
keep their data private and secure, I believe the most ethical option would be for companies to
take steps to ensure a user’s data sharing preferences are respected. To do this, companies should
be more transparent about the data they are collecting and allow users to opt out of all or specific
data collection. While I believe targeted advertising and collecting user information can be
beneficial to an internet user’s experience, the method in which a user’s data is collected must be
determined by the owner of the data. With this position, I align most with other internet users.
To achieve an experience online in which internet users can be confident that their
privacy isn’t being invaded by the constant collection and analysis of their data, action must be
taken. One step that could be taken is that when users access resources online, the default
standard is that a user’s data is not collected. By implementing this single step, internet users can
be confident that when they are accessing any resource on the web, they will not be subject to
monitoring. However due to this standard, some users who find using their data to improve
targeted advertising be beneficial may miss out. To resolve this, companies implementing
targeted advertisement should be extremely transparent about the data being collected, then allow
Davis 7
each user fine control over the specific data they want the company to collect. With this
recommendation, each user can tailor their browsing experience to their liking. Advertisers will
continue to benefit from users who appreciate the experience created by their advertisements,
and users who are more conscious of their privacy benefit knowing their data isn’t being
collected.
Davis 8
References
Auxier, B., Rainie, L., Anderson, M., Perrin, A., Kumar, M., & Turner, E. (2019, November 15).
Americans and Privacy: Concerned, Confused and Feeling Lack of Control Over Their
Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/11/15/americans-and-privacy-
concerned-confused-and-feeling-lack-of-control-over-their-personal-information/
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/relativism
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/utilitarianism-history
Froehlich, N. (2022, February 24). The Truth In User Privacy And Targeted Ads.
Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2022/02/24/the-truth-in-user-
privacy-and-targeted-ads/?sh=42e5a0d5355e
Levin. (2022, November 4). Who Did Advertising And Marketing Industries Target First.
WoodWardAvenue. https://woodwardavenue.org/who-did-advertising-and-marketing-
industries-target-first/
Milano, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Wachter, S. (2021, July 13). Targeted ads isolate and divide us even
Conversation. https://theconversation.com/targeted-ads-isolate-and-divide-us-even-when-
theyre-not-political-new-research-163669
Davis 9
YouTube. (n.d.). Use Video Targeting to Reach Your Audience - YouTube Advertising. Retrieved
yt-bi-c-skphr!o3~f14d0baa0541159049a16eb997f3f7b0~p77544129372~