CIVIL REVISION NO.

58/2023
NEELAM CHANDRA V. NEETA BAHL & ORS
Prayer
 Obtain records of C.S. No. 1469 of 2021, 2. Set aside the impugned order dated
10.06.2022 by the Learned ASCJ, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi due to material irregularity
Brief
Petitioner
 The petitioner seeks the revision of an order dated 10.06.2022 passed by the Learned
ASCJ, Tis Hazari Court, in C.S. No. 1469 of 2021.
 The impugned order directed the removal of a temporary structure on a disputed area and
allowed respondents to enter the area.
 The petitioner claims to be the exclusive owner of the ground floor flat and the disputed
area, as evidenced by sale deeds.
 The trial court's order allegedly pre-decided ownership without appreciating the evidence
and documents.
 The petitioner contends that the construction of the temporary structure was legal and
aimed to protect her property from debris caused by respondents.
 A suit for a mandatory injunction was filed by the respondent, but the petitioner argues
that the respondent lacked locus to file the suit.
 High Court proceedings involved the granting and vacating of stays.
 The petitioner seeks the setting aside of the impugned order, claiming it was erroneous
and beyond the trial court's jurisdiction.
Respondent
 Respondent firmly denies the allegations and argues that the current petition is an abuse
of the legal process.
 They emphasize that the issue has been extensively addressed in multiple court
proceedings, and the impugned order was made after thorough examination of the facts.
 The respondent points out that it was the petitioner who initiated unauthorized
construction in the common area, leading to hardship for the respondent.
 Consequently, the respondent urges the court to dismiss the revision petition and impose
costs on the petitioner.
Application:
 The petitioner seeks a stay on the operation of the impugned order dated 10.06.2022
passed by the Learned ASCJ, Tis Hazari Court, in C.S. No. 1469 of 2021. The petitioner
claims the order pre-decided ownership of the disputed area without proper appreciation
of facts and documents. They believe they have a strong case on merits and will suffer
irreparable loss if the order is not stayed.
 The petitioner seeks exemption from filing certified copies and true typed copies of
certain annexures in the main Revision Petition. The petitioner will provide the necessary
documents during the proceedings when directed by the Hon'ble Court.
 The petitioner seeks condonation of a delay of 169 days in filing the Civil Revision
Petition. The petitioner explains that 213 days should be excluded as it relates to the same
 matter in a previously filed Writ Petition. Thus, there remains a delay of 46 days, which
the petitioner requests to be condoned by the Hon'ble Court.
 The respondent seeks modification of the order dated 29.05.2023, stating that the court
mistakenly mentioned their agreement on a certain issue, which they did not agree to.
They request the deletion of the mentioned statement from the order.
 The respondent seeks exemption from filing the certified copy of the order dated
29.05.2023, citing paucity of time, and undertakes to submit it later when directed by the
Hon'ble Court.
 W.P.(C) NO. 5447/2023
RAMESH LAL V. INDERPRASTHA POWER GENERATION

Prayer
 The petitioner seeks a writ or direction for the grant of the Third Time Bound Promotion
Scale (TBPS) as per the 7th CPC/WRC order and the DVB's order.
 They request the 3rd TBPS from 21st March 2017 with revisions to previous TBPS and
any other appropriate order in their favor.
Brief
 The petitioner, a former Delhi Vidyut Board employee, files a writ petition under Article
226 of the Indian Constitution, seeking a writ or direction for the grant of the Third Time
Bound Promotion Scale (TBPS) as per the 7th CPC/WRC Notification Order No.
F.133(1)/Policy/2020-21/20 issued by the respondents.
 The petitioner alleges that they are entitled to the TBPS under the Delhi Vidyut Board's
order dated 23-07-1997, but the respondents have denied it, resulting in discrimination
and violation of Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution.
 The petitioner requests the court to quash the impugned order and grant the third TBPS as
per the 7th CPC/WRC order, along with the opportunity to present additional grounds
during the final hearing.
Application
 The petitioner seeks exemption from filing certified copies of annexures, dim annexures,
and typed copies with the writ petition. They assure to submit them when available. The
application is made in good faith and in the interest of justice. The petitioner prays for the
court to grant the requested exemption and any other suitable order in their favor against
the respondents.
 C.R.P.-191-2022
ABDUL SALAM Vs. SH. JAG SINGH
Prayer
 Petitioner requests Court to examine Suit record, set aside 20.05.2022 order, allow
application under Order VII Rule 11(d) r/w Sec. 151 CPC, reject respondent's plaint
grant.
Brief
 This is a revision petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC)
against an order dated 20.05.2022 passed by Ms. Mona Tirdi Kerketta, the Ld. A.D.J.
(North-East) at Karkardooma Court, Delhi in Civil Suit No. 105/2017 titled as 'Jag Singh
Vs. Abdul Salam'.
 The petitioner seeks to set aside the impugned order that dismissed their application
under Order VII Rule 11(d) r/w Section 151 CPC, and also seeks to reject the plaint filed
by the respondent.
 The petitioner contends that the Civil Court does not have jurisdiction over the suit
property, which falls under the Delhi Land Reform Act and should be dealt with in the
Revenue Court.
 Furthermore, the petitioner argues that the respondent has failed to seek the declaration of
title, making the relief of possession and permanent injunction not maintainable.
 Various judgments and grounds are cited to support the petitioner's case. T
 he petitioner seeks to quash the impugned order and requests appropriate relief from the
Hon'ble High Court of Delhi.
Application:
 Petitioner seeks stay on proceedings of Civil Suit No. 105/2017 pending before Ms.
Mona Tirdi Kerketta, Ld. A.D.J. (North-East Distt.) Karkardooma Court, Delhi, until
final disposal of the Revision Petition. Petitioner also requests any other suitable relief in
the interest of justice.
 Petitioner seeks exemption from filing the entire trial court records in connection with
Civil Suit No. 105/2017 pending before Ms. Mona Tirdi Kerketta, Ld. A.D.J. (North-East
Distt.) Karkardooma Court, Delhi, until the next hearing on 29.08.2022.
 Petitioner seeks condonation of the delay in re-filing the revision petition against the
order dated 20.05.2022 in Civil Suit No. 105/2017 titled as 'Jag Singh V. Abdul Salam'
due to unavoidable reasons. Petitioner also requests any other suitable order in the
interest of justice.
 Petitioner seeks early hearing of the revision petition against the order dated 20.05.2022
in Civil Suit No. 105/2017 titled as 'Jag Singh v. Abdul Salam' due to its urgent nature,
and requests any other suitable order in the interest of justice.