Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Banking Regulation
Since the earliest days of the nation, it has been a controversial issue
By MATTHEW JOHNSTON
Reviewed by
MICHAEL J BOYLE
Fact checked by
SUZANNE KVILHAUG
Trending Videos
0 of 36 secondsVolume 0%
Since Hamilton's day, the United States has grown into the largest economy
in the world.2 That growth has been accompanied by ever-evolving banking
regulation, which has swung like a pendulum over the past three centuries
between greater and lesser control. Competing forces like the desire for
financial stability versus more economic freedom, or the fear that too much
power is concentrated in too few hands, have kept the pendulum swinging
back and forth.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
As the U.S. evolved into the world's largest economy, its regulatory
framework has evolved as well.
Early regulations aimed to foster economic financial stability through
centralized control of the banking system. Opponents, however,
maintained that such regulatory authority gave the federal government
too much power in comparison to the states.
In the years following the Civil War, an assortment of financial crises
and bank panics led to new regulations. The Great Depression of the
1930s also gave rise to significant reforms.
The 1980s saw a move toward deregulation, soon followed by re-
regulation in the wake of the subprime mortgage crisis and the Great
Recession of the early 2000s.
Investopedia / Sabrina Jiang
The U.S. government turned to state banks to finance the War of 1812, but
with the significant over-expansion of credit that followed, it became apparent
that financial order needed to be restored.3 In response, the Second Bank of
the United States was chartered in 1816. It, too, would succumb to political
fears over the amount of control it gave the federal government and it was
dissolved in 1836.4
By the time the Second Bank dissolved, a new era of free banking was
emerging, with a number of states passing laws in 1837 that abolished the
requirement that banks obtain an officially legislated charter to operate.5 By
1860, a majority of states had passed such laws.
During this time of free banking, anyone could operate a bank on the
condition that all the notes it issued were backed by proper security. While
that helped reinforce the credibility of banknotes, it did not guarantee
immediate redemption in specie (gold or silver), which would serve to be a
crucial point.
The era of free banking suffered from financial instability, including several
banking crises. It also made for a chaotic currency market, characterized by
thousands of different banknotes circulating at varying discount rates. This
instability and disorder led to a renewed call for more regulation and central
oversight in the 1860s.
The new national banking system helped return the country to a more uniform
and secure currency but ultimately at the expense of an elastic currency that
could expand and contract according to commercial and industrial needs. The
growing complexity of the U.S. economy highlighted the inadequacy of an
inelastic currency, which helped fuel frequent financial panics throughout the
rest of the nineteenth century.7
It became apparent during the bank panic of 1907 that America's banking
system was out of date. A committee gathered in 1912 to examine the
situation and found that the nation's money and credit were becoming
increasingly concentrated in the hands of relatively few men. The Federal
Reserve Act of 1913 was approved during the presidency of Woodrow Wilson
to wrest control of the nation's finances from banks while creating a
mechanism to enable a more elastic currency and greater supervision over
the banking infrastructure.8
As banks became bigger, their financial services and products became more
complex. Banks started to offer new products like derivatives. They also
started packaging traditional financial assets like mortgages and selling them
to investors through the process of securitization.
Then, in 2021, the newly arrived Biden administration signaled its intention to
tighten the government's oversight of banks. A July 2021 executive order on
promoting competition in the American economy called for greater scrutiny of
bank mergers by the Department of Justice and federal banking regulators.
"Excessive consolidation," the order explained, "raises costs for consumers,
restricts credit for small businesses, and harms low-income communities."17
While more regulation led to a long period of financial stability, banks began
losing business to more innovative financial institutions, resulting in a move
toward deregulation in the 1980s and 1990s. But it wasn't long before the
mortgage meltdown of 2007 and the most severe economic crisis since the
Great Depression led to a call for re-regulation and to the passage of the
Dodd-Frank financial reforms of 2010. The Trump administration rolled back
some of those rules, but much of Dodd-Frank remains in place and the Biden
administration has indicated its desire to restore and tighten bank regulations,
particularly with regard to mergers.
If history is any guide, the story is far from over and the regulation pendulum
will continue to swing.