Professional Documents
Culture Documents
volume 11
A Continuation Order Plan is available for this series. A continuation order will bring
delivery of each new volume immediately upon publication. Volumes are billed only upon
actual shipment. For further information please contact the publisher.
recent advances in phytochemistry
volume 11
Edited by
Frank A. Loewus
Washington State University
Pullman, Washington
and
V. C. Runeckles
The University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
F. A. Loewus, 1956.
Contributors
Wilfred A. Cote
Deborah P. Delmer
Derek T. A. Lamport
Akira Sakakibara
Georg G. Gross
Pappachan E. Kolattukudy
xi
CONTENTS xii
W. E. Hillis
E. T. Reese
D. Bir Mullick
WILFRED A. C()TE
INTRODUCTION
Cellulose 45 42 45 48 51
Lignin 24 19 22 21 24
O-Acetyl-4-0-
methy1-g1ucu-
rono-xy1an 25 35 26 24 19
G1ucomannan 4 3 3 3 4
Pectin, starch,
ash, etc. 2 1 4 4 2
Cellulose 42 41 41 41 41
Lignin 29 27 29 33 31
Arabino-4-0-methy1-
glucurono-xy1an 9 13 9 7 14
O-Acety1-ga1acto-
glucomannan 18 18 18 16 12
Pectin, starch,
ash, etc. 2 1 3 3 2
Pits are gaps in the secondary cell wall. Each pit has
a closing membrane at what was originally primary wall.
Generally pits occur in pairs, the gaps of two adjacent cells
coinciding and the pit membrane consisting of the primary
walls of each cell plus the intercellular substance.
Undoubtedly becpuse of strength requirements, each cell pro-
duces a secondary wall whose cellulose microfibri1s sweep
WOOD ULTRASTRUCTURE 25
Galacto- Arabino-
Cell Wall Galac- Cellu- Arabi- 4-0-methyl-
Layer lose gluco-
tan mannan nan glucurono-
xylan
M+P 20 1 1 30 1
Sl 21 11 7 5 12
S2 outer Nil 47 39 Nil 21
S2 inner 59 39 38 21 34
S3 Nil 2 15 44 32
Arabino-
Galacto- Arabi- 4-0-methyl-
Cell Wall Galac- Cellu-
gluco- glucurono-
Layer tan lose mannan nan
xylan
M+P 2 1 1 32 3
Sl 32 21 23 7 29
S2 outer 49 35 39 16 33
S2 inner 16 43 37 45 35
SUMMARY
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
POLYSACCHARIDES
DEBORAH P. DELMER
Introduction 45
Structural Considerations Relative to Biosynthesis 46
Synthesis of the Matrix Components 48
The Special Problem of Cellulose Synthesis 52
References 68
INTRODUCTION
45
46 DEBORAH P. DELMER
CH 3 0
I II
H- [CH2 -C=CH-CH3] x-O-P-OH
I
0-
E
.§ 20
X
~
to!)
z
W
..J
II::
W
m 10
u:
A
~ _ _ _ 0.95 ml extract
2000
1600
800
-
o
=>
"0
o
5 10
400
200
°0~---5~--~1~0--~1~5--~2~0~-------------
Minutes @37°
and
Table 3. Possib le routes of synthe sis of UDP-g1ucose
GDP-g1ucose
Activity
UDP-glucose GDP-glucose
Tissue source pyrophosphorylase pyrophosphorylase
(nmoles/hr/mg protein)
16 day-old fibers
0.5 nWf
No coumarin coumarin Inhibition
added, cpm cpm %
Table 5. Continued
7 day-old fibers
0.1 DiM
No coumarin coumarin Inhibition
added, cpm cpm %
6 -Cou 1079 83
+Cou 186
7 -Cou 450
+Cou 109 76
9 -Cou 820
+Cou 304 62
12 -Cou 877
+Cou 315 64
14 -Cou 2776
+Cou 878 68
16 -Cou 2604
+Cou 699 73
19 -Cou 1466
+Cou 260 82
24
..
(I)
'-
.Q
;;::
20
01
E
16
:5...
!.
... I
12 I
::J
I
.2 I
'- I
8- I
(I)
II) 8 -CB,,/
'0 f1
E /
c /
4
.., ..,6" "
...0
......
80 120 160
UOP- Glucose (I'M)
20
," ,,
, ,,
I:
a.c: I
.
.!!
•
calculated
rate of eel u o.e
Ier lim
,,• I
I
,,
.a depOlition
;; 15 I
I
E
E
.... ,,
I
I
.,
~ I
,,
,
I
....'a
...,
'a
I
,,
10
,
II
,
I
..8
~
Go
,, I
,,
_5
,
, ,,
•• 5
,.~
0 I \
u
,,
:lI I \
Cit \
, of
.
00 in vitro rate
c: I Qi"uCciii"".yntheta..
,I
0 '-'--'
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32
Days Past Anthllis
Treatment Results
40
TOTAL
.....
52
~
Q
.g,
)(
20
:J
CJ)
"2-;
..
Z
'" 10
/ARA:INOSE
OL---,;;~~~8~~~~~~~X~Y~LOSE
o 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32
Days Post - Anthesis
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
DEREK T. A. LAMPORT
INTRODUCTION
79
80 DEREK T. A. LAMPORT
STRUCTURE OF EXTENSIN
NH2-Terminus
00 MO.
NtIIIIOlCYI'IIOLIIII
I
,
CIINHCI
,..- I 4
B. SER-HYP-HYP-HYP-HYP-SER-HYP-LYS
Exists with 2, 1, or 0 galactose residues.
C. SER-HYP-HYP-HYP-HYP-THR-HYP-VAL-TYR-LYS
Exists with 1 or 0 galactose residues.
D. SER-HYP-HYP-HYP-HYP-LYS
Exists with 1 or 0 galactose residues.
E. SER-HYP-HYP-HYP-HYP-VAL-"TYR"-LYS-LYS
Exists with 1 or 0 galactose residues.
~,
HO~CMi
Figure 4. S-Elimination of galactosyl serine.
IOOr----------------------------------------,
80 TOMATO CELL WALLS - ALKALINE EXTRACTION
70 • tmlAOXYPI!OLINE SCLUBILISED •
11'1 ALKALINE DMSO/HeO/EI.OH
10 15 20 25
HOURS AT 40"
HYP 30 30 30 30 27
ASP .6 .7 .6 1.2 0
THR .5 .4 .5 1.2 1
SER I 2.3 2.1 2.2 1.8 8
GLU 0 .3 .4 .7 0
GLY 1.2 .6 1.1 1.7 0
ALA .8 .9 1.1 1.8 0
VAL .9 1.3 2.2 5.0 2
ILU 0 .3 .3 .6 0
LEU 0 .2 .3 .6 0
TYR .6 2.1 2.4 3 2
LYS .8 3.2 4.8 8.5 6
TYR Deriv. .5 1.2 1.8 1.9 2
N2H~ Labile SER 11.0 0.8 1.2 0.3
ACN ** Labile SER 1.2 n.d. 0.4 1.6
ARA/HYP 2.8 5.7 3.3 4.6
GAL/SER 4.9 2.0 1.9 0.9
Ga1acturonic Acid 0 0 0 0
First, there are far fewer serine residues (only about 25% of
the serine residues are left) compared with the tryptic pep-
tides of extensin; second, the average number of galactose
residues per serine residue varies from one to five. Because
88 DEREK T. A. LAMPORT
C'II'78
.1.
LOW IIW ETHANOL SOLUBLE 'WE"
1,\
I
I
I (i
,I
I
I I
I 1 AlIA
I
HYP
,, ,I
,,
I' ,I I,
II : \ViI
I
I I
,""m
I
I -
I --n
10 20 SO 40 50
FIIACTION NUIIIE R (4 on"
A·4·7.
LOW IIW ETHANOL SOLUBLE 'WEP' pool SPC 25 ( ....kI'
vi. ISO ELECTRIC FOCUSING t
pH
10 •
5
5 5
10 20 40
FRACTION NUliBER (2' 5 mil
,," ,,
(\
DEAf CEL1.ULOSE· FRACTIONATION ., pH 6.'
01 GLYCOPEPTIDE FRACTION SPC 251
.
AFTER ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING. "
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
I ,
I ,
I •
I •
I \
II ',
,, ,,
I ,
YHYP
YURONIC ACI ,,I' '
10 ,/
,:
I
I
VURONIC ACID
,
I
, I
I
I
I
,,
I
I
,,
GRADIENT f"'..J
1 J
10 20 30 40 50 60
TUBE NUMBER (2 mil
CULTURE MEDIUM
CYTOSOL
INTRACELLULAR
PARTICULATE
="SAP"
Maple
Arabino-
galactan
~11l1\9171511J2.
Ii
'l1li.1 NY,
~
"YPARAII
40 IiO
TUBE NUMBER (10m!)
discard
Extract with 0.1 MH. Ac.
HYP rlml
y HYP/200p.1
20 40
TUBE NUMBER ( I ml)
HYP 30 30
ASP 22 24
THR 37 19
SER 43 26
GLU 44 16
PRO n.d. n.d.
GLY 47 15
ALA 42 26
VAL 34 11
CYST
MET 5
ILU 22 7
LEU 35 11
TYR 5 1
PHE 23 7
LYS 32 10
HIS 15 5
ARG 14 4
Analysis Date 3376/3 4976/1
HYP 30 30 MAN 8
ASP 11 5 GAL 4
THR 6 4 ARA 4
SER 13 10 RHA 2
GLU 7 4 GLC 1
PRO n.d. 2 XYL 0.5
GLY 29 4
ALA 9 4
VAL 5 4
CYST 0
MET 0
ILU 2 1
LEU 6 3
TYR 1 1
PHE 2 2
LYS 5 2
HIS 1 0
ARG 4 3
Analysis Date 3376/1 20376/3 4276/6
2. Function: Structural
3. Chemically: Hydroxyproline-rich
4. Structure: Glycoproteins
Helix type: Polyproline I I (9.4 A pitch,
3 residues/turn)
7. Evolutionary
Branch Point: VoZvox-like organism? (Origin of the
blastula?)
f\._
8.~fpl
-I
,
l;0I'II:, .T/lllln ......
PGlY-l-1n'IIfKIXW'1III.11IE
COfIt:III,..llIIln ......
-I
200 210
............,.
2110 100 320 200 210
.-
r.IO iOO 320
toO 210 250
IbllllslnIrwIk""
,·L7:'H:' SIr-HJp-",,-HJp-",,-Slr-",,-Slr-""'-""-""-ItrP"~"'-Jyr-lyi
d. d. ~I
ICIII1Q< SUYHw'IIIlln""','_ __
8·a.r:.-A;:1
bltnslnt..,. . . . .
~ 'r
.
CRUD( DCTBISIN B.IMINAJEO FIOM WAllS SIr-IW-ttwP-Itw-IW-Slr-""-Lrl
..... SIIIIIAQIIDIISCOIIOIlIONS _ a'yIW'lIlln .....
""" Sl7Hypllllln....,
200.., ISO
-- "'" "0
R R
II
o
"i-----r'f-R'
~
_ ~ a-Ke'.,'.'ar."
0<:: , .<,3
I R
+ H 0-1~0"'o.
CHI
I C-R'
CHI II
!OO· 0
o
I
0 - p;O
I
0-
H 1 = undecaprenol
16-21 = dolichols
Transfer of N- Transfer of N-
acetyl gluco- acetyl muramyl
samine oligo- pentapeptide
saccharide from from UNDECA-
DOLICHOL-P-P- PRENYL-P-P
oligosaccharide etc., to pepti-
to asparagine doglycan
amide group
No O2_
(Protozoal
(Have No HYP-Rich Glycoproteinsl
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
AlURA SAKAKIBARA
Introduction 117
Hydrolysis of Protolignin with Dioxane and Water 118
Catalytic Hydrogenolysis of Protolignin 124
Compression Wood Proto lignin 129
Conclusions 133
References 135
INTRODUCTION
117
118 AKIRA SAKAKIBARA
RI¢RI
OH
HzrOH QOCH'
HC--O
I
HzYOH~CH'
Hf--o
HCOH HCOH
R,- RI·H
Quc~
Is
II.,' R,- H, RI • OCH.
OI.,s R,-R.-OCH, ROOCH'
OH
IV. R·CHaQH VI.,s R-H
V. R-CHO VII. R-OCH.
N
~I OH OH
~H
CH H~(r'
~~
Hy "OCH,
HC--O
HoC....... O....... C--H
H-i--f4 H
H--<f-..,.. ..._CHI
HoC...- ....... C4H
I
H-C--C4H
I
I
I
H--C_ ......CH.
ROOCHI
OH
.¢~. ,HCOO:CHI
OH
VIII. R,-CH.OH, R•• H x. R" RI - H Xilis
IX. RI - CHO, RI - OCH, Xis R" H, R•• OCH.
XII_,. R,.R,.OCH.
OH
H':Q0CH.
H'r~CH' I H.C~H
OCH.
:x; -"
HCI OH '
__ 0, I f H
2) - l-:£
~
"j'"
I-YOCH.
HC--O
<; I R~H.
OH
~I
H.CO OCH.
OH XV." R,·R.=H
, CH. XVI. R,·OCH.,R.·H
H XIV. XVIIN,. R, .R•• OCH.
XVIII.
HC~H
f CH. OH H.COnOCH.
·1 f
¢
HC OH H,COQOCH. I
I _ HC OH
?)
!-ItoH -
H.C--O........ CH
I I
HC--CH
H.rOH YoCH. I I H.COH
HC--O ))O/CH. ~g;-o OCH.
i) H.<f 0H H.COVOCH.
r °
~
~OCH. H HzCOHYOCH
XIX N,.
~ 1-;°'
RY,0CH. ~
VOCH.
XX. R= H, XXls R· OCH. OH XXII.
Figure 1. Continued.
H.COH
I
HC'
I
HC
H,COQ +
o
xv
Mechanism I (by Lundquist et al. )
. ?; ~.--~.H,coy~~~: ?) -0:
H.COH H·rOH H.COH H.COH Har::-O
I
HC-
I
HC
-----+.
H.COQ YOCH. VOCHI YOCHI +
o o 0 0 OH
XV HOH.C-CHfCHO
Mechanism 2 (by N imz )
CATALYTIC HYDROGENOLYSIS
OF PROTOLIGNIN
~ ~
H.COV VOCH3
~
H;,coYOCH;,H,CO
"~ OCH.
OH OH OH OH
XXX. XXXI.
TH• HorCH
; ~o&::oJ
rHo rHo HzrOH THo
~ I?t ~c~o~CHs
HoCOVOCH
OHHoCO'- OCHo OH
OH
HoC '- OCH.
H XXXIII. XXXIV. OH
XXXII.
XXXV.
H0'i 0H
CHz
I
CHo
H.COH ~
~Ho ~OCH.
1:
HzT
~ OH
HoCOV--VOCHo
oH OH
XXXVII. XXXVllls
Figure 3. Continued.
XXVI XXVII
COOH
¢
COOH COOH COOH
~COOH HOOC~COOH
QCOOH
COOH COOH
¢-¢ H'CO~OCH'
COOH COOH
XLVI XLVII
OCH3 in Analysis of
Sample MWL MWL
Empirical Formula
(%) C (%) H (%)
Compression
wood 12.64 62.97 5.91 C9H7.S101.67(OCH3)O.76(OH)1.21
Normal wood 15.19 62.12 5.92 C9H7.6401.6S(OCH3)O.94(OH)1.20
Compression
wood 2.47 0.84 0.27 0.21 10.17 0.12 2.41 + 0.14
Normal wood 0.91 + 0.11 - 12.14 0.20 1.07 - 0.10
Compression
wood 0.31 + 0.33 1.01 1.67 2.52 1.11 3.11 10.06
Normal wood + + + + 2.44 3.01 1.79 4.78 12.05
Q
I I I I
¢ 0 0
CH. CO HCOE!
OH OH OH OH
XLVIII XLIX L LI
QOCH'
OH
¢lOCH,
OH
~OC"' ¢l ~
OH
OCH,
CONCLUSIONS
CH.
H'ro~
HC
rH'
THz
HorOH
rH•
I OCH.
CH. CH.
~
~ ~
OH
YOCH.
OH
H.CO~OCH.
OH OH
(H.COH) (CHo)
TH• H·rOH
TH• rH.
CH. CHI
MOCHO
OH OH
LXV R,' CH, • R. =OCH. LXVIII LXIX
LXVI R, =CH.OH. R. -OCH.
LXVII R, =CH,. R. =H
REFERENCES
GEORG G. GROSS
INTRODUCTION
141
142 GEORG G. GROSS
OH
p-Coumaryl Coniferyl Sinapyl
alcohol alcohol alcohol
ICarbohydratesl
Shikimate
Pathway
i
Deamination
6r co'- C;,,,mol.
Cinnamate
Pathway
j I CO£
u
Ri/ Substituted
cinnamic acids
HO 0
Activation g.... S-COA
I Cinnamoyl-CoA
R esters
H
HO
Reduction i I
CH20H
Cinnamyl
R alcohols
HO
Polymerisation
Ilignin/
.~ NH+
~4,
<D ~
L- Phenylalanine Cinnamale
~O2
~ao NH+
~4
",O¥~
o \..Ci>, HO ~
0
CO£
HO 0 <2> HO ~o HO
L-Tyrosine p- Coumarale Caffeate
~(5)
SAM'
Ad-
Homocys
'tr
C02-
H3CO
HOJWI
00
-
(AI + NADPH + H+ - Q + H20 + NADP+
OH
Cinnamatc p-Coumaratc
~oo-
~-
( BI 0+ 02 + AH2 -
o OH+
H20 + A
OH OH
p-Coumaratc Caffcatc
This latter reaction has been found in yeast for the reduction
of 2-amino-adipate 123 ,132 and in Neurospora for the reduction
of benzoic and cinnamic aCids. 44
via CoA esters, too. This was demonstrated for the first
time by Mansell et al. 90 with cell-free extracts from Salix
which catalyzed the reduction of feru1ate to conifery1 alco-
hol only in the presence of CoA. This result has been con-
firmed by several reports on the CoA-dependent reduction of
p-coumarate or feru1ate to the corresponding alcohols with
enzyme preparations from cell suspension cutures of Glycine,22
lignifying tissues of Forsythia 140 and root tissue of
Brassica. 116
E
c
o
'"
N
. j/
15
Fraction number
Cinnamate 5 24 o o
o-Coumarate 15 26
m-Coumarate 21 54
p-Coumarate 177 104 137 104
Caffeate 100 90 93 64
Feru1ate 100 100 100 100
Isoferu1ate 74 104 83 87
3,4,5-Trihydroxycinnamate 43
Sinapate 81 o 2 o
p-Methoxycinnamate 44 o o o G'J
m
3,4-Dimethoxycinnamate 159 o o o o
:Il
G'J
3,4,5-Trimethoxycinnamate 81 o o o P
G'J
:Il
*Data refer to the activity observed with feru1ate 100%. o
~
BIOSYNTHESIS OF LIGNIN 155
0 0 0
II II II
C-OH C"'AMP C""S-CoA
~ ~ CO~H
o OH
Ferulate
ATP
OCH3
PP;
~g21·
OH
Feruloyl
OCH3
AMP
~.
~OCH'
OH
Feruloy 1- CoA
adcnylate
Figure 7. Activation of cinnamic acids by hydroxy-
cinnamate:CoA ligase. Reaction shown with feruloyl-CoA
as substrate.
156 GEORG G. GROSS
oII oII
-S-CoA
~:C~
NADPH
+H+ NADP+
"«'- CoA-SH
OH
Feruloyl-CoA Coniferyl
aldehyde
Figure 8. Reduction of cinnamoyl-CoA esters by
cinnamoyl-CoA reductase. Reaction shown with feruloyl-CoA
as substrate.
158 GEORG G. GROSS
o
+ II
C-H *
I
R'
R-NC =x::
~=o
*
+
0
~~H + H® - R-N~ CHB + C~OH
I
C=O
R'
*
~' ~/
Cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase
(Class A I
c",
'0
~
Cinnamyl alcohol 39 o 55
p-Coumaryl alcohol 112 o 1
p-Methoxycinnamyl alcohol 290
Coniferyl alcohol 100 100 100
3.4-Dimethoxycinnamyl alcohol 384 o 44
3.4-Methylenedioxycinnamyl alcohol 383
Sinapyl alcohol (*)** o 95
4-Methylcinnamyl alcohol 128
2.4-Dimethylcinnamyl alcohol 90
4-Chlorocinnamyl alcohol 55
2.4-Dichlorocinnamyl alcohol l3
2.6-Dichlorocinnamyl alcohol 6
4-Bromocinnamyl alcohol 51
Cl
m
o
*Data refer to the activity observed with coniferyl alcohol = 100%. :0
Cl
**Sinapyl alcohol is converted rapidly; color development of the aldehyde P
formed prevents quantitative determination under the assay conditions employed. Cl
:0
o
~
BIOSYNTHESIS OF LIGNIN 161
oII OH
H
.. ...
OH OH
Coni feryl Coniferyl
aldehyde alcohol
Figure 10. Reversible reduction of cinnamyl aldehyde
by cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase. Reaction shown with
coniferyl aldehyde as substrate.
162 GEORG G. GROSS
Cen
wan
Pluma-
lemma
Oxal-
acetate
Sum of ,eactions:
C,toplasm
2 Malate. 2 02 _ 2 Oxalacotato • 2 H202
Hydroxycinnamate:
CoA ligase 47 p-Coumarate 2.0 0.18 11.1 1.9 0.18 10.6
Ferulate 2.5 0.14 17.8 2.4 0.14 17.1
Cinnamoyl-CoA
reductase** Feruloyl-CoA 1.4 "'0 1.3 "'0
Cinnamyl alcohol
dehydrogenase** Coniferyl alcohol 26.0 13.9 1.9 25.0 14.5 1.7
* X = xylem; P = phloem. C)
m
** Gross, unpublished.· o
:::tJ
C)
P
C)
:::tJ
o
~
BIOSYNTHESIS OF LIGNIN 167
TAXONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
CONCLUDING REMARKS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The work from the Bochum laboratory referred to in this
article was generously supported by grants from the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft to Professor M. H. Zenk.
BIOSYNTHESIS OF LIGNIN 171
REFERENCES
PAPPACHAN E. KOLATTUKUDY
185
186 P. E. KOLATTUKUDY
INTRODUCTION
0-
c9J OH
o¢ "h' ~~
",",-o.'."",,-@-,,,
",09 0'''.
OH
CHEMISTRY
*a, acetylenic
10 5 o
TIME (min.)
2
o
~
-
51
o
!D
o
~
273
,~95
VI
c:
!!
E 275
CI)
>
J
I M+-15-90
259 (~-47-90l 341
245
lL ~ 1 3~
289
309
M+-31-90
3f5
/
I.,
+
M -47-32
3r
240 280 320 360 400 440
m/e
SUlERIN-O-CHz-(CHzI,-CH- CH - (CHzl,-C~O
'0/ O-SUBERIN
213..:!!:!-3031 20' ..:!!...'69 ~ 213...:!!...245159~227
/ ! ~!-CH30H
./
~
(CH,J,S;-O-CHZ-(CHZI,~H _~O (CH,J,S;-O-CHZ-(CHZI,E' 1H-(CHzl,-C~0
? CH-(CHzl,
elCH, OCH,
2.BSO
OS;(CH,I, OCt<,
Si(CH')1 303.:!!..271
303..:!!....271 1 -90
1-
213
m
:;
l.
I0
ID
!!
~
'iii
c
J!
.E
O-CIJT1N
~
a ,A-~CHzJ,--~(CHzJ,-<
CUTIN-O, 0 WAIQ, 0
i
318J BSA BSA 303
100
1:IzC-(CHzI,-OHC~
I I
(CHzI,-1;Il:o
I
r-(CHzJ,E:1CHlHCHzJ,-1;Il:o
I I
O-S;(CH,I, ()-9(CH,J, o-S;(CH,l, -S;(CH,J, o-S;(CH,I, O-s;(CH,1,
147 305 300 320
250 300
mI.
1-- 214*
I
I
r.199
,
I ,0
(CH sl s Si-O-CH.(CH.14-CH.!
I '.C ~CH2~ (CH 21,- COOCHs
I
201 ~ ...
III---J ,
- Si(CH.ls°H :
216*- .J
126 --.J
-Si(CH.I.OH
o
R=H,R=OCH 3 HO J(j\...
'i=2 CH=CH-C-O
II -{cutin
Suberin
R
CH 3g-0 0CH2CH2CH2-~CHS 2 /I
»z
c
»
134
~
0
•cen
100 0 (")
a.
.... 0::
~m
~ C
"lI
43 CH3-cao
..=
0
u :J:
/
- _ 107
1~~CH2-CH-CH2 u m
Z
HOOCH 2 Q 0
--•
r-
oo
u
Lol \
>
:;:
0
'ii 194
It: II 176 ~-KETENE 3
MIt-KETENE - H20
1/ M-
236
iIII
HI II IIi II•• III i
Up I I
01 i "I
40 80 120 160 200 240
m/e 8 6 4 2 o
Time (Min)
Monomers (% of total)
Golden Delicious Apple V. faba
Acid Fruit Leaf Leaf Leafa
(adaxial) (abaxial)
OCH3
CUTIN ACIDS
Table 4. Continued
at C-lO 0.29
at C-16 0.03
at C-lO and C-16 0.03
None 0.65
Total free hydroxyl 0.38
[1_14C]Acetyl group incorporatedb 0.41
BIOSYNTHESIS
RADIOACTIVITY
lJJ
CI)
z
oa..
CI)
lJJ
0::
0::
g
U
lJJ HEXADECANE -
I- 1,16-DIOL
~ DIACETATE
o 5 10 15
TIME (min.)
9
10 10
~ w
a.. , U')
u 8
,., 'II,I"
II
Z
0
0..
0
6 1','
II
,I "
" U')
W
0:::
>-
I- 1,7, 16- II ,'8
>
HEXADECANETRIOL
'I,'
II "
11:1
0:::
0
l-
I- 4 1,2,16-
U "'1 U
« HEXADECANETRIOL "'1
: \I I
W
0 t\) 'I"
I-
W
0 DIFFERENTIAL I I
« 2 "" 0
: \' ,L'L __ '
, " I
REFRACTIVE INDEX I I , Ii I
0::: 'I'" \ I I
-- / ... \ \..--_..... / \
.....- ___ /
00 2 4 6 8 10 5 o
TIME (MIN)
ACETYL-CoA + 7 MALONYL-CoA
!
CH 3 (CH 2 )4 - CH = CH-CH 2 - CH= CH- (CH 2 )7 CO-S-CoA
w - Hydroxylation
~H 2(CH2)4 -CH = CH-CH 2- CH= CH- (CH 2 )7 CO-S- CoA
OH I
Epoxidation ~ (NADPH, O2 )
yH 2 (CH 2 )4 -CH = CH-CH 2 -C,H-CH-(CH 2 )7 CO-S- CoA
OH
Epoxide Hydration ! 0/
% Residue solubilized
Treatment Identity of Soluble
Weight Radioactivity
Product
Cellulase +
pectinase 41 21 ND
Pronase 6 4 ND
Cutinase 3 61 10,16-Dihydroxypalmitic
acid
LiAlH4 42 95 1,7,16-Hexadecanetriol
LiBH4 35 96 1,7,16-Hexadecanetriol
NaBH4 9 7 ND
KOH in 47 94 10,16-Dihydroxypalmitic
ethanol acid
BF3 in 41 95 Methyl 10,16-Dihydroxy-
methanol palmitate
,,0
CH z (CH z )14 -C~ CoA
~
OH OH
OH
OH 'S,:CV.
HYDROXYACYL
CUTIN TRANSFERASE
(PRIMER)
..J
o
a:::
r-
w
z<(
l)
lLJ
o
<{
X
lLJ
I
10 20 30
LEAF AREA (cm 2 )
Figure 17. Age-dependent changes in the amount and
the isomer composition of the hexadecane triol fraction
from the hydrogenolysate of Vioia faha cutin. 68 The amount
of the total triol was determined by gas chromatography
and is represented by arbitrary units; isomer composition
was estimated by mass spectrometry. 65
!
ACETYL-CoA+MALONYL-CoA " - - -
--?"'---!.~ Czo - CaoFA
FATTY ACID SYNTHETASE EL~NGATION
I
+
!
CH a (CH z I7 CH= CH(CH z I 7 COOH
w - HYDROXYLATION
CH z (CH z 114 COOH CH z (CH z I7 CH= CH(CH z I7 COOH
OH 1 OH
W - HYDROXYACID
j
DEHYDROGENASE (NADP)
l
O. 0.
H'C (CH z 114 COOH H,C(CH ZI7 CH = CH (CHZ)7COOH
1 w-OXOACID
DEHYDROGENASE (NAD.)
- I
1
I
12 3D::
-
Z
lLI
:IE m
u ::>
...... 9 CJ)
U (!)
lLI 2 ::I..
CJ)
D::
~
0 6 D::
0
I I
:IE
n. ::E
u n.
on
u
0 on
°0 2 4 6 SO 9.
DAYS SUBERIZED
free and bound abscisic acid was washed out by water from
the disks. I I I Exogenous abscisic acid did not fully restore
the suberization rates in washed tissue. Even though it
is not known whether the removal of abscisic acid is the sole
reason for the severe inhibition of suberization resulting
from the washing of the disks, the above results suggest
that abscisic acid might playa key role in the regulation
of suberin synthesis.
•
+
Cutinase I
4
E
Co
"C
co 0
0
-
>-
":;
"+=
0
6
I M
+
I
0
0 Cutinase n
"C
0
a::: 4
60
Mobility (mm)
4
•
:r:
'"m
o~
Z:r:
·0
~l.:
2 W Z
(fl-
E <[
Z~
.
"- ~
E
a. :::>
V\. ~V\
u
0
~.... .JU
'<I'
0 4 t t t t
•
:r:
u
I I I
'"m0 I
~ I I I
::J Z~
I I
+ C) I I
E ~I'-
I I
I
a:: 2 w:r:
(flo.
I
I
t- <[~ I I I
Z I
~ I I I
:::>
I I I I
C;~
W
0
I
(/)
I I
z I I
0 I I
a.. + I
l ~
(/)
w w I
a:: )--
Z ~
'0 W
...JZ S! U; ~ Z
a:: 0..
<!)<[
...J U ...J Z
w
~
<[ <[
(fl <[ <[
> W W
(/) <[ U Z ...J
a:: Z <[
~
...J
w
a::(fl
a::
)- U Vi ...J
0 :::> 0 )-
<X: U
:r: I-
:::> w:::>w a:: Z
Z I- :::>
<[ ...J m ...Jw...J
-...Ja::
)-
I-
w
:r:
<X: <!)
0 0..
~ 0
Z Z
0 w
~~JL~
I-
U (fl
<X: )-
0
0 u a::
Z 0..
~ 1 ..... '--
<X:
Figure 23. Distribution of radioactivity among the
amino acids in the hydrolysate of the protein isolated by
Bio-ge1 P-2 gel filtration of NaB3H4-treated cutinase I
from F. soZani pisi. The bottom tracing shows an amino
acid analyzer pattern obtained from a hydrolysate of
untreated cutinase. 81
CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
W. E. HILLIS
Introduction 247
Description of Secondary Wood Changes 249
Features of Heartwood Formation 264
Effect of Changes on Wood Quality 270
Nature of Differences in Non-structural Components 272
Origin of Extractives 283
The Role of Ethylene in the Formation of Cell Wall
and Polyphenols 293
Conclusions 294
References 296
INTRODUCTION
247
248 W. E. HILLIS
narrower xylem rings than younger wood and its rings are
made up essentially of thin-walled cells with negligible
latewood and a higher lignin and lower a-cellulose content. 109
DESCRIPTION OF SECONDARY
WOOD CHANGES
With Thuja pZicata it was found that the faster the growth
rate the wider the sapwood;345 with JugZans nigra and Prunus
serotina there is a strong and consistent relationship
between growth rate and sapwood thickness. 253 For a given
age Pinus taeda trees having the fastest growth rate during
the last 10 years have a relatively smaller proportion of
heartwood and this relationship is maintained irrespective
of the nature of the site. 242 A relationship has also
been shown between rate of growth and sapwood width in
spruce, silver fir and sessile oak. 39 A decrease in site
quality results in a decrease in heartwood volume of P.
syZvestris of the same age l13 and an increase in the sapwood
transition age of Cryptomeria japonica,179 but it has no
effect on Pseudotsuga menziesii.~44
NATURE OF DIFFERENCES IN
NON-STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
H'C~
O"H 0
I p- Thujaplicin
SECONDARY CHANGES IN WOOD 275
HO
HO 0
I Robinetin j[ Dihydromyricetin
HO H O w p - ODH r '\
~
I -
Hz
HO 0
HO HO
~CH ~CH OH
HO)=.l-Ht-o-OH HO)=TH~-60H
:2I 3,5,4'- '2!! 3,5,3',4'-
Trihydroxystilbene Tetrahydroxystilbene
OH
HO
Viii A Unit of Leucocyanidin
HO~Oy~ H0:cQCO-0 H
0Y-O-
o
OCH3 H3CO
;:,..1 1 'I~
o
_
OCH
3
OH
H'I
:-~~~:
H~ CA2
H~0'WP-0
~ O~
;:,..
HO
1
0
H2
-
~~ )(\7j Sakuranetin
~H~CH3
OH OH H~UCOSE~O
1
'I ~ OH
-
:gy Hydroxymatairesinol
GLUCOSE ;:,.. H
HO
1<VIf 6,8 ~di - C -glucosylapigenin
i
H,CO~:-.-
H~O 0 \
XVIII Ellagic Acid o
]iR 3,4,3'- Tri-O-methyl- ellagic acid
4'- glucoside
OH
]&I lso-olivil
"lOrn Matairesinol
HO OH
XXiii Quercetin
q9
HOOt CH 3
~ F'odocarpic Acid m Kaempferol-3-rhamnOSide
H~Oro-.;::
HO;:""
I 0 =0
:m: Scopoletin
HO~
'I ~ CH
XX2!! Pinosylvin - I~
HO He,,==!
Pinosylvin monomethylether (R = H)
H~~
'I_ ~ R~
HC-D
OH
HO~l-OH
HO
HO HQ~O
'I ~ OH
;:,...
I OH
-
HO HO 0
2000 A Unit of Leucodelphinidin :mn: Dihydrokoempferol
~ Eudesmin
~
I H-
H
~
HO
o
0
'I~
YY:P
~
HO
I
0
'l ~
H2
-
ORIGIN OF EXTRACTIVES
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
E. T. REESE
311
312 E. T. REESE
~~!••••
d
"I""'
" .'.
:> {~ e
~)~ ~\,~.
Figure 1. Hyphal penetration of wood cell-walls (a and
b) through pits, (c) constriction of hypha in wall, and
(d and e) enzymatic hydrolysis preceding penetration. 64
Cellulase
<:,
I
Constitutive Induced
/
--
>C
0
80
A/
/
'"
oS /
60
QI
E
I
I
, /
>-
N
C
I
J I /
w I I I
40 I /'"
I
I b... /
20
I
I
] ...... ...
/
--
I
I "'0..
I
I
r.) b.
j - -c>-- - - - "'"
4 8 12 16 20 d(lYs
IncubatIon
Exo-S-l,3-glucanase Basidiomycete 7 30
QM 806
Exo-S-l,3-glucanase Sclerotinia 8 15
Endo-S-l,3-glucanase Rhizopus 165 45
S-1,4-Glucan Trichoderma 14** 7,23
cellobiohydrolase
S-Glucosidase Trichoderma 50** 9
Endo-S-l,4-glucanase Trichoderma (10) E. T. Reese
(estimate)
Endo-S-l,6-glucanase Rhizopus 400+ 82
S-Glucosidase Asp. phoenicis 7 E. T. Reese
(estimate)
3 x 10 6 cm 2 jg. The latter are, for the most part, too small
to permit the entrance of large enzyme molecules (Fig. 6),
and digestion is therefore limited to the surfaces of the
large voids. It is possible to increase the size of the
wall capillaries by various types of swelling treatments,
and by dissolving out inter-micellar materials (pulping).
In nature, the fungus, itself, dissolves channels as it
advances through the wall, thereby increasing the surface
available to the enzyme.
C,/' W
,,
I
\
\
\
\
\
,
\
\
I \
I
I
I
,I ORE\ . ENZYME
I
I
from the hyphae. One must conclude either that the porosity
is greater than supposed, at least in the environment of
the organism, or that some enzyme components are smaller
than those that have been characterized, or both. Still
another possibility is that the organism itself is able to
open up the cell-wall pores by some unsuspected mechanism,
suchias the secretion of an active chemical of small size
(see below) or by physical forces exerted in local areas.
Our ignorance of these actions stems from the inability to
detect small, local changes resulting from action of the
organism on its substrate.
ESTERASE
SATURATION
METHYL BUTYRATE
Figure 7. Enzyme action on soluble (S) and on insolu-
ble (I) substrate. (After Sarda, 66.)
ENZYMIC DEGRADATION OF POLYMERIC CARBOHYDRATES 323
Cellulose
Peet1J'l and
Hem1eellulose
Protein
P&H
Cellulose
P&H
Protein
P&H
Cellulose
NON-SPECIFIC
.,. PROTEASES
COLLAGEN DNA
Figure 10. Action of enzymes on highly ordered struc-
tures. E = Enzyme acting on DNA.
~
C»
"Crystalline" Cl Amorphous or Cx
Cellulose ) Disordered Cellulose --------+ [Glucose] n= 1 - 6 a-Glucosidase~ Gl ucose
(a-Glucosidase produc-)
ing Fungi
rn
;-i
:0
m
m
en
m
ENZYMIC DEGRADATION OF POLYMERIC CARBOHYDRATES 329
-,,-S_-::-l~,4~-:-IgOl,;I::.;u::.;c:..;:a:..;:n~~!,;;:I;,::u;,::c.;:;an;.:0.:..-+,
12, oligomers
hydrolase
0-
Swollen
cellulose;
Cl alkali- .:. .S_-..::;I-'-,. . ;4_-...g'-l;...u..:c...:.a;.;:.n~g""l;;..:u-'c;..;o:...---+l glucose
Cotton ---+ hydrolase
soluble
cellulose
S-I,4-glucan cello- l cellobiose
biohydrolase
ENZYME PROPERTIES
Endo-g1ycanases
a-Amylase
Liquefying B. subtiZis 8 or 9 68
Saccharifying B. subtiZis 4 68
Soybean 8 68
Taka amylase (A. ol'yzae?) 7 68
Porcine pancreatic 5 68
a-1,6-g1ucanases PeniaiUium 5 32
Al'throbaatel' 10 32
Cytophaga 8 32
S-1,4-g1ucanases P. no tatum 5 54
MYl'otheaium 5 81
Lysozyme 6
Exo-g1ycanases
S-Amy1ase Soybean 7 68
Wheat bran 5 68
G1ucamy1ase Ryizopus deZemal' 7 68
ENZYMIC DEGRADATION OF POLYMERIC CARBOHYDRATES 335
Endo-acting enzymes R
Exo-acting enzymes I
Glycosidases R
Synthetases:
UDP-a-glucose+ a-glucans R
UDP-a-glucose+ S-glucans I
Phosphorolytic enzymes I
(R)*
A. Inversion of product
Transfer of a monomeric unit
a-Linked substrates
a-l,4-glucan + H2O -+ Fungal 50
••• (3-D-glucose Glucoamylase 20,25
a-l,3-glucan + H2O -+ C'ladosporium 76
••• (3-D-glucose resinae
a-mannan + H20 -+ Fungi 19
(3-mannose
a-glucosyl fluoride -+ 5
(3-glucose
(3-Linked substrates
(3-l,3-glucan -+ a-D- Fungi 50,20
glucose Eug'lena 6
(3-l,4-glucan -+ a-D- Bacteria 10
glucose Fungi 40
Transfer of dimer unit
a-Linked
a-l,4-g1ucan -+ ~-maltose ~-amylase of 37
higher plants
(3-Linked
(3-l,4-glucan -+ a-cello- Bacteria 70
biose Fungi 18
B. Retention
Transfer of monomeric unit
a-l,6-glucan -+ a-glucose Streptococcus 77
Transfer of dimeric unit
a-l,6-glucan -+ a-isomaltose Arthrobacter 67
@
UI/lIUIUIUIII/I/UIIIUUUl/l/lll/, UlIINUJUIIIIIII'iWlUIlIW'"
®
W~ - t
p,
H H
[XO-ENZYME IJm.U.ULJ SPECIFIC ZONE OF ENZYME
' - - - NON-SPECIFIC ZONE
GLYCOSIDASE OR EN DO-ENZYME
*Abdullah et at. , 1.
80
30
-..
.-.
E 70
E
-----
.... --
....
.... _.. --
...
U 60
S
.
~
::I i...,.
"io 20
.!
tI
'V
50
<to
-•
§
E
'i: ::I
II
6
..
.z:.
u
~
0 30
~
0 10
-- ----
-- ---- -- -.. 20
10
MALTOTETRAOSE
HOCH2
HO~CHb:OH HO~CHb c,0'fioH HjOCH2...
OH: ,OH H H~ ,-------, ~
t
HO : .l-fO
OH---------· OH
OH ~ HO OH
Jt
HOCH2 HOCH2
- 3G - 3G - 3G - 3G
6 6
I I
G G
over the new terminal 1-6 linkage, to attack the next 1-3,
forming gentiobiose and glucose as products. Here the enzyme
is specific for the 1,3 bond, but ~hat bond is not neces-
sarily terminal.
Synthesis by Reversion
Glycosidase (3-1,3-
2 (3-G1ucose (3-g1ucosidase (3-1,4- dimers of glucose
~
(3-1.6-
Exo-g1ycanases
2 (3-G1ucose exo-a-1,4-g1ucanase a-1,4-g1ucosy1
glucose 29
2 (3-Ma1tose (3-amy1ase a-1,4-ma1tosy1
ma1tose 29
2 a-Isomaltose exo-(G2)-1,6-g1ucanase a-1,6-isoma1tosy1
isoma1tose 69
E E
.j. .j.
- A- A- A- A- A- A- A-
E1 E2
-} -}
- A- B - A- B - A- B - A- B- A- B-
E3 E4 E3 E4
-} -} -}-}
- 4A - 3A - 4A - 4A - 3A - 4A - 4A
E4 E3
Cellulase ~-1,3-G1ucanase (endo-)
ES
.j..
0-6-0 -6-0 -6-(J) -+ 0-6-(J)
.j..
0~6-0-3-0-6-(J) -+ 0-6-(J)
.j..
E6
.j..
- 3A - 4A - 3A - 4A - 3A - 4A - 3A - 4A -
The only known enzymes capable of hydrolyzing this glucan are
specific for the a-l,4-linkage. 61 (No enzymes are known to
act on. the a-l,3-linkage of this compound). The products are
the dimer, nigerose (A-3A) and the tetramer (A-3A-4A-3A), of
which the tetramer is dominant. Enzymes of this type are sne-
cific for the 1-+4 link of the mixed glucan, and cannot act on
a homo-glucan where all linkages are 1-+4. Nor can the a-
amylases, which act on an a-l,4-linkage in a-l,4-glucan, act
on the 1-+4 linkage of the mixed glucan.
- A
-}
E7 -+ 6
A - 4A - 4A
-}
6
A - 4A - 4A
t I
ES
pullulanase (E 7) -+ A - 4A - 4A maltotriose sO
isopullulanase (ES) -+ A - 4A - 6A isopanose 65
E9 EIO
-} -}
A-a3B-S4A-a3B-S4A-a3B-S4A-a3B
t
Ell
Enzymes E9 and EIO act on the same linkage of the octomer
but E9 acts preferentially at the middle of the molecule, and
EIO at the bond nearest the reducing end. A different enzyme
(Ell) acts on the a-linkage. Tetramers often form an appre-
ciable part of the products.
ENZYMIC DEGRADATION OF POLYMERIC CARBOHYDRATES 353
El
- A - A -'" A - A - A
I
B
- X - X - '" X - X
I I
A A
There is no hydrolysis of - X - X - X -
I I
A A
E JZ
A - A - and - A- A- A- A- A- •
I
X
*
The best known enzyme of this type is lysozyme.
Substrate Non-substrate
A-S+4A P04-6'A-S+4A
A-S+4A
OCH 3 OCH 3
I I
C=O C=O
1:----0
o OH
OH OH
Figure 17. Unsaturated dimer produced from pectin by
bacterial e1iminase.
hydrolases, endo-
exo- dimer removing; monomer removing
eliminases, endo-
exo- dimer removing, monomer removing
methyl esterases
Cellulose degradation
weight loss %
Organism
°2-Atmosphere N2-Atmosphere
Cellulose Lignin
Cellobiose Quinone
\
phenol
oxidases
Cellobiono-
Diphenol
)
lactone
1 E2 1 E3
Cellobionic acid Ring cleavage etc.
5 p + R* ,
where E is an enzyme other than cellulase, acting on its sub-
strate (5) to yield two products, P and R*, R* being a highly
reactive molecule. Then
Pestalotiopsis (%)
westerdijkii
QM381 170 0.1 1 26 0.3 1.1
Trichoderma
viride QM9414 220 10.0 1 26 8.9 9.7
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
OF LIGNIN
J. G. ZEIKUS
Introduction 369
Methodology 370
Organisms and Environment 372
Chemistry and Physiology of Fungal Degradation 375
Conclusions 390
References 391
INTRODUCTION
369
370 T. K. KIRK, W. J. CONNORS, J. G. ZEIKUS
METHODOLOGY
aOnly those organisms are included which have been shown beyond a reasonable doubt to
cause structural alterations in, or complete decomposition of, unaltered lignins.
bThe white-rot, brown-rot, litter-decomposing, and soft-rot fungi are not taxonomically
classified as such. Their delineation is based solely on the types of decay caused.
cGravimetric analyses for lignins,_ based on acid-insolubility, 55 are neither fully
accurate nor specific, and can be used as criteria for lignin decomposition only when the
depletion is great enough to leave no reasonable doubt, and when care is taken to rule out
spurious results. Co)
dThese soft-rot fungi are probably Ascomycetes, but their perfect stages are not known, "I
Co)
and they are placed in Fungi Imperfecti.
374 T. K. KIRK, W. J. CONNORS, J. G. ZEIKUS
b
Method of Change
Property analysis a Increase Decrease
COOH
fH10H CHs
o
[0----0
---Jl'looH
COOH
/" ;'
r;\
,I
OC2H 5
OR'
1,200.------r----r---.----r-----,
1,000
E 800
Q.
"t:1
N
0 600
u
!:
C
£ 400
200
time, days
30r-----------------------------~
2.6mM N
20
10
26mM N
°O~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
40 60
TIME, DAYS
Component Amount
Glucose 10.0
NH4N03 .05
L-Asparagine .10
KH2P04 .20
MgS04· 7H20 .05
CaC12 .01
Thiamine'HC1 .0025
Trace meta1s a < .001 of each
Lignin .01-3.0
___ b
Buffer
H2 0 1 liter
60r---------.---------.---~----_,
~
.....
~
i:::
(,)
~
IS
~ 40
-J
~
f:?
~
~
'-
20
~
&:
~
I;;:
~
:st
00 20 40 60
TIME, DAYS
CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
D. BIR MULLICK
Introduction 396
Balsam Woolly Aphid 397
Chemistry and Localization of Reddish-purple Pigments
of Necrophy1actic Periderms 402
Discovery of a Non-suberized Impervious Tissue 409
Rhytidome Development 413
Phe110gen Restoration 418
Non-specific Nature of Defense Associated with
Penetration of Bark Surface 420
Non-specific Nature of Defense during Penetration of
Vascular Cambium 426
Non-specific Nature of Defense during Penetration of
Sapwood 428
Conclusions 430
Acknowledgments 433
References 433
395
396 D. BI R MULLICK
INTRODUCTION
PHELLEM FORMATION
PHELLODERM FORMATION
For the first two years of research, the F-F test was
carried out only through the cambial surface, and resulted
in blue coloration of the entire sample, including the injured
zone, until the development of impermeability, when the test
solutions stopped at a concave zone some distance from the
injury (Fig. 16, color plates). The impermeability around
injuries in A. amabiZis~ A. grandis~ T. pZicata~ and T. hetero-
phyZZa developed in three to four weeks in summer. 28 Cryo-
stat sections through such injuries showed that the stain had
stopped at the internal boundary of a zone of enlarged cells.
Critical examination failed to reveal any special feature of
the enlarged cells ascribable to impermeability (Fig. 6). In
general, they did not show suberization but occasionally
410 D. SIR MULLICK
,........-
--. _.-_ . ~- - ---- ..
---
I TEST SOWTION
\ OR WATER
Jan. 9 147
Feb. 14 109
Mar. 24 70
June 6 14
July 4 16
July 27 23
Sept. 5 35
Nov. 1 214
Control 16
1.5 17
2.0 29
3.0 49
CONCLUSIONS
NP
VC(i)
NP - NECROPHYLACTIC PERIDERM
op - EXOPHYLACTIC PERIDERM
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
COLOR PLATE I
COLOR PLATE II
COLOR PLATE IV
~"i~
IV
Chapter Eleven
UTILIZATION OF CHEMICALS FROM WOOD: RETROSPECT AND PROSPECT*
FRANKLIN W. HERRICK
Introduction 443
Compounds Obtainable by Direct Processes 448
Chemicals Derived from Carbohydrate Components 471
Chemical Products Derived from Lignin 487
Utilization of Wood Raw Materials and Pulp
Mill Byproducts 498
Conclusion 503
References 507
INTRODUCTION
% by weight
% by weight
% by weight
food sugars
animal feed
sOlid hydrocarbons
phenolic tars
a-pinene S-pinene
[1] [2]
UTILIZATION OF CHEMICALS FROM WOOD 451
\
\
eOOH
Abietic acid
[3]
UTILIZATION OF CHEMICALS FROM WOOD 453
The story of tall oil (Swedish for pine oil) and its
development as a large scale industrial commodity during
the past 25 years is a hopeful sign that other wood chemical
resources will become important in the future. Present
United States capacity for tall oil fractional distillation
is about one million tons/year (907,000 tonnes/year). One
tonne of crude tall oil yields 300 kg of fatty acids,
350 kg of rosin, and 350 kg of head, intermediate and pitch
fractions.
Oleic acid
[4]
Linoleic acid
[5]
HO
Sitosterol
[7]
H H
C=C-COOH
OH
Ferulic acid
[8]
HOCH2-(CH2)16-COOH
w-Hydroxystearic acid
[10]
o
II
C,\
HO CHZ
/
OH OH
Hydroxymatairesinol Conidendrin
[11] [12]
HO
HO
OH
Conidendrol
[13]
the dry wood. 141 The highest yields were obtained from
the darkly stained heartwood segments of old trees. The
chemical structure of seven related lignans, including
plicatic acid [14] and its lactone plicatin [15] were eluci-
dated during the 1960's.189
OH OH
HO HO
OH OH
OAc OH
OH OH
OH OH
HO
OH
Dihydroquercetin Catechin
[18] [19]
UTILIZATION OF CHEMICALS FROM WOOD 465
OH
HO OH
OH
OH
OH
OH OH
OH
HO
~ OH
OH
Sulfonated tannin
repeating unit Catechinic acid
[22] [23]
468 F. W. HERRICK AND H. L. HERGERT
Dry solids
% by weight
Carbohydrates: monomeric 19
polymeric 57
Lignin (derived) 9
Aldonic acids (as gluconic) 7
Furfural 3
Formic and acetic acids 1
Nitrogen 1
Ash 2
470 F. W. HERRICK AND H. L. HERGERT
Dry solids
Monomeric Tota1*
% by weight
Galactose 4 10
Glucose 2 14
Mannose 5 40
Arabinose 3 3
Xylose 5 9
Total 19 76
*After hydrolysis.
HO OH
OH OH
OH
HO HO HO OH
HO OH OH
Dry solids
Base: Sodium Ammonium
% by weight
Wood sugars - total 29.5 24.9
Galactose 4.0 3.4
Glucose 4.4 3.2
Mannose 15.5 13.4
Arabinose 1.5 1.2
Xylose 4.1 3.7
Carbohydrate polymers 0.0 3.5
Lignosulfonates (as sodium) 67.0 66.0
Aldonic acids (as gluconic) 1.6 3.5
S03Na
I
HOCH
I
HOCH
I
HOCH
I
HCOH
I
HCOH
I
CH20H
Furfural Hydroxymethylfurfural
[31] [32]
UTILIZATION OF CHEMICALS FROM WOOD 475
Diphenolic acid
[36]
OH
Levoglucosan
[37]
480 F. W. HERRICK AND H. L. HERGERT
COOH
I
COOH HCOH COOH
I I I
HCOH HCOH HCOH
I I I
HOCH HOCH HOCH
I I I
HCOH HCOH HCOH
I I I
HCOH HCOH HCOH
I I I
CH 20H CH 20H COOH
COOH
I
HCOH
I
CH2
I
CH20H
2,4-Dihydroxybutyric Glucoisosaccharinic
acid acid
(two isomers) (two isomers)
[44] [45]
UTILIZATION OF CHEMICALS FROM WOOD 483
CH20H CH20H
I I
HCOH HOCH CH20H
I I I
HOCH HOCH HCOH
I I I
HCOH HCOH HOCH
I I I
HCOH HCOH HCOH
I I I
CH20H CH 20H CH 20H
CH20H
I
CH20H HCOH
I I
CH 20H CH 20H
CHO COOH
OH OH OH
CHO CHO
OH OH
Syringa1dehyde p-Hydroxybenza1dehyde
[54] [55]
OH OH
COOH
YOCH. YOH
OH OH OH
OH
6 0-.
OH OH OH
Monoalkylphenols
R=methyl, ethyl,
Phenol 2,4-Xylenol
propyl (three
[61] [63]
isomers each)
[62]
T
CH 3-S-1::H 3
CONCLUSION
Price Range
Raw Material <;./kg <;./lb
REFERENCES
45. E1gee, H. 1973. AIChE Chem. Eng. Frog. Symp. No. 133,
69:6-10.
46. Enkvist, T. 1975. J. Appl. Polymep Sci. J Appl.
Polymep SympoBium No. 28:285-95.
47. Enkvist, T., J. Turunen, and T. Ashorn. 1962. Tappi
45(2) :128-35.
48. Era, V. and J. Hannula. 1974. PapePi ja Puu 5:489-95.
49. Esser, M. H. ed. 1976. Proc. Lightwood Research
Coord. Council, 154 pp.
50. Esterer, A. K. and L. E. Dowd. 1964. u.s. Patent
3,131,198, to Weyerhaeuser Timber Company.
51. Evans, J. C. W. 1975. Pulp & Papep 50(7):23-7.
52. Evshov, B. N. 1970. Izv. VVZJ PiBhchJ Teknol. No.
6:32.
53. Fomichev, A. V., et a1. 1968. U.S.S.R. Patent 249,364.
54. Forss, K. and K. Passinen. 1976. Pap. ja Puu 58(9):
608-18.
55. Franklin, E. C., M. A. Taras, and D. A. Volkman. 1970.
Tappi 53(12):2302-4.
56. Gaden, E. L., M. H. Mande1s, E. T. Reese, and L. A.
Spano. 1976. Enzymatic Conversion of Cellulosic
Materials: Technology and Application. Biotech.
and Bioeng. Symposium No.6, 316 pp. Interscience,
New York.
57. Galloway, D. 1975. Pulp and Papep 49(9):104-5.
58. Garber, J. D., C. Jones, and R. E. Jones. 1960. U.S.
Patent 2,929,823, to Merck and Co.
59. Gardner, J. A. F., G. M. Barton, and H. MacLean. 1959.
Can. J. Chem. 37:1703-9.
60. Gardner, J. A. F., B. F. MacDonald, and H. MacLean.
1960. Can. J. Chem. 38:2387-94.
61. Gardner, J. A. F., E. P. Swan, S. A. Sutherland, and
H. MacLean. 1966. Can. J. Chem. 44:52-8.
62. Goheen, D. W. 1964. Tappi 47(6):14A-26A.
63. Goheen, D. W. 1965. In Lignin Structure and Reactions.
R. F. Gould, ed. pp. 205-25. Advan, Chem. Sere
No. 59, ACS, Washington, D.C.
64. Goheen, D. W. 1973. AIChEJ Chem. Eng. Frog. Symposia
No. 133 J 69:20-24.
65. Goheen, D. W. and C. F. Bennett. 1961. J. OPg. Chem.
26:1331-2.
66. Go1dschmid, O. and H. L. Hergert. 1961. Tappi 44(12):
858-70.
67. Goldstein, I. S. 1975. Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Chem.
Marketing & Econ., Preprint:25 pp.
68. Goldstein, I. S. 1975. J. Appl. Polymep Sci. J Appl.
Polymep Symposium No. 28:259-67.
510 F. W. HERRICK AND H. L. HERGERT
517
518 SPECIES INDEX
521
522 SUBJECT INDEX