Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
The present study explores the determinants and lifestyle correletes of musical
preferences among a large sample of high school students in Toronto, Ontario.
Our work is informed by theory and research on cultural stratification and ado-
lescent subcultures. In terms of cultural stratification, we engage with Bourdieu’s
(1984) and Peterson’s (1996) conceptualizations of elite taste, while subcultural
theory encourages us to focus upon more dissenting tastes and to explore con-
nections between musical tastes and peer group activity. Our findings suggest
that racial and ethnic identity, school experiences and cultural capital are signifi-
cant sources of variation in musical tastes that loosely correspond to existing
typologies; they also confirm what has often been inferred – that musical tastes
and peer group cultural practices are closely linked. Our findings are then dis-
cussed in the light of current debates about the nature and dimensions of lis-
tening audiences for music.
Keywords: Youth; music; cultural stratification; subcultures; school; leisure
The quantity of recorded music available in our environment has grown expo-
nentially over the past several decades (Trondman 1990; Roe 1999). Most of
what is listened to is pop or rock music, though the looseness of this catego-
rization conceals that fact that it is differentiation, not homogenization, which
characterizes the contemporary musical field. While musical likes and dislikes
are conventionally understood as matters of personal taste, social scientists say
otherwise and postulate intimate connections between social stratification and
cultural stratification. The most famous proponent of this position is now
Tanner (Department of Social Science, University of Toronto at Scarborough), Asbridge (Department of Community Health and
Epidemiology, Dalhousie University) and Wortley (Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto) (Corresponding author email:
Julian.tanner@utoronto.ca)
© London School of Economics and Political Science 2008 ISSN 0007-1315 print/1468-4446 online.
Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden,
MA 02148, USA on behalf of the LSE. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00185.x
118 Julian Tanner, Mark Asbridge and Scot Wortley
Roe and his fellow Swedish researchers are,in part,also chroniclers of a putative
shift in the content of high cultural musical tastes.All acknowledge that, among
people who were young in the 1980s, jazz and blues had become musical
preferences of high school elites. As Trondman (1990) suggests, selective types
of popular music had been granted status, in Bourdieu’s terms, as legitimate
culture – they are seen as approximating the qualities and standards found in
classical music. That this is not just a Nordic, or European, phenomenon has
been made more apparent in research carried out in North America, beginning
with Michelle Lamont and her comparative study of the cultural habits and
lifestyles of males (1992) in France and the USA.Her insight was that high status
individuals in the USA achieve and maintain distinction in a different manner
from their French counterparts. Instead of restricting themselves to traditional
elite culture, they display their superiority by a willingness and ability to engage
with both highbrow and popular art forms. As a result, the boundaries of
legitimate culture have broadened. However, it is the work of Richard Peterson
and his colleagues that best illustrates this trend. Importantly, his subject matter
is music, his focus the changing nature of (adult) listening audiences (Peterson
1992; Peterson and Simkus 1993; Peterson and Kern 1996).
Peterson’s research shows that members of high status occupational groups
are more likely to report liking not only classical music and opera, but many
types of popular music as well. Indeed, he insists that this is how they announce
their exclusivity and distinctiveness. Rather than monopolizing a narrow
round of cultural pursuits and, concomitantly, dismissing everything else, they
hold a conspicuous appreciation of disparate musical tastes. The contemporary
signifier of wealth and status is not refined interests but polymorphous ones.
As Peterson (1992) puts it, yesterday’s snob has become today’s omnivore.
However, Peterson is reporting on more than just the expansion of upper class
musical taste. He also contends that low status individuals and groups, rather
than immersing themselves in an undifferentiated mass culture, involve them-
selves instead, more or less exclusively, in particular musical genres. Mass taste
is, therefore, anything but, as different groups of low status individuals listen to
different types of music – they have become univores. Not coincidently, the
types of music enjoyed by low status univores are themselves seen as low status
(e.g. blue grass, country and western, heavy metal, and rap). Crucially, those
same genres also comprise the types of music that even omnivores refuse to
listen to (Bryson 1996, 1997).
What is being described and explained here, let us not forget, is the recon-
figuration of adult musical taste.3 An obvious question, given that young
people routinely listen to more music than adults and are primarily responsible
for most musical innovation, is whether similar structures of omnivorous and
univorous taste are emerging among adolescents, similarly interpretable in
© London School of Economics and Political Science 2008 British Journal of Sociology 59(1)
Musical consumption and teenage lifestyles 121
either old or new hierarchical terms, and explainable in terms of the effects of
class and schooling. The Swedish research cited earlier is certainly suggestive
of omnivorous tendencies among status achieving high school students in the
recent past. However, that research, apart from some consideration of socially
devalued (Roe 1995) heavy metal music and its discredited low status listeners,
has little to say about teenage univores. The Swedish studies, furthermore,
make little reference to race and ethnicity as potential sources of musical
differentiation. Likewise, Bourdieu’s observations about the correspondence
between social position and cultural consumption are based almost entirely on
the racially and ethnically monocultural society that was France in the 1960s;
hence his singular emphasis on class. The significance of a missing racial com-
ponent looms especially large when connected to rap, the rapid ascendancy of
which means that new facts of musical consumption need to be explained.
According to some admittedly journalistic accounts, we are currently wit-
nessing a revolution in musical taste – because rap has now eclipsed rock as the
musical choice of today’s teenagers.4 If this is the case, then the arrival of rap
is reversing a process of musical segmentation that has been in place for
several decades. Moreover, the very popularity of rap revives old ideas about
the integrative role of popular music. The contention that rap supplies young
listeners with a common culture echoes the original claim that rock ‘n’ roll had
become a shared musical priority of American adolescents during the Eisen-
hower era (Coleman 1961). Although there is a growing body of research on
rap (see, for example, Binder 1993; Krims 2000; Quinn 2005; Lena 2006), little
of it has been devoted to audience reception. Its absence makes it difficult to
know whether arguments about rap’s unifying effects are any more accurate
than Coleman’s pronouncements about rock were forty years ago (Murdock
and McCron 1976).5
In any case, we are not prepared to accept, at face validity, the argument that
a large audience for rap is necessarily a homogenous one. While not denying
the growing influence of rap among young people, it does not necessarily
follow that the music holds a universal meaning for all who listen to it. Rap has
been represented as both a value carrier of symbolic resistance to racial
inequity and injustice, and as a source of misogyny, rampant materialism, and
violent criminal behaviour (Rose 1994; Keyes 2002; Quinn 2005). The music’s
commercial success and multicultural appeal speaks to its growing acceptance,
even legitimacy, its links to crime and delinquency (with attendant moral
panic), signify the opposite. Whilst some youth may hear rap as protest music,
other less rebellious or resistant ones may enjoy it in combination with other
musical genres. Finally, there is also no compelling reason to believe that the
spread of rap has been at the expense of the development of other new
popular music forms, such as house, techno, and jungle, or the burgeoning club
culture of which they are a part (Thornton 1995). Indeed, their emergence has
been taken by some as evidence of a more postmodern youth culture in which
British Journal of Sociology 59(1) © London School of Economics and Political Science 2008
122 Julian Tanner, Mark Asbridge and Scot Wortley
The research upon which the present study is based was conducted at a time
when the field of popular music was changing – when rap had entered the
mainstream and new musical genres were emerging – and in a city, as noted
earlier, defined by its cultural diversity. It was also undertaken at a time when
the value and importance of education was becoming increasingly apparent –
when relationships between educational attainment and future life chances
were becoming ever closer, when the majority of Canadian youth, for the first
time, embarked upon some form of post-secondary education (Davies and
Guppy 2006). Schooling matters more now than ever before. How it matters,
and how social background matters, for young people and their musical tastes
is the focus of this paper.
Our initial task is descriptive, mapping out the musical likes and dislikes, and
combinations thereof, of our respondents. We then investigate the correlates of
the patterns thus identified. Cultural choices and practices are originally learnt
in the family and then reinforced by what happens at school. According to
Bourdieu, the process of class reproduction in school is largely carried out
through the workings of cultural capital. Young people begin school with
different family based endowments. Those with large endowments – students
from high status backgrounds – find their cultural practices rewarded with good
grades and placement in academically oriented programmes. Students without
those endowments – those from lower class backgrounds and less familiar with
the codes of middle-class culture – do less well in school, as is made clear to them
by the sorting and evaluating practices employed in schools.
While Bourdieu links cultural capital to social reproduction, empirical appli-
cations of the concept have found that it also facilitates social mobility as well.
Research by Paul DiMaggio (1982;see also DiMaggio and Mohr 1985) finds that
cultural capital, although vital to academic success in school, is less strongly tied
to parental background than Bourdieu supposes.The ambitions of talented, but
lower-class students may thus be served by their own involvement in the cultural
capital, a point reinforced by more recent American research indicating that
cultural capital has a positive effect upon grades and educational careers
regardless of whether it is inherited (via socialization) from parents or acquired
by students themselves (Aschaffenburg and Maas 1997).
© London School of Economics and Political Science 2008 British Journal of Sociology 59(1)
Musical consumption and teenage lifestyles 123
(Roe 1983, 1992, 1993; Johansson and Miegel 1992; Trondman 1990; Peterson
1992; Peterson and Simkus 1993, Peterson and Kern 1996; Van Eijck 2001).
Conversely, previous research attests to the oppositional qualities embedded
in the hard rock tradition, particularly heavy metal (Tanner 1981; Roe 1983,
1992, 1993, 1999). However, whether heavy metal is the only musical genre
used in this manner remains to be seen.
We are now in a position to suggest hypotheses about what we expect to find
in our sample of Toronto high school students. First, the proliferation of
musical genres, the number of alternative ways of listening to music, and our
multicultural research site, all encourage us to believe that our high school
sample will be familiar with a variety of musical styles. As we have seen,
Peterson postulates that omnivorous taste has supplanted narrow, refined taste
as the defining cultural trait of American adults in elite positions.We expect that
a similar pattern is emerging among younger Canadian listeners. Moreover, we
believe that high status background, academic achievement, educational ambi-
tion and cultural capital, are likely to predict omnivorous musical tastes.
Second, although we do not anticipate finding large amounts of enthusiasm
for classical music and opera, jazz and blues, we do assume some constituencies
of support for those and related genres. We also anticipate that high status
background, academic achievement, educational ambition, and cultural
capital, are significantly related to a preference for such musical forms. Third,
students from more humble backgrounds, students who perform less well in
school, who have only modest educational plans, and are low in cultural capital
will, we predict, involve themselves in more oppositional and univorous
musical genres. Previous research suggests that hard rock, particularly heavy
metal, will be their musical choice. We see no reason why this tradition should
not be continuing among the present generation of low achievers and rebels.
However, we suspect that school counter cultures may have found another
musical focus as well, namely rap and hip-hop music.
Fourth, we anticipate that musical consumption is related to subcultural
behaviour. We expect an inverse relationship, net of other factors, between
musical clusters that include legitimate or respectable genres and peer leisure
activity, particularly its most delinquent manifestations. Conversely, we expect
that preference patterns that revolve around rap and heavy metal will be
directly related to peer leisure activity, especially its more disreputable versions.
Methods
Data
The data for this paper are drawn from the Toronto Youth Crime and Victim-
ization Study, a stratified cross-sectional survey of Toronto adolescents (Tanner
© London School of Economics and Political Science 2008 British Journal of Sociology 59(1)
Musical consumption and teenage lifestyles 125
Measures
Social background
The impact of students’ social backgrounds on musical preference is initially
examined in terms of demographic variables – gender, age, sex, race, and
ethnicity. The remaining background variables comprise indicators of the SES
characteristics of parents and respondents’ family situation. These include
measures of parental employment (labour force participation), subjective
social class (whether the respondent feels that they are poor, middle class, or
wealthy, as based on answers to the question ‘most of the time when growing
up, how would you describe your family’s financial or economic situation?’),
and parental educational attainment. We also employ a measure of family
intactness – whether or not respondents grew up in a two parent household
(either biological or step-parent).6
School measures
A second set of measures relates to educational attainment, experiences, and
expectations: self-reported grades (proportion receiving mainly ‘A’ grades),
skipping school, suspension from school, and educational stream. The alloca-
tion of students to different programs of study based on ability is a standard
organizational practice of North American high schools. Research consistently
finds that students from high status backgrounds are overrepresented in pro-
grammes that are more academic and students from low status backgrounds
are overrepresented in more vocational programmes. Although less rigid and
overt than in many European educational systems, and less likely to involve
radically differentiated curricula and credentials, stream allocation in Canada
structures future educational opportunities, channeling some students toward
post-secondary educational institutions, and others towards the labour market
(Davies and Guppy 2006). Stream allocation in our study is measured by a
dichotomy of academic versus non-academic stream. We also asked a more
evaluative question about the degree of importance that they attached to
education. Finally, we explored educational futures, by examining how much
and what sort of schooling a student expected to attain. Our measure asks
British Journal of Sociology 59(1) © London School of Economics and Political Science 2008
126 Julian Tanner, Mark Asbridge and Scot Wortley
Cultural capital
Our next independent variable is cultural capital.While mainly used in existing
research as an explanator of educational and occupational attainment
(DiMaggio 1982; Mohr and DiMaggio 1995; Robson 2003), it has also been
deployed to elucidate dispositions, or orientations, towards the arts (Swartz
1997). This is how it is applied in the present study – as a measure of how
different individuals and groups gravitate towards, or away from, particular
musical constellations. Our assumption is that familiarity with high cultural
pursuits provides students with a set of cues (Mohr and DiMaggio 1995) or
‘rules of the game’ (Aschaffenburg and Maas 1997) by which they can inter-
pret the meaning and significance of various popular music genres. This assists
young people to decide which musical genres to appropriate and include in
their listening repertoires and those that they are better off distancing them-
selves from (Trondman 1990). Knowing something about their involvements
with high culture might tell us about how high school students evaluate dif-
ferent genres of popular music. To address this issue we create a cultural
capital index of the frequency of involvement in seven activities that encom-
pass traditional highbrow pursuits. These activities include playing a musical
instrument, attending cultural events, going to the library, going to the sym-
phony or opera, going to the museum, reading a book for pleasure, and
involvement with hobbies. The sum of these seven items is standardized and
has an alpha of 0.65.
out in malls with friends, hanging out on the street, friends visiting your home,
and hanging out in coffee shops (alpha = 0.72). We capture hedonistic leisure
with an index of the frequency of participation in four hedonistic adolescent
pursuits, kissing and fooling around, having sex, going to house parties or raves,
and going to bars or nightclubs (alpha = 0.79). Finally, we asked questions
about illegal behaviour. Indices were created based upon respondents’ usage
of four recreational drugs (alpha = 0.74) and involvement in eight forms of
delinquency (alpha = 0.90). Details concerning all of the measures employed
in this study can be found in Appendix AI.
Musical tastes
Our primary dependent measure is adolescent musical preferences. Musical
categories can be understood as both a marketing strategy devised by the
recording industry and record stores and a more or less accurate reflection of
consumer taste (Frith 1999). Neither fixed and immutable nor arbitrary and
meaningless, they provide a map of musical genres that are broadly recognized
by both the recording industry and those who listen to music.At the same time,
we are very aware that change is the essence of popular music and specific
musical styles only have a short shelf life. Thus while we can claim a nuanced
set of musical categories reflective of the styles available to listeners when the
research was conducted, we are mainly interested in underlying patterns –
patterns that exist regardless of the more ephemeral labels used to categorize
them. Indicators of musical taste in our study are derived from the question:
‘How much do you like each of the following types of music?’ Respondents
were then asked to evaluate each of eleven contemporary musical genres: soul,
rhythm and blues, jazz, hip/hop and rap, reggae and dance hall, classical and
opera, country and new country, pop and top 40, alternative (including punk,
grunge), heavy metal (hard rock), ethnic music (traditional/cultural), and
techno (dance).7 Musical tastes were assessed on a five-point Likert scale that
addresses whether respondents liked the musical genre ‘Very much’, ‘Quite a
lot’, ‘A little bit’, ‘Not very much’, and ‘Not at all’.
Unlike some previous research that has focused exclusively on the musical
genres most liked (Peterson and Kern 1996) or disliked (Bryson 1996, 1997)
by respondents, we calculate the degree of appreciation (or lack of appre-
ciation) each respondent has for each particular musical genre. Our rationale
is twofold: First, we are most interested in developing a typology of the
general patterning of musical tastes: if one type of music is liked (or dis-
liked), what other types of music are liked (or disliked)? – the ‘combinatorial
logic’ that Van Eijck refers to (2001). Second, dichotomizing musical tastes,
and concentrating on either the most favoured or least favoured genres,
results in lost information. It is important for us to understand the middle
ground – those adolescents who structure their tastes around a general
British Journal of Sociology 59(1) © London School of Economics and Political Science 2008
128 Julian Tanner, Mark Asbridge and Scot Wortley
Analytic procedure
Results
Variables How much do you like each of the following types of music?
N 1 2 3 4 5
Very much Quite a lot A little bit Not very much Not at all
Soul, Rhythm and Blues 3353 13.1% 10.9% 23.5% 22.1% 30.4%
Jazz 3348 4.5% 5.7% 22.7% 28.3% 38.8%
Hip/Hop and Rap 3356 35.4% 21.0% 20.7% 10.6% 12.3%
Reggae and Dance Hall 3362 22.6% 15.3% 23.6% 17.6% 20.7%
Classical and Opera 3364 4.6% 7.4% 17.3% 19.9% 50.8%
Country and New Country 3353 3.2% 4.8% 16.9% 21.8% 53.3%
Pop and Top 40 3364 23.4% 21.1% 23.2% 12.6% 19.7%
Alternative (Punk, Grunge) 3364 11.9% 10.7% 18.3% 17.9% 41.1%
Heavy Metal (Hard Rock) 3353 7.5% 5.9% 11.1% 17.1% 58.4%
Ethnic Music (traditional/cultural) 3353 9.0% 6.7% 11.5% 14.8% 57.9%
Techno (Dance) 3357 18.8% 18.4% 24.2% 14.2% 24.3%
Musical consumption and teenage lifestyles
Variables Clusters
Soul, Rhythm and Blues 3.46 4.14 2.81 2.66 4.21 4.62 3.35 2.46 0.327 261.42c
Jazz 3.91 4.43 3.93 3.18 4.29 4.66 3.84 2.86 0.273 201.42c
Hip/Hop and Rap 2.44 1.84 1.30 3.08 3.60 3.43 2.51 1.95 0.365 301.42c
Reggae and Dance Hall 2.99 2.32 1.74 3.73 4.16 4.48 3.01 2.22 0.469 373.51c
Classical and Opera 4.05 4.57 4.61 3.01 4.26 4.45 3.87 2.95 0.287 475.36c
Country and New Country 4.17 4.39 4.61 3.82 4.60 4.36 3.84 3.23 0.174 216.64c
Pop and Top 40 2.84 2.31 4.04 2.00 3.26 3.76 2.31 1.84 0.342 113.17c
Alternative (Punk, 3.66 3.89 4.71 3.50 1.57 4.60 4.23 2.36 0.563 692.47c
Grunge)
Heavy Metal (Hard Rock) 4.13 4.52 4.87 4.51 2.10 4.67 4.58 3.00 0.559 679.66c
Ethnic 4.06 4.72 4.60 4.39 4.62 4.42 1.66 3.16 0.558 678.58c
(traditional/cultural)
Techno (Dance) 3.07 1.86 4.33 3.09 3.44 3.99 2.63 2.05 0.405 365.86c
N 3230 616 605 482 425 384 380 338
Notes:
Values approaching 1 indicate a great deal of appreciation for that genre of music, while values approaching 5 indicate a dislike.
a
p < 0.05. b p < 0.01. c p < 0.001 (two-tailed tests).
Musical consumption and teenage lifestyles
techno while the Black Stylists dislike grunge, punk, heavy metal, and
techno.
Variables Clusters
Club Kids Black Stylists New Traditionalist The Hard Rockers The Abstainers Ethnic Culturalist Musical Omnivores
(n = 616) (n = 605) (n = 482) (n = 425) (n = 384) (n = 380) (n = 338)
OR SE OR SE OR SE OR SE SE OR OR SE OR SE
Note:
a
p < .01 b p < .001.
134 Julian Tanner, Mark Asbridge and Scot Wortley
(which probably explains why they have working mothers), whereas Ethnic
Culturalists are most likely to have grown up with both parents present.
Students’ own educational achievements appear to exert a stronger influ-
ence on their musical preferences. Table III demonstrates that this is particu-
larly the case with those students least likely to be regarded by the school as
good ones. Black Stylists report school suspension, frequent absence from
school, and a paucity of ‘A’ grades, more so than other musical clusters. The
Club Kids share some, though not all, of this profile. They skip school and are
unlikely to be ‘A’ students, but are not significantly subject to suspension.
The Black Stylists and Club Kids also report significantly more modest
educational goals than other students. Overall, our respondents had high
educational expectations. In planning for future undergraduate and graduate
degrees and professional qualifications, they provide evidence of the revolu-
tion in Canadians’ educational expectations that Davies and Guppy (2006)
speak of. Within this context, the Black Stylists and Club Kids are relatively
unambitious, planning for no more than an undergraduate education. Like-
wise, they were the only two groups for whom musical taste and educational
plans correlated significantly.
At the other end of the school hierarchy are the New Traditionalists. These
are the high performing students for whom ‘A’ grades are routine, who are
never suspended, and who rarely miss classes. Less easily classifiable are the
Hard Rockers. They are advanced stream students who do not report particu-
larly good grades nor are likely to feel that education is an important part of
their lives. However, their relative disaffection from education does not trans-
late into the oppositional practices of skipping and suspension. School vari-
ables have a more scattered effect upon the remaining taste cultures. Neither
school achievement, or advanced stream status, nor skipping and suspension
predict Ethnic Culturalism, while good attendance is the only hallmark of the
Abstainer group. For their part, the Omnivores are largely devoid of distin-
guishing educational characteristics.
Although it appears that musical preferences are more related to the edu-
cational domain than the familial one, it may also be that our analysis has
understated the contribution that parents make to their children’s tastes: since
we do not partition the indirect effects of parental background on respon-
dents’ educational achievements, it is possible that some of the school effects
are themselves a consequence of family background.
Partial support for this proposition is found when we examine links
between cultural capital, our final independent variable, and musical taste.
We find that students in possession of cultural capital are significantly more
likely to be Musical Omnivores, New Traditionalists, and Hard Rockers;
those bereft of cultural capital are likely to be Club Kids and Black Stylists,
while being an Ethnic Culturalist or Musical Abstainer is unconnected to
cultural capital.
© London School of Economics and Political Science 2008 British Journal of Sociology 59(1)
Musical consumption and teenage lifestyles 135
Socio-demographic
Age -0.02 0.01 0.10b 0.01 0.14b 0.03 -0.20b 0.04
Female -0.12b 0.04 -0.18b 0.04 -0.26 0.11 -1.36b 0.18
Black -0.58b 0.06 -0.29b 0.07 -1.35b 0.25 -0.21 0.40
Asian -0.30b 0.05 -0.50b 0.06 -1.05b 0.15 -0.38 0.16
South Asian -0.32b 0.07 -0.48b 0.06 -1.27 0.14 -0.50 0.22
Other -0.25b 0.04 -0.12 0.06 -0.50 0.22 0.31 0.27
Socioeconomic status
Father received postsecondary education 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.18 0.17 0.02 0.26
Mother received postsecondary education 0.01 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.47a 0.14 0.63 0.24
“A” Student -0.09 0.03 -0.14b 0.03 -0.39b 0.08 -0.28 0.17
Advanced stream -0.13b 0.04 -0.12 0.03 -0.43 0.17 -0.72 0.29
Education is important part of life -0.19b 0.03 -0.15b 0.04 -0.93b 0.19 -1.25b 0.26
Cultural capital 0.12b 0.01 0.03 0.02 -0.20a 0.06 -0.23a 0.08
Musical taste clusters (abstainers ref)
Club Kids 0.50b 0.06 0.32b 0.05 0.27 0.19 0.36 0.27
Black Stylists 0.58b 0.08 0.43b 0.06 0.63a 0.22 1.49b 0.41
New Traditionalists 0.08 0.06 -0.09 0.05 0.07 0.19 -0.08 0.34
Hard Rockers 0.28b 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.68b 0.20 0.02 0.35
Ethnic Culturalist 0.18 0.07 0.13 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.27
Musical Omnivores 0.31b 0.07 0.17 0.06 0.62 0.24 0.54 0.30
Nagelkerke R2 0.21 0.30 0.25 0.23
a
Discussion
This paper has offered a a quantitative reading of audiences for music among
young people, a reading set against an increasingly diverse musical landscape
and informed by theoretical ideas drawn from cultural sociology. Our findings
suggest that the musical preferences of Toronto high school students are both
varied and structured, though not necessarily in ways envisaged by our theo-
retical sources, and are linked to forms of, and degrees of, involvement in peer
group activity.
Bourdieu is primarily concerned with the impact of social class on cultural
consumption. Among our adolescents, however, their own educational expe-
riences and cultural capital are more important immediate influences on
musical taste. The weak direct effects of parental social class and stronger
independent effects of schooling and cultural capital suggest that current
musical preferences more likely foreshadow their future status destinations
than reflect their status origins, and that the school is therefore not just a site
of class reproduction, as Bourdieu supposes. Moreover, while race and
ethnicity play little part in Bourdieu’s analysis of cultural stratification , those
factors emerge as important dererminants of taste in our own.
The most academically successful students in our sample – the young people
most likely to assume high status positions as adults – are the New
Traditionalists. They are certainly an academic elite and have some liking for
classical music and opera. However, their musical tastes cannot be construed
as elitist or highbrow – at least not according to our understanding of those
terms. Not only do they like popular music, but like some types of it more than
they like the classical forms. There is little evidence, therefore, of any aesthetic
distancing, or rejection, of the popular music tradition.
British Journal of Sociology 59(1) © London School of Economics and Political Science 2008
138 Julian Tanner, Mark Asbridge and Scot Wortley
groups – the New Traditionalists and Abstainers (who have little interest in any
kind of music) are the other two – to report disliking rap. They also, unlike the
New Traditionalists, have a low regard for jazz, soul, rhythm and blues, reggae
and dance hall – all musical genres most readily associated with black listeners.
Since the Black Stylists are even more rejecting of heavy metal and punk and
grunge, it would appear that they and the Hard Rockers are involved in a
relationship of mutual disregard and that their respective musical tastes serve
as a symbolic boundary between adolescent groups separated and divided by
race, cultural capital, and school achievement.
In this paper, we have classified and categorized young peoples’ musical
tastes, and made inferences about cultural hierarchies based on respondents’
status characteristics and their degree of cultural capital. However, Sarah
Thornton (1995) has observed that popular music audiences create their own
hierarchies according to their own rules and aesthetics. A limitation of the
present research is that we have little first hand information about how young
people acquire knowledge about, and evaluate, different musical genres – in
a word, how they use subcultural capital. Questions of this sort are probably
better addressed with more qualitative research designs; and indeed more
recent studies of young people, music, and youth culture have employed quali-
tative methods (Bennett 2000; Muggleton 2000). However, these ethnographic
exercises tend to focus on self-identified fans of specific musical styles, the
cognoscenti who may not be representative of all young listeners; such samples
are invariably small and rule out larger questions about the evolving nature of
musica1 taste. We believe that these ‘big picture’ questions are, in fact, best
interrogated with information collected from large numbers of young people
in dedicated surveys of the sort that we have just described.
We have used our survey to direct the ‘cultural turn’ in sociology towards
young people’s musical tastes. Are cultural preferences and cultural practices
forged in adolescence significant for future adult status attainments, as some
studies (i.e. Hagan 1991; Bielby 2004) suggest? Or are the leisure and cultural
preoccupations of youth of only fitful or fleeting consequence for young adult
identities and occuptional careers, as other investigations (i.e. Bynner and
Ashford 1992; Roberts 1997) have found? Answers to this question awaits
future research.
(Date accepted: December 2007)
British Journal of Sociology 59(1) © London School of Economics and Political Science 2008
140 Julian Tanner, Mark Asbridge and Scot Wortley
Independent measures:
Age Years 3331 16.62
Gender Male 1696 49.9
Female 1700 50.1
Race White 1334 39.4
Black 480 14.2
Asian 391 11.5
South Asian 653 19.3
Other 531 15.7
Father received postsecondary education Yes 1073 31.5
No 2327 68.4
Mother received postsecondary education Yes 917 27.0
No 2483 73.0
Father employed full time Yes 2608 76.5
No 792 32.5
Mother employed full time Yes 2057 61.1
No 1308 39.9
Two parent family Yes 2609 76.7
No 791 23.3
Have been suspended from school at least once Yes 450 13.2
No 2950 86.8
Have skipped school at least once Yes 2493 73.3
No 907 26.7
Primarily receive “A” Grades Yes 1092 32.1
No 2308 67.9
Educational Stream Advanced 2642 78.0
General 736 22.0
Education is Important Part of Life Yes 2309 71.8
No 905 28.2
Cultural capital leisure (index of frequency of involvement in Z-score 3325
playing a musical instrument, attending cultural events, going to
the library, going to the symphony or opera, going to the
museum, reading a book for pleasure, and involvement with
hobbies, with an " = 0.65).
Dependent measures:
Future educational plans High school 401 11.8
or less
College/ 1782 52.5
Undergrad
Graduate/ 1206 35.5
Profession
Peer leisure (index of frequency of involvement in driving around Z-score 3289
in car with friends, visiting friends at their home, shopping with
friends, hanging out in malls with friends, hanging on the street,
visiting with friends at your home, hanging out in coffee shops,
with an " = 0.72).
Hedonistic leisure (index of frequency of kissing and fooling Z-score 3321
around, having sex, going to house parties or raves, going to
bars or nightclubs, with an " = 0.79).
Drug Use (index of frequency of use of tobacco, alcohol, Z-score 3336
marijuana, cocaine and crack, and other drugs, with an " = 0.74).
Delinquent involvement (index of frequency of involvement in Z-Score 3396
stealing food, drink, or candy, using public transportation
without paying, spraying graffiti, using fake ID, breaking into
cars, minor theft under $50, property damage, stealing bikes,
with an " = 0.90).
© London School of Economics and Political Science 2008 British Journal of Sociology 59(1)
Musical consumption and teenage lifestyles 141
Notes
1. This research was supported by a grant mothers and fathers employment situation
from the Social Sciences and Humanities (eg. the nature of their work, earnings, posi-
Research Council (SSHRC). We would also tion in work organizations, occupational
like to thank Scott Davies for his comments prestige) by adolescents (or children).
on a previous draft of this paper. 7. Cognisant of the dangers of imposing
2. Bernice Martin has similarly noted a classificatory schema of our own making
the growing alignment of progressive rock upon high school students (albeit with their
with high art traditions in the UK in the late input from focus groups sessions conducted
1960s (Martin 1981). prior to the main survey), we also included
3. For further explorations of this issue an open-ended question that invited them
with adult populations, see Katz-Gerro to identify additional musical favourites. In
(1999) and Van Eijck (2001). total 515 respondents filled in the open-
4. More direct evidence of the ascension ended question. The majority simply regur-
of rap music can be gleaned from the Bill- gitated musical genres presented in the
board chart for the 12 of October 2003, questionnaire, particularly different forms of
where for the first time in American chart ethnic music (Indian, Spanish, Arabic), and
history, all acts in that the top 10 were were variations of club music (trip hop, trance,
rap/hip-hop artists. jungle, drum and beat). Two notable excep-
5. Far from being the overwhelming tions were Christian music and Latin/salsa
musical choice of the teenagers in Cole- music.
man’s sample, Elvis Presley, the most impor- 8. There is a tendency in the sociological
tant symbol of generational differences in literature review to depict young people’s
American society at that time, was consider- behaviours and cultural preferences in
ably less popular than Pat Boone. Subse- polarised terms – as deviant or conformist,
quent analysis revealed that Presley was subcultural or mainstream (Thornton 1995).
primarily the choice of working-class stu- It is this sort of dichotomizing that we seek
dents (Murdock and McCron 1976: 15–16, to avoid.
citing Johnstone 1961). 9. A more direct method of gauging
6. We also collected information on the significance of music is to ask about its
parental occupational status. However, it is importance in people’s lives. We posed
very difficult to get accurate information just such a question. The results suggest that
from students about their parents’ jobs, music was most salient for Black Stylists,
and the answers we received were invariably Hard Rockers and Omnivores: 52% of each
vague. For example, one respondent claimed group said that music was ‘quite’ or ‘very’
that his dad ‘worked for IBM’. Obviously, important to them. Music was less important
we could not determine whether his father for the Club Kids (40%), Ethnic Culturalists
was an executive, a computer scientist, or a (39%), New Traditionalists (36%) and –
member of the janitorial staff. Our experi- not surprisingly – the Abstainers (37%).
ences in this regard cause us to question the Clearly,music is more likely to be a cultural
reliability and validity of measures of paren- focus, albeit in different ways, of the Black
tal class or status characteristics that rely on Stylists, Hard Rockers and Omnivores than
the provision, in surveys, of details about of the remaining groups.
British Journal of Sociology 59(1) © London School of Economics and Political Science 2008
142 Julian Tanner, Mark Asbridge and Scot Wortley
Bibliography
Agnew, R. and Peterson, D.M. 1989 ‘Leisure Bryson, B. 1997 ‘What about the Univores?’
and Delinquency’, Social Problems 36(4): Poetics 25 (2–3): 141–56.
322–50. Bynner, J. and Ashford, S. 1992 ‘Teenage
Aldenderfer, M.S. and Blashfield, R.K. 1984 Careers and Leisure Lives: An Analysis of
Cluster Analysis Series: Quantitative Appli- Lifestyles’, Society and Leisure 15(2): 499–
cations in the Social Sciences, New York: 519.
Sage Publications Inc. Chan, T. and Goldthorpe, J. 2007 ‘Social
Alexander, V. 2003 Sociology of the Arts, Stratification and Cultural Consumption:
Oxford: Blackwell. Music in England’, European Sociological
Aschaffenburg, K. and Maas, I. 1997 Review 23(1): 1–19.
‘Culture and Educational Careers: The Coleman, J. 1961 The Adolescent Society,
Dynamics of Social Reproduction’, Ameri- New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
can Sociological Review 62(4): 573–88. Christenson, P.G. and Peterson, J.B. 1988
Bennett, A. 2000 Popular Music and Youth ‘Genre and Gender in the Structure of
Culture, New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc. Musical Preferences’, Communication
Bennett, T., Emmison, M. and Frow, J. 1999 Research 15(3): 282–301.
Accounting for Tastes: Australian Everyday Davies, S. and Guppy, N. 2006 The Schooled
Cultures, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Uni- Society: An Introduction to the Sociology
versity Press. of Education, Toronto: Oxford University
Bielby, W. 2004 ‘Rock in a Hard Place: Press.
Grassroots Cultural Production in the Post DiMaggio, P. 1982 ‘Cultural Capital and
Elvis Era’, American Sociological Review School Success: The Impact of Status
69(1): 1–13. Culture Participation on the Grades of U.S.
Binder, A. 1993 ‘Constructing Racial Rheto- High School Students’, American Sociologi-
ric: Media Depictions of Harm in Heavy cal Review 47(2): 189–201.
Metal and Rap Music’, American Sociologi- DiMaggio, P. 1984 Review of Roe (1983)
cal Review 58(6): 753–67. Mass Media and Adolescent Schooling:
Bourdieu, P. 1977 ‘Cultural Reproduction Conflict or Co-existence, Theory and Society
and Social Reproduction’ in J. Karabel and 13(6): 874–7.
A.H. Halsey (eds) Power and Ideology in DiMaggio, P. and Mohr, J. 1985 ‘Cultural
Education, New York: Oxford University Capital, Educational Attainment and
Press. Marital Selection’, American Journal of
Bourdieu, P. 1984 Distinction: A Social Cri- Sociology 90(6): 1231–61.
tique of the Judgment of Taste, Cambridge: Erickson, B. 1996 ‘Culture, Class, and Con-
Harvard University Press. nections’, American Journal of Sociology
Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, C. 1977 Repro- 102(1): 217–51.
duction in Education, Society, Culture, Frith, S. 1978a The Sociology of Rock,
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. London: Constable.
Brake, M. 1985 Comparative Youth Culture, Frith, S. 1978b ‘Youth Culture/Youth Cults:
London: Kegan and Paul. A Decade of Rock Consumption’ in
Brown, R. and O’Leary, M. 1971 ‘Pop Music C. Gillett and S. Frith (eds) Rock
in English Secondary School System’, File 5th edition, London: Granada
American Behavioral Scientist 14(3): 401– Publishing.
13. Frith, S. 1999 Performing Rites: On the Value
Bryson, B. 1996 ‘ “Anything but Heavy of Popular Music, Cambridge, MA: Harvard
Metal”: Symbolic Exclusion and Musical University Press.
Dislikes’, American Sociological Review Gelder, K. and Thornton, S. 1997 The Sub-
61(5): 884–99. cultures Reader, London: Routledge.
© London School of Economics and Political Science 2008 British Journal of Sociology 59(1)
Musical consumption and teenage lifestyles 143
Hagan, J. 1991 ‘Destiny and Drift: Sub- Murdock, G. and Phelps, G. 1973 Mass
cultural Preferences, Status Attainments, Media and the Secondary School, London:
and the Risks and Rewards of Youth’, Macmillan.
American Journal of Sociology 56(5): 567– Murdock, G. and McCron, R. 1976 ‘Youth
82. and Class: The Career of a Confusion’, in G.
Hall, S. and Jefferson, T. 1976 Resistance Mungham and G. Pearson (eds) Working
through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Post Class Youth Culture, London: Routledge and
War Britain, London: Hutchinson. Kegan Paul.
Hebdige, D. 1979 Subculture: The Meaning Osgood, W., Wilson, J., O’Malley, P.,
of Style, London: Methuen. Bachman, J. and Johnston, L. 1996 ‘Routine
Hendry, L. 1983 Growing Up and Going Activities and Individual Deviant Behavior’,
Out: Adolescents and Leisure, Aberdeen, American Sociological Review 61(4): 635–
Scotland: Aberdeen University Press. 55.
Johansson, T. and Miegel, F. 1992 Do the Peterson, R.A. 1992 ‘Understanding Audi-
Right Thing: Lifestyle and Identity in Con- ence Segmentation: From Elite and Mass to
temporary Youth Culture, Stockholm, Omnivore and Univore’, Poetics 21 (4): 243–
Sweden: Almquist and Wiksell. 58.
Johnstone, J.W. 1961 Social Structure and Peterson, R.A. and Kern, R. 1996 ‘Changing
Patterns of Mass Media Consumption, Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore’,
University of Chicago, unpublished doctoral American Sociological Review 61(5): 900–7.
thesis. Peterson, R.A. and Simkus, A. 1993 ‘How
Katz-Gerro, T. 1999 ‘Cultural Consumption Musical Taste Groups Mark Occupational
and Social Stratification: Leisure Activities, Status Groups’ in M. Lamont and M.
Musical Tastes and Social Location’, Socio- Fournier (eds) Cultivating Differences: Sym-
logical Perspectives 14(4): 627–42. bolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequal-
Keyes, C. 2002 Rap Music and Street Con- ity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
sciousness, Chicago: University of Illinois Quinn, E. 2005 Nothin’ but a G “Thang”:
Press. The Culture and Commerce of Gangster
Krims, A. 2000 Rap Music and the Poetics of Rap, New York: Columbia University Press.
Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Riley, D. 1987 ‘Time and Crime: The Link
Press. between Teenager Life Style and Delin-
Lamont, M. 1992 Money, Morals and quency’, Journal of Quantitative Criminol-
Manners: the Culture of the French and the ogy 3(4): 339–54.
American Upper-middle Class, Chicago: Roberts, K. 1997 ‘Same Activities, Different
The University of Chicago Press. Meanings: British Youth Cultures in the
Lena, J. 2006 ‘Social Context and Musical 1990’s, Leisure Studies 16(1): 1–15.
Content of Rap Music, 1979–1995’, Social Robson, K 2003 ‘Teenage Time Use as
Forces 86 (1): 479–95. Investment in Cultural Capital’, Working
Martin, B. 1981 A Sociology of Contempo- Papers of the Institute for Social and Eco-
rary Cultural Change, Oxford: Blackwell. nomic Research, paper 203–12, Colchester:
Milner Jr, M. 2004 Freaks, Geeks, and Cool University of Essex.
Kids: American Teenagers, Schools and Roe, K. 1983 Mass Media and Adolescent
the Culture of Consumption, New York: Schooling: Conflict or Co-existence, Stock-
Routledge. holm, Sweden: Almquist and Wiksell
Mohr, J. and DiMaggio, P. 1995 ‘The International.
Intergenerational Transmission of Cultural Roe, K. 1992 ‘Different Destinies Different
Capital’, Research on Social Stratification Melodies: School Achievement, Anticipated
and Mobility 14: 167–99. Status, and Adolescent’s Tastes in Music’,
Muggleton, D. 2000 Inside Subcultures, European Journal of Communication 7: 335–
Oxford: Berg. 57.
British Journal of Sociology 59(1) © London School of Economics and Political Science 2008
144 Julian Tanner, Mark Asbridge and Scot Wortley
Roe, K. 1993 ‘Academic Capital and Music Responses to Pop Music’, Canadian Review
Tastes Among Swedish Adolescents’, of Sociology and Anthropology 18(1): 1–13.
Young: The Nordic Journal of Youth Tanner, J., Davies, S. and O’Grady, B.
Research 1(3): 40–55. 1999 ‘Whatever Happened to Yesterday’s
Roe, K. 1994 ‘Media Use and Social Mobil- Rebels? Longitudinal Effects of Youth
ity’ in Karl Erik Rosengren (ed.) Media Delinquency on Education and Employ-
Effects and Beyond: Culture, Socialization ment’, Social Problems 46(2): 250–74.
and Lifestyles, London: Routledge. Tanner, J. and Wortley, S. 2002 The Toronto
Roe, K. 1995 ‘ “Adolescents’ ” use of Youth Crime and Victimization Survey:
Socially Disvalued Media: Towards a Theory Overview Report, Toronto: Centre of Crimi-
of Media Delinquency’, Journal of Youth nology, University of Toronto.
and Adolescence 24(6): 617–31. Thornton, S. 1995 Club Cultures: Music,
Roe, K. 1999 ‘Music and Identity Among Media and Subcultural Capital, Cambridge,
European Youth’, Soundscapes – Online England: Polity Press.
Journal on Media and Culture 2: 1–15. Trondman, M. 1990 ‘Rock Taste – on Rock
Rose, T. 1994 Black Noise: Rap Music and as Symbolic Capital: A Study of Young
Black Culture in Contemporary America, People’s Music, Taste and Music Making’ in
Hanover: Wesleyan University Press. K. Roe and U. Carlsson (eds) Popular Music
Swartz, D. 1997 Culture and Power: The Research, Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom.
Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu, Chicago: The Van Eijck, K. 2001 ‘Social Differentiation in
University of Chicago Press. Musical Taste Patterns’, Social Forces 79(3):
Swartz, D. 2003 ‘In Memoriam Pierre Bour- 1163–85.
dieu (1930–2002)’, Theory and Society 32(4): Willis, P. 1977 Learning to Labour: How
519–26. Working Class Kids get Working Class Jobs,
Tanner, J. 1981 ‘Pop Music and Peer Groups: Aldershot: Gower Publishing.
A Study of Canadian High School Students’
© London School of Economics and Political Science 2008 British Journal of Sociology 59(1)