Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Accounting2 Notes P3 (Cabilto)
Accounting2 Notes P3 (Cabilto)
If there is some standard or interpretation, then you simply apply it. For example, when your
account for your new machines, then you obviously need to apply IAS 16 Property, plant and
equipment.
When there is NO specific standard or interpretation dealing with your transaction or item, then
management needs to use judgement and develop its own policy, but careful, the policy needs to
provide as reliable and relevant information as possible.
Example:
I wrote an article about accounting for artwork under IFRS, because it is not
specifically addressed by the standards and in many cases, you need to develop
your own accounting policy.
Let’s also add that you must apply every accounting policy consistently, to all transactions
within the same category or of the same type. In some cases, IFRS permit to categorize your
transactions – in this case, you can apply different accounting policies to different categories.
1. When it is required by another IFRS. This will be the case when new IFRS is issued and
you HAVE TO apply it mandatorily.
2. When new accounting policy provides better, more reliable and relevant information. In
this case, you apply new accounting policy voluntarily.
If you apply new IFRS and this IFRS contains some transitional guidance, then you simply
follow the rules in that transition provisions. New IFRS will tell you exactly how.
However, if there’s no transitional guidance, or you change your accounting policy voluntarily,
then you should apply it retrospectively (there are some exceptions).
“Retrospectively” means going back to the previous reporting periods and restating every single
component of equity as if the new policy had always been in place. Be careful here because you
need to restate comparatives, too!
Accounting Estimates
Accounting estimate is not defined by IAS 8 directly, just indirectly via changes in accounting
estimates.
When you change the accounting estimate, you change either some amount of an asset or a
liability, or pattern of its consumption in both current and future reporting periods.
If these changes result from some new information or new trend, or development, then
they are changes in accounting estimates.
If these changes result from some error, such as incorrect calculation or wrong
application of accounting policies – then they are NOT changes in accounting estimates,
but errors and they must be accounted for as for errors.
Typical examples of changes in accounting estimates are:
Bad debt provisions,
Depreciation rates and useful lives of your assets,
Provisions for warranty repairs, etc.
How can your account for change in accounting estimate?
Unlike accounting for change in accounting policy, we need to change our accounting estimates
prospectively, either:
Errors
Prior-period errors are some omissions from (that’s when you forget something) or
misstatements in the financial statements as a result of ignoring or misusing the information that
was available or could be reasonably obtained when preparing these financial statements.
It does not really matter why the error happened – whether it was intentional (fraud) or
unintentional, you still need to correct it if it is material.
The question is:
Is the error material?
The concept of materiality is explained in IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, but to
simplify: anything that can affect the decisions of users of financial statements is material. In
other words – anything significant.
Do not forget that something can be material not only because of its size, but also due to its
nature: for example, bonuses paid to your management are always significant, whether they
amounted to a few dollars or to millions.
Back to our errors:
1. If the error is NOT material, then you can correct it in the current reporting period.
Remember, if the error is NOT material, then your financial statements still might be
reliable and relevant.
2. If the error IS MATERIAL, then you always correct it retrospectively, by going back and
restating your figures in the previous periods.
1. Adjusting events
These are events that provide evidence of conditions that existed at the end of the reporting
period.
Examples:
The court case is settled after the end of the reporting period and it confirms that an
entity had a present obligation and should have created a provision in line with IAS 37.
Bankruptcy of a customer after the end of the reporting period confirming that a client
was credit-impaired and ECL should have been recognized in line with IFRS 9.
Sale of inventories after the end of the reporting period at below-cost price suggesting
that the inventories’ NRV was lower that their cost.
Profit-sharing or bonus payments determined after the end of the reporting period
suggesting that there was a present obligation at the year-end.
Discovery of errors or fraud showing that the financial statements are incorrect.
What to do with those events?
In line with IAS 10.8, you should adjust the amounts recognized in your financial statements to
reflect adjusting events after the reporting period.
Short illustration:
DEF faces the court case for selling contaminated food to its customers. DEF denied all claims
and no provision was made in its financial statements at 31 December 20X1.
On 2 February 20X2, the court awards CU 1 mil. damages against DEF. The financial statements
have not yet been authorized for issue at that time.
Therefore, this adjusting event must be reflected in the financial statements at 31 December
20X1.
DEF needs to create a provision for the damages because the present obligation existed at 31
December 20X1 (they sold contaminated food prior that date):
Debit Legal costs in profit or loss: CU 1 mil.;
Credit Provision against legal costs: CU 1 mil.
2. non-adjusting events
These are events that are indicative of conditions that arose after the reporting period.
Examples:
Decline in fair value of investments after the reporting period,
Natural disasters, wars, pandemics, etc. happening after the reporting period
What to do with those events?
In line with IAS 10.10, you shall NOT adjust the amounts recognized in your financial
statements to reflect non-adjusting events after the reporting period.
Instead, in line with IAS 10.21, you should disclose, for each material category of non-adjusting
events after the reporting period, both:
1. The nature of the event, and
2. An estimate of its financial effect (or say it cannot be made if that’s true).
Short illustration:
DEF owns a plant. On 15 January 20X2, huge earthquake in the area destroyed the plant.
The financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X1 have not been yet authorized for
issue by the management at the time of earthquakes.
Dividends after the reporting period
The standard IAS 10 specifically says in par. 12, that the dividends declared after the reporting
period are NOT reported as a liability at the end of the reporting period.
In other words, you need to treat them like they are non-adjusting event
Let’s say that in January 20X2 DEF declared dividend in total amount of CU 10 000 from profit
of 20X1.
The dividend liability is recognized when the shareholder’s right to receive them has been
established – that is supposedly in January 20X2, but NOT in 20X1.
2. Restate the financial statements at the end of the current reporting period using that
GPI;
2.1: Decide on monetary vs. non-monetary items
The first thing you do, after selecting your GPI, is to determine which assets and liabilities are
monetary and which are non-monetary.
Leave out equity items for now; we will deal with these later.
Many items are straightforward:
Monetary items are: cash, cash equivalents, loans, receivables, debt securities, payables,
borrowings, taxes payable.
Non-monetary items are: property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, biological
assets, investment property, equity investments (e.g., ordinary shares), inventories,
deferred income, some provisions, etc.
Some items are not that straightforward and we need to help ourselves with the definition of
monetary items directly from IAS 29.12: “money held and items to be received or paid in
money”.
There will still be troubles. For example, deferred tax assets and liabilities are quite difficult to
assess because there are arguments for stating they are either one, so just be aware it requires
careful assessment and restatement here, especially when they are related to temporary
differences of different nature.
A few notes:
Use of GPI fraction:
Let me draw your attention to the GPI – it is expressed as a fraction because you would have GPI
for certain period that might not be the same as the period passed between the transaction date
and the year-end.
This fraction expresses just that and some literature and practice call it the conversion factor.
It might be quite a challenge to gather GPIs for every single day, but you can use approximation,
for example some average weekly GPI if it is appropriate.
However, if inflation soars out of the roof and the prices change like crazy, that would NOT be
appropriate to use, so you need to use your judgment.
Different restatement of some items:
Also, some items are calculated in a different way.
For example, deferred tax is derived from the changes in the temporary differences.
Gain or loss on the net monetary position:
You will have that as a separate line item in your profit or loss.
This is the number that expresses how much purchasing power you lost to inflation during the
period on your monetary assets (if they are greater than non-monetary assets) or how much you
gained if the situation is the opposite.
It is calculated as a change in GPI applied to the weighted average of a difference between your
monetary assets and monetary liabilities.
It is extremely impractical to calculate that way and therefore in practice, it is assumed that gain
or loss on the net monetary position is simply the opposite of the gain or loss on non-monetary
items – which is the sum of your restatement adjustments,
2.5: Restate cash flows
The standard IAS 29 does not say much about the restatement of cash flows, but it does require
that all items should be expressed in the measuring unit that is current at the end of the
reporting period.
It practically means that you need to restate all the amounts, similarly as with profit or loss and
other comprehensive income.
3. Restate the comparative information at the end of the previous reporting period.
the same principle applies: all items should be expressed in the measuring unit that is current
at the end of the reporting period.
This time it will be much easier than with statement of cash flows and profit or loss, because you
just take GPI and apply it to all the numbers by simple mathematical calculation.
The reason is that all items were there at the beginning of the period and none of them arose
during the year, so no fraction is necessary to use.