Professional Documents
Culture Documents
StockWatson Econ CH04
StockWatson Econ CH04
Regression with a
Single Regressor:
Hypothesis Tests and
Confidence Intervals
v2
~ N 1 , , where v i = (X i – μX )u i
n( X )
2 2
= (–3.30, –1.26)
so:
Estimation:
• OLS estimators and
• and have approximately normal sampling distributions in
large samples
Testing:
• H0: β1 = β1,0 v. β1 ≠ β1,0 (β1,0 is the value of β1 under H0)
• t = ( – β1,0)/SE( )
• p-value = area under standard normal outside tact (large n)
Confidence Intervals:
• 95% confidence interval for β1 is { ± 1.96×SE( )}
• This is the set of β1 that is not rejected at the 5% level
• The 95% CI contains the true β1 in 95% of all samples.
When Xi = 0, Yi = β0 + ui
• the mean of Yi is β0
• that is, E(Yi|Xi=0) = β0
When Xi = 1, Yi = β0 + β1 + ui
• the mean of Yi is β0 + β1
• that is, E(Yi|Xi=1) = β0 + β1
so:
β1 = E(Yi|Xi=1) – E(Yi|Xi=0)
= population difference in group means
0 if STRi 20
OLS regression: Test Score = 650.0 + 7.4×D
(1.3) (1.8)
Tabulation of group means:
Yi = β0 + β1Xi + ui
• β0 = mean of Y when X = 0
• β0 + β1 = mean of Y when X = 1
• β1 = difference in group means, X =1 minus X = 0
• SE( ) has the usual interpretation
• t-statistics, confidence intervals constructed as usual
• This is another way (an easy way) to do difference-in-means
analysis
• The regression formulation is especially useful when we have
additional regressors (as we will very soon)
1. What…?
2. Consequences of homoskedasticity
3. Implication for computing standard errors
Heteroskedastic or homoskedastic?
© Pearson Education Limited 2015
5-24
The class size data:
Heteroskedastic or homoskedastic?
© Pearson Education Limited 2015
5-25
So far we have (without saying so)
assumed that u might be heteroskedastic.