Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Name: Ng Ka Yin
UID: 3035279909
Explain the concept of “transit oriented development (TOD)” and elaborate on how to
implement this concept, using the case of Hong Kong or a city of your choice as an
example.
Introduction
Traffic congestion, inadequacy of public transport, difficulties of parking, are some of
the transport problem in urban area (Smeed, 1964). Vehicle-oriented development,
which focus on increasing the road system capacity to meet demand has been
implemented in 1950s and 1960s. This approach, however, worsen the environmental
condition and the problem of traffic congestion (Pacione, 2009). Transit-oriented
development (TOD) has become increasingly viewed as a solution to transport
problem globally (UNHABITAT, 2013), which is a development physically oriented
to public transport station. This essay will first explain the concept of TOD. It will
then illustrate the implementation of TOD, using the example of Hong Kong.
Table 1
In a typical TOD, rail or bus station is usually located at its centre, which is
surrounded by high-density development (Renne, 2009). It is in contrast with vehicle-
oriented transportation, which has a low urban density because of the requirement of
land for parking facilities and roads (Boroski, et al., 2002). The high-density
development around the station allow more residents to access public transport station
in a shorter walking distance. Transit ridership is thus encouraged and vehicle on the
road can be reduced. Refer to Table 1, a typical transit-oriented neighborhood usually
consists of a high-density commercial and residential area in the centre. The density
gradually decrease when extending outward from the city centre.
However, high density solely is not enough to improve the accessibility to public
transport. Pedestrian- and bicycle-oriented design is essential for a success TOD as
well. It is because a good pedestrian and bicycle connectivity to the station can allow
more TOD residents willing to use transit (Lund, Cervero & Wilson, 2004). Refer to
Table 2, research shows that good pedestrian condition encourages residents taking
public transit (Davidson, 1994). Improved walkability can therefore increase transit
area of influence (i.e. , the area around stations tends to be more transit-oriented)
(APTA, 2009).
As mixed land use clusters activities together, some residents in TOD area do not need
to take transits to commute. In other words, their workplace and living place is within
the same area. This can reduce the load on transport system, including public transit,
in peak hours, alleviate the crowding problem in public transports (Renee, 2009).
Figure 2 Ma On Shan Line (Brown Lines) and Bike Trail (Pink and Blue Lines)
Ma On Shan Line is a new MTR branch line opened in 2004 which greatly enhanced
the accessibility of Ma On Shan. The railway line carries 153,100 passengers average
on weekdays, significantly raises the mobility of residents in Ma On Shan (LEGCO,
2014). Ma On Shan is covered extensively by bike trails (Figure 2), allowing residents
to reach the railway stations conveniently.
On the other hand, Kowloon Bay MTR station is developed together with Telford
Plaza and Telford Garden, which are operated by the MTR as well. Mixed land use,
including commercial, office and residential, can be found in Kowloon Bay., which is
one of the major feature of TOD.
Reference:
1. Smeed, R. J. (1964). The traffic problem in towns. Town Planning Review, 35(2), 133.
2. Pacione, Michael, Urban Geography: A Global Perspective, 3rd Edition, London
and New York, Routledge, 2009.
3. Un-Habitat. (2013). Planning and design for sustainable urban mobility: Global report on
human settlements 2013. Taylor & Francis.
4. Niles, J., & Nelson, D. (1999). Measuring the Success of Transit-Oriented Development.
In Retail Market Dynamics and Other Key Determinants, Prepared for the American
Planning Association National Planning Conference, Seattle, Washington, April (pp. 24-
28).
5. John Boroski, Topaz Faulkner, B. Arrington, Stuart Mori, Terry Parker and Daniel
Mayer (2002), Parking and TOD: Challenges and Opportunities (Special Report);
California Statewide Transit-‐Oriented Development Study: Factors for Success in
California, Business, Transportation and Housing Agency, CalTrans
6. Hollie M. Lund, Robert Cervero and Richard W. Willson (2004), Travel
Characteristics of Transit-‐ Oriented Development in California, Caltrans
Statewide Planning Studies
7. Mansoureh Jeihani, et al. (2013), Development of a Framework for Transit-‐
Oriented Development (TOD), Office of Policy & Research, Maryland State
Highway Administration
8. Curtis, C., J. Renne and L. Bertolini (2009) Transit Oriented
Devel op ment: Making it Happen, Ashgate, Surrey, UK
9. Cervero, R. (2004). Transit-oriented development in the United States: Experiences,
challenges, and prospects (Vol. 102). Transportation Research Board.
10. Hank Dittmar and Gloria Ohland (2004), The New Transit Town: Best Practices in
Transit-‐Oriented Development, Island Press
11. Loo, B. P., Chen, C., & Chan, E. T. (2010). Rail-based transit-oriented development:
lessons from New York City and Hong Kong. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(3), 202-
212.
12. Weekday patronage of MTR heavy rail network from September 1 to 27 and
September 28 to October 25, 2014" (PDF). Legislative Council. 29 October 2014.
Retrieved 15 April 2015.
13. Davidson, 1994
14. APTA(2009),DefiningTransitAreasofInfluence,AmericanPublicTransportationAss
ociation