The Reactionary Subscribe Sign in

Prediction: Sidney Powell won't be cooperating

against Trump
Why Powell's plea deal doesn't help the RICO case against Trump
Techno Fog
Oct 19, 2023

35

Today, Sidney Powell accepted a plea agreement from the Fulton County District
Attorney, pleading to six counts of “Conspiracy to Commit Intentional Interference
with Performance of Election Duties.”
Those are all misdemeanors. She faces six years of probation, a $6,000 fine, and has to
pay $2,700 in restitution.
Call that a win for the defense. Here’s why.
Powell was indicted with seven felony counts: conspiracy to violate Georgia’s RICO
(Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) statute; two counts of conspiracy to
commit election fraud; conspiracy to commit computer theft, trespass, and invasion of
privacy; and conspiracy to defraud the state.
These charges are felonies that carry heavy penalties. A conviction under Georgia’s
RICO conspiracy statute, for example, requires a punishment of between five and 20
years of imprisonment. See Ga. Code Ann. § 16-14-5.
That gets us to our second point – the risk of conviction.
Let me start by saying that I believe Powell is innocent, that there was no RICO
conspiracy by her or anyone else, that the indictment, along with all overt acts in
furtherance of the conspiracy, is a joke. (More on the charged conduct and RICO
below.) That this case never should have been brought, that it criminalizes political
conduct. But I’m not a Fulton County juror. And you probably aren’t either.
When these cases go to trial (at this moment, nobody knows if Kenneth Chesebro will
be offered, or accept, a plea deal or go to trial on October 23), the defendants will face
a jury pool that is approximately 75% Democrat and only 25% Republican. The jurors
will salivate at the chance to convict anyone associated with Donald Trump. We’ve seen
it in DC with the January 6 defendants. We’ve seen it with the anti-Trump activist who

lied to get on the Roger Stone jury. They’re not concerned about justice. It’s political.

Adding to the pressure is the cost and expense of trial. Back in September, the Fulton
County District Attorneys estimated this case would take four months. There would be
hundreds of witnesses, even before the defense got to their case in chief. That’s the
type of trial that could bankrupt a defendant.
The Fulton County District Attorney knows that, and probably threatened the
excessively-long trial to increase the pressure on Powell and Chesebro (the only two
defendants who demanded a speedy trial) to accept a plea deal. It’s just another
example of the unethical conduct of the zealous Fulton County prosecutors, who have
engaged in very public evils from withholding exculpatory evidence from the grand
jury (violating a prosecutor’s duty to do justice) to lying about Georgia law to the trial
judge (We’ll add that the plea deal further demonstrates unethical behavior, as it
.

shows the prosecutors overcharged Powell.)

The deal also shows that Fulton County prosecutors don’t want to go to trial right
now. Spending four months in the courtroom and presenting hundreds of witnesses
would only help the defense of Donald Trump. There would be no surprises at Trump’s
trial - all the witnesses would be on record, the weaknesses of the prosecution would
be exposed.

Anyways, with all these factors at play, it’s no surprise that a misdemeanor plea deal
might be the best option. This is true even when you’re innocent. Principle is great,
but the system doesn’t work for the innocent. Trial is a terrible place to get to the
truth. It’s an even worse place for justice. Better to accept a misdemeanor and go home
instead of facing the near-certainty of 5+ years in prison and hundreds of thousands of
dollars in legal fees.
This gets us to another important matter – accusations that Powell is now
“cooperating” against Donald Trump.
Tim Pool, for example, said Powell would “blame Trump for everything.” Lawyer Elie
Honig, perhaps the most obtuse legal commentator on cable news, on CNN called this
a “big breakthrough for prosecutors” in their case against Trump. He further alleged:

“She’s going to have to admit that, ‘yes, we were trying to steal the election, yes, I
knew it was illegal, and yes, it was in fact a crime,’” Honig said. “All of that is in
play for her testimony against all of the 17 other co-defendants, including Donald
Trump.”
We’re not buying it. Let’s break down why.
First, Honig (and many others) are claiming – wrongfully – that Powell has no choice
but to implicate Trump in the RICO conspiracy.
These predictions defy the fact that Powell did not plead guilty to the principal charge
against Trump: the RICO conspiracy. She did not admit that she was part of a criminal
enterprise with Trump, et al. to “unlawfully” change the results of the 2020 election.
She did not admit that she conspired to violate Georgia’s RICO statute with Trump or
anyone else.
Instead, her plea deal is narrow and only relates to conduct that occurred in Coffee
County, Georgia, where contractors accessed voting machines with the permission of
local officials. Let us add a few words about those charges: Coffee County officials
gave a written invitation for contractors from technical group SullivanStrickler to
access their voting machines. Powell didn’t authorize those actions; she approved
payment to SullivanStrickler after the fact. Of course, Fulton County maintains that
local officials had no authority to grant access to voting machines, therefore making
all of their actions illegal. (Authority would have been an issue at Powell’s trial.) In any
event, Fulton County has no evidence that Powell or anyone from SullivanStrickler
knew that Coffee County officials didn’t have this authority.
But Fulton County isn’t accusing Trump of directing, being involved with, or even
knowing about what occurred in Coffee County. Thus, Powell’s plea to the Coffee
County charges does not, and will not, directly implicate Trump.
Second, there are claims that Powell might have other information that will hurt Trump.
Nobody has offered specifics; even The New York Times admitted “it remains unclear
what Ms. Powell might say about Mr. Trump if called upon to testify against him.”
One topic might be the December 18, 2020 meeting at the White House with President
Trump, General Flynn, Sidney Powell, Emily Newman, and Patrick Byrne. Yet it’s
unlikely that Powell will offer anything new about that meeting. It was the subject of
numerous depositions in the House Select Committee to Investigate January 6. Powell
was deposed on that issue. So too was Byrne. Ideas were floated during that perfectly
legal meeting – none of them being criminal – including Powell’s proposal that Trump
secure voting machines and
“have them inspected by a professional, nonpartisan, bipartisan group of experts in
a transparent fashion to obtain whatever evidence was on those machines to resolve
the issue hopefully, you know, finally put the whole thing to bed, whichever way it
came out.”
Relating point of what Powell might know, or what she might testify about,
to the
recall that she was actually disavowed by Trump’s legal team (Jenna Ellis and Rudy
Giuliani) in late November 2020. Powell filed cases in Michigan and elsewhere, while
Team Trump pursued their own legal strategies. There was no meeting of the minds
between the two camps. As far as litigation strategy goes, Powell was excluded from
what Trump’s legal team was doing. The indictment doesn’t suggest that Powell had
such extensive contact with Trump that she could testify to his election certification
efforts on January 6 or his state of mind concerning the 2020 election. Thus, we’re
doubtful she has anything of value to offer Fulton County prosecutors against Trump.
Finally, the nature of the RICO conspiracy charge against Trump doesn’t require
Powell’s cooperation.
To explain, the RICO conspiracy charge requires: (1) a conspiracy to violate Georgia’s
RICO statute; and (2) any member of the enterprise to commit “any overt act to effect
the object of the conspiracy.” Ga. Code Ann. § 16-14-4.

The State’s theory of the case is that Trump, et al. conspired to unlawfully change the
results of the 2020 election. Thus, to prove the RICO conspiracy, they just need one
overt act from any member of the enterprise (this could be from any of the 19
defendants or the numerous unindicted co-conspirators).
Now take a look at the indictment. It alleges 161 overt acts that were done to further
the object of the conspiracy (the purported “unlawful” effort to change the results of
the 2020 election), from Trump’s tweets to various legal memos from Trump’s lawyers
(and other lawyers) interpreting the Electoral College Act or how Vice President Pence
should proceed with the certification on January 6, 2021 to Trump’s calls with Georgia
Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.
Even if Powell were out of the case, even if she were deleted from the indictment and
wiped clean prosecutors’ memory, they would still have 150+ overt acts which they say
effected the alleged conspiracy. And under Georgia law, they only need to show one
overt act to support the RICO conspiracy charge.
Our point is that Powell isn’t an essential witness to prove the State’s case against
Trump. What she pleaded to – the Coffee County charges – has nothing to do with
Trump. Speculation that she will cooperate against Trump, or somehow implicate
Trump in the RICO conspiracy, isn’t supported by the facts. After all, she didn’t plead
guilty to being part of a RICO conspiracy.

246 Likes · 24 Restacks

35

35 Comments

33 more comments...

Top New Community

It's official: Durham is investigating the Clinton Campaign.

Enter the Clinton Campaign Lawyers
Dec 20, 2021 • Techno Fog

265

Epstein Island: Newly Unsealed Evidence of Abuse

Unsealed testimony implicates Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell
Dec 14, 2022 • Techno Fog

139

CIA Bombshell: The Sussmann data was "user created"

Also: Confirmation of a frame-job against President-Elect Trump
Apr 16, 2022 • Techno Fog

316

See all

© 2023 Techno Fog Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice

Start Writing Get the app

Substack is the home for great writing