Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PR1 Performance Task 3
PR1 Performance Task 3
Content Standards:
Performance Standard
Learning Competencies
The learners have already gained knowledge on coherently writing literature review
according to ethical standards and by correctly paraphrasing and synthesizing information
and using APA intext citations correctly.
1. Learners will work with their groupmates to write and present their review of related
literature and studies (Chapter 2).
2. Download the PETA 3 FILE posted in our subject GC. Then edit your Chapter 2 on
the downloaded file.
3. Used your approved Research Title in working your Chapter 2.
4. Follow the instructions given as you write your output.
5. Submission of the performance tasks will be at the last meeting of week 8 (hardcopy
printed on long bond paper).
Performance Criteria:
Knowledge
Skills
Main points well developed Main points well developed Main points are presented
with high quality and with quality and quantity with limited detail and
Sequence/ quantity support. Reveals a support. Critical thinking is development. Lack of
high degree of critical weaved into points. Some critical thinking is evident.
Developmen thinking. The sequence ideas follow general to Failed to follow the general
t of Idea follows the general to localized sequence. to localized sequence.
localized sequence. (3-5 PTS) (1-2 PTS)
(7-10 PTS)
The literature review uses The literature review uses The literature review failed
suitable sentence linkers and some sentence linkers and to show sentence linkers
connectors. Correct content connectors. Somehow and connectors that make
Coherency organization. correct content the information not
(7-10 PTS) organization. coherent.
(3-5 PTS) (1-2 PTS)
The literature review is free The literature review The literature review is
Grammatical from grammatical errors. contains some grammatical entirely grammatically
Correctness (5 PTS) errors. incorrect.
(3-4 PTS) (1-2 PTS)
All sources of information Some of the sources of No sources of information
were properly cited using information were properly were cited.
Citations APA style. cited using APA style. (1 PT)
(5 PTS) (2-4 PTS)
The literature review strictly The literature review follows The literature review does
General follows the thematic format the thematic format not follow the thematic
and is presented in using however some parts do not format and prescribed
Presentation correct general format. follow the prescribed general format.
(Format) (5 PTS) general format. (1-2 PTS)
(3-4 PTS)
All cited sources in literature Some cited sources in A lot of cited sources in
review were properly literature review were literature review were not
mentioned in the reference properly mentioned in the properly mentioned in the
Referencing list. An APA format was used reference list. An APA reference list. An APA
in listing references. format was used in listing format was not used in
(5 PTS) references. listing references.
(3-4 PTS) (1-2 PTS)
GROUP MEMBERS (Rate your members from 0-10; 0=no contribution and 10=highest rate)
1. 8.
2. 9.
3. 10.
4. 11.
5. 12.
6. 13.
7. 14.
APPROVED RESEARCH TITLE:
Practical Research 1 11
INTRODUCTORY
STATEMENT
>Insert the
general overview
of this chapter.
THEME Theme 1:
ADDITIONAL
THEME
Synthesis