Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contract Law 2
Contract Law 2
CL - LECTURE 3 05/10/21
OFFER
‘An offer is a statement to the effect that the person making it (the offeror) is willing to
contract on the terms stated, as soon as these are accepted by the person to whom the offer
is addressed (the offeree).’
Treitel, The Law of Contract
- The existence of an offer is subject to an objective test, so even if the offer is made
inadvertently, it will be capable of acceptance providing that a reasonable person
would be induced to believe that the offeror intended to make the offer.
- The offer can be made to an individual, a group of persons or to anyone who cares
to accept it.
INVITATIONS TO TREAT
1. DISPLAY OF GOODS FOR SALE:
3. AUCTIONS:
- Advert for forthcoming auction amounts to a statement of intention and not an
offer.
4. TENDERS
A request or advertisement for tenders (inviting parties to make offers to supply goods or
services) is generally regarded as an invitation to treat, as there is no obligation to accept
any of the tenders put forward.
402
CA: therefore, as Blackpool and Fylde tender has not been considered, entitled to
compensation of loss of opportunity
1. Time - where no time limit is specified, after a reasonable time - Ramsgate Victoria
Hotel Co v Montefiore (1866) L.R.1 Ex.109
2. Death of the offeror or the offeree before acceptance
3. Failure of a condition - expresses or implied.
Held: ‘There was a binding contract, because revocation could only take effect on
communication/ receipt of the defendant’s(D) letter but the acceptance by telegram took
affect as soon as it was sent 9 days before the revocation was received. By the time D’s letter
of revocation was received, a contract had already been made.’
4. It is REVOKED:
- An offer can be revoked (withdrawn) by the offeror at any time before acceptance -
Payne v Cave (1789) 3 Term Rep 148
- Another way to revoke offer is through a reliable third party.
402
Held: ‘The defendants offer had already been revoked by the communication from the fourth
person, so there was no contract. On hearing the news from the fourth person, the claimant
knew the D would no longer minded to sell the property to him, as plainly and clearly as if
the D had told him in so many ways. Regardless of this division D still had the right to
withdraw the offer at any time.’