Education Equity and Access: Bridging the Divide

A Position Paper

Presented to College of Education and Liberal Arts

PHINMA-Araullo University Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija

In partial fulfillment of The Requirements for

APP 002 : ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC AND

PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES

By: Mark Darin M.Mendiola Jr.

Stem 12 M4

October 2023
Introduction

Education is frequently celebrated as the great equalizer, a transformative force that offers
individuals the opportunity to transcend their circumstances and realize their full potential. It
holds the promise of breaking the cycle of poverty, reducing inequality, and fostering a society
where everyone has an equitable chance to succeed. However, the stark reality often diverges
from this idealistic vision, as disparities in education quality and access continue to plague many
regions and communities. This position paper delves into the multifaceted issues of education
equity and access, shining a spotlight on the persistent inequalities that hinder the realization of
education’s full potential as an equalizer

Disparities in Education Quality

Access to a quality education remains unequal, with underprivileged communities facing

resource shortages, outdated materials, and overcrowded classrooms. Studies consistently reveal
disparities in teacher qualifications, school facilities, and extracurricular opportunities between
affluent and marginalized communities.

 Teacher Qualifications: Research consistently demonstrates that schools in economically

disadvantaged areas often struggle to attract and retain experienced and highly qualified teachers.
This shortage of skilled educators can lead to disparities in instructional quality, negatively
affecting students’ learning outcomes.

 School Facilities: Disparities in school infrastructure are evident, with underfunded

schools often lacking essential resources such as up-to-date textbooks, technology, and safe,
well-maintained buildings. In contrast, wealthier schools have the means to provide students with
state-of-the-art facilities conducive to effective learning.

 Extracurricular Opportunities: Affluent schools typically offer a wider array of

extracurricular activities, including sports, arts, and academic clubs. These opportunities can
enhance students’ personal development, build leadership skills, and open doors to scholarships
and future success. In contrast, many underprivileged schools struggle to provide such
enrichment

Some argue that standardized testing helps identify and address disparities in educational quality.

 Standardized Testing for Accountability: Proponents of standardized testing argue that it

serves as a valuable tool for identifying disparities in educational quality. By assessing student
performance on a standardized scale, policymakers and educators can pinpoint schools and
districts that need additional resources or interventions. In this view, standardized testing can
help address disparities by highlighting areas that require improvement.

 Incentives for Improvement: Some contend that standardized testing incentivizes schools
to improve educational quality. The public release of test scores can put pressure on schools to
perform better, potentially driving improvements in curriculum, teaching methods, and resource
allocation. By holding schools accountable, standardized testing proponents argue that it can lead
to positive changes.
Debates about Standardized Testing

The use of standardized tests to measure student performance and teacher effectiveness has
sparked considerable debate. Critics argue that these tests can perpetuate inequalities. Research
shows that standardized tests often favor students from privileged backgrounds, leading to biased
outcomes in college admissions and educational policies.

 Bias in Test Outcomes: Studies have consistently indicated that standardized tests can
exhibit bias favoring students from more privileged backgrounds. Factors such as access to test
preparation resources, socio-economic status, and cultural bias in test content can lead to
disparities in test scores. This bias can, in turn, influence decisions related to college admissions,
educational policy, and funding allocation.

 Narrowing Curriculum: Critics argue that the emphasis on standardized testing can lead
to a narrowing of the curriculum, as educators may feel pressured to “teach to the test.” This can
limit the range of topics and skills that students are exposed to, potentially stifling creativity and
critical thinking.

 Negative Consequences for Teachers: Teachers may also face negative consequences
linked to standardized testing, such as being evaluated primarily based on student test scores.
This approach can create incentives for educators to focus excessively on test preparation at the
expense of a more comprehensive and enriching educational experience.

Supporters contend that standardized testing provides an objective measure of academic

achievement and accountability in education.

 Objective Measure of Academic Achievement: Supporters of standardized testing

contend that these assessments provide an objective measure of academic achievement. Unlike
subjective grading, standardized tests are designed to evaluate a student’s knowledge and skills
consistently, regardless of their background or the school they attend.

 Accountability in Education: Standardized testing can be a valuable tool for holding

schools, teachers, and districts accountable for student performance. It can help identify areas
where improvement is needed and guide resource allocation to address disparities in educational
quality.

 College Admissions Fairness: Standardized tests are used by many colleges and
universities as part of their admissions process. Supporters argue that these tests can level the
playing field by providing a standardized metric that colleges can use to evaluate applicants from
diverse educational backgrounds.

School Funding Challenges

Adequate funding is essential for providing quality education, yet disparities in school funding
persist, with some schools receiving far more resources than others. Lawsuits in various states
highlight the unequal distribution of education funding, leaving schools in impoverished areas at
a severe disadvantage.

 Unequal Distribution of Funds: Legal battles and lawsuits in various states across the
United States have illuminated stark disparities in education funding. These cases often reveal
that schools in economically disadvantaged areas receive significantly less funding per student
compared to their counterparts in more affluent districts. This disparity affects the availability of
resources, teacher salaries, and the overall quality of education.

 Impact on Educational Quality: Research consistently demonstrates that underfunded

schools face significant challenges in providing a high-quality education. Insufficient funding
can lead to larger class sizes, outdated instructional materials, limited extracurricular
opportunities, and difficulties in attracting and retaining qualified teachers. These factors can
hinder students’ academic progress and limit their future prospects.

 Cycle of Disadvantage: The impact of unequal school funding often perpetuates cycles of
disadvantage. Students in underfunded schools may face barriers to academic achievement,
making it more challenging for them to access higher education and secure well-paying jobs.
This perpetuates socio-economic disparities and inequality in the long term.

Some argue that simply increasing funding is not a guarantee of improved educational outcomes
and that reforms are needed alongside funding changes.
 Quality vs. Quantity: Some argue that simply increasing funding may not guarantee
improved educational outcomes. They contend that it’s essential to focus on how funds are
allocated and used within schools. Reforms, such as improved administrative efficiency, targeted
resource allocation, and evidence-based teaching practices, should accompany any changes in
funding to ensure that money is spent effectively.

 Accountability: Critics of increased funding often stress the need for greater
accountability in education. They argue that without rigorous evaluation and accountability
measures, pouring more money into underperforming schools may not lead to the desired
improvements. Holding schools and districts accountable for student outcomes is seen as a
crucial component of any meaningful reform effort.

 State and Local Control: In the U.S., education is primarily funded and administered at
the state and local levels. Some argue that these entities are better equipped to understand the
unique needs of their communities and make decisions about how to allocate resources. They
believe that decentralizing control allows for more tailored solutions to educational challenges.

The debate over school funding is complex, as it involves balancing the need for equitable access
to resources with concerns about how those resources are used and the importance of
accountability. Finding a consensus on the best approach to address these disparities remains a
significant policy challenge in education reform.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the pursuit of education equity and access stands as an imperative cornerstone for
the construction of a just and thriving society. To address these multifaceted challenges
comprehensively, we put forth the following propositions:
Equitable Funding: The implementation of equitable funding models that channel resources
toward schools in underserved communities is paramount. This ensures that every student,
regardless of their socio-economic background, has access to a quality education that lays the
foundation for a brighter future.

Reimagining Assessment: The reevaluation of standardized testing is vital to ensure that it aligns
with principles of fairness and inclusivity. A more holistic approach to assessment can better
capture the diverse talents and potential of all students, irrespective of their circumstances.

Empowering Educators: Promoting policies that prioritize teacher training and provide necessary
resources for disadvantaged schools is central to addressing the disparities in educational quality.
Well-supported educators are essential for creating a thriving learning environment.

Our stance, which advocates for equal education opportunities, serves as the path forward
towards a more equitable society. As Nelson Mandela profoundly stated, “Education is the most
powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.” It is incumbent upon us to ensure that
this powerful weapon is wielded equitably by all, enabling every individual to shape a brighter
and more equitable world for generations to come.
References

GGI Insights. (2023, May 14). Access to Education: The Impact of Inequality on Education.
Retrieved from https://www.graygroupintl.com/blog/access-to-education

Knoeppel, R. C., & Della Sala, M. R. (2015). Education Funding and Student Outcomes: A
Conceptual Framework for Measurement of the Alignment of State Education Finance and
Academic Accountability Policies. Vol. 42, No. 2, Spring. Retrieved from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1073925.pdf

Mason, C. Y., & Dodds, R. (2005). Bri Divide for Educational Equity. Education Digest:
Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 70(9), 25-27. Retrieved from
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ741330

Pietromonaco, C. (2021). The Effects of Standardized Testing on Students. Sacred Heart

University Academic Festival, Event 22. Retrieved from
https://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1588&context=acadfest