Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shelland Tube
Shelland Tube
1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Our team would like to take this opportunity and convey our
heartiest gratitude towards Dr. Md. Ashiqur Rahman,
whose constant support and enthusiasm has driven us to
successfully complete this project. Also, we would like to
thank Musanna Galib, who has constantly motivated us
through his words and made us complete the project in due
time.
2
ABSTRACT
3
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
FIGURE 1. Schematic diagram showing the 2 tube passes and the cross
flow of fluids inside the STHX.
5
Based on the best of our knowledge and literature review,
a shell and tube heat exchanger of TEMA type BXS has
been chosen to be appropriate as the condenser of the
power plant in consideration.
6
Chapter 2
PROBLEM STATEMENT
7
A schematic showing the process parameters and the
calculated appropriate flow rate of the cold fluid required is
shown below.
8
Chapter 3
OBJECTIVES
1. To design a heat transfer equipment that will carry out
the required process while meeting the following
requirements:
✓ minimum cost
✓ appropriate dimensions
9
Chapter 4
DESIGN STRATEGY
The given problem statement was carefully analyzed and it
was decided which type of heat exchanger would serve the
purpose best. A Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger was found
to be best suited for the process in question.
Energy balance has been performed using the shell side
mass flow rate, state change, and the tube side
temperature change, to determine the tube side mass flow
rate of cold fluid required.
A preliminary design was then drafted using the methods
learnt during the course and using references from different
text books and design handbooks to make rational
assumptions for the unknown dimensions using
recommended standards, such as ¾’’ BWG 18 tubes.
Based on the preliminary design, inputs were given to the
Heat Transfer Research, Inc. (HTRI) Xchanger suite
software which was used to iterate and optimize the design
variables to meet the design requirements of heat transfer
as well as pressure drops.
3D-Drawings and sectional views of the project were
designed and generated using the 3D CAD design software
SolidWorks.
10
Chapter 5
DESIGN FACTORS
Shell and Tube heat exchangers are generally made of
various combinations of front head, shell and rear head as
recommended by the Tubular Exchanger Manufacturing
Association (TEMA) and are referred to as the TEMA types
of the HTXs.
Type of shell
Cross flow has been found to be
most suitable for condensers where
the shell side fluid is condensing and
the tube side fluid is a single-phase
cooling liquid. Hence, the X type shell
has been chosen.
11
Rear head type
The floating-head, i.e. S type, has
been chosen as it permits free
expansion/contraction.
Process requirements
The process requirements as specified in the problem
statement has been taken from the practical data of a
typical powerplant.
The steam saturation temperature & pressure, water inlet,
outlet temperatures and pressure drop has been taken from
the real data of a powerplant in Bangladesh.
However, the mass flow rate of steam supply varies with the
power output of the plant, and therefore the mass flow of
steam required for unit MW power production has been
used as the process mass flow rate.
Dimensions, Passes and Number of tubes and shell
The tube dimensions have been chosen as ¾ BWG 18
tubes, i.e. following the Birmingham Wire Gauge standard.
This tube has been chosen since it is one of the most
common in industrial applications like this and class 18 to
keep pressure drops minimal.
The shell diameter has been iterated to accommodate the
number of tubes required in order to provide the required
cold fluid mass flow rate (as calculated from energy
12
balance) while keeping the pressure drop within its
maximum allowed value.
During optimization, design constraint has been set that the
velocity of cold fluid must be within 1.4 m/s to 3.00 m/s,
which is the economic flow velocity of water.
Two tube passes have been chosen in order to provide the
required overall heat transfer coefficient, and hence the
required heat duty, while keeping the length of the heat
exchanger reasonable. 4 or 8 passes have not been used
as that would result in too large an increase in pressure
drop for only a small increase in heat transfer coefficient.
Besides these, the Pitch ratio has been chosen as 1.33,
i.e. a 1-inch square pitch has been chosen, for easy
mechanical cleaning. No baffle plates are required for cross
flow in X type shell, however 6 supporting plates has been
provided so that the distance between the supports would
not be greater than 80 percent of the TEMA maximum
permitted unsupported span length.
Pumping power requirement
The pumping power required is the power required to
overcome the pressure drop in the tube side. More pumping
power is required by the ejector vacuum system in order to
create the low pressure for the condensation of steam in the
shell. Based on the pumping powers available at the plants,
the pressure drop design criteria has been chosen.
13
Chapter 6
DESIGN DRAWINGS
(a)
(b)
14
Isolated view of some major components:
17
Chapter 7
FABRICATION OF A SCALE-
DOWN PROTOTYPE
After the final design of the heat exchanger was ready, it
was scaled down to a size which was feasible and
affordable to manufacture practically within the limited time
available. We contracted with Saad Engineering Works,
Jatrabari, to help us build the prototype.
18
The remaining material, Mild Steel, satisfied all the criteria
best. It was readily available in the local shops and
cheaper than Stainless Steel; although it was a bit more
expensive than Cast Iron, it was, however, better in quality
and easier to weld. Therefore, Mild Steel was selected as
the material for the prototype.
19
The head and rear end parts were also fabricated in
similar ways. The flanges were attached onto the parts by
welding so that they can be assembled together.
Grinding was done to improve surface finish of the parts.
Once all the parts were produces, the final assembly was
ready to be carried out:
the tube sheet was placed inside the shell; the head and
rear end were fastened to the shell using bolts and nuts,
while putting gaskets in between to make them sealed.
20
A flow chat summarizing the fabrication process:
21
Chapter 8
ECONOMIC CALCULATION
Components Cost (BDT)
4½” Plate 3 × 50 = 50
Gaskets 120
Bolts and Nuts 16 × 20 = 320
Labor 3000
Transport 1200
Paint 200
Total 9740
22
Chapter 9
CALCULATION
23
24
25
26
27
28
FINAL RESULTS
29
CONCLUSIONS
30
REFERENCE
31