Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Not Measuring Up
"I must admit, I'm completely baffled by these scoring results for Cam Leslie," Carole
Wheeling said as she and company CEO Ronald Zeitland scrolled through the latest
employee surveys for middle management.
For the second year, RTZ Corporation used Wheeling's consulting firm to
survey and score managers. An increasingly younger workforce, changing consumer
tastes, and technology changes in the industry had caused Zeitland to look more
closely at culture and employee satisfaction. The goal of this process was to provide
feedback in order to assure continuous improvement across a variety of criteria. The
surveys could be used to highlight areas for improvement by showing manager and
company strengths and weaknesses, anticipating potential problem areas, providing
a barometer for individual job performance, and as a road map for transforming the
culture as the company expanded.
From the outset, Zeitland insisted on employee honesty in scoring managers
and providing additional comments for the surveys.
"We can't change what we don't know," Zeitland instructed employees in
meetings two years ago. "This is your opportunity to speak up," Zeitland had told
them. "We're not looking for gripe sessions. We're looking for constructive analysis
and grading for what we do and how
we do it. This method assures that everyone is heard. Every survey carries equal
weight. Changes are coming to this organization. We want to make those changes
as easy and
equally beneficial as possible for everyone."
Now, two years into the process, the culture was showing signs of changing
and improving.
"The results from last year to this year show overall improvement," Wheeling
said. "But for the second year, Cam's survey results are disappointing. In fact, there
appears to be
a little slippage in some areas."
Zeitland leaned back in his chair, paused, and looked at the survey results on
the screen.
"I don't really understand it," Wheeling remarked. "I've talked to Cam. He
seems like a nice guy-a hard worker, intelligent, dedicated. He pushed his crew, but
he's not a
control freak."
"He actually implemented several of the suggestions from last year's survey"
Zeitland said. "From all reports and my own observations, Cam has more presence
in the
department and has increased the number of meetings. He appears to have at least
attempted to open up communications. I'm sure he will be as baffled as we are by
these new
results because he has put forth effort."
"Employees mentioned some of these improvements, but it's not altering the
scores. Could it merely be a reflection of his personality." Wheeling asked.
“Well, we have all kinds of personalities throughout management. He’s very
knowledgeable and very task oriented. I admit he has a way of relating to people that
can be a little standoffish, but I don't think it's always necessary to be slapping
everyone on the back and buying them beers at the local pub in order to be liked and
respected and...”
“… in order to get high scores?" Wheeling finished his sentence. "Still, the
low percentage of favorable' scores in relation to ‘unfavorable’ and even ‘neutral..
"her voice trailed off momentarily: "That's the one that gets me. There are so many
‘neutral’ scores. That's really strange. Don't they have an opinion? I'd love to flesh
chat one out more. It seems that in a sea of vivid colors, he's beige."
"It's like he's not there," Zeitland said. "The response doesn't tell me that they
dislike Cam; they just don't see him as their manager."
Wheeling laughed. "Maybe we can wrap him in gauze like the Invisible Man,"
she joked.
The joke appeared lost on Zeitland. "That invisibility leaves him disengaged,
Look at the comments." He scrolled down. "Here's a follow-up comment: Employee
Engagement: Are you kidding? And here's another: Advocacy: I don't think and I
don't believe anyone here thinks he would go to bat for us."
"I know," Wheeling said. "On the other hand, many of their remarks indicate
they consider him fair in areas like distribution of workload, and they score him
decently in area of follow through in achieving company goals. But overall
satisfaction and morale levels are low."
“That's what I don't understand, Zeitland commented. “Morale and
productivity are normally so strong linked. Morale in this case is blah, blah, blah, and
yet these guys manage to perform right up there with every other division the
company. So they're doing it. They just don't like it or find any sense of fulfillment."
"Does Cam?"
"Interesting question," Zeitland agreed.
"So, how do we help Cam improve these scores in the coming year?"
Wheeling asked." What positive steps can he take? I'd at least like to see an up-or-
down vote--nor
all of this neutrality-on his management skills and job performance."
Questions
1 Do you think Zeitland's desire for changes in culture are related to changes in the
external environment? Explain.
2. What additional investigation might Wheeling and Zeitland undertake before
settling on a plan of action?
3. What are some steps you would recommend that Cam consider to better connect
with the employees who report to him?
CASE 2
Questions
1. How accurate is Adam Wainwright's analysis of the situation at Guitarras
Dominguez? Do you think craftsmanship is incompatible with increasing productivity
in this company? Why?
2. What social values are present in Guitarras Dominguez that seem different from
U.S. social values (Exhibit 4.6 and Exhibit 4.7)? Explain.
3. What do you recommend Adam do to increase production in a business setting
that does not seem to value high production?
CASE 3
Questions
1. How has Ken Bodine shaped the sales culture at Pace Technologies? Do you
consider this culture to be at a preconventional, conventional or post-conventional
level of ethical development? Why?
2. What should Ali Sloan do? What would you actually so if you were in her place?
Explain.
3. How might Cody Rudisell’s decision differ if he based it on the utilitarian approach
vs. individualism approach vs. practical approach to ethical decision making? Which
approach does he appear to be using?
CASE 4
Black-Jack Antiques
For 13 years, Jeremy Black and Kevin Jack worked in adjoining cubicles for the
department of transportation their state. Although Kevin was 8 years older than
Jeremy, the two men developed a strong friendship. They grumbled about their
humdrum jobs (decent pay, great benefits, no excitement or chance for
advancement) and argued over the NBA (Cavs vs. Bulls) and the NFL (Browns vs.
Bears). They discovered a mutual love for antique furniture–Jeremy for restoration
and Kevin for collecting. Together with their wives, Jenny and Susan, they haunted
estate sales and antique stores. At some point-neither remembered when–they
began discussing the possibility of someday becoming partners and opening their
own antique furniture sales and restoration business. Six years ago, talk became
reality. They took the plunge, left their jobs with the state, and opened Black-Jack
Antiques: Furniture and Restoration. They did not bother to write a business plan or
a partnership agreement.
Kevin secured start-up loans for the business in his name because Jeremy's
amount of personal debt and low credit score made it difficult for him to get a loan.
Jeremy's construction skills and supply contacts saved the duo thousands of dollars
in renovations to the building, and his reputation and client list, developed over years
of restoring furniture, provided a solid base of customers and referrals. Both men
considered it a win-win situation and spent no time trying to decide who had invested
the most in the business.
Black-Jack had its share of bumps along the way, but being aware of the
high rate of failure among start-up businesses, the partners were pleased by the
steady growth year after year. They agreed long ago on the division of labor. Kevin,
a detail-oriented, business-savvy individual, would oversee the sales and business
side, while Jeremy focused on the restoration of furniture. Each played to his
strengths. When Kevin seemed to be losing his fire under the burden of mundane
day-to-day activities, Jeremy suggested that Kevin and Susan build up antique sales
with occasional buying trips. The suggestion reignited Kevin's excitement.
As Jeremy's young family grew, worries about his mounting personal debt led
Kevin to offer financial help on two occasions. “He's my partner. We're in this thing
together. Besides, he would do the same for me if the situation was reversed" he
said. Kevin was impressed that, although Jeremy had considerable stress in his
private life, he seldom brought it in to work. Focus on his work and on the clients
remained strong. In recent months, Jeremy seemed particularly calm and more
assured, and Kevin surmised that his partner was working through his financial
woes.
The partners' wives also enjoyed a strong friendship and often met for lunch,
shopping, and other activities. Recently, Jenny let slip to Susan that Jeremy might
soon have a job with a nearby furniture design firm. It was a great opportunity for him
to use his talents, and he thought perhaps he and Kevin could sell the store or Kevin
could buy out his "share" of the business.
It was a great shock to Kevin. Hurt and angry, he could not bring himself to confront
Jeremy right away. Instead, he took his fears and concerns to "Coach." Ed Morgan
was his father-in-law, his old high school football coach, and a man of tremendous
common sense. Coach's way was not to preach or to advise, but to let Kevin talk his
way through a problem, with a few probing questions, until he discovered the
solution for himself.
After explaining the situation to Coach, Kevin expressed his devotion to the
friendship, as well as the partnership, and expressed concerns for Jeremy. "I'm
worried that he is letting his dream die because of fear and that one day soon he will
regret his decision," Kevin said. “I want to do the right thing for Jeremy, Jenny, and
the kids, but if he leaves the business, he takes the restoration side away and I'm
afraid the business will die. I don't know if the antique side can carry all the weight. If
we sell, I made the major financial investment, so how do we split any profits from
the sale? Jeremy has job prospects, but in today's job market, would I be able to find
something else at my age? It is all overwhelming. I want to be fair, but.."
Coach leaned forward, placing his hands on his knees and looking at Kevin
sitting on the nearby sofa. "I've been listening to you, Kevin, and your concerns
sound legitimate to me. Remember you have a business partnership and a
friendship. What should a friend and business partner do?"
Coach's question was a wake-up call. That night, Kevin and Susan discussed
the options and ways to proceed, beginning with frank discussions between the
partners. Kevin and Susan understood that the lack of a written agreement could
cause a problem if Kevin and Jeremy couldn't work things out. On the friendship
side, Kevin wanted to know what Jeremy was feeling that caused him to look for
other work. On the business side, Kevin and Susan discussed the antiques side of
the business, evaluating its strengths and potential separate from the restoration
side. They also evaluated Kevin's strengths an options he might consider for the
future. What has Kevin learned about himself? What options does Kevin have? What
should be his next move?
Questions
1. If you were Kevin, how would you initiate a conversation with Jeremy? What would
you want to learn? What would you say?
2. What does this case illustrate about the risks of starting a business with a partner?
How might those risks be minimized? Explain.
3. Do you think Kevin could make a go of the business alone? Should he try?
Discuss.
CASE 5
Questions
1. Explain how UPS's alternative-fuels fleet is a response to trends taking place in
the company's general environment.
2. Describe how UPS is using boundary-spanning roles to adapt to energy-related
uncertainty in its environment.
3. How does UPS's clean fleets initiative illustrate the concepts of sustainability and
corporate social responsibility?
CASE 6
Questions
1. Have you shopped at a Costco store? How do you think a Costco store compares
to Sam’s Club, Target, or Walmart stores? What do you value most when selecting a
low-priced store at which to shop?
2. With respect to competitive strategy, identify and evaluate Costco's target
customers, its core competence, and how it builds synergy and delivers value.
3. Would you rate Costco's competitive strategy as pursuing differentiation, cost-
leadership, focus, or some combination? Why?
CASE 8
The Office
Krista Acklen was the “golden girl” of metropolitan government in a large Midwestern
city. The top graduate of a local high school, she studied in France and interned at
Vogue in Paris before returning to the States to get an MBA, and she landed a
position with a top New York PR firm. She knew everyone, and chatting with or
“doing lunch” with the rich and famous was a normal day tor Acklen.
The only child of a single mom, Acklen dropped it all and willingly returned to
her Midwestern hometown when her mother’s health declined suddenly. She had
barely settled in and established home care for her mother when the mayor s office
contacted her with a job proposal. Would Acklen consider a position developing and
directing a public arts program tor the city? She enthusiastically accepted the job.
With her winning connections, drive, and abilities, she quickly expanded her mission
to develop a range of arts programs. Donations and grant money poured into
programs under her established nonprofit organization developed to support city
parks. Headquarters for Acklen and her staff was a comfortable unused third-floor
space in the city library that used to hold books and magazines that were now stored
digitally.
Then John Mitchell, director of parks and recreation, summoned her to a meeting "to
learn of a decision I have de that will affect your group”. Acklen was curious to out
what was going on. Knowing that budget factors recently forced reduction in staff
and office space throughout city government, and aware of the importance of dealing
carefully with public opinion, as well as the feelings of employees and other
stakeholders, Acklen felt that she was prepared for any decision Mitchell might have
reached.
She tried to get comfortable in the chair across from Mel, who seemed ill at
ease. Avoiding small talk, Michell said that he intentionally did not discuss the
decision advance because he believed Acklen would object.
He would not accept her objections anyway, he indicated, So the decision
was final.
“What is the decision?” asked Acklen.
“The mayor wants halt of your group’s office space for the Greenways
project,” Mitchell replied, "and I see no alternative except for you to agree.
The mayor’s idea
makes sense, and you must go along”.
Acklen felt fury rising in her chest as she stared at Mitchell while thinking,
“This people-pleasing, brown-nosing jerk. He will do anything to win the mayor’s
favor”.
The Greenways project, directed by Lisa Todd, had developed a number of beautiful
areas throughout the city. In recent years, Greenways had received the bulk of new
money and attention from the federal government, and Todd’s staff had grown with
the additional funding and development projects.
As Acklen regained her composure, she shot back at Mitchell, “Not
consulting me on this is unacceptable. I should be part of any decision affecting my
staff and program. I could have helped plan a solution that worked for everyone”.
Mitchell started to speak, but Acklen cut him off. “You have a responsibility to my
group as well as to the mayor. I think you are giving us the start as an easy way to
please her.”
The two argued a while longer, but Mitchell wouldn’t budge. Finally, Acklen
said, “John, since this was your decision, you should be the one to tell my people.
You better come over soon before the word gets out.”
“No,” Mitchell said, “you are their immediate boss. You have to tell them.
That's your job. Where is your team spirit, anyway?”
Acklen returned to her office, seething and vented about the problem to
Joanne Franklin, her most senior employee. "Oh no," Joanne moaned. "We really
need all this space. Our program is growing, too.”
Acklen agreed, but she explained Mitchell's support of the suggestion from
the mayor s office to make additional office space available to Lisa Todd and her
staff. Joanne started brainstorming. "I suppose we could pair up in the offices.
Acklen shook her head."We are team players. But John Mitchell and the
mayor need to know that this was not handled in a way that shows respect for our
employees. After a pause, she continued, "I'm too frazzled to think about it anymore
today. Let's talk about this tomorrow.
Questions
1. What mistakes do you think John Mitchell made with the way he solved the
problem of limited office space? Explain.
2. What approach would you have used if you were Mitchell? Why?
3. What are Krista Acklen's options for responding to Mitchell's decision? What
should she do now? Why.
CASE 9
CASE 10
Abraham's Grocery
The first Abrahams Grocery Store was started in 1967 by Bill Abraham and his sister
Doris. They used a small inheritance to start a small grocery store in a suburb of
Atlanta, Georgia, and it was immediately successful. The location was good, and
both Bill and Doris had winning personalities and a 'serve the customer attitude.
Abraham’s rapidly growing number of customers enjoyed an abundance of good
meats and produce, tor which Abrahams became well known.
By 2007, Abrahams had over 200 stores. Company headquarters moved to
downtown Atlanta to supervise stores throughout the southeastern United States.
There were tour regional managers responsible for about 50 stores each. Within
each region, there were four districts of 12 to 13 stores each.
Because the stores specialized in excellent meats and produce, there was a
separate meat department manager, grocery department manager, and produce
department manager within each store. The grocery department manager also
served as the store manager, but this person did not have direct authority over the
meat department or the produce department. The store meat department manager
reported directly to a district meat manager specialist, and the store produce
department manager reported directly to a district produce manager specialist. The
store manager (who is also the grocery department manager) reported directly to a
district store supervisor. This direct line of authority for each store department
provided excellent quality control over the meat, produce, and grocery departments
within individual stores.
However, there was growing dissatisfaction within the stores. The turnover of
store managers was high, mostly because they had no control over the meat and
produce departments within their stores. Coordination within stores was terrible,
such as when a store manager decided to promote a sale on Coke products as a
loss leader. Hundreds of cartons of Coke were brought into the store for the big sale,
but the meat and produce department managers would not give up floor space to
display Coke cartons. The frustrated store manager insisted that this was no way to
run a business and quit on the spot. Many stores experienced conflict rather than
cooperation among the meat, produce, and store managers because each was very
protective of their separate responsibilities.
Doris Abraham asked a consultant for advice. The consultant recommended
a reorganization within each store so that the meat, grocery, and produce
departments would all report to the store manager. The store manage thus would
have complete control over store activities and would be responsible for coordinating
across the meat, produce, and grocery departments. The meat department manager
in each store would report to the store manager and would also have a dashed-line
relationship (communication, coordination) with the district meat specialist. Likewise,
each store produce department manager would have a dashed-line relationship with
the district produce specialist. The store manager would report directly to the district
store supervisor. The district meat and produce specialists would visit individual
stores periodically to provide advice and help the store department heads to ensure
top quality in the meat, produce, and grocery areas.
The consultant was enthusiastic about the proposed structure. Store
managers would have more freedom and responsibility. By assigning responsibility
for all store departments to the store manager, the new structure would encourage
coordination within stores and give managers the ability to adapt to local tastes and
customer needs. The dashed-line relationships would ensure excellent meat,
grocery, and produce departments across all stores.
Questions
1. Based on the information available in the case, sketch a picture of the original
structure within an Abrahams store and the store managers' relationship with district
specialist managers. What type of structure is this? Explain.
2. Based on the information available in the case, sketch a picture of the consultant's
recommended structure within the store and the relationship of store department
managers with district specialist managers. What type of structure is this? Explain.
3. What are some of the advantages and disadvantages you see for the two types of
structures? Which structure do you think will work best for Abrahams? Why?
CASE 11
Questions
1. What do you think are the reasons for peoples resistance to the MRP
implementation? Explain.
2. What is the value of the task force idea suggested by the CEO as a way to
facilitate implementation? Explain.
3. Which implementation tactics do you think Elam should follow? Why?
CASE 12
Questions
1. What kind of employee social contract is assumed by Kirby and Cunningham?
Explain.
2. If you were an HR manager at the company, which view would you support?
Why?
3. HR departments hire and develop human capital to serve the organization's
strategy and drive performance. Which approach -- Kirby's or Cunningham’s -- is
more likely to have a greater positive impact on performance? Discuss.