Professional Documents
Culture Documents
‘Barani is theocratic, but Fazal is liberal’. Do you agree with the statement?
Give arguments in favour of your answer.
2 - Compare the Barani’s & Fazal’s perspectives on monarchy
Outline the novelty of his conception of Badshahat
On religious harmony
Intro
Abul Fazal - An historian of Medieval India, a secretary of Akbar
Early life - Study Arabic, Greek philosophy, Sufism / live a life of ascetic
Impact of his father condition - Mughal religious scholar (ulhama) humiliate his
father for being tolerant with Shia. Thus, he migrates from there. This impact
him & later he expose narrow minded bigotry of religious scholars
Influence of Ibn Arabi – who consider reality as transcendental Unity &
difference of world (of religion & spiritual are equally) insignificant & illusory /
denied view that religious leaders are superior to the king
Work
Change axis of historiography from core of Islam to teleology of universal
history (Akbar as heir of Adam a ruler of all, not of Muhammad)
Akbar Nama - 1. Account of Akbar ancestors 2. Akbar reign in chronological
order 3. Ain-i-Akbari account of sys of admin / differ departments of govt /
facts about its extent, condition, population, resources, industry, wealth /
account of Hindus religion, philosophy, their practices & customs. Thus,
Broaden the range and scope of history compared to other historians
Akbar & Fazal - Akbar needs ideological support to consolidate power against
the other power centers of society & Fazal was fit for it
Approaches to Governance
Fazal develop a broader ideology for Mughal civilization / Difficulty for Islam
as a universal religion (state and community coexist) e.g., as India with minority
of Islam ruler & majority of Hindu being ruled
Barani de-universalized Islam as tribal religion viz Turks / Firuz Toghlaq
argues to make India fit for it by conversion to Islam / Fazal - Gave twofold and
revolutionary approach – [1. equality among all religions (all have some truth)
2. separation of politics from religion by favor loyalty to Akbar above the
restrictions of any single religious community]
Methodology
• Rational and secular approach
• New methodology to collect facts and arrange them based on critical
investigation.
• widened range & scope (record a mass of facts)
• questioned the source validity and accepted it based on principles of
historical investigation.
SECULARISM OF DIN–E-ILAHI
Akbar wants ruler authority over all other elements of the state
• gained authority to interpret law, through Order of Mazhar. (Limited
power)
• seek new justification of religious thoughts /
o Fazal provide it by favor loyalty to Akbar above the restrictions of
any single religious community &
o create a cult of loyalty around the personality of the emperor
(model of Sufi pir-morid relationship)
o intent to endow the emperor with an ideology, replace Sariah as
sole principle to run state
Critique of Traditionalists
Criticism - kafir, not a true Muslim for rejects supremacy of Islam / Too
skeptical of tradition, favor science - remark Ghazali's criticisms of the
scientists as nonsense / unsuccessful experiments of Sulh-kul and Din-i-Ilahi /
Inconsistent views - gave incompatible theory of social contract and divine right
COMPARE FAZAL & BARANI
Origin of kingship – divine origin / both social contract & divine theory
Basis of sovereignty – force / social order & wisdom of mystic tradition
Nature of sovereignty – temporal as king subordinate religious laws / both
temp & spiritual sovereignty in king above religious laws
Duties of kingship – stability of ruling class, uphold sharia in all walks of life,
protect Islam / religious tolerance (Sulh-i-kul), social harmony, promote sci
Realism – more realistic (end justify means – king can use pol expediency) /
idealistic (king as perfect man)
Theory – gave own theory with novelty / no independent ideas, articulate
through Akbar vision
Practice – not follow by sultan / only follow by Akbar, later ignored