Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Haddadi 2009
Haddadi 2009
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Based on first-principles total energy calculations, we predict the elastic and electronic properties of the
Received 13 March 2009 anti-perovskites AsNSr3, SbNSr3 and BiNSr3 compounds. The calculated lattice constants are in good
Received in revised form 18 April 2009 agreement with the available results. The independent elastic constants (C11, C12 and C44) and their pres-
Accepted 21 April 2009
sure dependence are calculated using the static finite strain technique. The isotropic elastic moduli,
Available online 19 May 2009
namely, bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), Young’s modulus (E), Poisson’s ratio (r) and Lame’s con-
stants (k and l) are calculated in framework of the Voigt–Reuss–Hill approximation for ideal polycrystal-
PACS:
line ANSr3 aggregates. By analysing the ratio between the bulk and shear moduli, we conclude that ANSr3
71.15.Mb
62.20.Dc
compounds are brittle in nature. We estimated the Debye temperature of ANSr3 from the average sound
71.20.Nr velocity. The band structures show that all studied materials are semiconductors. The analysis of the site
and momentum projected densities, charge transfer and charge densities show that bonding is of cova-
Keywords: lent–ionic nature. This is the first quantitative theoretical prediction of the elastic and electronic proper-
Anti-perovskite ties of AsNSr3, SbNSr3 and BiNSr3 compounds that requires experimental confirmation.
PP-PW method Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Elastic properties
Electronic properties
Pressure effect
0927-0256/$ - see front matter Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.04.028
882 K. Haddadi et al. / Computational Materials Science 46 (2009) 881–886
The ternary strontium nitrides ANSr3, with A = As, Sb and Bi, be-
long to the anti-peroveskite-type nitrides. The ideal cubic anti-
perovkite structure for ANM3 compounds (#221) contains one for-
mula with the Wyckoff positions of the atoms are A 1a (0, 0, 0), N
1b (0.5, 0.5, 0.5) and Sr 3c (0, 0.5, 0.5).
The calculated equilibrium lattice constants for AsNSr3, SbNSr3,
and BiNSr3 compounds are summarized in Table 1. Results from
earlier works are quoted for comparison. The present results agree
well with the previous theoretical reports for these compounds Fig. 1. Calculated pressure–volume relations for AsNSr3, SbNSr3 and BiNSr3
[10]. For the three ANSr3 compounds the computed lattice con- compounds. V0 is the equilibrium volume. The solid lines are given by the Birch-
stants a within both GGA and LDA approximation deviate by small Murnaghan equation of state with the parameters listed in Table 1.
than 1% compared to the calculation of Beznosikov [10]. The bulk
modulus B0 at zero pressure and its pressure derivative B0 are cal-
culated by fitting pressure–volume data to a third-order Birch- R(As) = 1.33 Å, R(Sb) = 1.53 Å and R(Bi) = 1.63 Å. Meanwhile, the B
Murnaghan equation of state (EOS) [19] (Fig. 1). To date, no exper- values decreases in the following sequence: B (AsNSr3) > B
imental or theoretical data for the bulk moduli of AsNSr3, SbNSr3, (SbNSr3) > B (BiNSr3), i.e. in inverse sequence to a0 – in agreement
and BiNSr3 compounds are available to be compared with our the- with the well-known relationship between B and the lattice con-
oretical results. As it can be seen from these data, the a0 values of stants: B / vV 1
0 , where V0 is the unit cell volume. This simple
the series of ANSr3 phases increases in the following sequence: a0 trend – a larger lattice constant leads to a smaller bulk modulus
(AsNSr3) < a0 (SbNSr3) < a0 (BiNSr3). The result can be easily – has been demonstrated also for various perovkite-like materials
explained by considering the atomic radii of As, Sb and Bi: [20,21].
K. Haddadi et al. / Computational Materials Science 46 (2009) 881–886 883
The values of elastic constants Cij for AsNSr3, SbNSr3 and BiNSr3
single cubic crystals, calculated within the LDA and GGA, are listed
in Table 2. The errors quoted for Cij-values are associated with the
deviation of the stress–strain relationship from linearity. As far as
we are aware measurements or calculations of these stiffness coef-
Fig. 2. Electronic band dispersion curves of AsNSr3 along some high symmetry
ficients, C11, C12 and C44 have been not reported to date.
directions of the Brillouin zone. Vertical lines represent high-symmetry points of One can remark that the elastic constant C11, which represents
the Brillouin zone. The horizontal dashed line designates the Fermi level (EF). stiffness against principal strains, and the bulk modulus B, which
884 K. Haddadi et al. / Computational Materials Science 46 (2009) 881–886
Table 3
Elastic wave velocities (in m/s) for different propagation directions for AsNSr3,
SbNSr3, and BiNSr3 compounds.
t100
L t100
T1 t100
T2 t110
L t110
T1 t110
T2 t111
L t111
T1 t111
T2
AsNSr3
GGA 4974 2838 2838 4725 2838 3237 4339 3109 3109
LDA 5322 2797 2797 4888 2797 3502 4734 3284 3284
SbNSr3
GGA 4640 2818 2818 4560 2818 2945 4534 2903 2903
LDA 4692 2804 2804 4575 2804 2990 4535 2929 2929
BiNCa3
GGA 4095 2542 2542 4062 2542 2593 4052 2576 2576
LDA 4344 2562 2562 4200 2562 2792 4151 2717 2717
Table 4 value is associated with ductility and the low value indicates brit-
The calculated first- (a in GPa1) and second-order (b in 102 GPa2) pressure tleness. The critical value which separates ductile and brittle is at
coefficients of the elastic constants (C11, C44, C12) and the bulk modulus (B), for
AsNSr3, SbNSr3 and BiNSr3 compounds, using GGA approximation.
about 1.75. Based on Pugh’s notion [30], these compounds are
brittle.
AsNSr3 SbNSr3 BiNSr3
a b a b a b 3.5. Debye temperature
C11 8.89 7.75 7.94 5.35 8.38 6.43
C12 1.49 1.63 1.67 1.66 1.81 0.91 Having calculated the Young’s modulus E, bulk modulus B, and
C44 0.71 0.93 1.02 1.21 1.03 1.13 shear modulus G, one can calculate the Debye temperature, which
B 3.95 1.50 3.76 0.68 3.10 1.54
is an important fundamental parameter closely related to many
physical properties such as elastic constants, specific heat and
melting temperature. We have estimated the Debye temperature
(hD ) of ANSr3 compounds from the average sound velocity, vm ; by
derivatives of the elastic moduli C11, C12, C44 and B for the three the following equation [31]:
studied compounds. It is easy to observe that the all elastic con- 1=3
stants and the bulk modulus increase when pressure is enhanced. h 3
hD ¼ vm ð4Þ
From Table 4, one can remark that C11 is more sensitive to the kB 4pV a
change of pressure compared to the other elastic moduli. C44,
where h is the Plank’s constant, kB the Boltzmann’s constant and Va
which provide a measure of rigidity against the shape deformation,
the atomic volume. The average sound velocity in the polycrystal-
is the less sensitive one to the change of pressure.
line material is given by [31]:
The requirement of mechanical stability in a cubic structure
leads to the following restrictions on the elastic constants [23]: 1=3
1 2 1
vm þ ð5Þ
1 1 1 v3t v3t
ðC 11 þ 2C 12 þ PÞ > 0; ðC 44 PÞ > 0; ðC 11 C 12 2PÞ > 0
3 2
ð3Þ where ml and mt are the longitudinal and transverse sound velocity
obtained using the shear modulus G and the bulk modulus B from
These criteria are satisfied for the herein studied compounds in
Navier’s equation [31]:
the investigated pressure range, indicating that this compound is
stable against elastic deformations. 1 1=2
3B þ 4G 2 G
vl ¼ and vt ¼ ð6Þ
3.4. Elastic properties for polycrystalline aggregates 3q q
The elastic constants C11, C12 and C44 are estimated from first- The calculated sound velocity and Debye temperature as well as
principles calculations for ANCr3 monocrystals. However, these the density for ANSr3 compounds are given in Table 6. The Debye
materials are often used as polycrystalline compounds, and there- temperature of AnNSr3 (A = As, Sb and Bi) decreases going down
fore it is useful to estimate the corresponding parameters of the the column from As to Bi. As is substituted by Sb and subsequently
polycrystalline species. For these purpose we have utilized the Voi- by Bi, The value of hD decreases by 6% and 17%, respectively. In this
gt–Reuss–Hill approximation (VRH) (see Refs [24–29] to calculate formulation, the Debye temperature is directly related to the elas-
the main mechanical parameters for AsNSr3, SbNSr3 and BiNSr3, tic constants via average elastic wave velocity, and the decreasing
namely, bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), Young’s modulus of elastic wave velocity causes the decrease in Debye temperature.
(E), Poisson’s ratio (r) and Lame’s constants (k, l) from the elastic At low temperature the vibrational excitations arise solely from
constants of the single crystals. Table 5 gives the calculated values acoustic vibrations. Hence, at low temperature hD determines pho-
of the mentioned elastic parameters for polycrystalline AsNSr3, non frequency and specific heat. We can conclude that lower pho-
SbNSr3 and BiNSr3 species. non frequency (and specific heat) is expected in BiNSr3 compound
The calculated ratio of bulk modulus B to shear modulus G (B/G) than in AsNSr3 compound. Unfortunately, as far as we know, there
are 1.206, 1.213, and 1.182 for AsNSr3, SbNSr3 and BiNSr3, respec- are no data available related to these properties in the literature for
tively, using the GGA calculations and 1.278, 1.246, and 1.215, AsNSr3, SbNSr3 and BiNSr3 compounds, therefore our calculated
respectively, from the LDA calculations. The shear modulus G rep- values can be considered as prediction of these properties for these
resents the resistance to plastic deformation; while B represents compounds. Future experimental work will provide a comparison
their resistance to fracture. Pugh [30] proposed that the ratio of for our calculated results.
B/G represents a measure of machinable behaviour. A high B/G
Table 6
Calculated density q (in g/cm3), longitudinal, transverse and average sound velocity
Table 5 (tl ; tt and tm ; respectively, in m/s), calculated from polycrystalline elastic moduli, and
Calculated shear modulus G, Young’s modulus E, Poisson’s ratio m and Lame’s the Debye temperatures (hD in K), calculated from the average sound velocity, for
constants (k and l) for polycrystalline AsNSr3, SbNSr3 and BiNSr3 compounds. AsNSr3, SbNSr3 and BiNSr3 compounds.
Compound G E r k l Compound q tl tt tm hD
AsNSr3 AsNSr3
GGA 38.8 93.6 0.175 21.5 39.8 GGA 4.45 4769 2993 3295 306
LDA 44.3 105.5 0.190 27.1 44.3 LDA 4.73 4947 3061 3376 321
SbNSr3 SbNSr3
GGA 39.4 92.7 0.177 21.5 39.4 GGA 4.78 4580 2870 3161 289
LDA 44 104.3 0.183 25.5 44 LDA 5.09 4726 2943 3243 303
BiNSr3 BiNSr3
GGA 37.87 88.6 0.170 19.5 37.87 GGA 5.72 4080 2572 2831 257
LDA 42.8 100.5 0.177 23.4 42.8 LDA 6.09 4224 2646 2914 270
886 K. Haddadi et al. / Computational Materials Science 46 (2009) 881–886
4. Conclusion [2] W.S. Kim, E.O. Chi, J.C. Kim, H.S. Choi, N.H. Hur, Solid State Commun. 119
(2001) 507.
[3] E.O. Chi, W.S. Kim, N.H. Hur, Solid State Commun. 120 (2001) 307.
Employing PP-PW approach based on density functional theory, [4] A.L. Ivanovskii, Russ. Chem. Rev. 64 (1995) 499.
within the local density approximation and the generalized gradi- [5] A. Bouhemadou, R. Khenata, Comput. Mater. Sci. 39 (2007) 803.
[6] A. Bouhemadou, R. Khenata, M. Chegaar, S. Maabed, Phys. Lett. A 371 (2007)
ent approximation, we studied the structural, electronic and elastic
337.
properties of AsNSr3, SbNSr3 and BiNSr3 compounds. A summary of [7] M.Y. Chern, D.A. Vennos, F.J. DiSalvo, J. Solid State Chem. 96 (1992) 415.
our results follows. [8] D.A. Papaconstantopoulos, W.E. Pickett, Phys. Rev. B 45 (1992) 4008.
[9] P.R. Vansant, P.E. Van Camp, V.E. Van Doren, Phys. Rev. B 57 (1998) 7615.
[10] B.V. Beznosikov, J. Struct. Chem. 44 (2003) 885.
(i) The calculated structural parameters at zero-pressure are in [11] M.D. Segall, P.J.D. Lindan, M.J. Probert, C.J. Pickard, P.J. Hasnip, S.J. Clark, M.C.
agreement with the available data. Payne, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 (2002) 2717.
(ii) The electronic structure calculations showed that ANSr3 [12] D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990) 7892.
[13] D.M. Ceperly, B.J. Alder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 (1980) 566.
compounds are direct band gap (C–C) semiconductors, [14] J.P. Perdew, A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 23 (1981) 5048.
and the bonding is of covalent–ionic nature. [15] J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865.
(iii) A numerical first-principles calculation of the elastic con- [16] H.J. Monkhorst, J.D. Pack, Phys. Rev. B 13 (1976) 5188.
[17] T.H. Fischer, J. Almlof, J. Phys. Chem. 96 (1992) 9768.
stants was used to calculate C11, C12 and C44 and their pres- [18] V. Milman, M.C. Warren, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13 (2001) 241.
sure dependence for ANSr3 compounds. A quadratic pressure [19] F. Birch, J. Geophys. Res. B 83 (1978) 1257.
dependence of the elastic constants and bulk modulus were [20] R.D. king-Smith, D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 49 (1994) 5828.
[21] I.R. Shein, V.V. Bannikov, A.L. Ivanovskii, Physica C 468 (2008) 1.
found. [22] B.B. Karki, L. Stixrude, S.J. Clark, M.C. Warren, G.J. Ackland, J. Crain, Am.
(iv) We calculated the shear modulus, Young’s modulus, Pois- Mineral. 82 (1997) 51.
son’s ratio and Lame’s constants for ideal polycrystalline [23] B. Holm, R. Ahuja, Y. Yourdshahyan, B. Johanson, B.I. Lundqvist, Phys. Rev. 59
(1999) 12777.
AsNSr3, SbNSr3 and BiNSr3 aggregates.
[24] M.J. Mehl, B.K. Klein, D.A. Papaconstantopoulos, Intermetallic compounds:
(v) The value of the B/G ratio for ANSr3 compounds are lower principle and practice, in: J.H. Westbrook, R.L. Fleischeir (Eds.), Principles, vol.
then the critical value separating brittle and ductile behav- I, John Wiley and Sons, 1995.
[25] A. Reuss, A. Angew, Math. Mech. 8 (1929) 55.
iour, hence these compounds are brittle.
[26] W. Voigt, Lehrbush der Kristallphysik, Taubner, Leipzig, 1928.
(vi) We calculated the sound velocity and the Debye tempera- [27] R. Hill, Proc. Phys. Soc. London A 65 (1952) 349.
ture for ANSr3 compounds. [28] Z. Hashin, S. Shtrikman, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 10 (1962) 335.
(vii) It is our ambition that these calculations will inspire further [29] E. Schreiber, O.L. Anderson, N. Soga, Elastic Constants and Their Measurement,
McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973.
experimental research on these phases. [30] S.F. Pugh, Philos. Mag. 45 (1954) 823.
[31] O.L. Anderson, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 24 (1963) 909.
References
[1] J.B. Goodenough, J.M. Longo, in: K.-H. Hellwege, O. Madelung (Eds.), Magnetic
and Other Properties of Oxides and Related Compounds, Landolt–Bornstein,
New Series, Group III, vol. 4a, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970, pp. 126–275.