Features Of Academic Writing
[Institute Name]
[Date]
Introduction
Academic writing is the most significant skill in academics because writing is the core method of
communication in academics. It is a formal writing style which is used in scholarly publications and
academics of educational departments. Academic writing is utilized for writing various types of content
such as essays, thesis/dissertations, research papers, literature, proposals, scholarly articles, and annotated
bibliographies (Scribbr, 2022). Academic writing has a significant part in advancing the exchange the
ideas of facilities and knowledge within communities. Good academic writing ensures that the
information of the content is effectively transferred and understood by the audience and readers.
Academic writing helps to develop analytical and critical thinking skills along with the ability to
synthesise and evaluate existing research ( Mahanal et al., 2019). Moreover, academic writing helps to
originate the thoughts of the writer which promotes intellectual growth. This essay has included several
features and characteristics of academic writing which help to differentiate academic writing from other
content and their importance.
Features of Academic Writing
Structured
Structure is the most important feature of academic writing which is needed to be clear and cohesive. The
structure of academic writing mainly includes an introduction, a body and the conclusion of the content.
This structure differs with the type of content such as a report has an introduction, method and discussion.
For every type of content, perfect citations and references need to be included to provide credit to the
source. The structure of the content has great importance in academic writing because it allows the
students, scholars and researchers to communicate their research and ideas with readers in a credible
manner. A good structure of the content helps to organize the ideas and information in the writing.
Moreover, a good structure of the content also gives logic, coherence, and direction to the reader which
attracts the readers (Hyland and Zou, 2020). Furthermore, structured academic writing creates a
framework by which the writer can provide the evidence to support his claims. The sections of the
paragraphs start with specific thesis statements which make the argument more cohesive and coherent.
Evidenced
Evidencing the content is the most crucial feature of academic writing because it strengthens the claims
and arguments by adding validity and credibility (Alsaleh, 2020). Academic writing should have adequate
evidence that supports the data, facts, research, and results of the writer. It helps to develop a clear
understanding of the subject matter and strengthens the position of the writer. Moreover, evidence in
writing helps to increase the reliability and validity of the content as it shows that the writer has analysed
various resources and utilised them in the writing.
The evidence makes the writing valid and convincible which persuades the readers. Moreover, evidence
creates a connection between the ideas of the writer and the previous research that makes the content
logical. Furthermore, evidence interpretation and evaluation of the data and information objectively and
systematically. Evidencing promotes academic integrity and intellectual honesty by providing the credit
of the evidence to the sources. Adequate referencing and citation acknowledge the accuracy of the content
and scholarly conversation with the reader. Therefore, evidence has great importance in academic writing
to enhance the impact and quality of the work.
Critical
Critical thinking has a significant importance in academic writing which helps to evaluate, interpret, and
analysis of the topic (Mahanal et al., 2019). Critical thinking involves the examination of the ideas,
arguments, questions and evidence, as the content should not just explain the topic. Critical thinking
allows the writer to consider and establish different perspectives on the topic before explaining it (Zwiers
and Crawford, 2023). It enables the writer to examine various strengths and weaknesses of the theories
and hypotheses used in research by adding different diverse sources. Critical thinking makes a
comprehensive understanding of the topic by providing an in-depth analysis of ideas and arguments
(Alsaleh, 2020).
In addition, critical thinking helps to assess the reliability, and validity of the sources that are cited in the
content. Critical thinking eliminates the bias information and ensures the source of argument with
accurate reasoning. In addition, critical thinking is effective in identifying and addressing the objections
and counterarguments of other researchers. It supports the writer in anticipating different challenges and
viewpoints that strengthen the main idea or argument of the writing.
Balanced
For effective academic writing, it is essential to present balanced perspectives on topics under discussion.
Achieving balance requires identifying and incorporating major viewpoints from all sides of an issue in a
fair and even-handed manner. This shows the reader that the writing considers complex topics from
multiple angles rather than promoting a single stance. Balanced academic work helps validate conclusions
by demonstrating they were reached after weighing different positions. Neglecting opposing views risks
making the writing seem one-sided or biased, weakening its credibility and impact (Nelson, 2020). A
balanced approach does not require treating all perspectives as equally supported or plausible when they
have faced substantial criticism. However, acknowledging dissenting stances as part of an open scholarly
discussion can still strengthen balance. Writers must take care not to oversimplify topics or leave out
nuanced considerations in attempts to encompass everything. At the same time, omitting or dismissing
major schools of thought risks imbalance (Smith, 2022). Overall, balance calls for the inclusion of
materially relevant positions supported by evidence, not empty gestures, or a misleading fabrication of
treating all arguable fringe ideas even-handedly.
Precise
Precision requires avoiding not only vague and indefinite language but also being overly broad or narrow
in scope. In academic writing, terms must have clearly defined boundaries that neither overgeneralize
beyond reasonable interpretation nor restrict meaning too much without qualification (TAA, 2020). For
example, using highly specific terminology, acronyms or shorthand names may be precisely defined
within limited contexts but obscure understanding for a wider audience. Conversely, employing vague
terms open to wide connotations sacrifices precise communication. Precision also hinges on meticulous
attention to detail, including meticulous references that unambiguously attribute ideas to their sources
without potential confusion (Trafimow et al., 2020). Omitting key factors, mentions of exceptions, or
other nuances undermines precise reflection of issues. While striving for briefness, precision further
compels expressing full reasoning without substantial gaps or losses of continuity for readers. Together,
word selection, structure and completeness allow academic work to convey intended implications,
arguments, and conclusions very precisely.
Objective
Maintaining a truly objective stance requires rigorous self-monitoring and refinement of an individual’s
perspective. Even subtler biases relating to identity, lived experiences, assumptions and blind spots can
unintentionally influence language, emphasis, and conclusions if not carefully managed (Smith, 2022).
Objectivity necessitates a willingness to thoughtfully reconsider and amend one's position based on a re-
examination of evidence and insights from alternative viewpoints, rather than rigidly adhering to pre–
existing points. It also calls for recognition that complete neutrality and value-freedom can be difficult or
impossible to fully achieve as humans with distinctive subjectivities. Therefore, transparency around
limitations is important so readers can properly put findings in context. Moreover, objectivity does not
prevent acknowledging where certain stances dominate discussions due to power asymmetries or lack of
consideration for communities with social exclusion (The University of Western Australia, 2019).
Highlighting such dynamics without accusation can aid a more balanced analysis. In closing, objectivity
remains a rigorously self-aware search for impartial understanding rather than a completely achievable
state.
Formal
In closing, the last important feature of academic writing is ‘formal’. This feature distinguishes academic
writing from regular writing (Smith, 2022). Maintaining a formal academic style necessitates conveying
depth and subtlety through sophisticated syntactic structures and vocabulary. Moreover, incorporating
more advanced grammar than common in casual writing, such as the use of subordinate clauses,
transitional phrases, and varied sentence forms, allows exactly situating arguments and relations between
ideas in a way everyday language would struggle with. Simultaneously avoiding overly dense or
complicated rendering keeps delivery precise. Formality also entails meticulous formatting and
presentation provided purposefully cultivates an aura of professional scholarship. Stylistic conventions
like intentional paragraphing, consistent use of headings or subheadings, and a polished overall
presentation style signal the material has undergone careful composition worthy of academic
consideration. While flexibility exists between rigidness and accessibility, balancing formality with reader
approachability helps to spread knowledge broadly (Hsu, 2021). Ultimately, formal expertise in language
displays mastery to handle complex discussions at a high level.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the significance of structured, evidenced, critical, balanced, precise, objective, and formal
qualities for academic writing, is evident that these traits are interrelated and altogether they establish
credibility and integrity and elevate discourse. Moreover, these features incorporate and strengthen
arguments by demonstrating they have undergone scrutiny from all critical angles. It prohibits ambiguity
that opens the door to misconception, bolstering understanding. In addition, these features establish
impartiality and shield against potential charges of bias or manipulation. Overall, academic writing’s
significance emerges from how it improves society. Upholding standards of structured, evidenced,
critical, balanced, precise, objective, and formal expression regardless of transient viewpoints safeguards
accomplishments and sparks further progress.
References
Alsaleh, N.J., 2020. Teaching Critical Thinking Skills: Literature Review. Turkish Online Journal of
Educational Technology-TOJET, 19(1), pp.21-39.
Hsu, T.L., 2021. Academic and formal writing style rewriter.
Hyland, K. and Zou, H.J., 2020. In the frame: Signalling structure in academic articles and blogs. Journal
of Pragmatics, 165, pp.31-44.
Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Sumiati, I.D., Sari, T.M. and Ismirawati, N., 2019. RICOSRE: A Learning
Model to Develop Critical Thinking Skills for Students with Different Academic Abilities.
International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), pp.417-434.
Nelson, J., 2020. This was an easy assignment: Examining how students interpret academic writing tasks.
In Reading Empirical Research Studies (pp. 94-130). Routledge.
Scribbr (2022). What Is Academic Writing? | Dos and Don’ts for Students. [online] Scribbr. Available at:
https://www.scribbr.com/category/academic-writing/.
Smith, S. 2022. What is Academic Writing?
TAA. 2020. Distinguishing features of academic writing #1: Precision - Textbook & Academic Authors
Association.
The University of Western Australia (2019). ACADEMIC WRITING STYLE: OBJECTIVITY.
Trafimow, D., Hyman, M.R. and Kostyk, A., 2020. The precision of scholarly consumer behavior
research. Journal of business research, 114, pp.93-101.
Zwiers, J. and Crawford, M., 2023. Academic conversations: Classroom talk that fosters critical thinking
and content understandings. Routledge.
Alsaleh, N.J., 2020. Teaching Critical Thinking Skills: Literature Review. Turkish Online Journal of
Educational Technology-TOJET, 19(1), pp.21-39.
