MGMT 8761: Reflection Assignment #1 F23 : MBTI Assessment

Name: Joshua Kennedy Joseph

Reg No: 8916893

1. Introduction: Citing and referencing course concepts explain the concepts behind the
MBTI and its common use in organizations. Including how the MBTI uses 4 distinct
dichotomies and how they relate to the 16 possible personality types. (5 marks)

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a self-report questionnaire designed to indicate

psychological preferences in how people perceive the world and make decisions (Cherry,
2019). It was developed by Katharine Cook Briggs and her daughter Isabel Briggs Myers
based on Carl Jung's theory of psychological types. The MBTI categorizes individuals into one
of 16 personality types based on four dichotomies or dimensions (Langton et al., 2019):

- Extraversion (E) vs Introversion (I): This dimension focuses on where individuals get their
energy and focus their attention. Extraverts are oriented towards the outer world of people
and activity while Introverts are oriented towards their inner world of ideas and
experiences.

- Sensing (S) vs Intuition (N): This dimension focuses on how individuals take in information.
Sensors focus on concrete details and facts while Intuitive focus on patterns and possibilities.

- Thinking (T) vs Feeling (F): This dimension focuses on how individuals make decisions.
Thinkers make logical and objective decisions while Feelers make decisions based on values
and subjective evaluation of person-centred concerns.

- Judging (J) vs Perceiving (P): This dimension focuses on how individuals approach the
outside world. Judgers prefer structure and organization while Perceivers prefer flexibility
and spontaneity.

The MBTI is commonly used in organizations for team-building, leadership development, and
conflict management by helping individuals understand their preferences and how they
interact with others who have different preferences (Hermann, 1979; Langton et al., 2019).
Knowing one's personality type allows leaders to better understand their own behaviours,
strengths, blind spots, and interactions with others.

2. Assessment Score: Include your 4-letter personality code and common name. For
example if you scored: ENTJ you would know as “The Commander” (1 mark)

My MBTI personality type is INTJ, known as "The Architect".

3. Explanation of the results including:

a. Use your own words, supported with external resources & course concepts, to
summarize your personality type. Your answer requires you to explain your results across
the 4 dichotomies of the MBTI & be properly cited and reference using APA format. (5
marks)

As an INTJ personality type, I am introverted, meaning I am energized and focused inward on

my own inner world of ideas, thoughts, and concepts rather than outwardly focused on
people and activities (Cherry, 2019). I rely on my intuition and pattern recognition to take in
information and perceive the world around me rather than focusing on concrete facts and
details through my senses (Heider, 1958). When making decisions, I use logic, objective
analysis, and reason based on my principles and strategic vision rather than basing decisions
primarily on values or consideration of personal impact (Kelley, 1973). I prefer structure,
organization, closure, and planning in how I approach the outside world rather than going
with the flow or remaining open-ended and adaptable (Hermann, 1979).

b. Now that you can define your particular personality type, do you agree with it? Include
Agree/disagree statements for your results. Be sure to include one for each of the 4
dichotomies explaining with examples why you either agree or disagree with that section
of the MBTI. (8 marks)

Extraversion vs. Introversion:

I agree with the assessment that I am introverted. I tend to be very internally focused, often
lost in my own thoughts and ideas. I prefer solitary activities over large group interactions.
An example is that I would rather read a book alone than go to a crowded party.

Sensing vs. Intuition:

I agree that I rely more heavily on intuition than concrete facts and details. I enjoy thinking
about abstract concepts, patterns, and future possibilities. For example, in conversations I
tend to talk more about theories and big picture ideas rather than practical facts and details
of everyday life.

Thinking vs. Feeling:

I agree that I make decisions based on logic and objective analysis rather than values and
impact on people. I try to remain detached and impartial when weighing pros and cons. For
example, when giving feedback, I tend to focus on constructive criticism rather than trying to
avoid hurt feelings.

Judging vs. Perceiving:

I agree that I prefer structure, organization, and planning rather than going with the flow. I
like to make decisions quickly, have a plan, and achieve closure. For example, I like to have
my schedule planned out in advance rather than taking a spontaneous, last-minute
approach.

c. Identify 3 strengths & weaknesses that relate to leadership. Be sure that you include
evidence from the course material (modules), cited and referenced to support your
opinions. (6 marks)

Strengths:
- Strategic thinking and vision - As an INTJ, I can think critically and develop complex systems
and ideas to achieve goals (Module 4; Langton et al., 2019). This aids in strategic planning.

- Objective analysis - I can logically analyse information to make impartial, fact-based

decisions without personal bias (Module 2; Kelley, 1973). This is important for effective
problem-solving.

- Independent and determined - As an INTJ, I am very independent and driven to implement

my vision (Module 4; Cherry, 2019). This helps me take initiative and follow through.

Weaknesses:
- Lack of empathy - Because I make impersonal decisions based on logic, I may need to work
on compassion and considering human impacts (Module 2; Marsden, 2016). This is
important for ethical leadership.

- Intolerant of inefficiency - I can get impatient with indecision and lack of closure (Module 4;
Langton et al., 2019). I need to practice patience and inclusion of others' needs.

- Poor work-life balance - I tend to focus intensely on intellectual work and neglect other
areas of my life (Module 4; Cherry, 2019). As a leader, I need to model a healthy balance.

References

Cherry, K. (2019). What is personality & why does it matter? Retrieved from
https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-personality-2795416

Heider, F. (1958). Attribution theory. Retrieved from

https://www.simplypsychology.org/attribution-theory.html

Hermann, N. (1979). Whole brain dominance model. Retrieved from

https://www.herrmann.com.au/what-is-whole-brain-thinking/

Kelley, H. (1973). Covariation model. Retrieved from

http://psychology.iresearchnet.com/social-psychology/social-cognition/kelleys-covariation-
model/

Langton, N., Robbins, S., Judge, T. (2019). Organizational behaviour: Concepts, controversies
& applications, 8th edition. Pearson Publishing.

Marsden, T., A. (2016). The difference between personality & values. Retrieved from
https://blog.saberr.com/the-difference-between-personality-and-values-f06199bca2e2