Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NAME :
PNUMBER :
WORD COUNT : 2868
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction 2
Role of Leadership 7
Summary 10
References 12
1
Introduction
that influence the behaviour of employees and progress of the company. It becomes a
complex subject when the relationship between organisational culture and leadership
behaviour is considered. Every employee plays a role in changing organisational culture, but
it requires a remarkable leadership to manage and change organisational culture that impacts
understanding of values of the organisation and honest approach to transform the culture for
development of the company is necessary. This report discusses effective leadership through
strategy to achieve change. In the perspective of employees, culture is holistic and not
Sveningsson, 2008) Culture based on values and beliefs stay with individuals or organisations
and are often difficult to change. According to Ogbonna and Harris (2002), culture exists on
various levels and changing culture depends on numerous factors that are internal and
aim for change and introduce new culture and leadership style to enhance the performance.
The external factors that could force a change could be political, technological, cultural,
demographic, economic and market. (Alvesson and Sveningsson, 2008) The political factors
can be deregulations in international trade that could affect business. The introduction of
more sophisticated technology in the market could also trigger change and adapt new
2
working practices. Demographic factors could affect the recruitment of the organisation and
competence of work force. Though these are external factors that force organisational change,
there are also internal factors that could trigger the same. The arrival of new individuals in
key positions, revision or review of tasks that were performed by the company earlier,
modifying administrative structure could be observed as internal factors that impact the
and rituals and routines. In terms of language, an organisation’s principle and culture are
expressed through its vocabulary and slogans.(Alvesson and Sveningsson, 2008) A slogan
could describe what the company stands for. The nature of an organisation when viewed as
an iceberg, certain elements are visible, and others are not. The formal relationships of an
administrative procedures form the tip of the iceberg that could be visible to the outside
world. Though they form the tip of the iceberg, the informal relationships of organisation
such as attitude, values, perceptions, feelings, behaviour and communication that constitute
the organisational culture form the bottom of the iceberg. It could be argued that it is often
these less visible elements that form the culture of an organisation are catalysts for an
organisational change. These significant factors and theoretical aspects are further discussed
Company Background
General Motors was established in 1908. The company grew into a corporate giant in
a few decades. However, the emergence of Toyota declined the profit and growth of General
Motors in the market.(Khan, Raza and George, 2017) An external force such as the financial
3
breakdown in 2008 contributed to bankruptcy that forced the company to implement a change
to survive and recapture the market. The company received loan from Canadian and
American government to maintain expenses. Furthermore, other internal factors also played a
major role in forcing a change. General Motors was paying higher wages of an average 74
dollars per hour when compared to an average 44 dollars per hours by its competitors which
forced the company to cut wages and costs.(Khan, Raza and George, 2017) In addition to
this, a reluctance in change and delay in decision making also caused the General Motors to
Leadership
Later, one of longstanding employees of General Motors, Mary Barra was appointed
as CEO of the company in 2013 with an aim to establish an organisational change and
recapture the market. The greatest challenge was the crisis of ‘Switchgate’, a faulty ignition
issue that caused more than 100 deaths and forced the company to recall its cars from the
market.(Isidore, 2015) Mary Barra, as a leader, acknowledged the problem and conducted a
full investigation without a concern about the costs. The investigation revealed that the
company has pattern of neglect and incompetence which forced Mary Barra to redefine the
Organisational change
Mary Barra implemented a culture based on values focusing on customer service and
For instance, she revamped the 10-page dress code of the company to ‘dress appropriately’
which created a basic form of empowerment.(Mcllvaine, 2018) There were concerns among
managers that employees might show up for work in T-shirts. She approached decision-
making in a rational manner which made the manager who opposed the change to come up
4
with a solution of having a locker for employees to keep clothes in case an official showed up
in a meeting. Mary Barra introduced a program named ‘Speak up for Safety’ where
employees are encouraged to raise their issues, ideas and opinions without being
employees who contribute ideas. The program initiated by Mary Bara as response to the crisis
drive the cultural change in General Motors. The organisational change in General Motors
hierarchy ladder. In addition to this, under the supervision of Mary Barra, General Motors
innovation within organisation with an aim to keep the company a profitable business in the
market.(Ann, 2019) General Motors became a company that utilises its organisational culture
to enhance its performance in automotive industry. The cultural characteristics and leadership
organisations respond to various external and internal factors that may have affected the
performance of the company. These organisational changes can arise due to the proactive
attitude of leaders or as a reaction to a crisis. For instance, Mary Barra’s response to the
‘Switchgate’ crisis by forcing a cultural change displays a proactive attitude of a leader. The
business environment of the company could also contribute to a corporate cultural change as
the technology, competition and customer demands in the market could influence the
enhance the performance of the company in the business world. To trigger such a change, it is
5
necessary to have a quality leadership with a skilful, proactive attitude and a decent
requires consistency and must sustain for a longer span of time. The organisation must also
minimise the chances of a resistance and reassertion of previous corporate culture in order to
achieve success. Nevertheless, investing in corporate cultural change could have a significant
influence on the performance of the company. An adequate corporate culture can improve the
work culture, job satisfaction and productivity which in turn improve the performance of the
company.
Corporate changes can be planned or unplanned depending upon various internal and
external factors that could cause them. Planned change may perform either gradually or
rapidly.(Hirlak and Kara, 2018) A gradual change could observe the organisation adapting to
changing environment from time to time. For instance, regrouping of structure, activities and
introduction of new roles can be observed during a gradual cultural change. A radical change
demonstrates a change in the values, attitude and belief by redefining the culture of the
Kara, 2018) Though a planned change approach could influence key stakeholders in major
cultural change, the complexity of the task and uncertainty can result in less productivity and
through a direct change. According to Kerber and Buono (2005), a direct change ‘is driven
from top of the organisation’ and depends on individuals’ reaction to change. Moreover,
leaders must persuade the members of organisation to establish cultural change. A guided
change approach arises from within the organisation based on contributions by employees to
6
approach reassesses and rebalance patterns by identifying and eliminating obstacles. Though
organisational change. For instance, in case of General Motors, it could be argued that Mary
cultural change. She conducted a full investigation on the crisis that revealed the cultural
obstacles of a pattern of neglect and incompetency in the company. In addition to this, she
redefined the culture bringing transparency and integrity by acknowledging the fault and
tend to stay with the existing corporate culture and leaders have a tedious task to unfreeze and
transform the existing culture and refreeze it with a new culture by ensuring that employees
are ready for a change. The leaders also must ensure that the implemented culture will
enhance performance, improve job satisfaction and will bring the desired outcome. Therefore,
the purpose of such radical changes is always to transform the organisation into a better one.
These changes could involve setting up new values, redefining existing beliefs and improve
change in an organisation. The extent to which it can influence the organisational change
Role of Leadership
Leaders are often considered as sponsors of change. Considering the turbulent business
7
environment, the power and capacity to lead organisational change is crucial to individuals
and organisations. Leadership is the capability to instil confidence and support to individuals
various corporate cultural changes demonstrate various leadership qualities. These leadership
transactional, charismatic leadership, etc which are displayed by leaders during change.
Though transactional leadership also offer rewards, individuals face a punishment when goals
are not met.(Hirlak and Kara, 2018) Transformational leadership are often charismatic in
leaders are considered a source of vision as they apply change after developing a vision. For
instance, General Motors investment in electric vehicles and driver-less cars under the
supervision of Mary Barra demonstrate her long-term vision for the company. Barra
program that recognises employees who share an idea. These actions are significant in
values that individuals cherish in leaders and not based on commanding of an office.
Charismatic leaders are observed during unprecedented crisis or a transition period of the
organisation.(Hirlak and Kara, 2018) For instance, Mary Barra create space for individuals
within the organisation to express their ideas and opinions by involving them in decision-
charismatic leadership.
8
leader could create and initiate cultural change to achieve objectives of the organisation. An
effective leadership through change could be observed when a leader attempt to identify and
shape the cultural issues and encourage the participation of members of the
change management. In case of General Motors, Mary Barra displayed her exceptional social
skills and vast knowledge on the work that she does. Her communication skills and
knowledge on the work demonstrate excellent social and functional competence of leaders in
an organisation.
However, an enforced change from top-down can create resistance among employees
against major corporate cultural change.(Kerber and Buono, 2005) A resistance to cultural
change can slow the process of organisational change, reduce productivity and could affect
making could help to reduce resistance for cultural change which makes leadership effective
through change. Culture do not change unless leaders change and without a visionary
According to Kell and Carrot (2005), the leadership styles of an employee could be
leadership style is always situationally contingent. According to Kerber and Buono (2005), an
effective leadership through change involves ‘leading change in ways that are suitable to the
situation’. To achieve such effective leadership, various leadership styles are followed to
Bhatti, Nemati, Rehman, Rizwan, 2010) This contributes to a two-way communication in the
9
hierarchy ladder between leaders and individuals. It also encourages employees to achieve
for individuals of the organisation.(Majeed, Kamran, Bhatti, Nemati, Rehman, Rizwan, 2010)
It could improve the levels of effort made by employees in terms of productivity and increase
motivation. For instance, the ‘Speak up for Safety’ program initiated by Mary Barra in
General Motors encourages employees to raise their issues. This contributes to a favourable
environment for individuals and provide support at the workplace. A directive leadership
Bhatti, Nemati, Rehman, Rizwan, 2010) Leaders could contribute to organising a structured
system of tasks when individuals perform unstructured tasks in an organisation. This leads to
receptiveness to new ideas and thinking are also critical in developing an effective leadership
Summary
organisation stands for. Corporate culture displays the behaviour of the workplace through
attitude, values and beliefs of the organisation. As discussed earlier, these cultures and values
are often expressed through language, slogans, stories and symbols of an organisation. The
current chaotic business environment suggests that an organisational change is inevitable for
10
individuals and organisations to enhance performance. It is evident that culture is holistic and
is not restricted to an individual but exists on various levels when the subject of leadership
and change are considered. Corporate culture is difficult to change but with an effective
necessary to achieve a successful organisational cultural change. General Motors was able to
make a swift comeback in the market through an effective leader like Marry Bara. The case
minimal resistance to change was observed. A major reason for increase in resistance in
organisation is that it exposes mistakes of the organisation and these mistakes are often
viewed as failures in the business environment. However, an effective leader transforms that
mistake into an opportunity to learn when the mistakes are accepted and acknowledged by the
company instead of hiding it. The General Motors and its leader Marry Bara have
acknowledged the mistake of faulty car ignition that contributed to a redefined cultural
change within the organisation. The case of General Motors suggests that to succeed in
style that could adapt according to varying situations. A combination of planned and guided
11
References
Alvesson Mats, Sveningsson Stefan (2008) Organizational Change. In: Alvesson Mats,
Sveningsson Stefan. Changing Organizational Culture Cultural Change work in progress.
New York : Routledge, pp 13-34.
Alvesson Mats, Sveningsson Stefan (2008) Organizational Culture and Change. In: Alvesson
Mats, Sveningsson Stefan. Changing Organizational Culture Cultural Change work in
progress. New York : Routledge, pp 35-50.
Ann Carrie (2019). Leadership Lessons from GM CEO – Mary Barra. Industry Leaders. 27th
July. Available at : https://www.industryleadersmagazine.com/leadership-lessons-from-gm-
ceo-mary-barra/ (Accessed on 12 June 2020)
Bengu Hirlak and Kara Ergun (2018) Organisational Change and Leadership. In : Ozer
Ozcelik et al, (eds.) Studies on Interdisciplinary Economics and Business – Volume I. Peter
Lang, pp 255-269.
Isidore Chris (2014). Death toll for GM ignition switch: 124. CNNBusiness, 10th Dec.
Available at : https://money.cnn.com/2015/12/10/news/companies/gm-recall-ignition-switch-
death-toll/index.html (Accessed on 14 June 2020)
Kell Thomas and Carrott T Gregory (2005). Culture Matters Most. Harvard Business School.
May. Available at : https://hbr.org/2005/05/culture-matters-most (Accessed on 12 June 2020)
Khan Sundus Tanweer, Raza Sarah Saleem and George Shaju (2017) Resistance to Change in
Organizations: A Case of General Motors and Nokia. International Journal of Research in
Management, Economics and Commerce. 7(1) pp 16-25.
Majeed, Kamran and Bhatti, Afkar and Nemati, Ali and Rehman, Ijaz and Rizwan,
Arshad (2010). Can Cultural Change with Different Leadership Styles enhance the
Organisational Performance. Research Journal of Inernational Studies. (17) pp 102-
132
12
Ogbonna Emmanuel and Harris C Lloyd (2002). Managing Organisational Culture: Insights
from the Hospitality Industry. Human Resource Management Journal. 12(1) pp 33-53.
Rushe Dominic (2014). GM chief Mary Barra: 'pattern of incompetence' caused fatal recall
delay. The Guardian, 5th Jun. Available at :
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/jun/05/gm-mary-barra-fatal-recall-
incompetence-neglect (Accessed on 14 June 2020)
Saporito Bill (2014). At GM, Safety Could Be Mary Barra's Silver Bullet. Time. 16th
April. Available at : https://time.com/64707/mary-barra-gm-safety/ (Accessed on 12
June 2020)
13