1

Running head Management

Innovation and change

Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Institutional Name
Unit Code & Unit Name
Submission Date
 2
Running head Management
Change management

Tesla, Inc. (formerly Tesla Motors, Inc.) has an organizational culture that promotes the

development of human resources necessary to create breakthrough goods in the worldwide auto

commercial. The rules also principles that drive employees' conduct also choices remain referred

by way of a company's organizational otherwise corporate culture. The corporate of Tesla culture

drives staff towards seeking out the most innovative ideas, allowing the business to position out

the motorized also liveliness age group also storing manufacturing. Workers remain stimulated

towards thinking past the box in directive to help the business succeed. Over the situation

company culture, Tesla, for example, retains humanoid reserve capabilities vital to its continued

expansion in the global market for electric vehicles, batteries, solar panels, and associated things.

In this way, the company's cultural features can be used to improve the firm's strategic

efficiency. Over structural culture, Tesla Inc.'s managing maximizes workers' creative also

innovative activities. For the company's technical innovation to continue, several initiatives are

required.

Before implementing a change program, it's important to examine the organization's culture

(Johansson 2013). In order to strengthen change readiness, it's critical to figure out which

cultural components should be modified and which should be kept. The change effort will be far

more likely to succeed if it is built on current values, beliefs, and behaviors (Heracleous, 2001,).

At the investigations for practicability for reform in the Swedish psychiatric health center,

Johansson et al. (2013) discovered that structural culture for the flexibility, coherence,

belongingness, also trust improves alteration eagerness. (Detert 2000) explore the dimension of

the structural culture in the context of modification preparedness in their investigation of

structural culture which relates towards Total Quality Scheme transformation project.
 3
Running head Management
Organizational culture is also studied by the (Armenakis 2011) within context of the

organizational reform. Different elements of the organizational culture remain generated through

alteration of the management, communication, involvement, also provision techniques,

according to the research on organizational change. (Janijevi 2012), for example, outlined the

criteria for matching structural culture to the category of the modification management method.

(Lopez-Dominguez 2013) investigated in what way leadership also structural microclimate

impact employees' alteration related behavior. Different aspects of the organizational culture

remain also discussed in context of the leaders' modification connected behaviors also alteration

management approach (Rafferty and Griffin, 2004). Though, the impact of the corporate culture

on the modification project preparedness had received insufficient attention. The study looked at

how to link organizational culture to management strategy.

The Beginnings

More research is needed, according to (Janijevi 2012), on how an organization's culture affects

the efficiency for the transition procedure. According to (Detert 2000), there is dearth of the

theoretical influence in the investigating the specific characteristics of an administration's culture

which is the most relevant towards change project also program execution. They picked the

abduction research technique to better comprehend the significance of the organizational culture

in establishing readiness aimed at modification of the projects. They begin by posing a research

question, somewhat compared to opening through a theory as a strictly logical approach. As a

result, a detailed assessment of available literature in fields of the organizational change also

organizational culture remains starting point. In contrast to a strictly inductive approach, the

thesis does not attempt to generate a new theory. Somewhat, they examine the present literature

in subject of awareness also propose a theoretical outline towards addressing the study topic.
 4
Running head Management
After that, they used interviews to put the proposed theoretical framework to the test. Preliminary

interviews result in a limitation of the research question's scope and, as a result, a more thorough

assessment of literature. Which remains shadowed through more interviews also comparison

analyses, which will help us fine-tune our basic theoretical framework. Rather than forcing a

single, linear strategy on the subject, it repeats amongst inductive also deductive processes,

resulting through a truly imaginative study procedure (Pettigrew, 1997).

Understanding the change

BUSINESS MANAGEMENT is a term that describes how a company is run.

Tesla Inc.'s Organizational Culture and Its Characteristics (Analysis)A Tesla Model S prototype

was on display at the 2009 Frankfurt Motor Show. Tesla Inc. (formerly Tesla Motors, Inc.) has a

culture that encourages automotive companies to innovate and respond quickly. (This image is

available for use in the public domain.)

Tesla, Inc. (formerly Tesla Motors, Inc.) has an organizational culture that promotes the

development of human resources necessary to create breakthrough products in the global

automobile business. The rules and principles that drive employees' conduct and decisions are

referred to as a company's organizational or corporate culture. Tesla's corporate culture drives

staff to seek out the most innovative ideas, allowing the company to stand out in the automotive

and energy generation and storage industries. Employees are encouraged to think beyond the box

in order to help the company succeed. Through its corporate culture, Tesla, for example, retains

human resource capabilities vital to its continued expansion in the global market for electric

vehicles, batteries, solar panels, and associated things. In this way, the company's cultural

features can be used to improve the firm's strategic effectiveness. Through organizational culture,
 5
Running head Management
Tesla Inc.'s management maximizes employees' creative and innovative activities. For the

company's technical innovation to continue, several initiatives are required.

Authors have argued that the abductive approach is the best way to gain insight into and work

toward adding new theoretical potentials towards the current theoretical base (Suddaby, 2006).

Change readiness had been extensively studied in context of the organizational culture, as stated

in the thesis introduction, nonetheless literature prepares not given a uniform outline of the

organizational culture components in background of evaluating change willingness. Given the

study's originality, we believe that an abductive technique is the most appropriate method for

conducting it. Peter Drucker, one of the most eminent management gurus, predicted the

unavoidable upsurge of the alteration that will bend the commercial sector in 1988. Because of

the extraordinary changes in population analysis, budget, also technology, he noted in his milled-

flouting object which the future organizations will depend on statistics extra as compared to any

additional source also may function like "symphony orchestra" slightly than organized

organization outlines route over knowledge also switch (Drucker, 1988,). D'Aveni (1998,)

emphasizes the consequence of the structural change in his work on hyper competition, stating

that "industries have changed from slow moving stable oligopolies to environments characterized

by intense and rapid competitive moves, in which competitors strike quickly with unexpected

unconventional means of competing." According to (Jones 1996), the first 1970s were the period

the minute the info stage made the situation mark on the commercial world. This remained the

point at which organizations realized they had no optimal but towards shifting from the old-style

construction towards a self-motivated one in which individuals might canal their vigor also

originality into the inevitable structural change.

Adopting change model

 6
Running head Management
Characteristics of Tesla's Workplace Culture

Tesla, Inc. has a creative problem-solving culture. In this form of business culture, employees are

motivated to find profitable solutions to present and developing difficulties in the target market.

The company's organizational culture, for example, has been applied to the creation of

sophisticated electric vehicles as a response to the environmental issues caused by internal

combustion engines. The advantages of the company's corporate culture contribute to the

company's ability to consistently introduce superior electric automobiles. Tesla Inc.'s corporate

culture has been recognized as having six distinct characteristics

1. Make fast decisions

2. Aim for the Unthinkable

3. Be on the lookout for new ideas at all

4. Base your decisions on "Principle

5. Put yourself in the shoes of a business owner.

6. We're all on the same page when it comes to our goals.

Make as much progress as possible. The competitive advantage of Tesla Inc. is determined by its

speed. This corporate culture trait highlights the importance of employees' ability to respond

swiftly to market trends and changes. The company's human resources, for example, allow it to

manufacture cutting-edge products that are on par with or better than those created by

competitors in the automobile sector. Tesla's corporate culture promotes business resilience by

allowing for swift responses to industry concerns and challenge.

 7
Running head Management
Make the unthinkable possible. Tesla's company culture must encourage employees to go beyond

the box while designing new products. This cultural component emphasizes the importance of

new ideas and solutions, as well as the benefits of thinking beyond the box. Human resource

managers, for example, train employees to push the limits of productivity and creativity in

automotive design, paving the path for new energy and transportation solutions to emerge. Tesla

Inc. now has a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to strategically improve its business performance

as a result of this issue. This corporate culture has a significant influence on the worldwide

automotive and energy solutions industries, generating new ideas.

Be on the lookout for new ideas at all times. Tesla, Inc. is a business that thrives on new ideas.

The company's continual dedication to innovation is the focus of this component of the

company's culture. For example, the company is continually studying and creating new ways to

improve current energy storage product designs. In this section of the company study, constant

innovation encourages the development of cutting-edge electric cars and related items.

According to Porter's Five Forces study, Tesla Inc. maintains its competitive edge in the face of

strong industry competition through continuous innovation. The company's corporate culture,

which stimulates continuous innovation, satisfies this demand. Supervisors encourage employees

to participate in constant innovation in business procedures and output.

According to logic, "principles" should be used. Elon Musk, the company's CEO, is a firm

believer in first-principles reasoning. These concepts are based on identifying root causes in

order to better understand and solve real-world issues. For example, Tesla Inc.'s energy storage

products are one of the solutions to the challenges of absorbing renewable energy while

improving energy efficiency. Because of the company's corporate culture, employees adhere to

first principles in their job. Training sessions are part of Tesla's human resource management to
 8
Running head Management
familiarize employees with this component of the company's culture. Consider yourself a

businessperson. Tesla's corporate culture is an example of how to maintain a growth mindset.

Employees at the company, for example, are encouraged to see themselves as business owners.

The ownership notion underpins Tesla's corporate vision and purpose statements, encouraging

employees to take responsibility and accountability for their jobs and the company's overall

performance. The ownership attitude is a fundamental behavioral attribute that helps firms grow

and maintain their integrity in a range of industries. This corporate culture aspect aids employee

identification with the company's strategic aims, resulting in greater strategic performance.

We’ve all come to the same decision. Tesla, Inc. has a company culture that encourages

employees to collaborate as a team to improve the company. For example, this cultural feature

supports dispute resolution through teamwork. As a result of this partnership, human resource

synergy arises. As a result, the corporate culture maximizes the value of its employees' talents

and abilities. Tesla's ability to compete in the global vehicle industry is boosted through

synergistic teamwork. Business administration and strategy implementation are also made

considerably easier by this one cultural approach.

As evidenced by the aforementioned cultural attributes, Tesla, Inc. is committed to supporting

innovation that results in valuable products for the worldwide market. Technological

breakthroughs are the foundation for the company's growth and success. Tesla Inc.'s corporate

culture has been oriented on such innovation since the company's founding. However, as the

business grows and diversifies its product offerings, the corporate culture must adapt to suit new

demands.

The majority of academics and experts agree that business is evolving at a faster rate, creating

hesitation around the upcoming (Senior and Swailes, 2010). Administrations have always
 9
Running head Management
remained subjected to alteration, but the rate at which it occurs now is unparalleled (Gambil and

Kirk 1999). The notion of the structural change had been examined from several angles.

Organizational transformation is defined as the procedure of the reconsidering also reviving an

organization's planned way. (Helms Mills 2008), on the other hand, examine structural change

via the lens of an administration's core capability. Organizational change, according to (Moran

and Brightman 2001), includes changes in the organization's direction, capabilities, and structure.

As a result, there is no general definition of structural change in literature. However, the process

character of structural change is a prevalent component in its description. Change had

continuously remained an element of the organization's lifetime sequence; the individual, the

cluster, or group experiences alteration, whether consciously or unconsciously (Gareis, 2010).

More than a hundred organizations, according to (Kotter 1995), are attempting to become better

competitors through diverse activities such as restructuring, comprehensive excellence

organization, reengineering, also rightsizing. Though, as per (Kotter 1995) points out, the goal

aimed at nearly entirely these businesses had remained towards changing in what way they do

occupational in directive towards adapting the changing market conditions. Failure to respond

quickly to an external call can jeopardize the organization's survival (Leana and Barry, 2000).

Implications, Benefits, and Drawbacks of Tesla, Inc.'s Corporate Culture

Tesla's corporate culture places a strong emphasis on innovation. This cultural trait benefits the

company since it allows it to manufacture high-tech products that appeal to its target market. As

a result of the company's strong branding, Tesla autos, for example, are becoming a larger part of

the car business. This benefit is in line with Tesla's bigger competitive strategy and ambitious

expansion plans. The business culture is also positive in terms of support for quick replies and

problem solving. This cultural trait guarantees that the company keeps up with new technology
 10
Running head Management
while also ensuring that its products are practical and relevant to its customers' needs and

preference.

Recommendation

The sensory or perceptual inputs that initiate organizational change are known as organizational

change triggers. These exterior also interior causes prime towards the start for the structural

alteration (Stuart, 1995). Preliminary through external variables, the literature on structural

change proposes that remains as elements otherwise triggers which may remain discovered using

a variety of methodologies, including PEST, Porter's Five Forces, and SWOT analysis. (Johnson

2005) differentiate four dissimilar “layers” of the change triggers which may outcome from

exterior setting in their well-known book on corporate strategy: macro-setting, manufacturing,

participants, and marketplaces, in that directive. To pinpoint factors that lead to organizational

change, (Senior and Swailes 2010) used the PEST investigation optional by (Johnson 2005). The

change triggers detected by PEST are listed in the table below.

The goal from this segment remains towards outlining the steps involved in applying structural

change. In the literature on structural change, remain various representations that describe the

change implementation procedure. However, the majority of them are based on Lewin's (1952)

classic change model, which remained the primary towards studying structural change. They

projected the power arena theory, that remains grounded through unfreeze, change, also refreeze

three-step model (Jones, 2010). The initial stage starts through dropping the equipoise forces

preservative the organizational behaviors at the situation present state also fixing the

organization aimed at change. Stirring a group beginning its present state towards its anticipated

state is the second stage of change (Lewin, 1952). In tertiary stage, refreezing, Lewin suggests

towards locking the administration’s attained state by means of device like measures also
 11
Running head Management
standards. (Schein 1985) also (Tichy and Devanna 1986) both current trio stage representations

based on (Lewin’s 1952) classical. Although the stages have different names, the underlying

implications are the similar.

References

Agnew M. & VanBalkom W. D. (2009) Internationalization of the university: factors impacting

cultural readiness for organizational change. Intercultural Education, 20 (5), 451-462.

Amis J. M., Aissaoui R. (2013). Readiness for change; an institutional perspective. Journal for

Change Management, 13, 69-95.

Armenakis A. A. & Harris, S. G. (2002). Crafting a change message to create transformational

readiness. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15, 169-183.

Armenakis A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. 1999. Organizational change: A review of theory and

research

in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25, 293-315.

Armenakis A. A., Harris S. G., Mossholder K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational

change. Human Relations, 46 (6), 681-703.

Armenakis A., Brown S., Mehta A. (2011). Organizational culture: assessment and

transformation.

Journal of Change Management, 11 (3), 305-328.

Arthur, S. & Nazroo, J. (2003). Designing fieldwork strategies and materials. In: Ritchie, J. &
 12
Running head Management
Lewis, J. Eds. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and

researchers. London: Sage Publications, 110-133

Balogun, J. & Hope Hailey, V. (2004), Exploring Strategic Change, Prentice Hall: London.

Balthazard P. A.; Cooke R. A., Potter R. E. (2006) Dysfunctional culture, dysfunctional

organization; Capturing the behavioural norms that form organizational culture and drive

performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21 (8), p. 709-732.

Beddowes P., Wille E., (1990). Triggers for Change, Leadership & Organization Development

Journal, 11 (7), 28 – 31.

Berg, B.L. (2001). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston: Allyn and

Bacon.

Beshay M & Sixmith A. (2008). Dimensions of culture: a project perspective. Communication

of

the IBIMA, 5, 82-88.

Biedenbach, T., Solderholm, A., 2008. The challenge of organizing change in hypercompetitive

industries: a literature review. Journal of Change Management, 8 (2), 123–145.

Bommer W. H., Rich G.A., Rubin R.S. (2005). Changing attitudes about change: longitudinal

effects of transformational leader behaviour on employee cynicism about organizational

change, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 733-753. 72

 13
Running head Management
Bordia P., Hobman E., Jones E., Gallois C., Callan V. J. (2004). Uncertainty during

organizational

change: types, consequences, and management strategies. Journal of Business and

Psychology, 18, 507-532.

Bresnen, M. (2006) Conflicting and conflated discourses? Project management, organizational

change and learning. In D. Hodgson and S. Cicmil (eds), Making Projects Critical.

Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 68-89.

Brown, A.D., Humphreys, M. and Gurney, P.M. (2005), Narrative, identity and change: a case

study of Laskarina Holidays. Journal of Organizational Change Management,18 (4), 312-

326.

Burnes B., (2004) Emergent change and planned change – competitors or allies: The case of

XYZ

construction, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24 (4), 886

– 902.

Caldwell S. D., Herold D. M., Fedor D. B. (2004). Toward an understanding of the relationships

among organizational change, individual differences, and changes in person–environment

fit: A cross-level study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (5), 868-882.

Caluwe L., Vermaak H. (2003). Learning to Change: A Guide for Organization Change Agents.

London: Sage Publications Crawford, L., & Nahmias, A. H. Competencies for managing

change. International Journal of Project Management, 28(4), 405-412.

 14
Running head Management
Lewis, K. L. (2011) Organizational Change: Creating Change through Strategic Communication,

1st edition, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Moran J.W., Brightman B.K., (2001). Leading organizational change. Career Development

International, 6 (2), 111 – 119

Senior, B. & Swailes, S. (2010). Organizational Change. 4th edition, Pearson Education Limited:

Essex.

Shelby, L. (2018). Becoming the Safest Car Factory in the World. Tesla, Inc.