Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IAS 8 Summary
IAS 8 Summary
* Question will usually indicate whether SARS has decided to reopen the returns-however, if no statement,
assume that it has not been reopened
Retrospective application impracticable
Can be impracticable because:
1. The impact of retrospective application cannot be determined; (impact on opening and closing balance
must be determinable)
2. Assumptions about management’s intentions would be required (e.g. intent to sell or use); or
3. Estimations are necessary for the application of the accounting policy and there is no objective way to
distinguish between information that was available when the policy should have been applied in previous
years and other information. (cannot use eventual outcomes that was not known at that date)
Effect
• Effect is that the cumulative or period-specific impact, or both cannot be determined- ****can only apply
and disclose retrospectively if both can be determined in a period
• Period specific cannot be determined- only apply to the cumulative impact, thus apply retrospectively
from the beginning of the earliest period possible (will still need to do the calculations as per normal to
get the current year’s effect on e.g. cost of sales)- class example 4- *** thus, even if you have the new
closing balance of the previous year available, but cannot apply the effect on the opening balance, the old
closing balance will be used (in the SFP), as the previous year is not accounted for retrospectively- in note
will also have only the current year column, but will have to show the effect on retained earnings at the
beginning of the year
• Cumulative effect at beginning of the year not determinable- prospectively applied from the earliest date
possible (beginning of the current year), and balances before that date remain unchanged (thus only
change the balances and period-specific effects for the current year- thus amounts will not be the same as
when the closing balance of the previous period was also available)- class example 5- thus, will have only
the current year column in the change in policy note
Disclosure
• Normally, if there is more than one change in accounting policy in the same period, each change in
accounting policy is disclosed in a separate note.
1. State the line items, and not the individual changes i.e. other expenses instead of depreciation
2. Income tax effect under OCI presented separately
3. Line items, such as PPE must be shown
4. Disclose each class of equity separately (thus, if it only affects retained earnings, only have to write once,
but write; “Increase in equity- retained earnings”
5. No subtotals are required, such as non- current assets (however, remember still to split long- and short-
term portions of debt, if applicable)
* Disclose the change (increase/decrease) for each financial statement line item affected)
* Note must be shown from the opening balance of the earliest period presented
* Opening balance of earliest period presented, only show the changes in the accounts with balances, thus
not profit for the year and the specific expense/ income
* Comparative period- disclose all expenses and balances, as these can be seen in the statements- thus do
the same as for the current year
* The change in the balances (Second part)
- Specific asset/liability
- Current/ non-current and total assets/liabilities
- Retained earnings
- Equity
* The change in accounting policy has no effect on the ordinary disclosure as per the standards. Thus e.g. if
Investment property is changed to fair value model, disclose as per normal as if it has always been on the
fair value model
* Change in earnings per share would be the same as the change in the profit for the year, divided by the
number of shares
* If retrospective application had been impracticable, state this fact, why it was impracticable, and from
which date the policy had been retrospectively applied
Prior period error (41-49)
General
• Prior period errors arise from existing information that was already available when the financial
statements were authorised for issue.
• Regardless of whether management had the information, if the information could have been reasonably
obtained, it can lead to a prior period error.
• Important to remember: If the tax returns are reopened, there will be adjustments to current tax liability
as well as deferred tax. If they are not reopened, only adjust the deferred tax balances
Practical
Class example 6
• More likely for an error that the tax returns of previous years would be reopened by SARS
• If there already had been temporary differences, such as with a depreciable asset, would need to change
the deferred tax as well as the current tax balances
• For deferred tax, get the temporary differences and deferred tax of what was done, and what should have
been done, and the difference is then shown in the note (but remember in the second year that deferred
tax is a cumulative calculation, and thus the difference in the 2 years increase will be the increase/decrease
in the deferred tax part of the current tax expense)
• For the current tax payable balance: Remember to take into account all the tax differences of all the
previous years in the opening balance of the prior year, and not only the period specific effect (thus
basically the cumulative effect of all the differences in the current tax calculations)- for the current year,
add the differences of the cumulative years, with the difference in the current year
• For the change in current tax calculation: Only take into account the difference in the tax allowances, and
not the differences in accounting allowances (depreciation)- thus, the change in tax payable balance is just
the differences of the tax allowances. Remember that in the second
year, the calculation gives the amount of the movement, and it is thus
not cumulative.
• **If every aspect of the error is taxable: The change in the accounting
expense, will be exactly the same as the tax implication, thus multiplied
by 28%
• For the balances, the change in the PPE will also be exactly the same as
the tax consequences, but you have to split between current and
deferred tax. Thus, one would be able to just work out the total change,
and then current or deferred tax, and then get the other one as a
balancing figure- deferred tax usually easier to calculate)
If asked for journals
• If there was a prior period error, and the journals for the current year is asked: Remember that you then
do not have to go and correct the prior period specific effect, and the opening balance of the prior period
• Will only write journal entries to correct the opening balance of the current year, and then just the journals
(or adjusting journals if already recorded and asked)
Leases general
• For finance leases, present the difference in the note as “Decrease in long-term net investment in lease
/ finance lease debtor” and “Decrease in short-term net investment in lease / finance lease debtor”
• Thus, do not have to separately show gross investment in the lease and unearned finance income, as this
is one item when presenting, but it has to be split between the current and non-current portion.
• For the tax consequences: As the only deferred tax consequences for a finance lease are for the net
investment in the lease and for the asset that is being leased out (if not a manufacturing lessor), the
change in the balances will also represent the change in the deferred tax
Changes in estimates
• For changes in estimates where the URV decreased for a finance lease: The debit journal entry to the
finance income account (see leases notes), will be the amount with which finance income will differ for
the year.(thus do not have to subtract that amount with interest that would have been earned, as that is
already an adjusting journal). This is the same amount as the change in the balance (at the date of the
change in estimate) of the finance lease because of the new URV
• The cumulative change for the future periods will then be calculated as follows: The decrease in the URV
represents the total decrease in the finance cost over the entire period. Thus, to get the change in future
periods, take the change in the URV less the change in finance cost, as calculated above (Or, you can
work out the cumulative change first, as this will be the entire change in unearned finance income for the
future periods)
Disclosure
General
* Columns: only prior periods- comparative year and opening balance of comparative year (no current year
column!)
* The changes in the balances will take into account the alteration of the opening balance, and thus the period
specific effect in the expenses and incomes (top part of note), might differ from the changes in the balances
(bottom part of note)- look at the change in the balance, as if only one entry would have had to be made
Restatement in SCE
Prior period error before comparative period
• Will have to correct the error before the comparative period is shown, thus:
• Thus, will have to be no restatement in the current year, as IAS 1 par 110 states that the effect must be
shown on the opening balances
Prior period error in comparative year
• Only impact is that you would have the "Restated profit for the year" and the "Restated other
comprehensive income" to correct the impact of the prior period error in the comparative period
• These corrections will automatically correct the closing balance for the comparative year. This means that
you would not have a separate line item at the start of the current year to show the impact of the prior
period error