Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. OBLIGATIONS
C. Breach of Obligations
1. Voluntary breach through default or mora
2. Voluntary breach through fault or dolo
3. Voluntary Breach through Negligence or culpa
4. Voluntary breach through contravention of tenor thereof
3. Accion pauliana
Cases:
Samson vs CA, 238 SCRA 397;
Nakpil vs CA, 144 Scra 596;
Sia vs CA, 222SCRA 24;
Adorable vs CA, 319 SCRA 2000;
Fideldia, et al., v. Soncuan, et al., G.R. No. 151352, August 29,
2005;
Jose et al., v. Novida et al., G.R. No. 177374, July 02, 2014;
CCC Insurance Corp. v. Kawasaki Steel Corp.,et al., G. R. No.
15616, June 22, 2015;
Cases:
Lao Lim vs CA, 191 SCRA 150;
Patente vs Omega, G.R. No. L-4433, May 29, 1953, 93 Phil 218;
Angeles vs CA, 250 SCRA 223;
UFC vs CA, 33 SCRA 1;
Ong vs CA, 310 SCRA 1999
2. Obligations With a Period
a. Concept of term or a period
Distinguished from condition
Classification of a term or a period
Effect of fortuitous event
b. Effect of advanced payment or delivery
c. Benefit of term or period
d. Judicial term or period
When court may fix term
Nature of action
Effect of judicial period
c. Extinguishment of debtor’s right to period
Cases:
Lakarge Cement Phils. Vs. Continental Cement Corp., et al.,
G.R. No. 155173, Nov. 23, 2004;
Agoncillo vs Javier, 38 Phil. 424;
Ynchausti vs. Yulo, 34 Phils. 978
Cases:
Garcia vs CA, 167 SCRA 815;
Insular Bank of Asia and America vs. Sps. Salazar, 159, SCRA,
111;
Umali vs Miclat, 105 Phil. 1109)
G. Extinguishment of Obligations
General provisions
Cases:
Filinvest Credit Corp., vs. Phil. Acetylene Co., 197 Phil. 394;
Haw Pia vs. China Banking Corp., 80 Phil. 604;
Cases:
PNB vs Teves, L-8076, 8813, Dec. 14, 1951;
New pacific Timber and Supply Co. vs Judge Seneris, 101 SCRA
686; Singson vs. Caltex [Inc.], G.R. No. 1327798, Oct. 4, 2000;
Hubonhua vs CA, G.R. Nos. 95897 and 102604, Dec. 14, 1999;
Velasco vs. Manila Electric Co., 42 SCRA 556;
Lantion vs NLRC, 181 SCRA 513;
Roman Catholic Bishop of Malolos, Inc. vs IAC, 191 SCRA 411;
(1262)
a.2. Effect of fortuitous event; Exception
Case:
Naga Telephone Co., et al. vs CA, et al., Feb. 24, 1994
Cases:
Testate Estate of Mota vs. Serra, 40 Phil 464;
Yek Tong Lin Fire and Marine Insurance Co. vs Yusingco, 46 Phil
473
b. Kinds of compensation
c. Requisites of compensation (1279)
c.1. As to parties Bound as principals
c.2. As to objects
c.3. As to maturity
c.4. As to liquidation and demandability
c.5. As to claims of third persons
d. Right of guarantor to set up compensation (1280)
e. Voluntary compensation (1281-1282)
f. Judicial compensation (1283)
g. Rules in case of rescissible or voidable debts (1284)
h. Effect of assignment of rights (1285)
h.1. When compensation has taken place
h.2. When compensation has not taken place
h1. With consent of debtor
h2. With knowledge, but without consent of debtor
h3. Without knowledge of debtor
i. Debts which cannot be compensated (1286 – 1288)
j. Effect of compensation 91289 – 1290)
COURSE in BUSINESS LAW
Case:
Gullas vs National Bank, 62 Phil. 519
II. CONTRACTS
a.3. Classification
a.4. Auto Contracts
a.5. Contracts of Adhesion
b. Freedom to Contract (1306)
b.1. Validity of stipulations
b.2. Limitations on stipulations
c. Innominate Contracts (1307)
Analogous contracts
d. Mutuality of Contracts (1308)
d.1. Unilateral cancellation
d.2. Express agreement
e. Relativity of contracts (1311)
e.1. Parties bound by contract
e.2. Third persons not bound
e.3. Enforcement of contract
e.4. Annulment of contracts
e.5. Contracts bind heirs
e.6. Stipulations for third persons
e.7. Who may revoke
e.8. Collective contracts
f. Real rights in property (1312)
g. Contracts in fraud of creditors (1313)
h. Interference by third persons (1314)
h.1. Extent of liability
i. Perfection of consensual contracts (1315)
i.1. Binding effect of contract
j. Perfection of real contracts (1316)
k. Ratification necessary (1317) Express or implied
k.1. Effect retroactive
k.2. Status before ratification
k.3. Liability of representative
Cases:
Sps pascual vs Ramos, G.R. No. 144712, July 4, 2002;
Cuizon vs CA, 260 SCRA 645;
Ferrazini vs. Gsell, 34 Phil. 697;
Del Castillo vs Richmond, 45 Phil. 697;
COURSE in BUSINESS LAW
CONSENT
b. Concept of consent (1319)
b.1. Elements
b.2. Forms of consent
b.3. Manifestation of consent
b.4. Offer by one party (definite, complete, international, mental)
b.5. Acceptance by offeree
b.6. Amplified acceptance
b.7. Complex offers
b.8. Simultaneous offers
b.9. Successive agreements
b.10. Knowledge of offeror (Through intermediaries, by
correspondence, by telephone)
b.11. Effect of silence
b.12. Withdrawal of offer
b.13. Lapse of time
b.14. Revocation of acceptance
b.15. New contract before acceptance
b.16. Public offers
c. Implied acceptance (1320)
c.1. Waiver of acceptance
c.2. Effect of silence
Cases:
ABS-CBN vs CA et al., 301 SCRA 572;
Palattao vs. CA, et al., G.R. No. 131726, May 7, 2002;
National Commercial Bank of Saudi Arabia vs. CA, G.R. No. 1242467,
January 17, 2005;
DBP vs Perez, G.R. No. 14854, Nov. 11,. 2004;
Sanchez, vs Rigos, 45 SCRA 368;
Mercado and Mercado vs. espiritu, 37 Phil. 125;
Braganza vs Villa Abrille, 105 Phil 456;
Songco vs Sellner, 37 Phil. 254;
Rosario, et al. v. CA, et al., G.R. No. 127005, July 19, 1999;
Lee and Asiatrust Development Bank v. Bangkok Bank Public Co.,
G.R. No. 173349, February 09, 2011;
Philtranco Service Enterprises, Inc., v. Paras and Inland Railways,
Inc., et al., G.R. No. 161909, April 25, 2012;
Paz v. Environmental Universality. Inc., G.R. No. 203993, April 20,
2015;
OBJECTS OF CONTRACTS
a. Concept of object
COURSE in BUSINESS LAW
a.1. Requisites
a.2. Within commerce of man (1347)
a.3. Existence of object
a.3.1. Future inheritance
a.3.2. Not part of inheritance
a.4. Contrary to law or morals
a.5. Prestation of third party
Case:
Blas vs Santos, 111Phil. 503;
CAUSE OF CONTRACT
a. Concept
Distinguished from object
Distinguished from consideration
Distinguished from motive
Requisite of cause
Onerous contracts (1350)
Mutual promises
Accessory contracts
Accommodation parties
Remuneratory contracts
Contract taken as a whole
b. Purpose of contract (1375)
c. Usages or customs (1376)
d. Obscure terms construed (1377)
Contracts of adhesion
e. Reciprocity of interests (1378)
Least transmission of rights
COURSE in BUSINESS LAW
Cases:
Phil. Banking Corp. vs Lui She, 21 SCRA 52;
Villaroel vs Estrada, 71 Phil. 14;
Mactal vs melegrito, 111 Phil. 363;
B. Form of Contracts
a. Intent over form (1356)
Contracts valid in any form
Formalities required by law
For validity of contract
Execution of instrument
b. Compliance with formality (1357)
Causes of action
Survival of actions
c. Writing not for validity (1358)
Case:
Dauden-Hernaez vs Delos Angeles, 27 SCRA 1276;
C. Reformation of Instruments
a. Basis of reformation (1359)
Requisites of reformation
Distinguished from annulment
Operation and effect
Effect on statutes of frauds
b. Requisites of mistake (1361)
Mistake of fact
Must be mutual
Effect of negligence
c. Mistake of one party (1362)
d. Mistake of draftsman (1363, 1364)
e. Deed held to be mortgage (1365)
f. Donations and wills (1366)
g. Void agreements (1367)
COURSE in BUSINESS LAW
Cases:
Huibonhua vs COA, 320 SCRA 625;
Bentir and Formida vs Judge Leanda and Leyte Gulf Traders, Inc.,
G.R. No. 128991, April 12, 2000;
Rita Sarming, et al., vs Dy, et al., G.R. No. 133643, June 6, 2002;
D. Interpretation of Contracts
a. Interpretation of terms (1370)
Intent of the parties
Proof of intention
Reformation of instruments
b. Determining intention (1371)
c. Scope of general terms (1372)
d. Validity favored (1373)
e. Contract taken as a whole (1374)
f. Purpose of contract (1375)
g. Usages or customs (1376)
h. Obscure terms construed (1377)
Contracts of adhesion
i. Reciprocity of interests (1378)
Least transmission of right
j. Partly written contract (1379)
Natural right
E. Rescissible Contracts
a. Defective contracts
Relative ineffectiveness
Concept of rescission (1380)
Nature of contract
Rescission in reciprocal obligations
Rescission and mutual dissent
Requisites of rescission
Direct proceedings to rescind
b. Rescission on legal grounds 91381)
Contracts with lesion
Contracts of guardians
COURSE in BUSINESS LAW
Cases:
Rosencor development Corporation and Rene Joaquin vs Paterno
Inquing, et al., G.R. No. 140479, March 8, 2001;
Khe Hong Cheng vs CA, G.R. No. 144169, March 28, 2001;
Guzman, Bocaling and Co., Inc. vs Bonnevie, 206 SCRA 668;
Concepcion vs Sta Anna, 87 Phil.787;
Rivera vs. Li Tam and Co., 4 SCRA 1072;
COURSE in BUSINESS LAW
F. VOIDABLE CONTRACTS
a. Concept
G. UNENFORCEABLE CONTRACTS
a. Concept and distinctions
b. Unauthorized contracts (1403)
Statute of frauds
Purpose of statute
Validity of contracts
Action to enforce Note
or memorandum
Performance within one year
Guaranty of another’s debt
Test of guaranty
In consideration of marriage
Sale of personalty
Separable contracts
Partial delivery or payment
Lease or sale of realty
Description of property
Representation as to credit
Parties incapacitated
c. Ratification validates contracts (1404)
d. Failure to object (1405)
Acceptance of benefits
e. Defense is personal (1408)
Cases:
Rosencor Development Corp. vs Inquing, 354 SCRA 119;
Factoran vs Sabanal, 81 Phil. 512;
Diana vs Macalibo, 75 Phil. 71;
Western Minadanao Lumber Co., vs Medalla, 79 SCRA 702;
Shoemaker vs La Tondena, 68 Phil 24;
Cases:
Liguez, vs CA, 102 Phil. 577;
Mapalo vs Mapalo, 17 SCRA 114; R
odriguez vs Rodriguez, 20 SCRA 908;
Angel Jose Warehousing Co., vs Chelda Enterprises, 23 SCRA 119;
Development Bank of the Phil. Vs Perez, G.R. No. 148541, Nov. 11,
2004; Phil. Banking Corp., vs Lui She, 21 SCRA 52
I. NATURAL OBLIGATIONS
a. Basis of natural obligations
b. Types of obligations (1423)
Concept of natural obligations
Natural and imperfect
Natural and moral
Fulfillment of natural obligations
Voluntary fulfillment
Conversion to civil obligation Guaranty
of natural obligations
Illicit obligations
c. Restitution by minor (1426)
COURSE in BUSINESS LAW
Payment by minor
Good faith of the creditor
Nature of thing
Non-consummable thing
d. Nullity due to form (1430)
J. ESTOPPEL
a. Principle of estoppels (1431)
Concept of estoppels
Illegal act excluded
Distinguished from waiver
Distinguished from ratification
Representations and positive acts
Admissions
Silence or inaction
Nature of laches
Laches and prescription distinguished
Reliance and belief
b. Effect of provision (1432)
c. Kinds of estoppels (1433)
Elements of estoppels in pais
d. Subsequent acquisition of title (1434)
e. Estoppels of tenant (1435, 1436)
f. Estoppels against owner (1437)
g. Estoppels from benefits (1438)
h. Parties affected (1439)
No estoppel against government
Cases:
Maneclang vs Buan, 208 SCRA 179;
Heirs of Lacamen vs Heirs of Laruan, 65 SCRA 605;
Nielson & Co., Inc., vs lepanto Consolidated Mining Co., 18 SCRA
1040; PNB VS Barreto, 52 Phil 818
K. TRUSTS
a. Characteristics of trusts
Distinguished from other relations
b. Mayorazgo as trust (1440)
COURSE in BUSINESS LAW
EXPRESS TRUST
a. Proof of express trust (1443)
b. No particular form required (1444)
c. Want of trustee (1445)
IMPLIED TRUST
a. Trust from payment (1447, 1448)
Exceptions to rule
b. Inheritance in trust (1449-1451)
c. Title in one co-owner (1452)
d. Trust based on promise (1453)
e. Investment of trust funds (1454-1545)
Acquisition of trust property
f. Mutual mistake (1456)
Unilateral mistake
Cases:
Cuaycong vs Cuaycong, 21 SCRA 1192;
Fabian vs Fabian, 21 SCRA 213; S
otto vs Teves, 86 SCRA 154;
Alarcon vs Bidin, 120 SCRA 390;
Caragay-Lagno vs CA, 133 SCRA 718;
Tongoy vs CA, 123 SCRA 99;
Bueno vs Reyes, 27 SCRA 1179;