You are on page 1of 1

ICARUS 127, 263 (1997)

ARTICLE NO. IS975717

BOOK REVIEW
The Biological Universe: The Twentieth Century terminated by Congress until October, vice September, 1993; NASA was
Extraterrestrial Life Debate and the Limits of Science. the main sponsor of the 1991 Decennial US–USSR Conference on SETI,
etc.) that might be more significant to touchy ex-program managers than
Steven J. Dick. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, to the general reader. Many more of the (correct) details are made widely
1996. 578 pp., $54.95 (hardback). accessible here for the first time.
If the book has any major flaws, they are sins of omission. Because it
During the early 1960s, I was fortunate to make the acquaintance in was prepared for publication in mid-1996, one can scarcely blame Dick
print of Edgar Rice Burroughs and his protagonist John Carter, who, for omitting an analysis of how the claims made for ALH-84001 might
thanks to Ballantine Books, were repeating his adventures on Mars in affect the discourse about life on Mars. The elevation of the Mars-life
paperback form. My summer afternoons were spent learning about a debate is a sure indication of how even a little data, and the promise of
Mars that had once been covered with oceans, but had dried out—leaving more to come, can add ‘‘life’’ to planetary exploration.
dead sea bottoms behind and requiring an ‘‘atmosphere factory’’ and Less astute, however, is Dick’s analysis of how the interdisciplinary
planet-wide irrigation to enable its hardy (oviparous!) human inhabitants field of exobiology has affected modern biological thought. Especially
to enjoy their life of near continuous warfare and romance. with respect to the fields of genomics and paleontology, exobiology is
I was in love with the place. not, in my view, a ‘‘protoscience’’ which ‘‘had little chance of enunciating
And then came Mariner 4. The ‘‘real’’ Mars, as increasingly revealed a rationale of practical application.’’ Exobiology has provided an opportu-
by the Mariners (4, 6, 7, and 9), might still have dead ‘‘sea bottoms’’—but
nity to combine ‘‘established’’ disciplines like physics, biology, and chem-
no atmosphere factories, no surface water, and a decidedly unromantic istry (or more properly, to combine scientists in those fields) and to
cratering record. The real Mars was not John Carter’s ‘‘Barsoom,’’ and gain a synergistic benefit by addressing fundamental scientific questions
never had been. I knew that whatever adventure might be had on the through those combinations. The benefits of an exobiological perspective
Mars of the Mariners and Vikings would require that the real planet can be seen in answers to questions like ‘‘What happened to the dino-
be appreciated (even loved) for what it truly is and not only for what saurs?’’, ‘‘Why do we have so much oxygen in the atmosphere?’’, ‘‘When
imagination had suggested. did life arise on Earth?’’, and the perennial ‘‘Could life exist anywhere
That the fictional Mars was not solely the invention of Edgar Rice else?’’. So far, the practical applications of an exobiological perspective
Burroughs is one of the lessons of an excellent book by Steven Dick, an have been seen in the use of genetic sequence data to identify the ancient
historian at the U.S. Naval Observatory. That some in the public, the biochemical relationships that are still important to the health of plants,
press, and the scientific community will cling to myths about Mars and animals, and people; in the generation of potential new pharmaceuticals
about life in the universe long after the data have rendered a different
through directed evolution in the laboratory; and in a variety of new
judgment is another.
instrumentation and computational techniques invented to help address
I wish that I had been able to read The Biological Universe when I what are essentially biological questions with chemical and physical tools.
first worked in NASA’s exobiology program, back in 1986. Dick’s thor- Notwithstanding this complaint, the practical contributions (or their
ough and informative summary of the controversies and discoveries that lack) of exobiologists, bioastronomers, and UFOlogists do not constitute
have affected the extraterrestrial life debate might not have changed the
a major focus of the work. Rather, Steven Dick has largely succeeded
course of the program, but it would have been much easier to recognize the in recording the ebb and flow of the discoveries, debates, and dismissals
heritage of some of the arguments that from time-to-time were brought to surrounding the question of life outside of the Earth, and the ability of
bear by the public and scientists alike. On reading the book, what struck science, as an enterprise, to deal with extraterrestrial life as a subject. It
me was how many of the arguments of the 19th century are still kept is evident that some of the history covered in this book could be repeated,
alive in the 20th. Thus, it is easy to recommend The Biological Universe if we do not take care to avoid it. The ghosts of these arguments are
to anyone who is interested in planetary exploration for the 21st century
alive and well in the public, in Washington, and alas, in science. Dick
(and the remainder of this one). It is likely that the ghosts of past debates has provided us with an enjoyable and useful means of identifying old
will continue to surround even the most objective events of future plane- ghosts, (re)learning their lessons, and perhaps avoiding them in the future.
tary exploration and astronomy.
His thoughtful recounting should recommend this book to anyone who
In the book, Dick provides a relatively unbiased account of the histori- in the coming decades might have to deal seriously with the question of
cal events that have colored the scientific (and to some extent, popular)
extraterrestrial life.
discourse on extraterrestrial life, including anthropocentrism and specula- We should be so lucky!
tions about intelligent life on Mars, UFOs, and SETI. The book contains
a variety of useful bibliographic references to past writings on the subject
JOHN D. RUMMEL
(and though it couldn’t hope to be exhaustive on the subject, the book
contains many references not easily found elsewhere). There are, forgiv- Marine Biological Laboratory
ably, some minor errors in the book (e.g., NASA’s SETI program wasn’t Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543

263
0019-1035/97 $25.00
Copyright  1997 by Academic Press
All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

You might also like