Professional Documents
Culture Documents
22
0099-2240/09/$12.00 doi:10.1128/AEM.01359-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Listeria monocytogenes is ubiquitous in nature due to its for abrasion (e.g., edges, convex surfaces, etc.) (43, 45). At-
inherent ability to survive and grow under a wide range of tachment to surfaces is believed to be important for the sur-
adverse environmental conditions, such as refrigeration tem- vival and persistence of this pathogen in such environments,
peratures, high acidity and salinity, and reduced water activity with some strains able to remain on equipment surfaces for
(16). This microorganism is a major concern for the food several years (32, 37). Thus, L. monocytogenes has been shown
industry, since it is the causal agent of listeriosis, a severe to adhere to and form biofilms on various food contact surfaces
disease with high hospitalization and case-fatality rates (ap- under laboratory conditions (3, 42, 44). Furthermore, attached
proximately 91% and 30%, respectively) (25). According to the L. monocytogenes cells are more difficult to mechanically re-
European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, listeri- move from surfaces and are more resistant to sanitizers than
osis was the fifth most common zoonotic infection in Europe in their free-living counterparts (15, 40).
2006 (14), while it accounts for approximately 28% of the Dairy products have been implicated in outbreaks of listeri-
deaths resulting from food-borne illnesses in the United States osis (10, 31). However, most of the in vitro studies of the
(34). growth and survival of L. monocytogenes in such products have
In the food industry, inadequately cleaned food-processing used strains previously cultivated planktonically (41). Although
equipment (e.g., stainless steel [SS] surfaces) constitutes a po- the results obtained in these studies are of great value, such
tential source for L. monocytogenes, resulting in contamination studies have not taken into consideration that cells contami-
of foods which come in contact with such equipment (36). nating a product in a food-processing environment are usually
Even though adherence to strict sanitation practices should attached to surfaces enclosed in biofilms. Limited information
minimize the risk of survivors on surfaces, existing evidence is available on the kinetic behavior of L. monocytogenes in
suggests that a considerable risk may occur in sites of process- dairy products inoculated with detached cells, although prein-
ing plants which are not easily cleaned or sanitized, such as cubation conditions have been shown to influence subsequent
those that do not allow direct access of sanitation equipment growth and survival of L. monocytogenes in foods (7, 13, 17,
18). Given the major physiological differences between at-
tached and planktonic cells (15, 27, 48), an effect on subse-
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Food Qual- quent growth might be possible.
ity Control and Hygiene, Department of Food Science and Technol- Considering the above, the main objective of the present
ogy, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, Athens 11855,
Greece. Phone: 30 210 529 4684. Fax: 30 210 529 4683. E-mail: pskan
study was to assess the influence of L. monocytogenes preincu-
@aua.gr. bation conditions with respect to mode of growth (either at-
䌤
Published ahead of print on 18 September 2009. tached to SS or grown suspended in dairy products) on the
7182
VOL. 75, 2009 L. MONOCYTOGENES BIOFILM FORMATION AND DETACHMENT 7183
subsequent growth of this pathogen in milk (at 5°C for 20 ing product) were used to inoculate milk in order to evaluate the effect of the
days). To prepare the two types of inocula, two different previous environment on the subsequent growth kinetics of L. monocytogenes at
5°C. The experiment focused directly on the comparative growth of the two types
growth media (milk and vanilla custard) and temperatures (5 of cells in case of different cross-contamination scenarios. Specifically, cells
and 20°C) were studied. The unforced detachment of L. mono- growing in suspension aimed to simulate cross-contamination of milk from prod-
cytogenes cells from SS coupons and growth in two dairy prod- uct waste, purge, or residues, whereas attached cells represented contamination
ucts (milk and custard) at 5°C for 20 days was also evaluated. from soiled surfaces. Finally, the ability of L. monocytogenes cells to detach
(unforced) from SS coupons soiled with yogurt and to disperse in noninoculated
In the latter case, previous attachment of cells to the coupons
dairy products, such as milk and vanilla custard, at 5°C was evaluated. All three
was done under especially adverse preincubation conditions studies were performed at least twice, and in each replicate study the samples
(in yogurt at 5°C for 7 days). were analyzed in duplicate (n ⫽ 4).
Inoculation of dairy products and adhesion experiments. Prior to inoculation,
portions (40 ml) of freshly pasteurized milk were aseptically transferred into
MATERIALS AND METHODS 50-ml sterile plastic centrifuge tubes. Inoculation of custard and yogurt was
Bacterial strain and inoculum preparation. L. monocytogenes Scott A (sero- performed in their commercial packages (170 g for vanilla custard and 200 g for
type 4b, epidemic strain, human isolate), kindly provided by Eddy Smid (Agro- yogurt). Specifically, a 0.5-ml aliquot of appropriately diluted L. monocytogenes
Italy) according to the protocol described by Pan et al. (40). Briefly, SS coupons attachment (approximately 3.7 log10 CFU/cm2 and 3.9 log10
habituated for 7 days in the different dairy products were aseptically removed CFU/cm2 for L. monocytogenes and TVC, respectively). Fur-
from the products, rinsed thoroughly with 25 ml of Ringer’s solution, and trans-
ferred to a small petri dish (diameter, 5 cm). Samples were stained with 0.01% thermore, incubation of milk and yogurt at 5°C resulted in
acridine orange (Sigma-Aldrich Ltd., Greece) for 5 min at room temperature. significantly (P ⬍ 0.05) higher levels of attached TVC than of
Subsequently, coupons were rinsed three times with Ringer’s solution to remove attached L. monocytogenes, indicating the existence of a mixed
excess stain. Images of attached cells taken with a digital (charge-coupled device) attached population on the SS coupons. Moreover, micro-
camera (E-330; Olympus, Greece) were processed using Image-Pro Plus image
analysis software (version 4.5; Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD). scopic observation of the coupons placed in yogurt revealed
Fitting and statistical analysis. The data from plate counts (CFU per gram or the presence of attached cells (Fig. 2). Regardless of storage
per ml) of duplicate samples from two independent experiments (n ⫽ 4) were temperature, the bacterial populations growing in suspension
transformed to log10 values. The log10-transformed data for attached and sus- were significantly greater (P ⬍ 0.05) than the attached popu-
pended cells (from SS coupons) of L. monocytogenes were fitted to the Baranyi
model with the in-house program DMFit version 2.1 (available at http://www.ifr lations (Fig. 1). Except for in yogurt, no major differences were
.ac.uk/Safety/DMfit/default.html) in order to estimate the growth kinetics of the seen between the suspended populations of L. monocytogenes
two populations. For each growth curve, the maximum specific growth rate and TVC (Fig. 1).
(max; days⫺1), the lag time (tlag; days), the lower asymptote (yo; log CFU/ml), Effect of habituation conditions on the subsequent growth of
and the upper asymptote (yend; log CFU/ml) were determined. The growth data
as well as the parameter estimates of the fitting then were analyzed by analysis
L. monocytogenes in milk. Multivariate statistical analysis re-
of variance by the general linear model procedure of the SPSS statistical package vealed that the preincubation conditions (storage temperature,
(SPSS 10.0.1 for Windows; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Tukey’s multiple-range test growth medium, and mode of bacterial growth) significantly
was used to compare means. All differences are reported at a significance level (P ⬍ 0.05) affected the subsequent growth kinetics of L. mono-
of alpha 0.05.
cytogenes in milk at 5°C. Habituation at 20°C delayed (P ⬍
0.05) subsequent growth of both attached and suspended cells
RESULTS of L. monocytogenes in milk, as seen by an increased lag phase,
Attachment of L. monocytogenes and TVC on food-soiled SS compared to habituation at 5°C (Table 1; Fig. 3). At 5°C, no
coupons. Bacterial attachment on SS coupons and prolifera- significant difference (P ⬍ 0.05) was observed between the two
tion in different food matrices were more favorable (P ⬍ 0.05) types of inocula in the subsequent growth kinetics (lag phase
at 20°C than at 5°C (Fig. 1). At 20°C, significantly (P ⬍ 0.05) and growth rate) of L. monocytogenes in milk (Table 1). Re-
higher numbers of attached populations were recovered from gardless of temperature, habituation of L. monocytogenes in
coupons placed in custard (5.30 and 5.42 log10 CFU/cm2 for L. milk decreased the lag phase of cells previously attached to SS
monocytogenes and TVC, respectively) than from those placed coupons compared to cells previously grown in suspension
in milk (4.49 and 4.55 log10 CFU/cm2 for L. monocytogenes and (Table 1; Fig. 3). However, for populations habituated in milk,
TVC, respectively). It should be noted that at 20°C for both a slightly higher growth rate was observed for suspended cells
dairy products, similar levels of attached L. monocytogenes and than for attached cells (Table 1). In contrast, habituation in
TVC were observed, suggesting that the pathogen dominated custard increased the lag phase of cells previously attached to
TVC. At 5°C, the lowest level of attached cells was observed in SS coupons compared to cells previously grown in suspension
yogurt, whereas milk and custard resulted in similar levels of (Table 1; Fig. 3) In general, the highest maximum specific
VOL. 75, 2009 L. MONOCYTOGENES BIOFILM FORMATION AND DETACHMENT 7185
growth rates were observed when the habituation conditions respectively (Fig. 4). However, by the end of incubation (21
were identical to the subsequent storage conditions (Table 1). days), higher growth was obtained in custard (4.4 log10 CFU/g)
Moreover, total bacterial counts reached approximately 6 to 7 than in milk (3.7 log10 CFU/ml) (Fig. 4).
log10 CFU/ml, regardless of preincubation conditions (data not
shown). DISCUSSION
Unforced detachment of L. monocytogenes cells from cou-
pons and subsequent growth in dairy products. Although L. The ability of bacteria, including L. monocytogenes, to ad-
monocytogenes was not detectable on SS coupons after 7 days here to and colonize surfaces is influenced by many environ-
of incubation in yogurt (Fig. 1) the transfer of whole coupons mental factors (26) that affect the physiological characteristics
into uninoculated milk and custard resulted in the detachment of bacteria (6, 11, 33) and/or alter the chemistry of the surface
and proliferation of the pathogen in both products (Fig. 4). (26). The type and the composition of food residue on food-
More specifically, detectable growth of detached L. monocyto- processing equipment have been suggested to influence both
genes cells occurred after 9 and 10 days in custard and milk, the population levels of attached cells and their resistance to
TABLE 1. Kinetic parameters of Listeria monocytogenes growth in milk at 5°C following preincubation under different conditionsa
Mean ⫾ SD (n ⫽ 4)b
Preincubation Preincubation Preincubation mode
Growth rate yend r2
growth medium temp (°C) of growth Lag time (days) yo (log CFU/ml)
(day⫺1) (log CFU/ml)
Milk 5 Attached 0.00 a ⫾ 0.00 0.51 c ⫾ 0.02 1.66 ab ⫾ 0.02 5.98 b ⫾ 0.10 0.982–0.987
Suspended 1.85 ab ⫾ 0.19 0.57 c ⫾ 0.02 1.54 ab ⫾ 0.09 5.26 a ⫾ 0.06 0.977–0.991
20 Attached 3.04 b ⫾ 0.95 0.23 a ⫾ 0.03 1.61 ab ⫾ 0.43 — 0.938–0.981
Suspended 6.23 c ⫾ 1.31 0.26 a ⫾ 0.00 2.07 b ⫾ 0.16 — 0.963–0.975
Custard 5 Attached 1.41 ab ⫾ 0.30 0.25 a ⫾ 0.01 2.12 b ⫾ 0.16 6.42 c ⫾ 0.18 0.983–0.991
Suspended 0.00 a ⫾ 0.00 0.24 a ⫾ 0.01 2.09 b ⫾ 0.32 6.62 d ⫾ 0.00 0.986–0.965
20 Attached 9.07 d ⫾ 1.87 0.41 b ⫾ 0.08 1.15 a ⫾ 0.21 — 0.975–0.976
Suspended 5.71 c ⫾ 0.65 0.27 a ⫾ 0.03 1.89 b ⫾ 0.46 — 0.975–0.979
a
Food-soiled surfaces from which cells were detached or food in which the suspended population was grown prior to transfer to the new environment.
b
Means within a column sharing at least a common letter are not significantly different at a P value of ⬍0.05. yo, upper asymptote; yend, lower asymptote; —, no upper
asymptote occurred.
7186 POIMENIDOU ET AL. APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
tion that detached cells from milk exhibited faster growth than significant risk due to possible detachment and multiplication
their suspended counterparts underlines the importance of the in food products. Moreover, detached cells may exhibit a
physiological or metabolic history of cells for their subsequent higher tolerance to stressful conditions than cells in suspen-
growth (35, 46). It can be speculated that in the case of con- sion, which depends on the growth environment before and
tamination, the risk of L. monocytogenes growth may be higher after their transfer. Detached cells, although old or injured,
when bacteria are derived from biofilms rather than from re- still pose a major public health threat to the food industry.
sidual liquids or product waste (e.g., whey or purge). There- Food soil, as ecological background, does affect both the
fore, studies evaluating the effect of preservation treatments or growth and behavior of L. monocytogenes, and this effect differs
modeling of microbial responses should also consider cells between planktonic and biofilm states of growth. However,
detached from biofilms. future research should evaluate similar contamination scenar-
Attached L. monocytogenes cells habituated in yogurt ios with multiple L. monocytogenes strains, also assessing ge-
seemed to detach from the SS coupons and migrate to the notypic changes due to attachment and detachment of the
favorable medium of milk or custard at 5°C (Fig. 4). This bacterium. This would improve understanding of the mecha-
observation suggests that the bead vortexing procedure and/or nisms that allow persistence of L. monocytogenes in dairy
the conventional plating technique used in this study could plants.
underestimate the attached microbial population on SS cou-
pons and thus the actual risk of contaminated surfaces (1). It ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
has also been suggested that in order to survive under adverse This work was funded by the European Union Integrated project
environmental conditions, many food-borne pathogens enter a “BIOTRACER: Improved bio-traceability of unintended microorgan-
viable but nonculturable state (i.e., a dormant state) (51) in isms and their substances in food and feed chains” (proposal/contract
which they maintain metabolic activity and pathogenicity but no. 036272). E. D. Giaouris acknowledges the Greek State Scholar-
ships Foundation (I.K.Y.) for providing a fellowship for postdoctoral
cannot be cultured by common laboratory methods (39). This
studies.
conclusion is supported by a previous study demonstrating that
cells that were metabolically active but not culturable by con- REFERENCES
ventional plating techniques (detection limit, 1.3 log10 CFU/ 1. Asséré, A., N. Oulahal, and B. Carpentier. 2008. Comparative evaluation of
cm2) remained attached to the SS coupons after the bead methods for counting surviving biofilm cells adhering to a polyvinyl chloride
surface exposed to chlorine or drying. J. Appl. Microbiol. 104:1692–1702.
vortexing (19). Furthermore, custard was more favorable than 2. Belessi, C. I. A., S. Papanikolaou, E. H. Drosinos, and P. N. Skandamis.
milk for detachment of L. monocytogenes from soiled surfaces 2008. Survival and acid resistance of Listeria innocua in feta cheese and
and proliferation (Fig. 4). This may be associated with the yoghurt, in the presence or absence of fungi. J. Food Prot. 71:742–749.
3. Beresford, M. R., P. W. Andrew, and G. Shama. 2001. Listeria monocytogenes
structural heterogeneity and difference in nutrient composition adheres to many materials found in food-processing environments. J. Appl.
that contributed to the faster detachment and proliferation of Microbiol. 90:1000–1005.
4. Boulange-Petermann, L. 1996. Processes of bioadhesion on stainless steel
custard-derived cells. Moreover, the density, structure, and surfaces and cleanability: a review with special reference to the food industry.
strength of the attached microbial population are among the Biofouling 10:275–300.
factors influencing bacterial detachment (21, 22, 36). 5. Bremer, P. J., I. Monk, and C. M. Osborne. 2001. Survival of Listeria
monocytogenes attached to stainless steel surfaces in the presence or absence
In conclusion, the results of this work indicate that L. mono- of Flavobacterium spp. J. Food Prot. 64:1369–1376.
cytogenes cells attached to equipment surfaces may constitute a 6. Briandet, R., T. Meylheuc, C. Maher, and M. N. Bellon-Fontaine. 1999.
7188 POIMENIDOU ET AL. APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
Listeria monocytogenes Scott A: cell surface charge, hydrophobicity, and 29. Lianou, A., J. D. Stopforth, Y. Yoon, M. Wiedmann, and J. N. Sofos. 2006.
electron donor and acceptor characteristics under different environmental Growth and stress resistance variation in culture broth among Listeria mono-
growth conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:5328–5333. cytogenes strains of various serotypes and origins. J. Food Prot. 69:2640–
7. Buchanan, R. L., and L. A. Klawitter. 1991. Effect of temperature history on 2647.
the growth of Listeria monocytogenes Scott A at refrigeration temperatures. 30. Lindsay, D., and A. von Holy. 1997. Evaluation of dislodging methods for
Int. J. Food Microbiol. 12:235–246. laboratory-grown bacterial biofilms. Food Microbiol. 14:383–390.
8. Carpentier, B., and D. Chassaing. 2004. Interactions in biofilms between 31. Lundén, J., R. Tolvanen, and H. Korkeala. 2004. Human listeriosis outbreaks
Listeria monocytogenes and resident microorganisms from food industry pre- linked to dairy products in Europe. J. Dairy Sci. 87:E6–E11.
mises. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 97:111–122. 32. Lundén, J. M., M. K. Miettinen, T. J. Autio, and H. J. Korkeala. 2000.
9. Chavant, P., B. Martinie, T. Meylheuc, M.-N. Bellon-Fontaine, and M. Persistent Listeria monocytogenes strains show enhanced adherence to food
Hebraud. 2002. Listeria monocytogenes LO28: surface physicochemical prop- contact surface after short contact times. J. Food Prot. 63:1204–1207.
erties and ability to form biofilms at different temperatures and growth 33. Mai, T. L., and D. E. Conner. 2007. Effect of temperature and growth media
phases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:728–737. on the attachment of Listeria monocytogenes to stainless steel. Int. J. Food
10. De Buyser, M. L., B. Dufour, M. Maire, and V. Lafarge. 2001. Implication of Microbiol. 120:282–286.
milk and milk products in food-borne diseases in France and in different 34. Mead, P. S., L. Slutsker, V. Dietz, L. F. McCaig, J. S. Breese, C. Shapiro,
industrialised countries. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 67:1–17. P. M. Griffin, and R. V. Tauxe. 1999. Food-related illness and death in the
11. Di Bonaventura, G., R. Piccolomini, D. Paludi, V. D’Orio, A. Vergara, M. United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5:607–625.
Conter, and A. Ianieri. 2008. Influence of temperature on biofilm formation 35. Mellefont, L. A., T. A. McMeekin, and T. Ross. 2003. The effect of abrupt