The document discusses a controversy in 2013 over large bonuses given to SSS executives. SSS President Emilio de Quiros defended the bonuses, claiming they were deserved for meeting financial targets and were needed to attract top talent. However, some argued the bonuses were immorally excessive given SSS's purpose of serving the public, even if they were legally authorized. While the bonuses incentivized performance and helped SSS compete, their large size could be seen as an unfair use of funds that otherwise help SSS members.
The document discusses a controversy in 2013 over large bonuses given to SSS executives. SSS President Emilio de Quiros defended the bonuses, claiming they were deserved for meeting financial targets and were needed to attract top talent. However, some argued the bonuses were immorally excessive given SSS's purpose of serving the public, even if they were legally authorized. While the bonuses incentivized performance and helped SSS compete, their large size could be seen as an unfair use of funds that otherwise help SSS members.
The document discusses a controversy in 2013 over large bonuses given to SSS executives. SSS President Emilio de Quiros defended the bonuses, claiming they were deserved for meeting financial targets and were needed to attract top talent. However, some argued the bonuses were immorally excessive given SSS's purpose of serving the public, even if they were legally authorized. While the bonuses incentivized performance and helped SSS compete, their large size could be seen as an unfair use of funds that otherwise help SSS members.
De Vera 12- Holy Cross Activity 1: SSS Kabalikat ng Bayan
SSS is a government-owned corporation whose members own it. It
was in the news in 2013 because of the issue of the P1 million productivity performance bonus given to SSS executives. SSS President Emilio de Quiros stated that the bonuses were deserved because the SSS executives and employees were able to meet, if not exceed, their financial targets for the year through good investments and significant savings. De Quiros also claimed and believed that giving large bonuses to members of the state-run firm's board of directors was not only legal but also moral, and he went on to say that he needed to offer such a large bonus in order for the SSS to compete with private firms.The bonuses were significantly lower than those offered by private firms. The SSS must provide appropriate incentives to attract the best candidates.
For this to be ethical practice, they must consider whether such
compensation is excessive in comparison to the provision of service and whether the compensation process is compromised by inadequately transparent negotiation.
In my personal opinion, in that case, I would say that it is legally and
ethically immoral. This is legal because Republic Act No. 6971 requires the voluntary formation of labor-management committees to negotiate productivity agreements where employees will receive productivity bonuses. Employees exceeded their financial targets in this case and were thus rewarded for allowing the company to compete in the private sector. The SSS has the authority to give bonuses to their employees because it is written by the law and the employees have performed well. However, it is immoral because the amount allotted to it is excessive. The money provided by the SSS could be used for more important purposes. That is why some people are unable to avoid the step of awarding bonuses, claiming that it is immoral even though it is legal because the bonuses are authorized by the SSS, and that it is also unfair to other sectors who work hard but do not receive such large bonuses.