You are on page 1of 3

Table 1. Summary of participant characteristics.

Study P Tact Listener LRFFC Echoic Mand Intraverbal Assessment


Boa et al. (2017) P1 200+ Fluent Yes
NR
P2 200+ NR NR NR Fluent Yes
P3 100+ 70+ Low

Delfs et al. P1 200+ Fluent 200+ NR NR Yes ABLLS


(2014) P2 200+ 200+ NR VB-MAPP Level 2 50+ VB-MAPP
P3 50+ 50+ NR Fluent Yes ABLLS & VB-MAPP
P4 50+ 50+ NR Low Emerging VB-MAPP

Frampton et al. P1 VB-MAPP domain 7 VB-MAPP domain 6


(2017) P2 VB-MAPP domain 6 VB-MAPP domain 7.5
P3 VB-MAPP domain 3 VB-MAPP domain 2.5
P4 VB-MAPP domain 8 VB-MAPP domain 8.5
NR NR NR NR VB-MAPP
P5 VB-MAPP domain 7 VB-MAPP domain 8
P6 VB-MAPP domain 13 VB-MAPP domain 11
P7 VB-MAPP domain 7 VB-MAPP domain 5
P8 VB-MAPP domain 6.5 VB-MAPP domain 4.5

Kodak & Paden P1 1500 PPVT score 2yr8mo 50


(2015) P2 2000 PPVT score 2yrs6mo NR NR NR 50 NR

Sprinkle & P1 5+ Yes


Miquel (2012) P2 5+ Yes
NR NR NR NR NR
P3 5+ Yes
P4 5+ Yes
Note: P = participant; LRFFC = listener responding given feature, function, class; NR = not reported; VB-MAPP = Verbal Behavior Milestones and
Assessment and Placement Program; ABLLS = Assessment for Basic Language Learning Skills; PPVT = Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test
Table 2. Summary of maintenance per participant within each study.
S

Study Listener trained Listener emerged Speaker trained Speaker emerged


Maintenance Sets Sets Sets Sets
measure
P 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
Boa et al. (2017) - - - - -
Delfs et al. (2014) P1 47 36 40* 40 35 35 100 100 100 100 100 100
Average percentage P2 93 73* - 90 90* - 53 73* - 63 40* -
correct during final P3 60 53* 91 76 77 80 33 50* 35* 13* 50* 11*
maintenance P4 95 85 80 70 80 90 50 40 96 10* 46* 80*
assessment
Frampton et al. (2017) P1 0 0* 0* 0 66* 100 66* 66* 100 0* 0* 0*
Percentage of targets P2 100 0* - 100 100 - 100 100 - 100 0* -
at mastery level P3 100 66 66* 100 100 100 100 100 66* 100 66 0*
during final P4 100 100 100 66 66 100 33 66 100 66 66 0
assessment P5 66 66* - 0 66* - 66 66* - 0* 0* -
P6 100* 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 66* 100 66
P7 100 66 66* 100 100 100 0 0 100 0* 100* 0*
P8 100 100 - 100* 100 - 100 100 66* 100 -
Kodak & Paden
- - - - -
(2015)
Sprinkle & Miquel
- - - - -
(2012)
Note. Maintenance reported by set of targets. The – indicates that sets were not assessed. The * indicates that the participants’ responding did not
reach mastery levels with all targets for that set prior to the maintenance assessment.

You might also like