Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quarterly Report
सूिच के अनुसार
As per Mailing List
Sir,
IEGC के खं ड 6.5.2 के अनुसार, ाटर-01 (अ ैल 2022 से जून 2022) के दि ण े के ै मािसक रपोट
आपकी सूचना एवं आव क कायवाई के िलए वेब साइट www.srldc.org पर उपल है ।
As per clause 6.5.2 of IEGC, the Quarterly report of SR for Quarter-01 (April 2022 –
June 2022) is available in the website www.srldc.org/www.srldc.in for your kind information
and necessary action.
(Sh. T Srinivas)
व र महा बं धक ( .से-II)/Sr.GM,
SO
Departmental Procedure Doc. Number :
(Based on ISO 9001:2008) SRLDC/SO-II/D-04
Classification
Modification History
INDEX
I Cover page
Ii Index
b) Demand chart
2. Quality of service
a) Frequency profile
b) Voltage profile
3. Interregional exchanges
6. Summary report
i) Transmission constraints
i) Grid disturbances
1B. SR Demand
Month State / UT Requirement (MU) Energy met (MU) Shortage (MU) Shortage (%)
ANDHRA PRADESH 6,743.26 6,361.83 381.43 6.00
KARNATAKA 7,393.52 7,369.86 23.66 0.32
KERALA 2,479.71 2,467.57 12.14 0.49
Apr-22 PONDICHERRY 276.01 275.37 0.64 0.23
TAMILNADU 10,635.08 10,605.26 29.82 0.28
TELANGANA 7,233.16 7,216.59 16.57 0.23
S.Region 34,760.74 34,296.48 464.26 1.35
ANDHRA PRADESH 6,074.72 6,061.54 13.18 0.22
KARNATAKA 6,222.07 6,218.88 3.19 0.05
KERALA 2,360.15 2,358.99 1.16 0.05
May-22 PONDICHERRY 280.13 280.02 0.11 0.04
TAMILNADU 10,462.55 10,457.84 4.71 0.05
TELANGANA 5,750.67 5,747.74 2.93 0.05
S.Region 31,150.29 31,125.01 25.28 0.08
ANDHRA PRADESH 6,163.15 6,152.49 10.66 0.17
KARNATAKA 6,047.42 6,042.84 4.58 0.08
KERALA 2,253.53 2,251.82 1.71 0.08
Jun-22 PONDICHERRY 290.52 290.35 0.17 0.06
TAMILNADU 10,380.23 10,373.42 6.81 0.07
TELANGANA 5,314.56 5,310.32 4.24 0.08
S.Region 30,449.41 30,421.24 28.17 0.09
2. Quality of service
Percentage
Month <49.7 > 49.7 - 49.9 49.9-50.05 >50.05-50.20
Apr-22 4.94 31.98 59.25 8.77
May-22 0.27 9.83 72.23 17.94
Jun-22 0.42 12.45 73.39 14.16
Average Frequency for Apr - 22
50.05
50.00
49.95
49.90
49.85
220KV- 220KV-
220KV-AMBEWADI- 220KV-AMBEWADI- 220KV-CHIKKODI-
Month LOWER_SILERU- UPPER_SILERU-
PONDA XELDEM KOHLAPUR
BARSUR BALIMELA
Import(MW) 200.00 1.00
Maximum interchange
Export(MW) 101.00 210.00
Apr '22 Import MU 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Export MU 5.18 66.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net MU's -5.18 -66.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
Import(MW) 135.00 1.00
Maximum interchange
Export(MW) 183.00
May '22 Import MU 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Export MU 0.00 74.59 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net MU's 0.00 -74.59 0.00 0.00 0.00
Import(MW) 112.00 1.00
Maximum interchange
Export(MW) 123.00
Jun '22 Import MU 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Export MU 0.00 55.93 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net MU's 0.00 -53.75 0.00 0.00 0.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
Days
200.00
150.00
100.00
50.00
0.00
01/05/2022
02/05/2022
03/05/2022
04/05/2022
05/05/2022
06/05/2022
07/05/2022
08/05/2022
09/05/2022
10/05/2022
11/05/2022
12/05/2022
13/05/2022
14/05/2022
15/05/2022
16/05/2022
17/05/2022
18/05/2022
19/05/2022
20/05/2022
21/05/2022
22/05/2022
23/05/2022
24/05/2022
25/05/2022
26/05/2022
27/05/2022
28/05/2022
29/05/2022
30/05/2022
31/05/2022
Days
SR Wind Generation in MU's during Jun - 22
250.00
Wind Gen (in MU)
200.00
150.00
100.00
50.00
0.00
Days
Operational Feedback on
Transmission Constraints
(ट्रांसमिशन बरधरओां पर पररचरलन प्रतिक्रियर)
(Southern Region)
(दक्षिणी िेत्र)
July 2022
जुिाई 2022
0|Page
Contents
Section 1: Operational Constraints .................................................................................................... 2
1.1. Transmission Line Constraints ............................................................................................ 2
1.2. ICT Constraints ....................................................................................................................... 4
1.3. Nodes Experiencing Low Voltage .......................................................................................... 8
1.4. Nodes Experiencing High Voltage ........................................................................................ 10
Section 2: Action taken in real-time to mitigate constraint ............................................................. 14
2.1. Lines opened on High Voltage .............................................................................................. 14
2.2. Lines / ICTs opened to control overloading .......................................................................... 17
Section 3: Delay in Transmission / Generation ............................................................................... 18
3.1. Delay in transmission lines affecting grid operation adversely............................................. 18
3.2. Delay in Generation affecting grid operation adversely........................................................ 19
Section 4: Outage of FSCs, Oscillations in the Grid, Tower Collapse............................................ 19
4.1. Outage of Fixed Series Capacitors (FSCs) and FACTS Devices .......................................... 19
4.2. Oscillations observed through PMUs in this quarter............................................................. 19
4.3. Transmission Tower Collapses ............................................................................................. 22
Section 5: ......................................................................................................................................... 23
5.1. Transmission Elements under long outage :.......................................................................... 23
5.2. Important lines / ICTs under construction from Transfer Capability and Reliability view point 23
5.3. Substations with High Fault level: ........................................................................................ 24
Section 6: Markets........................................................................................................................... 24
6.1. Congestion observed while processing STOA Applications................................................. 24
Section 7: Other Issues in Southern Region .................................................................................... 25
7.1. Other Issues in Southern Region ........................................................................................... 25
Annexure I: Uncertainty in Load Growth ....................................................................................... 28
1. Yearly Peak Demand Met: Southern Region ........................................................................ 28
2. Yearly Energy Met: Southern Region ................................................................................... 30
3. Monthly Peak Demand met in the Quarter: Southern Region ............................................... 32
4. Monthly Energy met in the Quarter: Southern Region ......................................................... 33
Annexure II: Details of Grid Disturbances and Grid Incidences .................................................... 34
Annexure IIIA: Details of SPS operations ...................................................................................... 54
Annexure IIIB: Details of Islanding system operations .................................................................. 54
Annexure IV: Details of Fault Level calculations ........................................................................... 55
Annexure V.A: Graphs indicating Transmission Line Constraints in Southern Region…………..55
Annexure V.B: Graphs indicating ICT Constraints in Southern Region…………………………..75
Annexure V.C: Graphs Indicating Nodes Experiencing Low Voltage in Southern Region……….92
Annexure V.D: Graphs Indicating Nodes Experiencing High Voltage in Southern Region………105
1|Page
Quarterly Operational Feedback on Transmission
Constraints
2|Page
Has the
Season/ Figure constraint
S.
Corridor Antecedent Description of the constraints / table occurred
No
Conditions no. in earlier
quarter?
220kV HSR-Manyatha tech park
220kV HSR-Koramangala S/C
220kV Hoody-ITPL S/C
220kV Tumkur –Antarasanahalli D/C
220kV HSR-Mylasandra S/C
The 220kV Nagjheri – Ambewadi DC,
220kV Ambewadi – Narendra DC,
220kV Kodasalli – Nagjheri D/C
220kV Kaiga – Kodasally SC & 220kV
Kadra – Kodasally SC lines are severely
Constraints in over-loaded. In 1st meeting of Southern'
4 Nagjheri PH Whole Year Region Standing Committee on A24 Yes
evacuation Transmission (SRSCT) held on 71h
September, 2018, it was recommended for
Re-conductoring of the the lines with
HTLS conductor. KPTCL to expedite the
same.
3|Page
Has the
Season/ Figure constraint
S.
Corridor Antecedent Description of the constraints / table occurred
No
Conditions no. in earlier
quarter?
230kV Neyveli TS2-Neyveli (TN) D/C
230kV Neyveli TS2-Kadalangudy S/C
230kV Neyveli (TN)-Kadalangudy S/C
230kV NNTPP-Neyveli (TN) D/C
230 kV Pugalur-Karukathi S/C
230 kV Pugalur – Pugalur (PG) D/C
230 kV Pudanchandai-Pugalur S/C
230kV STCMS – Cuddalore S/C
230kV STCMS – Deviakurchi S/C
230kV Neyveli TN-Shankarapuram S/C
230kV Royapuram-Taramani
230kV Mylapur-Taramani
230kV Shankarapuram-Tiruvannamalai
230kV Almathy-Thiruverukadu S/C
230kV Alundur-Trichy D/C
230kV Coimbatore- Othakalmandapam
S/C
230kV Kalvindapattu-Omega S/C
230kV Kalvindapattu-Siruseri S/C
230kV Kalvindapattu-Veerapuram S/C
230kV Othakalmandapam-Tudiyalur
S/C
230kV Tiruvallam(TN)-Thiruvallam
(400/230kV SS) D/C
Peak 220kV Iddukki-New Pallom S/C
A55-
Kerala 220kV demand 220kV Areakode-Kanhirode S/C Yes
9
Network scenario of 220kV Areacode- Orkkattery S/C A56
Kerala
Has the
constraint
Season/ Figure/
S. Description of the occurred
ICT Antecedent table
No constraints in earlier
Conditions no.
quarter?
Details.
High demand
400/220kV Gazuwaka ICTs
period of Andhra N-1 not satisfied for 1 % in Figure- Yes
1
(2X315 + 1X500 MVA) Apr, 2 % in May, 1 % in Jun B1
Pradesh
4|Page
Has the
constraint
Season/ Figure/
S. Description of the occurred
ICT Antecedent table
No constraints in earlier
Conditions no.
quarter?
Details.
High demand
400/220kV KVKota ICTs
period of Andhra N-1 not satisfied for 7 % in Figure- Yes
2
(2X315 MVA) Apr, 1 % in May, 1 % in Jun B2
Pradesh
High demand
400/220kV Maradam ICTs
period of Andhra N-1 not satisfied for 1 % in Figure- Yes
3
(2X315 + 1X500 MVA) Apr, 3 % in May, 8 % in Jun B3
Pradesh
High demand
400/220kV Narnoor ICTs
period of Andhra N-1 not satisfied for 1 % in Figure- Yes
4
(2X315 MVA) Apr B4
Pradesh
High demand
400/220kV Nellore ICTs
period of Andhra N-1 not satisfied for 2 % in Figure- Yes
5
(3X315 MVA) Apr, 1 % in Jun B5
Pradesh
High demand
400/220kV Rachagunneri
period of Andhra N-1 not satisfied for 51 % in Figure- Yes
6
ICTs (2X315 MVA) Apr, 30 % in May, 66 % in Jun B6
Pradesh
High demand
period of Andhra
400/220kV Talapalli ICTs
Pradesh and N-1 not satisfied for 7 % in Figure- No
7
(3X315 MVA) Apr B7
Pump operation
of N’Sagar units
High demand
400/220kV Vemagiri ICTs
period of Andhra N-1 not satisfied for 16 % in Figure- Yes
8
(3X315 + 1X500 MVA) Apr, 15 % in May, 25 % in Jun B8
Pradesh
High demand
765/400kV Nizamabad ICTs
period of N-1 not satisfied for 1 % in Figure- Yes
9
(2x1500 MVA) Apr, 1 % in Jun B9
Southern region
400/220kV,2x315 MVA +
Peak demand
400/220kV, 2x250 MVA +
period of N-1 not satisfied for 1 % in Figure- Yes
10
400/132kV 200MVA ICT at Apr B10
Telangana
Ramagundam STPS
5|Page
Has the
constraint
Season/ Figure/
S. Description of the occurred
ICT Antecedent table
No constraints in earlier
Conditions no.
quarter?
Details.
400/220 kV ICTs at Hassan Peak demand
N-1 not satisfied for 1 % in Figure- Yes
11 period of
(2 x 315 MVA) Apr B11
Karnataka
Peak demand
400/220 kV 3x500 MVA
period of N-1 not satisfied for 12 % in Figure- Yes
12
ICTs at Hoody Apr, 1 % in Jun B12
Karnataka
High demand and
400/220 kV 2X315 MVA
peak solar N-1 not satisfied for 24 % in Figure- Yes
13
ICTs at Jindal SS Apr, 10 % in May, 10 % in Jun B13
Scenario
400/220 kV 2X500 MVA
Whole Year N-1 not satisfied for 2 % in Figure- Yes
14
ICTs at Kaiga May, 10 % in Jun B14
High demand
400/220 kV 2X500 MVA
Scenario of N-1 not satisfied for 32 % in Figure- Yes
15
ICTs at Kolar Apr, 7 % in May, 16 % in Jun B15
Karnataka
High demand
400/220 kV 2X315 + 1x500
Scenario of N-1 not satisfied for 25 % in Figure- Yes
16
MVA ICTs at Mysore Apr, 1 % in May, 2 % in Jun B16
Karnataka
High demand
400/220 kV 2X500 MVA
Scenario of N-1 not satisfied for 1 % in Figure- Yes
17
ICTs at Narendra Apr, 8 % in Jun B17
Karnataka
400/220 kV 2X500 MVA
ICTs at Nelamangala
Whole Year N-1 not satisfied for 19 % in Figure- Yes
18
one ICT (1X500MVA) is Apr, 2 % in May, 2 % in Jun B18
operated radially
400/220 kV 1X315 +1X500
MVA ICTs at Raichur TPS During high wind
Presently ICT-2 (1X315 generation period N-1 not satisfied for 6 % in Figure- Yes
19
May, 1 % in Jun B19
MVA) under prolonged of Karnataka
outage since 23.07.2021
400/220 kV 2X315 MVA Peak demand
N-1 not satisfied for 19 % in Figure- Yes
20
ICTs at UPCL Scenario of Apr, 10 % in May B20
6|Page
Has the
constraint
Season/ Figure/
S. Description of the occurred
ICT Antecedent table
No constraints in earlier
Conditions no.
quarter?
Details.
Karnataka and
full generation of
UPCL
High demand
400/230 kV 2X315 +1X500
Scenario of Tamil N-1 not satisfied for 5 % in Figure-
21
MVA ICTs at Allundur SS May, 5 % in Jun B21
Nadu
High demand
400/230 kV 2X315 +1X500
Scenario of Tamil N-1 not satisfied for 20 % in Figure- Yes
22
MVA ICTs at Arasur SS Apr, 1 % in Jun B22
Nadu
High demand
400/230 kV 3X315 MVA
Scenario of Tamil N-1 not satisfied for 32 % in Figure- Yes
23
ICTs at Hosur SS Apr, 16 % in May, 10 % in Jun B23
Nadu
400/230 kV 2X315 +1X500 High demand
MVA ICTs at Kalvindapattu Scenario of Tamil N-1 not satisfied for 8 % in Figure- No
24
Apr, 21 % in May, 30 % in Jun B24
SS Nadu
400/230 kV 2X315 MVA
High demand
ICTs at Karamadai SS
Scenario of Tamil N-1 not satisfied for 5 % in Figure- Yes
25
ICT-3 is out since 15th May Apr B25
Nadu
2021
High demand
400/230 kV 2X250 MVA
Scenario of Tamil N-1 not satisfied for 19 % in Figure- Yes
26
ICTs at Neyveli II TPS Apr, 41 % in May, 28 % in Jun B26
Nadu
High demand
400/230 kV 2X315 MVA
Scenario of Tamil N-1 not satisfied for 21 % in Figure- Yes
27
ICTs at Salem SS Apr, 17 % in May, 12 % in Jun B27
Nadu
High demand
400/230 kV 2X315 MVA
Scenario of Tamil N-1 not satisfied for 25 % in Figure- Yes
28
ICTs at Tiruvallam Apr, 33 % in May, 10 % in Jun B28
Nadu
400/230 kV 2X315 MVA High demand
N-1 not satisfied for 3 % in Figure- Yes
29
ICTs at Udumalpet Scenario of Tamil Apr B29
7|Page
Has the
constraint
Season/ Figure/
S. Description of the occurred
ICT Antecedent table
No constraints in earlier
Conditions no.
quarter?
Details.
(3X315 MVA) Nadu
High demand
400/220kV Cochin ICTs
Scenario of N-1 not satisfied for 2 % in Figure- Yes
30
(2X315 MVA) Apr, 9 % in May, 1 % in Jun B30
Kerala
High demand
400/220kV Kozhikode ICTs N-1 not satisfied for 7 % in
Scenario of Figure- Yes
31 Apr, 1 % in May
(2X315+1X500 MVA) B31
Kerala
** N-1 is not monitored for Renewable Energy pooling stations (400kV Pavagada,400kV NPKunta and 400kV Tuticorin GIS)
8|Page
Voltages are going below
Peak demand
390kV during high Figure – No
5 400kV Kudgi-PG
scenario C5
demand period
Voltages are going below
Peak demand
390kV during high Figure – No
6 400kV Manali
scenario C6
demand period
Voltages are going below
Peak demand
390kV during high Figure – No
7 400 kV Munirabad
scenario C7
demand period
Voltages are going below
Peak demand
390kV during high Figure – No
8 400 kV Puducherry
scenario C8
demand period
Voltages are going below
Peak demand
390kV during high Figure – No
9 400 kV Salem
scenario C9
demand period
Voltages are going below
Peak demand
400 kV 390kV during high Figure – No
10
Sholinganallur scenario C10
demand period
Voltages are going below
Peak demand
390kV during high Figure – No
11 400 kV SV Chatram
scenario C11
demand period
Voltages are going below
Peak demand
400 kV Trichur- 390kV during high Figure – No
12
Kerala scenario C12
demand period
Voltages are going below
Peak demand
390kV during high Figure – No
13 400 kV Trichur
scenario C13
demand period
Voltages are going below
Peak demand
390kV during high Figure – No
14 400kV Trichy
scenario C14
demand period
Voltages are going below
Peak demand
390kV during high Figure – No
15 400 kV Udumalpet
scenario C15
demand period
9|Page
1.4. Nodes Experiencing High Voltage
Has the
Season/ constraint
S. Description of the Figure/
Nodes Antecedent occurred
No constraints table no.
Conditions in earlier
quarter?
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D1 Yes
1 400 kV CHILAKALURIPETA peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D2 Yes
2 400 kV CUDDAPAH-PG peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D3 Yes
3 400 kV GHANI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D4 Yes
4 400 kV GOOTY peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D5 Yes
5 400 kV HINDUJA peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D6 Yes
6 400 kV HINDUPUR peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D7 Yes
7 400 kV JAMALAMADUGU peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D8 Yes
8 400 kV KALIKIRI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D9 Yes
9 400 kV KURNOOL-AP peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high Figure-D10 Yes
10 400 kV KURNOOL-PG peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high Figure-D11 Yes
11 400 kV KV KOTA peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D12 Yes
12 400 kV NP KUNTA peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D13 Yes
13 400 kV PODILI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D14 Yes
14 400 kV RYTPS STG V peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D15 Yes
15 400 kV SATTENAPALLI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D16 Yes
16 400 kV TALARICHERVU peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D17 Yes
17 400 kV TALLAPALLI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D18 Yes
18 400 kV URAVAKONDA peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D19 Yes
19 400 kV VEMAGIRI-PG peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D20 Yes
20 400 kV VTS54_AG peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D21 Yes
21 765 kV CHILAKALURIPETA peak during low demand period
22 765 kV CUDDAPAH-PG During off Voltages remain very high Figure-D22 Yes
10 | P a g e
Has the
Season/ constraint
S. Description of the Figure/
Nodes Antecedent occurred
No constraints table no.
Conditions in earlier
quarter?
peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D23 Yes
23 765 kV KURNOOL-PG peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D24 Yes
24 765 kV NELLORE-PS peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D25 Yes
25 765 kV SRIKAKULAM peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D26 Yes
26 765 kV VEMAGIRI-PG peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D27 Yes
27 400 kV ASUPAKA peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D28 Yes
28 400 kV CHANDULAPUR peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D29 Yes
29 400 kV DICHIPALLI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D30 Yes
30 400 kV DINDI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D31 Yes
31 400 kV GAJWEL peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D32 Yes
32 400 kV JANGOAN peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D33 Yes
33 400 kV JULURPADU peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D34 Yes
34 400 kV KAKATIYA TPS peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D35 Yes
35 400 kV KETHIREDDYPALLI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D36 Yes
36 400 kV KHAMMAM peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D37 Yes
37 400 kV KTPS-VII peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D38 Yes
38 400 kV KTPS-VI peak during low demand period
400 kV MAHESHWARAM- During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D39 Yes
39 PG peak during low demand period
400 kV MAHESHWARAM- During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D40 Yes
40 TS peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D41 Yes
41 400 kV MALKARAM peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D42 Yes
42 400 kV MAMIDIPALLI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high Figure-D43 Yes
43 400 kV MEDARAM peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high Figure-D44 Yes
44 400 kV NARSARPUR peak during low demand period
11 | P a g e
Has the
Season/ constraint
S. Description of the Figure/
Nodes Antecedent occurred
No constraints table no.
Conditions in earlier
quarter?
During off Voltages remain very high Figure-D45 Yes
45 400 kV NIRMAL peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high Figure-D46 Yes
46 400 kV NIZAMABAD peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high Figure-D47 Yes
47 400 kV RAMADUGU peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high Figure-D48 Yes
48 400 kV RAMAGUNDAM peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high Figure-D49 Yes
49 400 kV SHANKARPALLI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high Figure-D50 Yes
50 400 kV SINGARENI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high Figure-D51 Yes
51 400 kV SRISAILAMLB peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high Figure-D52 Yes
52 400 kV SUNDILLA peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D53 Yes
53 400 kV SURYAPET peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D54 Yes
54 400 kV TIPPAPUR peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D55 Yes
55 400 kV TUKKAPUR peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D56 Yes
56 400 kV VELTOOR peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D57 Yes
57 400 kV WARANGAL peak during low demand period
765 kV MAHESHWARAM- During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D58 Yes
58 PG peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D59 Yes
59 765 kV NIZAMABAD peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D60 Yes
60 400 kV BIDADI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D61 Yes
61 400 kV HIRIYUR peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D62 Yes
62 400 kV KOLAR peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D63 Yes
63 400 kV MYSORE peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D64 Yes
64 400 kV NARENDRA peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D65 Yes
65 400 kV NELAMANGALA peak during low demand period
12 | P a g e
Has the
Season/ constraint
S. Description of the Figure/
Nodes Antecedent occurred
No constraints table no.
Conditions in earlier
quarter?
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D66 Yes
66 400 kV PAVAGADA peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D67 Yes
67 400 kV RAICHUR TPS peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D68 Yes
68 400 kV RAICHUR-PG peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D69 Yes
69 400 kV TUMKUR peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D70 Yes
70 400 kV YELAHANKA peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D71 Yes
71 765 kV RAICHUR-PG peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D72 Yes
72 400 kV ANIKADAVU peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D73 Yes
73 400 kV DHARAMAPURI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D74 Yes
74 400 kV KAMUTHI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D75 Yes
75 400 kV KARAIKUDI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D76 Yes
76 400 kV KAYATHAR peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D77 Yes
77 400 kV PALAVADI peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D78 Yes
78 400 kV THAPPUGUNDU peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D79 Yes
79 400 kV THENAMPATTY peak during low demand period
During off Voltages remain very high
Figure-D80 Yes
80 765 kV TIRUVALAM-PG peak during low demand period
13 | P a g e
Section 2: Action taken in real-time to mitigate constraint
14 | P a g e
Total No. of
Total No. Hours of Outage
S.No Name of Element Owner Name
of Outages during this
quarter
35 765KV-CHILAKALURIPETA-CUDDAPAH-1 PSITSL 4 321.4
36 765KV-NIZAMABAD-MAHESHWARAM_PG-2 POWERGRID 5 309
37 400KV-RAMAGUNDAM-WARANGAL-1 POWERGRID 1 296.5
38 400KV-KHAMMAM_PG-NAGARJUNASAGAR_PG-3 PVTL 1 261
39 400KV-JANAGAON-JULURUPADU-2 TSTRANSCO 3 240.7
40 400KV-PAVAGADA_PG-TUMKUR-1 POWERGRID 8 238.1
41 765KV-CHILAKALURIPETA-VEMAGIRI_PG-1 PSITSL 1 237.4
42 400KV-TIPPAPUR-JANAGAON-1 TSTRANSCO 1 215.2
43 400KV-KETHIREDDYPALLY-SHANKARAPALLY-2 TSTRANSCO 3 205.2
44 400KV-CHANDALAPUR-TUKKAPUR-2 TSTRANSCO 2 184.8
45 400KV-NAGARJUNASAGAR_PG-RAMAGUNDAM-2 POWERGRID 2 159.9
46 400KV-JANAGAON-JULURUPADU-1 TSTRANSCO 2 159.2
47 400KV-MAMIDAPALLI-KHAMMAM_PG-2 POWERGRID 5 105.5
48 400KV-MAHESHWARAM_TG-SHANKARAPALLY-2 TSTRANSCO 1 94.3
49 400KV-RAYALSEEMA TPP-KALIKIRI-2 APTRANSCO 1 91.8
50 400KV-RAYALSEEMA TPP-KALIKIRI-1 APTRANSCO 1 83.7
51 400KV-SHANKARAPALLY-NARSAPUR-2 TSTRANSCO 2 81.6
52 400KV-TALARCHEVU-URAVAKONDA-2 APTRANSCO 1 80.4
53 400KV-MALKARAM-SURYAPET-1 TSTRANSCO 1 77
54 765KV-CUDDAPAH-THIRUVALAM-2 POWERGRID 2 67.1
55 400KV-UPCL-HASSAN-2 KPTCL 4 60.2
56 400KV-HIRIYUR-MYSORE-1 POWERGRID 5 46.8
57 400KV-RAMADUGU-SINGARENI-2 TSTRANSCO 3 46.1
58 400KV-SURYAPET-KV_KOTA-1 APTRANSCO 1 41.1
59 765KV-CUDDAPAH-THIRUVALAM-1 POWERGRID 1 35.4
60 400KV-CUDDAPAH-KOLAR_AC-1 POWERGRID 2 26.3
61 400KV-TUMKUR-KUDGI_PG-2 KTL 1 16.5
62 400KV-UPCL-HASSAN-1 KPTCL 2 15.1
63 765KV-SRIKAKULAM-VEMAGIRI_PG-2 PVTL 1 13.5
64 400KV-RAMADUGU-SINGARENI-1 TSTRANSCO 1 12
65 400KV-BHOOPALAPALLY-CHANDALAPUR-2 TSTRANSCO 1 10.3
66 400KV-BTPS-HIRIYUR-2 KPTCL 1 9.9
67 400KV-PAVAGADA_PG-MYSORE-1 POWERGRID 1 9.5
68 400KV-NIRMAL-SUNDILA-1 TSTRANSCO 1 7.6
69 400KV-RASIPALYAM-ANAIKADAVU-2 TANTRANSCO 1 7.1
70 400KV-KAIGA-GUTTUR-2 KPTCL 1 6.9
71 400KV-KETHIREDDYPALLY-RAYADURG-1 TSTRANSCO 1 3.8
72 765KV-KURNOOL_PG-CUDDAPAH-2 POWERGRID 1 1.6
73 400KV-HINDUJA-KALPAKKA-2 APTRANSCO 1 0.5
15 | P a g e
Fig. 1: Lines opened on high Voltage
16 | P a g e
2.2. Lines / ICTs opened to control overloading
400/230kV
Overloading of 230kV Siruseri line up to
400KV/230KV Kalvindapattu ICTs are
1 190 MW as soon as ICT-3 was
SHOLINGANALLUR-ICT - 3 heaviely loaded with
normalized from LV side
opening of this ICT
Expedite commissioning
230kV Neyveli-Villianur To control loading on Neyveli stage2
2 of 400kV Network
S/C ICTs
planned around Neyveli
17 | P a g e
Section 3: Delay in Transmission / Generation
3.1. Delay in transmission lines affecting grid operation adversely
Proposed
Actual/ Likely
S. Transmission Commissioning
Commissioning Transmission Constraint Caused
No. Corridor Date/ Original
Date
Target date
After the commissioning of the
400kV Jagalur PS-
CNhalli and downstream system the
1 Chikkanayakanahalli -- Tendering stage
ICT loading of 400/200kV Mysore
– Kadakola D/C line
will get reduced.
Constraint in Evacuation of NNTPP
Generation will be relieved. Due to
delay in commissioning of 400kV
Ariyalur S/s and its downstream
230kV network, 400kV Pugalur-
400 kV Ariyalur- Kalivanthapattu-2 is LILoed at
NNTPP D/C line & Ariyalur by making 400kV NNTPP-
2 Feb-2020 RoW issues
230kV Ariyalur Ariyalur-Pugalur & 400kV NNTPP-
system Ariyalur-Kalivanthapattu. Due to delay
in commissioning of Ariyalur S/s and
its associated transmission system, the
flow on 400/230kV NNTPS ICT’s and
400/230kV NLCTS2 ICT’s are heavily
loaded upto their N-1 Limit.
Constraint in Evacuation of YTPS
Generation will be relieved. Presently
Gulbarga 400/220 kV
YTPS is connected only to 400kV
sub-station and
3 Bellary Pooling station. During high
Yeramarus TPS-
generation at YTPS and Pavagada
Gulbarga 400 kV D/C
solar, N-1 violation of Jindal ICTs
loading is observed.
18 | P a g e
3.2. Delay in Generation affecting grid operation adversely
Proposed
Sl. Generating Area/ Actual/ Likely Operational Constraint
Commissioning
No Unit State Commissioning Date Caused
Date
1 NIL
19 | P a g e
1. Oscillations observed at 220kV Sharavathy Station during Grid Disturbance in
220kV/110kV Shimoga SS on 27-04-2022 at 13:13hrs:
20 | P a g e
2. Oscillations observed at 400kV Kolar Station on 02-05-2022 at 12:09hrs:
21 | P a g e
4.3. Transmission Tower Collapses
Impact on Grid
No. of days and System
Sl. Voltage Outage Revival
Line Region taken for Operation during
No (in kV) Date Date
revival 1st Quarter of
2022 - 23
400 kV Pavagada- 08-05- 27-05-
1 400 SR 20
Tumkur 1&2 2022 2022
400kV Gooty- 08-05- 25-05-
2 400 SR 18
Somanahalli 2022 2022
220kV Alipur-
Regulapadu & 16-05- 31-05-
3 220 SR 16
220kV BTPS- 2022 2022
Lingapur
Line reconfigured
220kV
19-11- as 220kV
4 Chinakampalli- 220 SR - -
2021 Renigunta-
Rajampeta
Rajampeta
*Note: As per regulation 5b of CERC (Standards of Performance of inter-State transmission
licensees) Regulations, 2012, any line going under outage due to tower collapse should be restored
22 | P a g e
back on emergency restoration tower within 12 days and on normal tower within 50 days in case of
river bed.
Section 5:
5.1. Transmission Elements under long outage :
Sl No Transmission Elements Affected Areas Expected Revival date
5.2. Important lines / ICTs under construction from Transfer Capability and
Reliability view point
These envisaged lines would enhance the reliability or increase the inter-regional transfer capability
between different regions as per the present conditions and can be expedited.
23 | P a g e
Sl. Name of the transmission element (Line / Implementing
Remarks
No ICT) agency
Will enhance the
3 400kV Kottayam SS and Associated system KSEBL TTC/ATC of S3
(KERALA)
Will enhance the
4 400/220kV Cochin ICT-3 Powergrid TTC/ATC of S3
(KERALA)
Enhances S1(S2 and S3)
5 400/230kV Vellalavididi SS TANTRANSCO and Tamil Nadu control
area TTC/ATC
Enhances S1(S2 and S3)
6 400/230kV Thiruvallam ICT-3 TANTRANSCO and Tamil Nadu control
area TTC/ATC
Enhances NEW-SR import
7 765/400kV Nizamabad ICT-3 POWERGRID
TTC/ATC
400kV MAHESWARAM-TS
400kV MAHESWARAM -PG
400kV RAICHUR-PG
400kV CHINAKMPALLI
400kV CUDDAPA GIS
400 kV
400kV TUMKUR
400kV Pugalur (Existing)
400kV TIRUNELVELLI
400kV RAICHUR TPS
400kV NELAMANGALA
Section 6: Markets
Apr'22 No congestion - - - - -
24 | P a g e
May'22 No congestion - - - - -
Jun'22 No congestion - - - - -
During peak RE scenario of Karnataka 400kV Raichur TPS – Veltoor S/C line
loading is touching 650-660 MW. In future, the loading on this line will increase
further due to more RE additions. Suitable arrangement of making LILO of
400kV Raichur TPS – Veltoor S/C at 400kV Raichur SS (POWERGRID) may be
planned for relieving this line loading.
7.1.3 Planning alternate auxillary supply for Lift Irrigation stations at lower
voltage levels
Telanagana substations are experiencing severe over voltage issue during low
demand periods in monsoon. The Lift irrigations pumps are generally not operated
during this period and the transmission lines connected (mostly at 400kV) to these
sations are kept in service to meet the auxillary power requirement. Due to no load
at LIS, the connected lines are under loaded and generating reactive power which
is contributing to over voltages. During no LIS load and high voltage scenario
hand tripping these lines will help in controlling the over voltages provided
alternate arrangement for meeting auxillary power requirement is available. In
25 | P a g e
view of the above, it is suggested to have alternate supply to all LIS station from
distribution level and suitable reactive compensation at all the LIS stations.
26 | P a g e
7.1.7 Planning NGR Bypass arrangement for Line reactors to utilise as bus
reactors:
In the absence of sufficient reactive power management tools available at
present to address the issue of abnormal high and low voltages in the grid,
convertible line reactors would give flexibility to the operator in maintaining
voltages within IEGC band. To control the high voltages, lightly loaded lines are
being kept open and the line reactors of these lines are being converted to bus
reactors. However, due to non-availability of NGR bypassing arrangement, the
line reactors are not being converted to bus reactors.
Hence, it is suggested that all line reactors of all the new 400kV & 765kV
transmission lines should come along with NGR bypass arrangement including the
projects under TBCB.
27 | P a g e
Annexure I: Uncertainty in Load Growth
28 | P a g e
Yearly growth Yearly
Peak Latest EPS
rate in peak projected
S. No Year Constituent Demand projection
demand met growth in
Met (MW) (MW)
(%age) EPS (%age)
Tamil Nadu 16129 17230 6% 5%
Puducherry 412 518 6% 4%
SR 49534 52171 5% 7%
Andhra Pradesh 10207 10259 8% 7%
Telangana 13168 12712 23% 11%
Karnataka 13258 12834 2% 5%
8 2019-20 Kerala 4316 4788 2% 5%
Tamil Nadu 16386 18213 2% 5%
Puducherry 480 539 17% 4%
SR 53465 56007 8% 7%
Andhra Pradesh 11193 11021 10% 7%
Telangana 13688 13757 4% 8%
Karnataka 14367 13534 8% 5%
Kerala 4284 5021 -1% 5%
9 2020-21
Tamil Nadu 16481 19240 1% 6%
Puducherry 421 561 -12% 4%
SR 58395 59581 9% 6%
SR 59781 62975 2% 6% 1
Andhra Pradesh 12293 12731 2% 7%
Telangana 13636 15338 -4% 6%
2022-23** Karnataka 14725 15033 -1% 5%
11 (Till June
2022) Kerala 4385 5513 0% 5%
Tamil Nadu 17563 21471 2% 6%
Puducherry 485 606 6% 4%
SR 60876 66710 2% 6%
Note: ‘Latest EPS projection’ data taken from 18th EPS for the FY 2012-13 to 2016-17 and
data taken from 19th EPS for the FY 2017-18, FY 2018-19, FY 2019-20 FY 2020-
21, FY 2021-22 & FY 2022-23.
29 | P a g e
2. Yearly Energy Met: Southern Region
Yearly Yearly
Latest EPS
Energy Met growth rate projected
S. No Year Constituent projection
(MU) in Energy growth in
(MU)
met (%age) EPS (%age)
Andhra Pradesh 82171 93189 9% 9%
Karnataka 57044 58513 6% 8%
Kerala 20391 20516 5% 7%
1 2012-13
Tamil Nadu 76161 91625 -1% 7%
Puducherry 2291 3024 7% 4%
SR 238058 266867 0% 8%
Andhra Pradesh 89036 101231 8% 9%
Karnataka 58052 63001 2% 8%
Kerala 21052 21889 3% 7%
2 2013-14
Tamil Nadu 87980 97865 16% 7%
Puducherry 2320 3155 1% 4%
SR 258444 287141 9% 8%
Andhra Pradesh 56313
109968 9% 9%
Telangana 40644
Karnataka 59926 67833 3% 8%
3 2014-15 Kerala 22127 23354 5% 7%
Tamil Nadu 92750 104529 5% 7%
Puducherry 2376 3293 2% 4%
SR 274136 308977 6% 8%
Andhra Pradesh 50366 -11%
119458 9%
Telangana 49948 23%
Karnataka 60971 73036 2% 8%
4 2015-16 Kerala 23194 24917 5% 7%
Tamil Nadu 96586 111648 4% 7%
Puducherry 2429 3436 2% 4%
SR 283494 332495 3% 8%
Andhra Pradesh 54257 8%
129767 9%
Telangana 53017 6%
Karnataka 66538 78637 9% 8%
5 2016-17 Kerala 24261 26584 5% 7%
Tamil Nadu 104488 119251 8% 7%
Puducherry 2546 3586 5% 4%
SR 305107 357826 8% 8%
Andhra Pradesh 58299 58846 7.45% 8%
Telangana 60475 61102 14.07% 16%
Karnataka 68949 69808 3.62% 6%
6 2017-18 Kerala 24502 25875 0.99% 5%
Tamil Nadu 106732 111583 2.15% 5%
Puducherry 2544 3121 -0.08% 4%
SR 321514 330336 5.38% 8%
Andhra Pradesh 63535 63290 9% 7%
Telangana 66423 67680 10% 10%
Karnataka 71785 73636 4% 5%
7 2018-19 Kerala 24826 27184 1% 5%
Tamil Nadu 110137 117505 3% 5%
Puducherry 2671 3254 5% 4%
SR 339382 352549 6% 6%
Andhra Pradesh 64542 68034 2% 7%
Telangana 69181 75164 4% 11%
8 2019-20
Karnataka 72656 77532 1% 5%
Kerala 26344 28535 6% 5%
30 | P a g e
Yearly Yearly
Latest EPS
Energy Met growth rate projected
S. No Year Constituent projection
(MU) in Energy growth in
(MU)
met (%age) EPS (%age)
Tamil Nadu 110904 123724 1% 5%
Puducherry 2804 3387 5% 4%
SR 346432 376376 2% 7%
Andhra Pradesh 62134 73090 -4% 7%
Telangana 67501 80700 -2% 7%
Karnataka 69385 81622 -5% 5%
9 2020-21 Kerala 25207 29924 -4% 5%
Tamil Nadu 102742 130189 -7% 5%
Puducherry 2616 3521 -7% 4%
SR 329585 399047 -5% 6%
Andhra Pradesh 68299 78540 10% 7%
Telangana 71531 84603 6% 5%
Karnataka 73230 85932 6% 5%
10 2021-22 Kerala 26536 31371 5% 5%
Tamil Nadu 111942 136643 9% 5%
Puducherry 2885 3664 10% 4%
SR 354424 420753 8% 5%
Andhra Pradesh 18576 84429 -73% 7%
Telangana 18275 88130 -74% 4%
Karnataka 19632 90381 -73% 5%
2022-23** (Till
11 June 2022)
Kerala 7078 32861 -73% 5%
Tamil Nadu 31437 144145 -72% 5%
Puducherry 846 3809 -71% 4%
SR 95710 443754 -73% 5%
31 | P a g e
3. Monthly Peak Demand met in the Quarter: Southern Region
Projected
Growth growth
rate in over RPC
Peak
peak same LGB
Peak RPC Deman
S. demand month of projecti
Deman LGB d Met
N Month Constituent met over last year on
d Met projectio (MW)
o same as per (MW) in
(MW) n (MW) in FY
month of RPC FY
2021-22
last year LGB 2021-22
(%age) projectio
n (%age)
Andhra
12293 11917 5.4% 19.7% 11661 9954
Pradesh
Telangana 13636 14165 0.3% 33.7% 13595 10597
Karnataka 14725 14473 4.0% 8.6% 14158 13322
1 Apr’22 Kerala 4385 4387 3.2% -0.4% 4251 4406
Tamil Nadu 17563 17153 4.3% 0.9% 16846 17000
Puducherry 465 483 3.6% 6.4% 449 454
SR 60876 59799 4.2% 12.2% 58430 53277
Andhra
11218 10610 8.0% -3.4% 10390 10982
Pradesh
Telangana 10519 10632 28.2% 12.9% 8202 9421
Karnataka 12260 13017 13.2% 2.0% 10829 12766
2 May’22 Kerala 4182 4568 9.1% 1.8% 3834 4487
Tamil Nadu 16906 16576 5.9% -0.1% 15957 16600
Puducherry 482 478 36.2% 2.6% 354 466
SR 53644 53416 12.3% 2.1% 47784 52295
Andhra
11484 10484 12.9% 0.7% 10172 10407
Pradesh
Telangana 9806 11629 -11.9% 25.9% 11130 9239
Karnataka 11781 12392 5.4% 2.7% 11174 12064
3 Jun’22 Kerala 3989 4204 10.5% 2.6% 3609 4097
Tamil Nadu 17517 16485 9.2% -1.3% 16040 16700
Puducherry 485 490 15.5% 2.1% 420 480
SR 50879 53216 -0.3% 5.1% 51046 50640
32 | P a g e
4. Monthly Energy met in the Quarter: Southern Region
Growth
Projected
rate in
growth
Energy Energy
over same
met Met RPC LGB
Energy RPC LGB month of
S. over (MU) projection
Month Constituent Met projection last year
No same in (MU) in
(MU) (MU) as per
month 2021- 2021-22
RPC LGB
of last 22
projection
year
(%age)
(%age)
Andhra
6362 6607 1% 12% 6289 5921
Pradesh
Telangana 7217 6986 8% 18% 6712 5937
Karnataka 7370 7503 1% 3% 7316 7277
1 Apr’22
Kerala 2468 2527 2% -3% 2430 2603
Tamil Nadu 10605 10868 1% 0% 10519 10900
Puducherry 275 285 2% 3% 269 278
SR 34296 34850 2% 6% 33536 32988
Andhra
6062 6394 3% -2% 5880 6537
Pradesh
Telangana 5748 5537 18% -1% 4875 5570
Karnataka 6219 6973 7% 0% 5820 7008
2 May’22
Kerala 2359 2668 15% 1% 2058 2641
Tamil Nadu 10458 10976 13% -2% 9293 11200
Puducherry 280 290 13% 0% 249 291
SR 30993 32919 10% -1% 28176 33328
Andhra
6152 6001 11% 1% 5554 5937
Pradesh
Telangana 5310 5526 2% 2% 5219 5406
Karnataka 6043 6067 14% 0% 5301 6052
3 Jun’22
Kerala 2252 2270 12% 1% 2013 2251
Tamil Nadu 10373 10445 11% -2% 9366 10700
Puducherry 290 282 20% 1% 242 280
SR 30421 30656 10% 0% 27695 30707
33 | P a g e
Annexure II: Details of Grid Disturbances and Grid Incidences
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
Complete Outage of 220kV/66kV
Kushalanagar SS of KPTCL: As per the
report submitted, the triggering
incident was tripping of 220kV
SR/ Mysore Kushalnagara Line-1&2 due
01-04-2022
GD- SR to 220kV tower damage which was 0 90 GD-1
17:03
1 caused by heavy wind and rain. Since
220kV/66kV Kushalnagar SS was
radially fed from 220kV Mysore SS,
this resulted in complete outage of
the substation
34
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
Complete Outage of 220kV/110kV
Ranebennur SS, 220kV/66kV
Davanagere SS, 220kV/66kV Honnali
SS and 220kV/66kV Benkikere SS and
Multiple trippings in 400kV/220kV
Guttur SS of KPTCL: During the
antecedent conditions, 220kV/110kV
Ranebennur SS, 220kV/66kV
Davanagere SS, 220kV/66kV
Benkikere and 220kV Honnali SS were
radially fed from 400kV/220kv Guttur
SS. As per the reports submitted, the
SR/ triggering incident was B phase
16-04-2022
GD- SR isolator failure in 220kV Guttur Haveri 22 259 GD-1
01:43
5 Line-1 at Guttur end resulting in Bus-
1 fault. BBP initiated but did not
operate due to DC supply failure. All
220kV lines connected to 220kV
Guttur Bus-1 and Bus-2 got tripped
on operation of zone-4 protection.
400kV/220kV Guttur ICT-1 & 2
tripped on Back-up over current
protection .This resulted in complete
outage of 220kV/110kV Ranebennur
SS, 220kV/66kV Davanagere SS,
220kV/66kV Honnali SS and
220kV/66kV Benkikere SS .
Complete Outage of 400kV SEIL_P2
Generating station of Sembcorp and
Multiple Trippings in 400kV Nellore
Pooling Station of PGCIL SR-1: As per
the reports submitted, the triggering
incident was Y-N fault in 400kV Bus-2
at NPS end due to isolator switching
SR/
20-04-2022 operation . This resulted in the
GD- SR 1301 0 GD-1
15:47 tripping of all the Main breakers of
6
Bus-2 at 400kV NPS. At the same
time, 400kV NPS SEIL_P2 line-1 and 2
got tripped at NPS end on OV St-2
protection and DT was sent to
remote end. Due to loss of both the
evacuating lines, running Units#1 and
2 at SEIL_P2 got tripped.
Complete Outage of 220kV/110kV
SR/ MRS Shimoga SS of KPTCL and
27-04-2022
GD- SR Partial Loss of Supply to 0 167 GD-1
13:13
7 220kV/110kV Kibbanahalli(KB Cross)
SS of KPTCL: During the antecedent
35
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
conditions, due to 220kV split Bus
operation at 220kV/110kV
Kibbanahalli(KB Cross) SS, 220kV Bus-
1 was radially fed from 220kV/110kV
MRS Shimoga SS. As per the reports
submitted, triggering incident was
LBB maloperation in 220kV Shimoga
Mysore line-1 at Shimoga end. Since
there was 220kV Single bus
operation, immediately all the lines
connected to 220kV Bus got tripped.
This resulted in complete outage of
220kV/110kV MRS Shimoga SS and
partial loss of supply to 220kV/110kV
Kibbanahalli(KB Cross) SS .
Complete Outage of 220kV/33kV
Gopalpura Station and 220kV/66kV
Kaduvinakote(Hole Narsipura) SS of
KPTCL: As per the report submitted,
the triggering incident was tripping
of 220kV Hassan Gopalpura Line due
to Y-B fault. Subsequently, 220kV
SR/ Mysore Gopalpura line tripped on
29-04-2022
GD- SR over current protection . Tripping of 0 30 GD-1
19:14
8 both connected lines resulted in
complete outage of 220kV/33kV
Gopalpura SS. Since 220kV/66kV
Kaduvinakote(Hole Narsipura) SS was
radially fed from 220kV Gopalpura SS,
this further resulted in the complete
outage of 20kV/66kV
Kaduvinakote(Hole Narsipura) SS.
Complete Outage of 400kV BPS SS,
400kV YTPS GS, 400kV/220kV Jagalur
SS, 220kV/66kV Chitradurga SS,
220kV/66kV Kudligi SS and multiple
tripping in 400kV/220kV JSWEL GS
and 220kV/66kV Thalak SS: As per
the information received, the
SR/
29-04-2022 triggering incident was YB fault in
GD- SR 1657 70 GD-1
11:51 400kV BPS Pavagada line-2 at a
9
distance of 70km from BPS end at
11:47hrs and RB fault in 400kV BPS
Pavagada line-1 at a distance of 98km
from BPS end at 11:51hrs.
Subsequently, 400kV BPS Jagalur line-
1&2, 400kV BPS YTPS line-2, and
400kV BPS JSW line-1 got tripped on
36
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
operation of OV St-1 protection at
BPS end and DT was sent to the
remote ends. Running units#1 and 2
got tripped at YTPS end due to loss of
evacuation. Running units#3 and 5 at
JSW end got tripped and there was
opening of 400kV bus coupler at JSW
end due to sps operation. Since
400kV/220kV Jagalur SS, 220kV/66kV
Chitradurga SS, 220kV/66kV Kudligi
SS, and part of 220kV/66kV Thalak SS
loads were radially fed from 400kV
BPS. This resulted in complete loss of
outage of 400kV BPS SS, 400kV YTPS
GS, 400kV/220kV Jagalur SS,
220kV/66kV Chitradurga SS,
220kV/66kV Kudligi SS. Details are
awaited.
Complete Outage of 220kV/66kV
HSR SS and 220kV/66kV
Naganathapura SS of KPTCL: During
antecedent conditions, 220kV
Naganathapura Somanahalli, 220kV
HSR Koramangala were under idle
charged condition and 220kV HSR
Mylasandra was under outage.
Because of this, 220kV/66kV
Naganathapura SS was radially fed
SR/
01-05-2022 from 220kV/66kV HSR SS. As per the
GD- 0 180 GD-1
SR 14:40 reports submitted, the triggering
10
incident was R-Y fault in 220kV HSR
Hoody line at 14:40hrs and the line
tripped. At 14:45hrs, 220kV HSR
Naganathapura line was hand tripped
due to emergency. At 14:57hrs,
220kV HSR EPIP line tripped on R-Y
fault. Tripping of all these lines
resulted in complete outage of
220kV/66kV HSR SS and 220kV/66kV
Naganathapura SS.
37
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
Complete Outage of 230kV/33kV
Veeranam SS of TANTRANSCO:
During antecedent conditions, there
was single bus operation at
230kV/33kV Veeranam SS. As per the
reports submitted, the triggering
SR/
03-05-2022 incident was B-ph CT failure in 230kV
GD- SR 53 0 GD-1
03:05 Veeranam Kayathar feeder at
11
Veeranam end. Immediately, 230kV
BBP operated and all 230kV feeders
tripped. This resulted in loss of
evacuation of Wind generation and
complete outage of 230kV/33kV
Veeranam SS.
Complete Outage of 400kV/220kV
Kalpaka SS of APTRANSCO,
400kV/220kV Gazuwaka SS of PGCIL
SR-2, 400kV HNPCL of M/s Hindhuja,
400kV Simhadri Thermal Station of
NTPC, 220kV VSS, 220kV/132kV MRS
VSS, 220kV/132kV Parawada SS,
220kV/132kV Pendurty SS,
220kV/132kV Gangavaram SS,
220kV/132kV Brandix SS,
220kV/132kV Gazuwaka_AP SS,
220kV/132kV Diary Farm SS, 220kV
Sharadha Alloys and 220kV/132kV
Simhachalam SS of APTRANSCO: As
per the report submitted, the
triggering incident was B-N fault in
SR/
03-05-2022 400kV Kalpaka Gazuwaka line-2. At
GD- SR 2645 809 GD-1
03:16 Kalpaka end, differential operated,
12
A/r operated and line was holding. At
Gazuwaka end, differential operated,
B pole tripped but not reclosed and
hence line got tripped on operation
of PD. Tripping at 03:16:40hrs: As per
the report submitted, the triggering
incident was tracking in R-ph CT of
Bus Reactor-2 at 400kV Kalpaka SS
which was connected to Bus section-
4. Due to non-operation of Bus
reactor differential protection, BBP of
Bus section-4 and reverse zone
protection of connected lines not
operated. Fault was cleared by
tripping of the remote ends. This
resulted in complete outage of
38
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
400kV/220kV Kalpaka SS of
APTRANSCO, 400kV/220kV Gazuwaka
SS of PGCIL SR-2, 400kV HNPCL of
M/s Hindhuja, 400kV Simhadri
Thermal Station of NTPC, 220kV VSS,
220kV/132kV MRS VSS, 220kV/132kV
Parawada SS, 220kV/132kV Pendurty
SS, 220kV/132kV Gangavaram SS,
220kV/132kV Brandix SS,
220kV/132kV Gazuwaka_AP SS,
220kV/132kV Diary Farm SS, 220kV
Sharadha Alloys and 220kV/132kV
Simhachalam SS of APTRANSCO
Complete Outage of
230kV/110kV/22kV Karaikudi_TN SS
of TANTRANSCO: During antecedent
conditions, all the elements were
connected to 230kV Bus-1 at
Karaikudi_TN SS. As per the report
submitted, the triggering incident
was failure of B-phase CT in 230kV
SR/
05-05-2022 Karaikudi_TN Karaikudi_PG line-1 at
GD- SR 0 265 GD-1
12:45 Karaikudi_TN SS. Bus-1 BBP operated
13
and all the elements connected to
Bus-1 got tripped except 230kV
Karaikudi_TN Kavanur-2 which was
hand tripped later at 13:14hrs.
Subsequently, all 110kV lines tripped
on overloading. This resulted in
complete outage of
230kV/110kV/22kV Karaikudi_TN SS.
39
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
40
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
Complete Outage of 220kV/33kV
Ostro Kannada Wind Plant : As per
the report submitted, the triggering
incident was R-N fault in 220kV
SR/
08-05-2022 Hiriyur Ostro line and the line tripped
GD- SR 66 0 GD-1
18:23 at both ends . Due to tripping of the
17
only connected line , there was
complete loss of supply at
220kV/33kV Ostro Kannada Wind
Plant.
Complete Outage of 230kV Mywadi
Switching Station of TANTRANSCO
and Multiple Trippings at
400kV/230kV Udumalpet_PG of
PGCIL SR-1: During antecedent
conditions, there was single bus
operation in 230kV Mywadi Switching
Station. As per the reports
submitted, triggering incident was R-
phase CT failure in 230kV Mywadi
SR/
09-05-2022 Kurukkathi line at Myvadi SS.
GD- SR 0 0 GD-1
23:26 Immediately, BBP operated and all
18
the elements connected to 230kV
Mywadi SS got tripped. Since 230kV
side of 400kV/230kV Udumalpet_PG
ICT-1,2 & 3 are connected to 230kV
Mywadi Bus, LV side of ICTs tripped
on operation of BBP. This resulted in
complete outage of 230kV Mywadi
Switching Station of TANTRANSCO
and multiple trippings at
400kV/230kV Udumalpet_PG.
Complete outage of 400kV SEPL,
400kV MEPL and Multiple Trippings
at 400kV Nellore Pooling Station : As
per the reports submitted, the
triggering incident was B-N fault in
400kV NPS SEIL_P1 Line-1 at
07:40hrs and the line tripped. At
SR/
10-05-2022 07:49hrs,i. 400kV NPS Thiruvalam
GD- SR 0 0 GD-1
07:40 Line-1 tripped on R-N fault, ii. 400kV
19
NPS Thiruvalam Line-2 tripped on B-N
fault, iii. 400kV NPS MEPL line tripped
on R-N fault, iv. 400kV SEPL MEPL line
tripped on R-N fault and v. 400kV NPS
SEPL line tripped on B-N fault. At the
same time, 765kV/400kV NPS ICT-1
tripped on OLTC OSR in Y-phase.
41
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
Tripping of 400kV NPS MEPL line,
400kV NPS SEPL line and 400kV MEPL
SEPL lines resulted in complete
outage of 400kV SEPL and 400kV
MEPL.
Complete Outage of 400kV/220kV
Talaguppa SS, 220kV/110kV Shimoga
SS, 220kV/110kV Shiralakoppa SS,
220kV/110kV Sirsi SS of KPTCL and
220kV Sharavathy Generating
Station and 220kV Sharavathy Tail
Race of KPCL and Partial Loss of
Supply to 220kV/110kV
Kibbanahalli(KB Cross) SS of KPTCL :
During antecedent conditions due to
the non-availability of Bus
Sectionalisers, 220kV Shimoga SS was
under single bus operation and due
to 220kV split Bus operation at
220kV/110kV Kibbanahalli(KB Cross)
SS (to limit loading of 400kV/220kV
Nelamangala ICTs), 220kV Bus-1 was
radially fed from 220kV/110kV
Shimoga SS and due to outage of
many 220kV Shimoga connected lines
SR/
13-05-2022 and 400kV Talaguppa Nelamangala
GD- SR 892 175 GD-1
07:24 line, there was no N-1 reliability for
20
220kV Sharavathy generation
evacuation. As per the information
received, the triggering incident was
failure of B ph CT of 220kV Shimoga
Sharavathy line-3 at Shimoga end.
Dead zone protection operated
resulting in the tripping of all the
elements connected to 220kV
Shimoga SS (delayed operation of
XXms was observed). This resulted in
a complete outage of 220kV/110kV
Shimoga SS and partial loss of supply
to 220kV/110kV Kibbanahalli(KB
Cross) SS. The total load loss reported
during this event was 96MW
(Shimoga-45MW and KB Cross-
51MW). After the tripping of Shimoga
lines, Sharavathy generation was
evacuated through Talaguppa lines.
With the tripping of 400kV Hassan
42
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
Talaguppa line tripped at Hassan end
on operation of power swing
protection, running Units at
Sharavathy got tripped on operation
of over frequency stage-1 protection.
This resulted in complete outage of
400kV/220kV Talaguppa SS,
220kV/110kV Shimoga SS,
220kV/110kV Shiralakoppa SS,
220kV/110kV Sirsi SS of KPTCL and
220kV Sharavathy Generating Station
and 220kV Sharavathy Tail Race of
KPCL and Partial Loss of Supply to
220kV/110kV Kibbanahalli(KB Cross)
SS of KPTCL.
Complete Outage of 220kV/110kV
Alipur SS of KPTCL: As per the reports
submitted, the triggering incident
was tower collapse near Alipur due to
heavy wind and rain. This caused B-N
SR/
16-05-2022 fault in 220kV BTPS Lingapura and
GD- SR 0 80 GD-1
17:38 220kV Alipur Regulpadu line and the
21
lines tripped. At the same time,
220kV BTPS Alipur line got tripped.
Tripping of both connected lines
resulted in the complete outage of of
220kV/110kV Alipur SS.
Complete Outage of 220kV/33kV
KSPDCL SS-1: As per the reports
submitted, triggering incident was
RYB fault in 33kV feeder-3 of Block-2
SR/
20-05-2022 of M/s Aadya and the feeder tripped
GD- SR 81 0 GD-1
11:05 on EFR and OCR protection. At the
22
same time, 220kV/33kV PTR-1&2 got
tripped on EFR. This resulted in the
complete outage of 220kV/33kV
KSPDCL SS-1.
43
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
Multiple Trippings at 400kV/220kV
RTPS Station of KPCL and Complete
Outage of 220kV/110kV Sedam SS,
220kV/110kV Humnabad SS,
220kV/110kV Halburga SS,
220kV/110kV Shahpur SS,
220kV/110kV Shabad SS,
220kV/110kV Gulbarga SS,
220kV/110kV Bagewadi SS,
220kV/110kV Mallat SS and
220kV/110kv Lingasugur SS of
KPTCL: During antecedent conditions,
220kV Sedam Tandur, 220kV
Bagewadi Lingasugur Line-1&2,
220kV Bagewadi GM Navar Line-1&2
were under outage. Because of this,
220kV/110kV Sedam SS,
220kV/110kV Humnabad SS,
220kV/110kV Halburga SS,
220kV/110kV Shahpur SS,
SR/ 220kV/110kV Shabad SS,
21-05-2022
GD- SR 220kV/110kV Gulbarga SS, 1000 368 GD-1
11:21
23 220kV/110kV Bagewadi SS,
220kV/110kV Mallat SS and
220kV/110kV Lingasugur SS stations
were radially fed from 400kV/220kV
RTPS Station. At 11:21hrs,
400kV/220kV RTPS ICT-1&3 tripped
on over current protection. This
resulted in outage of 220kV level of
400kV/220kV RTPS Station. At the
same time, 220kV Lingasugur
Sindhanur line tripped on line fault .
This resulted in complete outage of
220kV/110kV Sedam SS,
220kV/110kV Humnabad SS,
220kV/110kV Halburga SS,
220kV/110kV Shahpur SS,
220kV/110kV Shabad SS,
220kV/110kV Gulbarga SS,
220kV/110kV Bagewadi SS,
220kV/110kV Mallat SS and
220kV/110kv Lingasugur SS.
44
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
Complete Outage of 220kV/110kV
Mahalingapura SS and 220kV/110kV
Soudatti SS of KPTCL: During
antecedent conditions, 220kV/110kV
Soudatti SS was radially fed from
220kV/110kV Mahalingapura SS. At
220kV/110kV Mahalingapura SS, all
220kV elements were connected to
SR/ 220kV Bus-2 . As per the reports
05-06-2022
GD- SR submitted, the triggering incident 13 86 GD-1
19:16
24 was R-N fault in 220kV Narendra
Mahalingapura Line-2. At
Mahalingapura end, Y-pole of the
breaker failed to open leading to LBB
operation . All the elements
connected to 220kV Bus-2 tripped .
This led to complete outage of
220kV/110kV Mahalingapura SS and
220kV/110kV Soudatti SS.
Complete Outage at 220kV/110kV
Haveri SS of KPTCL: In the
antecedent condition, all the
elements were connected to Bus-2 at
220kV Haveri SS and Bus coupler was
in closed condition. As per the
reports submitted, the triggering
SR/
07-06-2022 incident was the failure of B phase
GD- SR 0 0 GD-1
13:57 Bus-1 string insulators. However Bus
25
Bar did not operate at Haveri end.
Since Haveri Bus-1 did not clear the
fault, this led to the tripping of all the
lines connected to Haveri at remote
ends and Bus coupler got tripped on
EF. This led to the complete outage at
220kV/110kV Haveri SS.
Complete Outage of 400kV/110kV
Thappugundu SS of TANTRANSCO:
During antecedent conditions, 400kV
Anaikadavu Thappugundu line-2 was
under outage. As per the reports
SR/
08-06-2022 submitted, triggering incident was R-
GD- SR 67 6 GD-1
08:34 N fault in 400kV Anaikadavu
26
Thappugundu Line-1 and the line got
tripped. Tripping of the only
connected line resulted in complete
outage of 400kV/110kV
Thappugundu SS.
45
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
Complete Outage of 400kV/11kV
Tippapur SS and 400kV/11kV
Medaram SS of TSTRANSCO: During
antecedent conditions, 400kV
Singareni Ramadugu line-2 , 400kV
Ramadugu-Gajwel line-1, 400kV
Medaram Ramadugu line-2, 400kV
Tippapur Ramadugu line-2, 400kV
Tippapur Ramadugu line-2 and 400kV
SR/
17-06-2022 Tippapur Chandulapur line-1 were
GD- SR 0 0 GD-1
00:53 under outage . While charging 400kV
27
Singareni Ramadugu line-1 at 00:53
hrs, 400kV Ramadugu-Medaram-1,
400kV Ramadugu-Tippapur-1, 400kV
Tippapur-Jangaon-1 and 400kV
Tippapur-Chandlapur-2 tripped on
over voltage. Tripping of all
connected lines resulted in complete
outage of 400kV/11kV Tippapur SS
and 400kV/11kV Medaram SS.
Complete Outage of 220kV/132kV
Nellore AP SS of APTANSCO: As per
the reports submitted, the triggering
incident was Y-N fault in 220kV
Manubolu Nellore Line-3. At both
ends, A/R initiated and Y-pole
SR/
18-06-2022 opened. After 400ms, the relay could
GD- SR 0 220 GD-1
12:38 still sense the current in Y-phase and
28
LBB operated. All the elements
connected to 220kV Bus tripped.
Since 220kV Nellore AP SS was under
single bus operation, this led to
complete outage of 220kV/132kV
Nellore AP SS .
Complete Outage of 230kV/110kV
Theni SS of TANTRANSCO: As per the
reports submitted, the triggering
incident was LV side insulator failure
of 230kV/110kV Auto Transformer-2
SR/
21-06-2022 at Theni SS. Immediately, LBB
GD- SR 277 120 GD-1
14:53 operated and all the elements
29
connected to 230kV Bus tripped.
Since 230kV Theni SS was under
single bus operation. This resulted in
complete outage of 230kV/110kV
Theni SS.
46
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
Complete Outage of 220kV/132kV
Medchal SS of TSTRANSCO: As per
the reports submitted, the triggering
incident was 220kV BBP operation at
SR/
21-06-2022 220kV/132kV Medchal SS and all the
GD- SR 0 150 GD-1
19:34 elements connected to bus bar
30
tripped. Since 220kV Medchal was
under single bus operation, this
resulted in complete outage of
220kV/132kV Medchal SS.
Complete Outage of
220kV/110kV/11kV Areacode SS,
220kV/110kV/11kV Kanhirode SS,
220kV/110kV/11kV Orkattery,
220kV/110kV/33kV Taliparamba SS,
220kV/110kV/11kV Mylatty SS and
220kV/110kV Ambalathara SS of
KSEB: As per the reports submitted,
the triggering incident was Earth wire
SR/ snapping and falling on 220kV Bus-1
25-06-2022
GD- SR and Bus-2 at 220kV/110kV/11kV 0 404 GD-1
05:46
32 Areacode SS . 220kV Bus-1 and Bus-2
BBP operated and all the elements
connected to the Buses tripped
resulting in complete outage of
220kV/110kV/11kV Areacode SS .
Because of radial connection, this
also resulted in complete outage of
220kV/110kV/11kV Kanhirode SS,
220kV/110kV/11kV Orkattery,
220kV/110kV/33kV Taliparamba SS,
47
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
220kV/110kV/11kV Mylatty SS and
220kV/110kV Ambalathara SS.
48
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
220kV Bus Outage of 400kV/220kV
Kozhikode SS of PGCIL SR-2: During
antecedent conditions, all 220kV
elements were connected to Bus-2 as
SR/ Bus-1 was taken under shutdown at
26-04-2022
GI- SR 400kV/220kV Kozhikode SS. 97 0 GI-1
09:42
5 Triggering incident was B-N fault in
220kV Bus-2 and immediately BBP
operated resulting in the tripping of
all the elements connected to Bus-2
at Kozhikode SS.
Tripping of 110kV Bus at
400kV/230kV/110kV Kanarpathy SS
of TANTRANSCO: As per the report
submitted, the triggering incident
was the failure of 400kV/110kV
Kanarpathy ICT-3 LV side B-phase
bypass isolator towards the Bus side.
HV and LV side breakers of
SR/ 400kV/110kV Kanarpathy ICT-3 got
30-04-2022
GI- SR tripped on the operation of 261 0 GI-1
09:28
6 Differential protection. Since the fault
was not in the BBP zone and the fault
was persistent even after the tripping
of ICT#3, LV side backup OC
protection of ICT#3 operated, and
this initiated LBB resulting in the
tripping of all the elements
connected to 110kV Bus at
Kanarpathy.
Tripping of 400kV Bus-1 of
400kV/220kV Kalpakka SS of
APTRANSCO: As per the reports
SR/ submitted, 400kV Bus-1 Y-phase
01-05-2022
GI- SR differential protection operated at 0 0 GI-2
00:18
7 Kalpakka SS due to heavy tracking of
insulators. Immediately, BBP
operated and all the elements
connected to Bus-1 got tripped.
49
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
50
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
Bus-1 and Bus-3 at NCTPS.
51
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
52
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
Tripping of 400kV Bus-3 of
400kV/220kV Kalpakka SS of
APTRANSCO: As per the reports
submitted, triggering incident was
SR/
09-06-2022 Bus-3 Y-phase CT failure in Bus
GI- SR 0 0 GI-2
16:20 sectionalizer connecting Bus-3 and
17
Bus-1 . Immediately, BBP operated
and all the elements connected to
400kV Bus-3 got tripped at
400kV/220kV Kalpakka SS.
Tripping of 400kV Bus-1 at
400kV/220kV Nelamangala SS of
KPTCL: In the antecedent conditions
due to link rod cut in the limb to R-ph
Breaker of 400kV Neelamangala-
Hassan line the limb was closed
without opening. With the closing of
isolator for preparatory works,
voltage was observed only in the R-
phase limb for 400kV Nelamangala-
Hassan feeder. As per the reports
submitted, the triggering incident
was the closing of 400kV
Nelamangala-Talaguppa line at
Nelamangala end after which a fault
SR/
15-06-2022 current was observed feeding 400kV
GI- SR 0 0 GI-2
17:56 Nelamangala-Hassan feeder for 1 min
18
30 sec of a magnitude of around 3kA
in R-phase. As the fault was being
fed for 1min and 30 sec, 400/220kV
ICT-2 at Nelamangala tripped on
operation of backup Earth fault
protection, 400kV Nelamangala-
Bidadi-1 and 2 , 400kV Nelamangala-
Devanahalli and 400kV Yelahanka-
Nelamangala tripped on directional
earth fault at Bidadi, Devanahalli and
Yelahanka ends respectively. At the
same time, LBB of 400kV Mysore
Nelamangala line-2 maloperated at
Nelamangala end causing tripping of
400kV Bus-1 at Nelamangala SS.
53
Category as
Generati Load
S. Outage Date & per CEA
Region Event on Loss Loss
No. time Grid
(MW) (MW)
Standards
Tripping of 400kV Bus-2 at
400kV/220kV Guttur SS of KPTCL: As
per the reports submitted, the
SR/ triggering incident was the
17-06-2022
GI- SR maloperation of Zone 2 Bus Bar 0 0 GI-2
16:51
19 protection operation in 400kV Bus-2
at 400kV/220kV Guttur SS.
Immediately, all the elements
connected to the Bus-2 tripped.
2 May-22 NIL
3 Jun-22
54
Annexure IV: Details of Fault Level calculations
Note: The calculation of short circuit levels has been done using IEC 60909 Fault calculation method in
PSS/E platform.
3-phase
Voltage 3-phase Short
Bus Name Short Circuit
Level circuit MVA
current (kA)
CHINAKMPALLI 28582 41
CUDDAPA GIS 28582 41
MHSWRM-PG 32248 47
MAHES-TS 32309 47
400 kV RAICHUR TPS 28823 42
TUMKUR 27782 40
RAICHUR-PG 30128 43
TIRUNELVELLI 31421 45
PUGALUR 27825 40
55
Annexure V.A: Graphs indicating Transmission Line Constraints in Southern Region
Figure – A1
Figure – A2
56
Figure – A3
Figure – A4
57
Figure – A5
Figure – A6
58
Figure – A7
Figure – A8
59
Figure – A9
Figure – A10
60
Figure – A11
Figure – A12
61
Figure – A13
Figure – A14
62
Figure – A15
Figure – A16
63
Figure – A17
Figure – A18
64
Figure – A19
Figure – A20
65
Figure – A21
Figure – A22
66
Figure – A23
Figure – A24
67
Figure – A25
Figure – A26
68
Figure – A27
Figure – A28
69
Figure – A29
Figure – A30
70
Figure – A31
Figure – A32
71
Figure – A33
Figure – A34
72
Figure – A35
Figure – A36
73
Figure – A37
Figure – A38
74
Figure – A39
Figure – A40
75
Figure – A41
Figure – A42
76
Figure – A43
Figure – A44
77
Figure – A45
Figure – A46
78
Figure – A47
Figure – A48
79
Figure – A49
Figure – A50
80
Figure – A51
Figure – A52
81
Figure – A53
Figure – A54
82
Figure – A55
Figure – A56
83
Figure – B1
Figure – B2
84
Figure – B3
Figure – B4
85
Figure – B5
Figure – B6
86
Figure – B7
Figure – B8
87
Figure – B9
Figure – B10
88
Figure – B11
Figure – B12
89
Figure – B13
Figure – B14
90
Figure – B15
Figure – B16
91
Figure – B17
Figure – B18
92
Figure – B19
Figure – B20
93
Figure – B21
Figure – B22
94
Figure – B23
Figure – B24
95
Figure – B25
Figure – B26
96
Figure – B27
Figure – B28
97
Figure – B29
Figure – B30
98
Figure – B31
Annexure V.C: Graphs Indicating Nodes Experiencing Low Voltage in Southern Region
99
Figure – C1
Figure – C2
100
Figure – C3
Figure – C4
101
Figure – C5
Figure – C6
102
Figure – C7
Figure – C8
103
Figure – C9
Figure – C10
104
Figure – C11
Figure – C12
105
Figure – C13
Figure – C14
106
Figure – C15
Annexure V.D: Graphs Indicating Nodes Experiencing High Voltage in Southern Region
107
Figure – D1
Figure – D2
108
Figure – D3
Figure – D4
109
Figure – D5
Figure – D6
110
Figure – D7
Figure – D8
111
Figure – D9
Figure – D10
112
Figure – D11
Figure – D12
113
Figure – D13
Figure – D14
114
Figure – D15
Figure – D16
115
Figure – D17
Figure – D18
116
Figure – D19
Figure – D20
117
Figure – D21
Figure – D22
118
Figure – D23
Figure – D24
119
Figure – D25
Figure – D26
120
Figure – D27
Figure – D28
121
Figure – D29
Figure – D30
122
Figure – D31
Figure – D32
123
Figure – D33
Figure – D34
124
Figure – D35
Figure – D36
125
Figure – D37
Figure – D38
126
Figure – D39
Figure – D40
127
Figure – D41
Figure – D42
128
Figure – D43
Figure – D44
129
Figure – D45
Figure – D46
130
Figure – D47
Figure – D48
131
Figure – D49
Figure – D50
132
Figure – D51
Figure – D52
133
Figure – D53
Figure – D54
134
Figure – D55
Figure – D56
135
Figure – D57
Figure – D58
136
Figure – D59
Figure – D60
137
Figure – D61
Figure – D62
138
Figure – D63
Figure – D64
139
Figure – D65
Figure – D66
140
Figure – D67
Figure – D68
141
Figure – D69
Figure – D70
142
Figure – D71
Figure – D72
143
Figure – D73
Figure – D74
144
Figure – D75
Figure – D76
145
Figure – D77
Figure – D78
146
Figure – D79
Figure – D80
147
148
SRLDC - Quarterly Grid Report 2022-23