INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: ZOSIMA A. GILLO Name of Rater: CORNELIA D. ESQUIERDO

Position: TEACHER III Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BALANGIGA CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Date of Review: April 30, 2019
Rating Period: JUNE 2018 - APRIL 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied June 2018- Quality No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.300
Services Knowledge and knowledge of March 2019 evidence was
Pedagogy content within and Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge shown Showed knowledge
across curriculum of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within integration within
and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
7.5%
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4 of 6
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted any 1 of
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV the given MOV evidence was the given MOV
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by shown
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range June 2019- Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable Facilitated using 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services of teaching March 2020 different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was different teaching
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown strategies that
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 6

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Facilitated using
learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was different teaching
lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently shown strategies that
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any of the promote reading
and supported by and supported by and supported by other given MOV writing and/or
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other numeracy skills as
MOV given MOV given MOV given shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range June 2019- Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable Used different 4 4 4.000 0.300
Services Knowledge and of teaching March 2020 teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was teaching strategies
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown that develop critical
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or
thinking, as well other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
as other higher shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 5
skills. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted 2
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any of the other shown evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by given MOV 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed June 2019- Quality No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services Environment classroom March 2020 Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom evidence was Used classroom
and Diversity of structure to management management management management shown management
Learners engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
individually or in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in engage learners in
groups, in activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
meanigful shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
exploration, 7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
with a rating of 4 with a rating of 5
discovery and Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 3
hands-on supported by any of evidence was
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
activities within a the acceptable shown
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
range of physical MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
learning acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
environments. Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed June 2019- Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable Applied teacher 4 4 4.000 0.300
Services learner behavior March 2020 management management management management evidence was management
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown strategies of learner
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment 7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 5
Services learner behavior March 2020
constructively by
applying positive
and non-violent
discipline to
ensure learning-
focused Performance Indicators
environment 7.5% Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 4
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies evidence was of the given
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only shown strategies as
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson observed in 2
4 lessons lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used June 2019- Quality Applied Applied Applied No acceptable Applied 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services Environment differentiated, March 2020 differentiated Applied differentiated differentiated evidence was differentiated
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies differentiated teaching strategies teaching strategies shown teaching strategies
Learners appropriate to address learner teaching strategies to address learner to address learner to address learner
learning diversity as shown to address learner diversity as shown diversity as shown diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 rating of 4 rating of 4
gender, needs, rating of 6
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable Submitted any 1
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was differentiated
7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in shown teaching strategy in
experiences.
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as only 1 lesson as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV evidently shown in evidently shown in
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, June 2019- Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable Planned and 5 4 4.500 0.337
Services and Planning managed and March 2020 implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was implemented
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown developmentally
developmentally sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
sequenced and learning and learning and learning and learning and learning
teaching and process as shown process as shown process as shown process as shown process as shown
learning in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
processes to meet rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 rating of 5
curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3
varied teaching 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was developmentally
contexts. sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching shown sequenced teaching
and learning and learning and learning and learning and learning
process as process as process as process as process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV supported by any 1
of the other given of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in June 2019- Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable Rarely participated 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services and Planning collegial March 2020 participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was in LAC/FGD/
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown meeting to discuss
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner teacher/learner
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich feedback to enrich
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as instruction as
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted submitted
7.5% submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable Participated in 1

least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was LAC/FGD/meeting
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently as evidently shown shown as evidently shown
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the given in any 1 of the given
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV MOV MOV
the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, June 2019- Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable Developed and 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services developed, March 2020 used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was used varied
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown teaching and
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning address learning address learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4 of 5
goals.
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable Submitted 2 varied
7.5%
teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was teaching and
Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown learning resources,
varied teaching and including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
learning resources, evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
including ICT, as MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the MOV 1 and
evidently shown in supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV supported by any 1
MOV 1 and of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
supported by any 1 MOV MOV MOV
of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, June 2019- Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable Designed, selected, 4 4 4 0.3
Services and Reporting selected, March 2020 organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was organized and used
organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, shown diagnostic,
used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and formative and
formative and summative summative summative summative summative
summative assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5%
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 6

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 2 varied
varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was assessment tools
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown as evidently shown
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the in any 1 of the
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and June 2019- Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable Frequently 5 4 4 4.333 0.324
Services evaluated learner March 2020 monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was monitored and
progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown evaluated learner
achievement progress and progress and progress and and achievement progress and
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner achievement using
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as learner attainment
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV data as shown in
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted the MOV submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted a
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was combination of 3 of
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown across 2 quarters
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica June 2019- Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable Occasionally 4 4 4 4 0.3
Services and Reporting ted promptly and March 2020 showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear evidence was showed prompt and
clearly the clear communication of clear communication of shown clear
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs,
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key progress and
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders,
guardians. including parents/ guardians as shown including parents/ guardians as shown including parents/
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown
7.5% in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted a

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was combination of 2 of
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown across 2 quarters
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2019- Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable Occasionally 5 4 4.500 0.450
Services various related March 2020 performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was performed various
works/activities related related related work/activities that shown related
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the work/activities that
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning contribute to the
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown teaching learning
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV process as shown
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted in the MOV
submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted 2

different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown acceptable MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
Very Satisfactory 4.111
rm-09072018 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory ZOSIMA A. GILLO CORNELIA D. ESQUIERDO LETECIA E. OPONG
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)
Name of Employee: ZOSIMA A. GILLO Name of Rater: CORNELIA D. ESQUIERDO
Position: TEACHER III Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BALANGIGA CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOODate of Review: April 30, 2019
Rating Period: JUNE 2018 - APRIL 2019

Numerical Ratings
Weight per Weight per
KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective
Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 3 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 4 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 7 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 9 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 10 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5 4 4 4.333 0.324
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5 4 4.500 0.450
Final Rating Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating 4.111

ZOSIMA A. GILLO CORNELIA D. ESQUIERDO LETECIA E. OPONG

rm-09072018 Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV
Name of Employee: LUDIVICA B. SARANZA Name of Rater: LETECIA E. OPONG
Position: MASTER TEACHER II Position: PRINCIPAL III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED. SALCEDO CES, EASTERN SAMAR Date of Review: April 25, 2019
Rating Period: JUNE 2018 - APRIL 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective JUNE 2019 - Quality No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.300
Services Knowledge and applications of content MARCH 2020 Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective evidence was Modeled effective
Pedagogy knowledge within and applications of applications of applications of applications of shown applications of
across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across within and across within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5 of 7
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted 3 lessons
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was as evidenced by
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV MOV 1 from shown MOV 1 from
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues 1 from colleagues colleagues and colleagues and
any 1 of the other and supported by and supported by supported by any 1 supported by any 1
MOV given any 1 of the other any 1 of the other of the other MOV of the other MOV
MOV given MOV given given given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with JUNE 2019 - Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action Proposedaction No acceptable Conducted action 4 3 3 3.333 0.249
Services colleagues in the MARCH 2020 completed and completed action research with research with evidence was research with
conduct and application disseminated action research with colleagues colleagues shown colleagues
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable Submitted any 2
7.5%
of the given MOV the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was MOV
MOV shown
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable Conducted the
research report research report research report research report evidence was research report
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating shown within the rating
period period period period period
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and JUNE 2019 - Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable Demonstrated 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services Knowledge and applied effective MARCH 2020 effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching evidence was effective teaching
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to shown strategies to
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other higher- well as other higher- well as other higher- well as other higher- well as other higher-
thinking skills. order thinking skills order thinking skills order thinking skills order thinking skills order thinking skills
as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 6
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted 2 lessons
more lessons as lessons as evidently lessons as evidently as evidently shown evidence was as evidently shown
evidently shown in shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and and supported by and supported by supported by any of supported by any 1
supported by any 1 any 1 of the other any 1 of the other the other MOV of the other MOV
of the other MOV MOV given MOV given given given
given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with JUNE 2019 - Quality No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services Environment and colleagues to model and MARCH 2020 Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and evidence was Modeled and
Diversity of share effective shared effective shared effective shared effective
shared effective shown shared effective
Learners techniques in the classroom classroom classroom classroom classroom
management of management management management management management
classroom structure to strategies that strategies that strategies thatstrategies that strategies that
engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in groups, activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
in meaningful done in different done in different done in different
done in different done in different
exploration, discovery physical learning physical learning physical learning
physical learning physical learning
7.5%
and hands-on activities environments as environments as environments asenvironments as environments as
within a range of shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
physical learning with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
with a rating of 5 with a rating of 6
environments.environme Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
nts. Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 3 lessons
supported by any of evidence was
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported supported by MOV
the acceptable shown
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any 1 and any 1 of the
MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other other acceptable
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective JUNE 2019 - Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective No acceptable Exhibited effective 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services Environment and and constructive MARCH 2020 and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive evidence was and constructive
Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior behavior behavior shown behavior
Learners skills by applying management skills management skills management skills management skills management skills
positive and non-violent by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
learning-focused discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
environments. learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused
7.5% environments environments environments environments environments
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 7

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable Applied at least 7 of
the given strategies the given strategies the given strategies given strategies as evidence was the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2 observed in only 1 shown as observed in 3
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson lessons
 environments.
7.5%

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at Performance Indicators

least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable Applied at least 7 of Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight the Outstanding
given strategies Very
the given strategies the Satisfactory
given strategies Unsatisfactory
given Poor
strategies as evidence was theActual Results
given strategies Ave Score
QET as observed
(5) in at asSatisfactory
observed in 3(4) as observed(3) in 2 observed(2)
in only 1 shown (1) as observed in 3 Q E T
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson lessons
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 6. Worked with JUNE 2019 - Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable Worked with 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services colleagues to share MARCH 2020 colleagues at least colleagues in the colleagues but no colleagues but no evidence was colleagues in the
differentiated, in the department or evidence of sharing evidence of sharing shown department or grade
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share with others with others level to share
appropriate to share lesson lesson lesson
opportunities to address
Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable Submitted at least 1
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson, as evidence was lesson as evidently
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 evidenced by either shown shown in MOV 1
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by and supported by MOV 2 or 3 but no and supported by
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable any acceptable evidence of sharing any acceptable
MOV MOV MOV with others MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and JUNE 2019 - Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable Developed and 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services Planning applied effective MARCH 2020 applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective evidence was applied effective
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing shown strategies showing
planning and developmentally- developmentally- developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
developmentally and learning and learning and learning and learning and learning
sequenced teaching and process as shown process as shown process as shown process as shown process as shown in
learning processes to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a rating
meet curriculum rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 of 6
requirements and varied 7.5%
teaching contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted 2-3
lessons as lessons as as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence was lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown evidenced by MOV
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and and/or 2 and acceptable MOV 1 and 2 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with JUNE 2019 - Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable Frequently led 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services Planning colleagues, teacher and MARCH 2020 participated in collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was collaborative
learner feedback to LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown reviews of teacher
plan, facilitate and gs to discuss and learner and learner and learner and learner
enrich teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
feedback to enrich evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the
instruction as MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3

7.5%
collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative review evidence was collaborative
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher of teacher and shown reviews of teacher
and learner and learner and learner learner feedback as and learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as evidently shown in feedback as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in any of the evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and acceptable MOV MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided JUNE 2019 - Quality Consistently Frequently advised Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable Consistently 5 4 4.500 0.337
Services colleagues in the MARCH 2020 advised colleagues colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was advised colleagues
selection, organization, in the selection, selection, in the selection, selection, shown in the selection,
development and use of organization, organization, organization, organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and development and development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
address specific learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources
learning goals. as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted at least 4

teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was teaching and
learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resource shown learning resources
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by as evidenced by at
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the any of the least 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked JUNE 2019 - Quality Consistently Frequently reviewed Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable Consistently 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services and Reporting collaboratively with MARCH 2020 reviewed collaboratively reviewed collaboratively evidence was reviewed
colleagues to review the collaboratively assessment tools collaboratively assessment tools shown collaboratively
design, selection, assessment tools with colleagues as assessment tools with colleagues as assessment tools
organization and use of with colleagues as shown in the MOV with colleagues as shown in the MOV with colleagues as
a range of effective shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
diagnostic, formative submitted submitted submitted
7.5%
and summative
assessment strategies Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted at least 4
consistent with assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was assessment tools as
curriculum requirements. as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown evidently shown in
in any of the in any of the in any of the any of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted JUNE 2019 - Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable Consistently 5 5 5 0.375
Services and Reporting collaboratively MARCH 2020 collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with with colleagues in evidence was collaborated with
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the the interpretation of shown colleagues in the
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of assessment data as interpretation of
attainment data to assessment data as assessment data as assessment data as shown in the MOV assessment data as
support learner progress shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
7.5%
and achievement. submitted submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 2
different types of of the same kind of of the same kind of the MOV evidence was different types of
MOV MOV MOV shown MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the JUNE 2019 - Quality Consistently applied Frequently applied Occasionally Rarely applied skills No acceptable Frequently applied 4 4 4.000 0.300
Services effective communication MARCH 2020 skills in the effective skills in the effective applied skills in the in the effective evidence was skills in the effective
of learner needs, communication of communication of effective communication of shown communication of
progress and learner needs and learner needs and communication of learner needs and learner needs and
achievement to key progress to parents/ progress to parents/ learner needs and progress to parents/ progress to parents/
stakeholders, including guardians as shown guardians as shown progress to parents/ guardians as shown guardians as shown
parents/guardians. in the MOV in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV in the MOV
7.5% submitted submitted in the MOV submitted submitted
submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 Submitted any 3
of the acceptable MOV MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various JUNE 2019 - Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable Consistently 4 4 4.000 0.400
Services related works/activities MARCH 2020 performed special performed special performed special special tasks and/or evidence was performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or tasks and/or assignments as shown tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as assignments as shown in the MOV assignments as
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
10% submitted submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 4
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown acceptable MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
Very Satisfactory 4.136
rm-09072018 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory LUDIVICA B. SARANZA LETECIA E. OPONG HENRIETTA T. MANAGBANAG, Ph. D.
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: LUDIVICA B. SARANZA Name of Rater: LETECIA E. OPONG

Position: MASTER TEACHER II Position: PRINCIPAL III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED. SALCEDO CES, EASTERN SAMAR Date of Review: April 25, 2019
Rating Period: JUNE 2018 - APRIL 2019

Numerical Ratings
Weight per Weight per
KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective
Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4 3 3 3.333 0.249
Objective 3 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 4 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 7 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 9 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 10 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 4 4 4.000 0.400
Final Rating 4.136
Adjectival Rating Very Satisfactory

LUDIVICA B. SARANZA LETECIA E. OPONG HENRIETTA T. MANAGBANAG, Ph. D.

rm-09072018 Ratee Rater Rater Approving Authority