EDITED IPCRF 2018-2019 For Teacher I-III Final

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
Name of Employee: GINAH O. MEA Name of Rater: EDNA M. KATIGBAK

Position: TEACHER III Position: PRINCIPAL I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Date of Review:
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Actual Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Ave Score
QET Results
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Quality No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Education Knowledge knowledge of evidence was
Services and content within shown
Pedagogy and across
Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of
curriculum
content and its content and its content and its content and its
teaching areas.
integration within and integration within and integration within and integration within and
across subject areas as across subject areas as across subject areas as across subject areas as
shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
lessons using MOV 1 and using MOV 1 and using MOV 1 and given MOV evidence was
supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of shown
the other given MOV the other given MOV the other given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Education range of different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
Services teaching strategies that promote strategies that promote strategies that promote strategies that promote shown
strategies that reading writing and/or reading writing and/or reading writing and/or reading writing and/or
enhance numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
learner shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
schievement in rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
literacy and
numeracy
skills
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 learner- Submitted 2 learner- Submitted 1 learner- No acceptable
learner-centered lessons centered lessons as centered lessons as centered lessons as evidence was
as evidently shown in evidently shown in MOV evidently shown in MOV evidently shown in any shown
MOV 1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 and supported by any of the other given MOV
any 1 of the other MOV 1 of the other MOV given 1 of the other MOV given
given
Timeliness
Actual Rating
QET Results
Basic 1. Content 3. Applied a Quality Used different teaching Used different teaching Used different teaching Used different teaching No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Education Knowledge range of strategies that develop strategies that develop strategies that develop strategies that develop evidence was
Services and teaching critical and creative critical and creative critical and creative critical and creative shown
Pedagogy strategies to thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or
develop critical other HOTS as shown in other HOTS as shown in other HOTS as shown in other HOTS as shown in
and creative MOV 1 with a rating of 7 MOV 1 with a rating of 6 MOV 1 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating of 4
thinking, as
well as other
higher order
thinking skills.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons as Submitted 2 lessons as Submitted 1 lesson as No acceptable
lessons as evidenced by evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by any of the evidence was
MOV 1 and supported by supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of other given MOV shown
any 1 of the other given the other given MOV the other given MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Education Environment classroom evidence was
Services and Diversity structure to shown
of Learners engage Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
learners, management strategies management strategies management strategies management strategies
individually or that engage learners in that engage learners in that engage learners in that engage learners in
in groups, in activities/tasks as shown activities/tasks as shown activities/tasks as shown activities/tasks as shown
meanigful in MOV 1 with a rating of in MOV 1 with a rating of in MOV 1 with a rating of in MOV 1 with a rating of
exploration, 7 6 5 4
discovery and
hands-on
activities
within a range
of physical Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
learning supported by any of the evidence was
environments. acceptable MOV shown
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons
lessons supported by supported by MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and any 1 of the any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
other acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Education learner management strategies management strategies management strategies management strategies evidence was
Services behavior of learner behavior that of learner behavior that of learner behavior that of learner behavior that shown
constructively promote positive and promote positive and promote positive and promote positive and
by applying non-violent discipline as non-violent discipline as non-violent discipline as non-violent discipline as
positive and shown in MOV submitted shown in MOV submitted shown in MOV submitted shown in MOV submitted
non-violent with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
discipline to
ensure
learning-
focused
environment
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 of Submitted at least 4 of Submitted at least 4 of Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
the given strategies as the given strategies as the given strategies as given strategies as evidence was
observed in at least 4 observed in 3 lessons observed in 2 lessons observed in only 1 lesson shown
lessons
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 of Submitted at least 4 of Submitted at least 4 of Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
the given strategies as the given strategies as the given strategies as given strategies as evidence was
observed in at least 4 observed in 3 lessons observed in 2 lessons observed in only 1 lesson shown
lessons
Timeliness
Actual Rating
QET Results
Basic 2. Learning 6. Used Quality No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Education Environment differentiated, evidence was
Services and Diversity developmentall Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated shown
of Learners y appropriate teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to
learning address learner diversity address learner diversity address learner diversity address learner diversity
experiences to as shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1 with
address a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4
learners’
gender, needs,
strengths,
interests and Efficiency No acceptable
experiences. evidence was
shown
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
Submitted any 1
differentiated teaching differentiated teaching differentiated teaching
differentiated teaching
strategies in at least 2 strategies in at least 2 strategies in 2 lessons
strategy in only 1 lesson
lessons as evidenced by lessons as evidenced by as evidenced by MOV 1
as evidently shown in
MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and supported by and supported by any 1
any 1 of the acceptable
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other of the other acceptable
MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Education and Planning managed and evidence was
Services implemented Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and shown
developmentall implemented implemented implemented implemented
y sequenced developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
teaching and sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and
learning learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
processes to shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
meet rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
curriculum
requirements
and varied
Efficiency No acceptable
teaching
evidence was
contexts.
shown
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
Submitted 1
developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally
sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and
sequenced teaching and
learning process as learning process as learning process as
learning process as
evidently shown in MOV evidently shown in MOV evidently shown in MOV
evidently shown in any 1
1 and supported by any 1 and supported by any 1 and supported by any
of the given MOV
1 of the other given MOV 1 of the other given MOV 1 of the other given MOV
Timeliness
Actual Rating
QET Results
Basic 3. Curriculum 8. Participated Quality Consistently participated Frequently participated Occasionally participated Rarely participated in No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Education and Planning in collegial in LACs/FGDs/meetings in LACs/FGDs/meetings in LACs/FGDs/ meetings LAC/FGD/ meeting to evidence was
Services discussions to discuss to discuss to discuss discuss teacher/learner shown
that use teacher/learner feedback teacher/learner feedback teacher/learner feedback feedback to enrich
teacher and to enrich instruction as to enrich instruction as to enrich instruction as instruction as shown in
learner shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV the MOV submitted
feedback to submitted submitted submitted
enrich
teaching
practice.
Efficiency Participated in at least 4 Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable

LACs/FGDs/meetings as LACs/FGDs/meetings as LACs/FGDs/meetings as LAC/FGD/meeting as evidence was
evidently shown in any 1 evidently shown in any 1 evidently shown in any 1 evidently shown in any 1 shown
of the given MOV of the given MOV of the given MOV of the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, Quality Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Education developed, varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and evidence was
Services organized and learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, shown
used including ICT, to address including ICT, to address including ICT, to address including ICT, to address
appropriate learning goals as shown learning goals as shown learning goals as shown learning goals as shown
teaching and in MOV 1 with a rating of in MOV 1 with a rating of in MOV 1 with a rating of in MOV 1 with a rating of
learning 7 6 5 4
resources,
including ICT,
to address
learning goals.
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any teaching No acceptable

teaching and learning teaching and learning and learning resource, evidence was
resources, including ICT, resources, including ICT, including ICT, as shown
as evidently shown in as evidently shown in evidently shown in any
MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and supported by of the acceptable MOV
any 1 of the acceptable any 1 of the acceptable
MOV MOV
Submitted at least 4
varied teaching and
learning resources,
including ICT, as
evidently shown in MOV
1 and supported by any
1 of the acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Actual Rating
QET Results
Basic 4. 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Education Assessment selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was
Services and organized and diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative shown
Reporting used and summative and summative and summative and summative
diagnostic, assessment strategies assessment strategies assessment strategies assessment strategies
formative and consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
summative curriculum requirements curriculum requirements curriculum requirements curriculum requirements
assessment as shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1 with
strategies a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4
consistent with
curriculum
requirements.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 assessment No acceptable
varied assessment tools assessment tools as assessment tools as tool as evidently shown evidence was
as evidently shown in evidently shown in any 1 evidently shown in any in any of the acceptable shown
any 1 of the acceptable of the acceptable MOV 1 of the acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored Quality Consistently monitored Frequently monitored Occasionally monitored Rarely monitored and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Education and evaluated and evaluated learner and evaluated learner and evaluated learner evaluated learner evidence was
Services learner progress and progress and progress and progress and shown
progress and achievement using achievement using achievement using achievement using
achievement learner attainment data learner attainment data learner attainment data learner attainment data
using learner as shown in the MOV as shown in the MOV as shown in the MOV as shown in the MOV
attainment submitted submitted submitted submitted
data.
Efficiency Submitted a combination Submitted a combination Submitted 1 acceptable No acceptable

of at least 4 of the of 2 of the acceptable MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV Submitted a combination MOV shown
of 3 of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 evidence was
quarters quarters quarters quarter shown
Actual Rating
QET Results
Basic 4. 12.Communica Quality Consistently showed Frequently showed Occasionally showed Rarely showed prompt No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Education Assessment ted promptly prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear and clear evidence was
Services and and clearly the communication of the communication of the communication of the communication of the shown
Reporting learners’ learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs,
needs, progress and progress and progress and progress and
progress and achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key
achievement stakeholders, including stakeholders, including stakeholders, including stakeholders, including
to key parents/ guardians as parents/ guardians as parents/ guardians as parents/ guardians as
stakeholders, shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
including submitted submitted submitted submitted
parents/
guardians.
Efficiency Submitted a combination Submitted a combination Submitted a combination Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
of at least 4 of the of 3 of the acceptable of 2 of the acceptable given MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV MOV MOV shown
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently performed Frequently performed Occasionally performed Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Education various related various related various related various related various related evidence was
Services works/activities work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that shown
that contribute contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the
to the teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning
teaching- process as shown in the process as shown in the process as shown in the process as shown in the
learning MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
process.
10%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 different Submitted 2 different Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
different kinds of kinds of acceptable MOV kinds of acceptable MOV acceptable MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV shown
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory DONNA M. DE TORRES EDNA M. KATIGBAK EDNA M. KATIGBAK
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)
Name of Employee: DONNA M. DE TORRES Name of Rater: EDNA M. KATIGBAK

Position: TEACHER III Position: PRINCIPAL I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Date of Review: APRIL 8,2019
Rating Period: JUNE 2018- APRIL 2019
Numerical Ratings
Weight per Weight per
KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective
Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Objective 12 7.5% 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!
DONNA M. DE TORRES ARNEL C. LUCING EDNA M. KATIGBAK

Ratee Rater Approving Authority

EDITED IPCRF 2018-2019 For Teacher I-III Final

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

EDITED IPCRF 2018-2019 For Teacher I-III Final

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: GINAH O. MEA Name of Rater: EDNA M. KATIGBAK

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Efficiency Participated in at least 4 Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable

Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any teaching No acceptable

Efficiency Submitted a combination Submitted a combination Submitted 1 acceptable No acceptable

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

Name of Employee: DONNA M. DE TORRES Name of Rater: EDNA M. KATIGBAK

DONNA M. DE TORRES ARNEL C. LUCING EDNA M. KATIGBAK

You might also like