Title mini-lesson:

Names presenters:

A. Content /10
- Are main issues clearly identified and presented?
- Is the background information provided sufficient and relevant to the stated
topic or theme of the presentation? Is the background information in
proportion to the rest of the presentation (i.e. not too long, not too short)?
- Is the way the topic is treated sufficiently linked to the theme of the course:
The Second Language Acquisition of English ?
- Are sufficient previous studies on the chosen topic referred to?
- Are general trends and findings from previous research on the chosen topic
clearly synthesized and illustrated by examples? Are these examples clear or
sufficiently discussed?
- Is the presentation sufficiently personal/critical, i.e. has an attempt been
made to integrate the information collected from the literature into a coherent
whole rather than a mere summing up of individual studies, facts, issues,
statements and quotes from the literature?
- Do you have the impression that you have learned something (or enough)
from this mini-lesson?

B. Form /10

• Language:
- Has the presentation been delivered in sufficiently accurate and fluent
English?
- Is the English stylistically appropriate to the task and register at hand (i.e.
spoken academic English)?

• Structure & Coherence:

- Is the presentation well-structered, with a clear organisation and division
into sub-sections?
- Is the information presented in a coherent and logical order?
- Is the transition between the different sections and between the different
presenters (if applicable) sufficiently smooth and logical? Is there a more
or less equal division of labour between the presenters?

• Slides:
- Are the slides sufficiently informative, well-structured, with a clear lay-out
and easy to process?
- Do the slides sufficiently complement or support the information provided
orally?
- Is the handout (if any) sufficiently clear and useful?

Suggested final mark: /20