Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Validity of Survivorship Analysis in Total.10
The Validity of Survivorship Analysis in Total.10
BY FREDERICK DOREY, PH.D.t, AND HARLAN C. AMSTUTZ, M.D.t, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
/rom the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery. University of California, Los Angeles. School of Medicine, Los Angeles
ABSTRACT: The use of survivorship analysis re- tient’s status at the time of follow-up is unknown. According
quires an assumption that patients who are lost to follow- to follow-up procedures at the University of California at
up are no more or less likely to be at risk of failure of Los Angeles, patients who are lost to follow-up are those
an operation or a procedure than are patients who are who were due for a follow-up visit but who did not respond
still being followed. This is a major assumption in long- to a written request for a follow-up evaluation. This lack
term orthopaedic studies, in which a high percentage of of response may be due to factors that were not related to
patients are usually lost to follow-up. the status of the arthroplasty, such as the patient’s having
We compared the survivorship curve for the first relocated, having died, or having been dissatisfied with the
100 Tharies replacements done at our institution (which inconvenience of returning for follow-up examination.
were completed by September 1977), using data that The first long-term survivorship analysis for Tharies
were collected in the standard way up to 1985, through replacements was performed in 1985 and was based on all
a letter requesting a follow-up visit, with the curve for 585 patients who had had a Tharies replacement’. At that
the same patients that was based on almost complete time, a substantial number of patients were lost to follow-
follow-up data that were gathered by telephone from up, as is common in long-term orthopaedic studies com-
1985 on. The similarity of the two curves suggested that prising large numbers of patients. The usual method of
the assumptions that are necessary for the validity of survivorship analysis treats patients who are lost to follow-
survivorship analysis are reasonable, even in the ortho- up similarly to those who are still being followed and who
paedic setting, in which many patients are lost to follow- have not yet had a failed result. Both groups of patients are
up. referred to as being censored at the time of the most recent
The usefulness of the survivorship curve for pre- follow-up.
diction was also evaluated by comparing the curve based A major assumption of the survivorship analysis is that
on the first forty-six of the 100 Tharies replacements the mechanism of censorship is independent from the mech-
(before 1977) with the curve based on the last fifty-four anism of failure. This assumption becomes a problem if the
such operations (from January 1977 to September 1977). reason for the patient’s being lost to follow-up is related to
The results of these two comparisons suggest that the present status of the prosthesis.
survivorship analysis is a valid technique to use in the Another valid concern pertains to the use of the sur-
long-term evaluation of patients who have had a joint vivorship curve as a predictive tool. If such a curve does
replacement. not have some predictability for future implants in similar
patients under similar conditions, its use as an analytical
Survivorship analysis in the evaluation of total joint tool is limited.
arthroplasty has recently come into common use as an an- In this study, we used results of the first 100 Tharies
alytical technique, and it may soon be the preferred method replacements to investigate these concerns. We compared
of analysis of long-term clinical studies28. Of major con- the 1985 Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve7 (based on the
cern is the independent assumption that patients who are routine follow-up procedures at our institution, and hence-
lost to follow-up are no more or less likely to have had an forth referred to as the standard 1985 curve) with the 1985
operation that failed than are patients who are still being curve that would have been obtained ifthere had been almost
followed. complete follow-up data available for all patients (referred
A patient is considered to be lost to follow-up if he or to as the complete 1985 curve). In this comparison, we were
she missed the most recent follow-up visit, so that the pa- investigating the validity of the independence of the lost-
to-follow-up assumption.
* No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from In addition, in order to evaluate the predictive ability
a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject ofthis article.
No funds were received in support of this study.
of a survivorship curve, we compared the standard 1985
t Division of Orthopaedic Surgery. University of California, Los Kaplan-Meier curve, based on patients who had an operation
Angeles, School of Medicine, Center for the Health Sciences, 10833 Le
Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90024-6902. Please address re-
before 1977, with the complete 1987 curve, based on pa-
quests for reprints to Dr. Dorey. tients who had an operation in 1977. In this second com-
DATA ON THE FIRST ONE HUNDRED THARIES PROSTHES ES, IMPLANTED BE TWEEN JUNE 1975 AND SEPTEMBER 1977*
Etiology
Osteoarthritis 26 19 37
Osteonecrosis 21 19 23
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 11/13/2023
parison, the usefulness of the survivorship curve as a prosthesis and had not been seen since 1984. This search
predictor of future results was assessed. consisted of reviewing the charts and using any available
information on patients, friends, and relatives that could be
Materials and Methods used for contacting the patients by telephone. Information
At the University of California, Los Angeles, the nor- on all subsequent operations for revision (our definition of
mal protocol for follow-up consists of return visits at six failure) was obtained by telephone. Because of the asso-
months; at one, two, and four years; and every one to four ciation of the Thames prosthesis with our institution, several
years thereafter, depending on the decision of the attending revision operations of University of California, Los An-
surgeon, which is based on the most recent evaluation of geles, patients that were performed by outside physicians
the patient. When a population of patients is to be analyzed, were reported directly to us, and no extra effort was needed
a letter requesting that a follow-up appointment be made is on our part. Using the time when the revision was done as
sent to patients for whom there is inadequate follow-up. our definition of time to failure, contact by telephone was
With this protocol, some patients who have not been seen adequate for obtaining complete follow-up information on
for the previous two to three years would still not be regarded these patients for the subsequent survivorship analysis.
as lost to follow-up ifthey had been seen at the most recently
Results
scheduled visit
and were not yet due for the next visit.
In June 1987, we initiated an extensive follow-up Assumption of Independence
search for the first 100 patients who had received a Tharies The first 100 Tharies prostheses were implanted be-
0
w
(I,
F-
0
z o-o”STANDARD” 1985 ANALYSIS
F-
z 29 REVISIONS
LU
0
.-. “COMPLETE” 1985 ANALYSIS
Li
0 41 REVISIONS
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
YEARS
TIME TO REViSION OF EITHER COMPONENT
FIG. 1
Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve, based on the standard 1985 data, compared with the 1985 curve, based on almost complete data. This comparison
evaluates the assumption of independence that is necessary for the survivorship analysis to be valid.
Age (mean and standard deviation) (yrs.) 42 ± 16 40 ± 14 the prosthesis over time.
Weight (mean and standard deviation)(kg) 71 ± 12 69 ± 14
Sex (percentage of men) 67 42 Predictive Ability
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 11/13/2023
TABLE III
Ten-Year
Kaplan-Meier Curve Ten-Year Curve
(Standard 1985 Data) (Complete 1985 Data)
Revisions (no.) 29 41
Patients who had not had a revision who had 26 49
follow-up of at least eight years (no.)
Mean duration of follow-up of patients 67.9 94.6
who had not had a revision (mos.)
Estimated rate of failure (per cent)
At five years 19 18
At nine years 46 41
LU
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
o-0PRE 77 SURGERIES
F-
0
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 11/13/2023
LU
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
YEARS
TIME TO REVISION OF EITHER COMPONENT
FIG. 2
Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves comparing the standard 1985 data for patients who had an operation before 1977 with the 1987 data for patients
who had an operation in 1977. This comparison evaluates the predictive value of a survivorship curve.
decreased risk of needing an operation for revision, com- equally, without regard to their clinical status. Finally, at
pared with those who return for follow-up evaluation. This the time of analysis, the characteristics of patients for whom
is important because in long-term orthopaedic studies, a the data are incomplete should be similar to those of patients
large percentage of patients is frequently lost to follow-up. for whom the data are complete. If these criteria are sat-
It is very time-consuming and expensive to keep track of isfied, we believe that our results justify the use of survi-
large numbers of patients. We have sometimes spent a total vorship analysis, even if a large percentage of patients has
of more than eight hours trying to contact only one patient. been lost to follow-up.
The problem of being lost to follow-up is not likely to be Our second comparison provides evidence of the use-
solved with better follow-up procedures, due to limitations fulness of the Kaplan-Meier curve in predicting results for
of time and cost. Also, if the assumption is true, the extra future patients. Considering the small size of the samples,
time and expense that are involved in tracking down patients we were encouraged by the long-term similarity of the two
who are lost to follow-up may not be justified for studies curves. The major reason for this similarity is the homo-
involving large numbers of patients. geneity of the patients in the two groups. We would not
A comparison should always be made, however, be- expect curves based on sixty to seventy-year-old patients to
tween the characteristics of patients who are lost to follow- provide any information on results for future patients in the
up and those of patients who are still being followed, in thirty to forty-year-old age bracket. Special care should be
order to evaluate whether there might be some bias in the taken, when comparing results in the literature, to ensure
former group. For example, the ages, etiologies, and di- that the groups that are being compared are similar with
agnoses at the time of operation should be similar for the regard to important prognostic variables, such as age, di-
two groups. If there is a difference, the assumption of in- agnosis, and level of activity, before reaching any conclu-
dependence should be questioned, and more effort should sions.
be made to at least make contact by telephone with a large Thus, while it is important to obtain as much up-to-
percentage of the missing patients, in order to verify if any date information on patients as possible, it does not seem
bias actually exists between the two groups. necessary to make an extraordinary effort in this direction
For the results that are presented here to be applicable in order to obtain valid survival curves. The designation of
to other medical centers, three criteria must be met. First, all patients who have not had a revision as censored seems
a continual effort must be made to follow all patients. Sec- to produce valid survival curves, which yield unbiased es-
ond, the follow-up effort should be applied to all patients timates of true curves.
References
1 . AMSTUTZ, H. C.; DOREY, FREDERICK; and O’CARROLL, P. F. : THARIES Resurfacing Arthroplasty. Evolution and Long-Term Results. Clin. Orthop.,
213: 92-114, 1986.
2. CORNELL, C. N. , and RANAWAT, C. S. : Survivorship Analysis of Total Hip Replacements. Results in a Series of Active Patients Who Were Less
than Fifty-five Years Old. J. Bone and Joint Surg. , 68-A: 1430-1434, Dec. 1986.
3. DOBBS, H. S.: Survivorship of Total Hip Replacements. J. Bone and Joint Surg. , 62-B(2): 168-173, 1980.
4. DOREY, F. , and AMSTUTZ, H. C. : Survivorship Analysis in the Evaluation of Joint Replacement. J. Arthroplasty, 1: 63-69, 1986.
5. JINNAH, R. H.; AMSTUTZ, H. C. ; TOOKE, S. M. : DOREY, FRED; and DALSETH, TERESA: The UCLA Chamley Experience: A Long-Term Follow-
up Study Using Survival Analysis. Clin. Orthop. . 211: 164-172, 1986.
6. KIM, W. C.; GROGAN, THOMAS: AMSTUTZ, H. C. ; and DOREY, FREDERICK: Survivorship Comparison ofTHARIES and Conventional Hip Arthroplasty
in Patients Younger than 40 Years Old. Clin. Orthop. , 214: 269-277, 1987.
7. LEE, E. 1. : Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis. Belmont, California, Lifetime Learning, 1980.
8. PAVLOV, P. W.: A 15-Year Follow-up Study of 512 Consecutive Charnley-Muller Total Hip Replacements. J. Arthroplasty, 2: 151-156, 1987.
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 11/13/2023
From St. Paul and Fairview Riverside Hospitals. Minneapolis, and Gillette Children’s Hospital, St. Paul
ABSTRACT: Forty-six patients who had a neuro- rate of complications was 48 per cent. Pseudarthrosis
muscular spinal deformity were treated with arthrodesis occurred in three patients (6.5 per cent). There were no
and Luque segmental spinal instrumentation and were major neurological deficits related to the correction or
followed for an average of three years. Twenty-two pa- to the use of sublaminar wires. Three patients died, one
tients had cerebral palsy and twenty-four had another in the immediate postoperative period and the other two
neuromuscular disease. In thirty-nine patients, the ar- at eighteen months and four years after the original
throdesis was extended to the sacrum. Eleven patients procedure, due to causes unrelated to the operation.
who had severe scoliosis as well as pelvic obliquity and
decompensation of the torso had a combined anterior Patients who have a progressive or non-progressive
and posterior arthrodesis; the other thirty-five patients neuromuscular disorder are at high risk for the development
had a one-stage posterior procedure. Preoperatively, the of serious and devastating spinal deformity’3729. These pa-
average scoliosis was 74 degrees; this was corrected to tients have more complex problems than do patients who
39 degrees at follow-up. Final corrections were similar have idiopathic scoliosis. Spinal deformity, especially in a
for scoliosis and were better for pelvic obliquity and patient who has spastic cerebral palsy, is difficult to control
decompensation of the torso in patients who had com- with a brace, and it may progress even after skeletal maturity
bined anterior and posterior arthrodesis. The results for has been reached46’25. These patients also may have pelvic
scoliosis and pelvic obliquity in patients who had a spas- obliquity, dislocation of the hip, limited balance or ability
tic deformity were similar to the results in patients who to sit, back pain, and, in some circumstances, a serious
had a flaccid deformity. Correction of decompensation decrease in pulmonary function6”52022’2628’33. Treatment of
of the torso was better in patients who had a spastic spinal deformity secondary to neuromuscular disease pre-
deformity. sents a great challenge to the surgeon. Even with the advent
Postoperatively, a brace was used in half of the of newer surgical techniques, pertinent questions remain.
patients in each group; this did not appear to affect the Among these are: (1) Is Luque instrumentation appropriate
amount of correction in either group, although the result for a patient who has neuromuscular spinal deformity? (2)
may have been influenced by the selection process. The What is the role of the combination of anterior release and
posterior Luque instrumentation? (3) How predictable are
* No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from
a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject ofthis article.
correction of the curve and maintenance of correction in the
No funds were received in support of this study. various types of deformities? (4) Is external immobilization
t Twin Cities Scoliosis Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Minnesota, 920 East 28th Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota
necessary after Luque instrumentation for neuromuscular
55407. Please address requests for reprints to Dr. Boachie-Adjei. scoliosis? (5) Is the Galveston technique reliable for ex-
:1: Minnesota Spine Center, Fairview Riverside Hospital, 2312 South
tending an ai-throdesis across the lumbosacral junction in a
Sixth Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454.
§ Gillette Children’s Hospital, 200 University Avenue East, St. Paul, patient who has neuromuscular scoliosis?
Minnesota 55101.
The purpose of this paper is to review our experience
#{182}
Shnners Hospital for Crippled Children, 1900 Richmond Road,
Lexington, Kentucky 40502. with arthrodesis and Luque segmental spinal instrumentation