Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Handbook HDI NDT
Handbook HDI NDT
Risk Engineering
Guideline –
Non-destructive testing
of machines and systems
www.hdi.global
2 Risk Engineering Guideline: Non-destructive testing of machines and systems Risk Engineering Guideline: Non-destructive testing of machines and systems 3
• Minor damage is repaired during overhaul. Examples of some production machines and plants and their risk
• Machine availability is increased. areas are shown in Tab. 2.
• Temporary repairs can be used to continue production until the
scheduled downtime in order to minimise business interruption.
• Test findings can be used by operators and machine manufacturers
to improve the design.
• It provides information to asset management for medium and
long-term planning of maintenance budgets, replacement
procurement and other capital costs.
During heat forming, the input material is heated to the • Press frame Positive material identification (PMI) Material identification, e.g. with X-ray fluorescence analysis, optical emission spectrometry, infrared spectrometry
temperature at which recrystallisation occurs parallel to • Tool holder, tool table
Heat forming presses
deformation. The material does not undergo any hardening •
Depending on construction Acoustic emission (AT) Detection of damage processes
and can be formed again almost without any limitation. Cylinder, hammer, press ram, tension rod, drive
Tab. 2: Test methods NDT
• Tension rod
Injection moulding machines are used to manufacture ready- • Fixed clamping plate
Injection moulding machines to-use parts from aluminium or from plastic (in cords or
• Moving clamping plate
Hydraulic machines granulate form). The required moulding compound is prepa-
• End plate
Toggle-lever machines red in the injection unit and then injected into a negative
mould. • Toggle lever
• Screw
• Machine frame
Forge rollers are designed for the preforming of both round • Rolling trunnion
and rectangular materials. The blank is fed radially to the • Tension rod
Forge rollers
rollers by means of a manipulator and formed into individual • Gearing
sectors. • Cardan shaft drive
• Adjustment (screw, hydraulics)
6. Conducting NDT. 7. Scope of testing. 8. Limits of methods. When measuring the transit time of an ultrasonic pulse between both
ends of the bolt, changes can be detected when tightening the tie rod
The way in which NDT is conducted depends largely on the following In some industries, the scope of the testing will be constrained by The method is chosen in such a way that the intended objective of the The running time decreases linearly with elongation in the elastic
factors: applicable standards and statutory regulations. test is achieved with sufficient reliability and as little effort as range, with two shares contributing to this:
• the test object, possible. This is not always easy to achieve in day-to-day NDT work. 1. the direct extension of the tie rod ∆ L and
• the test method and equipment chosen, When it comes to testing in the field of machine and plant The reliability of a method depends on many influencing factors, 2. the acoustoelastic effect i.e. the degradation ∆ v of the sound
• ambient conditions. construction, the scope of testing is determined by the lessons including those that are independent of the process, such as the velocity v due to the elastic Stress in the tie rod.
learned from damage and by knowledge of the stresses applied to human factor.
The following conditions generally must also be met before carrying equipment during operation.
out testing: Furthermore, the design, size of defects, misalignment, material
• Smachine/system out of service, Non-destructive tests are usually relatively expensive, so they can thickness, test temperature, material, etc. can limit the detection of
• machine put into a safe condition, also have a significant effect on the cost of products. Cost pressures flaws and defects.
• safe working conditions, therefore force us to keep the scope of the testing as small as
• clean inspection areas, possible. However, this does not mean deliberately admitting defects
• certification of testing personnel, e.g. in line with ISO 9712. that could lead to damage. If this results in danger to persons, those 9. Special applications of NDT by exploiting
responsible for admitting such defects would risk being accused of
To prepare for the NDT inspection, it is essential to become familiar gross negligence and would face criminal charges. Moreover, from a
physical properties.
with the type of loads and risk areas of the machines and systems. financial perspective, it is worth noting that the damage caused by a
The type, shape, direction and location of damage (e.g. cracks) that defect in the product generally entails higher costs than the NDT Bolts/tie-rods measure pre-stress with ultrasonic
can arise should also be determined. In addition, the accessibility of inspections that could have been conducted to identify such defects. Many components in plants, machines and vehicles are joined
the area to be inspected must be checked in order to identify together by screws. Insufficient tightened screws can cause
components that may need to be dismantled or moved to certain The effectiveness of NDT depends largely on choosing the right test considerable damage to leading man and machine. When using e.g.
positions. Moreover, it may be necessary to develop, build or modify methods and conditions. Knowledge of the probability of detecting torque spanners different clamping forces occur by friction, settling
special testing equipment. defects should also be employed, and personnel must be familiar with forces and flow behaviour. The existing clamping force can be
the manufacturing process and material properties. adjusted after tightening with mechanical funds are insufficiently
Finally, the personnel and time required to carry out the NDT audited. With safety-relevant components it is required, to check the
examinations is calculated. This will depend on the test object, the Considering the importance of experience to improving quality and clamping force carefully, as this is the only parameter relevant for the
number of risk areas, the accessibility and the downtimes scheduled thus also reducing the amount of testing required, there is no doubt strength of the joint. This can be reliably performed using ultrasonic.
by the operator. Occupational safety and regulatory requirements that qualified personnel must be employed for these duties.
must be observed. In mechanical engineering, for example, the repair of cracked press
frame tie-rods is used for the reception of pressing forces. When
tensioning the tie-rods the benefits of monitoring and control of the
Preload measurement with ultrasonic become clearly.
Fig. 9: Repair with a tie rod Fig. 10: Pulse-echo method with transit time measurement at zero
Fig. 7 and 8: Gear unit of a multi-stage press with cracks in the tooth flanks crossing
10 Risk Engineering Guideline: Non-destructive testing of machines and systems Risk Engineering Guideline: Non-destructive testing of machines and systems 11
intervals and condition-based inspection looks at the condition of 12.12. EN ISO 9712 2021
Due to the special requirements, suitable ultrasonic devices and system components and then determines the inspection interval. Non-destructive testing – Qualification and certification of NDT personnel
15.3 Beiblatt 1 2014
sensors must be selected or developed. The test method has already
proven itself in many practical applications. Many losses in the past have shown that it is important to ensure that 11.3 CEN/TS 15053 2005 Non-destructive testing – Recommendations for discontinuities-types in test specimens for examination
the requirements of RBI plans are met. It has become increasingly
15.11 EN ISO 18490 2015 Non-destructive testing – Evaluation of vision acuity of NDT personnel
apparent that RBI plans exist, but are not implemented, e.g. due to
cost and personnel savings. Non-destructive testing – Code of practice for the approval of NDT personnel by recognised third-party organisa-
10.4 CEN/TR 15589 2007
tions under the provisions of Directive 97/23/EC
10.4 CEN ISO/TR 25107 2006 Non-destructive testing – Guidelines for NDT training syllabuses
10.4 CEN ISO/TR 25108 2006 Non-destructive testing – Guidelines for NDT personnel training organizations
Contact
For questions and/or more information
you can contact us via:
Although we made every effort possible to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, no liability can be assumed for the currentness, correctness and completeness of the information.
We neither intend, nor assume any obligation, to update or revise these statements in light of developments which differ from those anticipated.