Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Economic and Political Weekly
November 5, 2011 vol xlvi nos 44 & 45 E32S3 Economic & Political weekly
king, it is an etic, external (in contra oil reserves". to India. Egypt mattered insofar as the
distinction to emic) term. People of the Given the logic of the cold war preva
Suez Canal provided the shortest sea route
Middle East themselves did not coin this lent at the time of the book's publication,between western Europe and Asia, includ
term. Even today there are not many in the word "non-communist" is clearly iming the Far East and Australia; it reduced
the distance (formerly crossed via Cape of
the Middle East who actually use it. Out portant. A more crisp description is of
side too it does not have a global currency. fered soon after the passage cited above.Good Hope) between western Europe and
For instance, Indians do not use the term He described Saudi Arabia and Kuwait as Asia by more than 3,000 kilometres (Ogen
Middle East; they usually call it West Asia. "oil-rich" states. In contrast, he called the 2008: 529). Not surprisingly, when Egyp
So, when I hear this term I often ask my then two Yemens as "oil-less" (Stookey tian President Gamal Abdul Nasser, in
self: middle between which two points or 1984: xvi, xviii, xix). It is evident how 1956, nationalised the Suez Canal, the
locations? And yes, East of what? Clearly, the Middle East made any sense to the French press screamed that Nasser was a
Economic & Political weekly 0353 November 5, 2on vol xlvi nos 44 & 45
Great Game between the imperial BritainHuntington called a "Catholic wave", beginning interpenetration of ... religion
and the tsarist Russia to exercise control 30 countries made the transition to democ and the state" (Lewis 1996: 54, 61). Ber
over Central Asia and India. Curzon, later racy In contrast, between 1980 and 1991, nard Lewis, in fact, remarked that, like
to become India's viceroy, exemplifiedof the world's 37 Muslim-majority coun Christianity, Islam is not a religion. "Islam
such a geostrategic conceptualisation tries only two were democratic (Hunting from its inception", he declared, "is a reli
of Afghanistan: ton 1991: 28). By 2005, of the undemocrat gion of power" (1986: 82). Curiously
ic regimes across the globe, Muslim coun enough, Islam's equation with power was
Turkestan, Afghanistan, Transcaspia, Persia
- to many these words breathe only a sensetries constituted a total of 55% (Fattah: advanced precisely at a moment when the
of utter remoteness, or a memory of strange
2006:1). This absence of democracy in the Middle East stood disempowered at the
vicissitudes and of moribund romance. To
"Muslim world" has generated many ex hands of the West.
me, I confess they are pieces on a chessboard
upon which is being played out a game for planations. Following the third wave, The lack of democracy in the Middle
Huntington wrote:
the domination of the world (cited in Rashid East was attributed primarily to the
2001:145).
Once viewed as no more than an area of
november 5, 2011 vol xlvi nos 44 & 45 EH22 Economic & Political weekly
standard
distinctiveness of Islam as a religion. Ifis not a sufficient explanation the form of parliament's demand for the
because
such an understanding is valid, how do we what we see is not just the double eviction of the us navy base from Bahrain.
explain the democratic upsurge but
in rather
the a series of multiple standards. It is important to mention here that the
Middle East? Logically, it will mean that robbery is probably an appro American military presence in Bahrain
Conceptual
the people marching in the street and
priate term to construe such a sudden dates to 1949. After the withdrawal of
chanting for democracy, even sacrificing
shift in the very terms of contrasting, even British forces, American presence sharply
their lives for it - were not Muslims. That
contradicting, explanations for the ab increased subsequently. Legally, Bahrain's
is, their struggle for democracysence
hasand
nopresence of democracy. parliament was right in asking for the
relations whatsoever to Islam. Indeed, this
The democratic storm swept across the eviction of the us navy. But the ruling Al
seems to be the case. Now that the Middle
Middle East not only because of the avail Khalifa dissolved parliament in 1975.
East has risen for democracy, most com ability of Facebook, youth unrest, and so Since then there has been no democratic
mentators have changed their explanaon; it was, in fact, a continuation of yearn institution until 2002. Various vibrant
tory paradigm. ings for democracy the history of which is institutions of civil society such as trade
The democratic storm in Egypt, Tunisia much older than what most commentators unions were all crushed. So, what mat
and Yemen is now explained not in termswould have us believe. People in the Mid tered to the us was not the voice of the
of Islam, but in terms of technology, Face dle East have been desiring democracy for Bahraini people, but America's national
book, youth, the rate of unemployment, long; it was the western power which con interest, which was to keep the American
and so on and so forth. Newsweek (21 Febtinually subverted and derailed it. In light navy base in Bahrain. Again, this is a
ruary, 2011; also see The Economist, 19-25 of the argument, I propose here the im classic example of how the West de
February 2011) ran a story titled "Faceportant question is not if Islam is compati democratised the Middle East (for details,
book Freedom Fighter". One commentator ble with democracy for it was a bogus see Ahmad 2011).
seemed to psychologise the issue in that question from the beginning (for details, It is for this pursuit of national interest
he attributed the fall of the regime of Musee Ahmad 2011), but how the West de by the West that, intellectuals such as
barak less to the massive demonstrations democratised the Middle East. To pursue Fareed Zakaria recently began to advo
and more to the loss of the grandchild of
my argument, consider two examples. cate constitutional liberalism at the cost of
commentators. But the logic of double challenge to the Al-Khalifa family came World".
in Outlining the us policy towards
Economic & Political weekly nrar] November 5, 2011 vol xlvi nos 44 s. 45
the Middle East, he wrote: judgment stood". This fable typifies the
incompatibility with democracy is both
Oil, strategic ties, history will enduretheoretically
our on ideology and practice that the sovereign
and historically flawed. Con
going involvement. We will continue tothis
tra aid all-pervasive myth, I showed howdecides well before the legal procedures
the Egyptian regime, we will continue to
the West, on the contrary, de-democra
unfold; judgment is delivered prior to trial
protect the Saudi monarchy... The question
tised the Middle East from the early 1950s
and irrespective of evidence. The lesson of
really is, should not we ask for something in
onwards.
return? By not pushing these regimes, the To this end, I offered the ex
the fable is succinctly contained in the
amples of West's de-democratisation of
United States would be making a conscious opening lines: "The strong are always best
decision to let things stay as they are - toand Iran. I conclude this section
Bahrain at proving they are right/witness the case
once again opt for 'stability'...We don't seek
we are now going to cite" (2005: x).
by showing how the liberal position such
democracy in the Middle East - at least not
as Fareed Zarakria's that constitutional
Derrida takes the figures of wolf and
yet. We seek first.. .what I have called 'consti
ism, not
tutional liberalism' - the rule of law, indi democracy, should be lamb
promoted to institute a deconstruction of the
insepara
vidual rights, private property...the the Arab world is, in fact, a new mecha
contemporary and past forms of democracy.
tion of Church and state'.7
nism to continue the old western policyThe
of key to his "militant and interminable
As the reader will recall, Zakaria's vari
de-democratising the Middle East. critique" is the notion of "democracy to
ety of conceptualisation of the Middle East come", which at one place in the other
3 Conclusions: 'Democracy to
is precisely what I have been critiquing wise dense text he defines as a protest
(see Section I). Consistent with hisCome' and Tahrlr Square
line of "against all naivete and every political
When asked what he thought about the abuse, every rhetoric that would present
reasoning this is how he, in 2004, justified
the above policy: impact of the French revolution, Chair as a present or existing democracy, as a de
The Arab rulers of the Middle East are auto man Mao Zedong said that it was too early facto democracy, what remains inade
cratic, corrupt and heavy-handed. But theyto say (Osborne 2006: 2).8 If it is too early quate to the democratic demand..." (ibid:
are still more liberal, tolerant and pluralistic for an event of 1789, it is definitely earlier 86). One such inadequacy he identifies is
than those who would likely replace them for an event of 2011 which, in some ways, how democracy continues to be hostage to
(Zakaria 2004: 2).
is still in the making. However, it is my the violent logic of nation and its self-ful
The contradiction in Zakaria's argu hope that it is not the kind of democracy filling interests. He, thus, issues a plea for
ment here comes to its full glare as it unwe have seen in the 20th century and the installing a democratic global order of
dermines his own earlier argument (madefirst decade of the 21st century; from the democracy for the existing international
in 1997) that constitutionalism should notus to Australia, democracy also has a dark arrangements remain so distant from his
be sacrificed to the shallow logic of elec history of subjugation and utter violence conceptualisation of "democracy to come".
toral democracy. It is too well-known to (Ahmad 2009: 233-36). The categorical Describing the binding and enforceable
repeat that "the Arab rulers" like Mubarakrevolution, I hope and hypothesise, con power of the Security Council as "mon
repeatedly organised sham elections andtextually exemplifies some elements of strosity", Derrida observes:
showed little, if any, respect to individual what Jacques Derrida termed "democracy To put it in the most cut and dried terms, I
liberty, rights or constitutionalism of anyto come". would say that the fate of the democracy to
kind. In fact, the regime of Mubarak was Though present in earlier writings (e g, come, in relation to world order, depends on
highly skilled in the business of illegal de1994, 2004), his posthumous publication, what will become of this strange and sup
posedly all-powerful institution called the
tention, torture and killings of scores ofRouges: Two Essays on Reason, offers a
Security Council (2005: 98).
opposition activists (Hafez 2003). Yet, lib fuller treatment of "democracy to come".
erals like Zakaria have no qualms in justiIn preface to Rouges, Derrida cites a fable Returning to Derrida's fable, the demo
fying the brutal, anti-democratic regimes from La Fontaine (a 17th century French cratic storm in the Middle East shows one
(continually violating the constitutional fabulist). Titled The Wolf and the Lamb, it how to gallantly confront the wolf (the
provisions) such as Mubarak's or Salih's inshows how a blood-thirsty wolf, having sovereign) and secure dignity and justice.
Yemen on the lame pretext that "Islamdecided in advance to kill an innocent By enacting his individual sacrificial death,
ists" and "fundamentalists" might take lamb, enacts the justification to kill her.
Mohammad Bouazizi, it seems, succeeded
in lighting the hopes and aspiration of
over the reign of power. Right in the thickThe wolf accuses the lamb of dirtying the
of the Arab Spring or what I call the catewater to which she protests saying she is
millions for securing the collective life of
gorical revolution, the Dutch politician20 feet downstream from the wolf, and
Ayaan Hirsi Ali (now a resident fellow attherefore, could in no way muddy the
Economic&PoliticalwEEKLY
American Enterprise Institute, Washingwolfs water. In violent disregard to the
ton, dc) did exactly what Zakaria had pre lamb's plea based on evidence, the wolf available at
scribed much earlier. In The Wall Street persists in his allegation: "you are muddy
Journal (21 February 2011), she warned of
ing it". More allegations follow; the poor
Altermedia-Bookshop Ecoshop
M G Road
the takeover of Egypt by the "fundamen
lamb continues to present her defence and Thrissur 680 001
talist" Muslim brotherhood. evidence. But to no avail! The wolf always Kerala
To summarise, my argument in this sec wins. The passage ends: "The Wolf drag Ph: 2422974
tion has been that the notion of Islam's ged and ate his mid-day snack/so trial and
november 5, 2oii vol xlvi nos 44 & 45 033 Economic & Political weekly
mocracy to Come' Opening in Two Turns", The The Economist (2011): "Cover Story", 19-25 February.
The democratic storm in Tiinisia, Egypt,
South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(2-3): 323-41. Zakaria, Fareed (2004): "Islam, Democracy and
Bahrain, Yemen and elsewhere seem to
- (1994): The Spectre of Marx: The State of Debt, The Constitutional Liberalism", Political Science
dethrone the categories and language Work
of of Mourning, and the New International Quarterly, 119(1): 120.
(London & New York: Routledge).
thoughts dominant for over half a century.
Downer, Alexander (2011): "Well-Meaning Warrior:
Review of George W Bush's Decision Points",
This is why I call the democratic storm in the Permission for Reproduction of
American Review: Global Perspectives on America,
Middle East "the categorical revolution".9 May-July, issue 04:46-49. Articles Published in EPW
Fattah, Moataz A (2006): Democratic Values in the
Muslim World (London and Boulder: CO: Lynne No article published in epw or part thereof
NOTES
Rienner).
should be reproduced in any form without
Haddad,
1 Drawn from numbers of protesters in Emily A (2005): "Digging to India: Moderni
different
ty, Imperialism and the Suez Canal", Victorian
towns/cities listed at Wikipedia http://en. prior permission of the author(s).
Studies 47(3): 363-96.
wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_revolution_of_
Hafez, Mohammed A soft/hard copy of the author(s)'s approval
2011. Accessed on 2iMarch 2011.1 am aware of the H (2003): Why Muslims Rebel: Re
extent to which this source is accurate. pression and Resistance in The Islamic World, should be sent to epw.
(Boulder, Colo: Lynne Reinner Publishers).
2 In his review of George W Bush's autobiography,
Hitchens, Christopher and WW Rostow (1986): "Mad In cases where the email address of the
Decision Points, Alexander Downer (2011:Dogs
49),andthe
Others: Suez 1956", Grand Street 6(1):
author has not been published along with
Australian foreign minister, went to the extent
102-119. of
suggesting that the Arab Spring was Huntington,
indeed the Samuel (1991): "Democracy's Third the articles, epw can be contacted for help.
"message" of Bush's "freedom agenda". Wave", Journal of Democracy 2(2): 12-34.
Economic & Political weekly 0353 November 5, 2011 vol xlvi nos 44 & 45 35