The document summarizes some of the internal and external problems facing states after World War 1, including revolutions overthrowing governments and the rise of revolutionary ideologies from both the left and right. From the left came revolutionary communism seeking to destroy civilization and reshape it on a new basis. From the right came counter-revolutionary nationalist movements like fascism in Italy and national socialism in Germany seeking national integration, which adopted authoritarian methods and produced totalitarian regimes similar to communism. Overall the document outlines the political turmoil, ideological conflicts, and authoritarian trends that emerged in the aftermath of World War 1.
The document summarizes some of the internal and external problems facing states after World War 1, including revolutions overthrowing governments and the rise of revolutionary ideologies from both the left and right. From the left came revolutionary communism seeking to destroy civilization and reshape it on a new basis. From the right came counter-revolutionary nationalist movements like fascism in Italy and national socialism in Germany seeking national integration, which adopted authoritarian methods and produced totalitarian regimes similar to communism. Overall the document outlines the political turmoil, ideological conflicts, and authoritarian trends that emerged in the aftermath of World War 1.
The document summarizes some of the internal and external problems facing states after World War 1, including revolutions overthrowing governments and the rise of revolutionary ideologies from both the left and right. From the left came revolutionary communism seeking to destroy civilization and reshape it on a new basis. From the right came counter-revolutionary nationalist movements like fascism in Italy and national socialism in Germany seeking national integration, which adopted authoritarian methods and produced totalitarian regimes similar to communism. Overall the document outlines the political turmoil, ideological conflicts, and authoritarian trends that emerged in the aftermath of World War 1.
if icgarded as partisan from beginning to end, andthat a time to use it she came also to realize its aciocame Germany n wasfor machinery, its difused responsibility, be turned (as its delayed cumbersome Hitler's action, and its pacifistic professions might purposes. inWhether of the Rhincland) to her own basis is arguable, but it could only be a drag on remiitarization the Leaguc could have become the proper instrument or a ermat recovery on a liberai national destiny as it began to be shapedl by Hitler. To nonc of the ambitious aggr who arose in the thirties did the Lcaguc commend itseli, either in:es bias towards the status quo, or in its Anglo-French association with t ors Versailles system, or in its disinterested concepts. The League had also other drawbacks which impaired its chanra of success. Its machinery, like its power, was also based in subtle a well as in obvious ways upon Anglo-French principles. As the con gressional system of 1815-22 was closely associated with the autocrat:. principles favoured by Austria, Prussia, and Russia, so the League of Nations system was based on democratic practices and Parliamentary traditions familiar enough to France and Great Britain, but wholly or partially alien to states which had only a short or no cxperience of real democratic government. Such states were unversed in the habits of Parliamentary compromise and unaccustomed to the authority of a majority vote. Finaly, the League of Nations had no military and administrative power to cnforce its will upon recalcitrant states, and the implementa tion of its decisions rested upon individual nations who could not afford to take the risks or pay the costs involved, and were not wholly per suaded that the quarrels were their own. The League has now come to be discredited on all sides--unjustly, perhaps, for its "immenscly benehcent secondary functions" havé ben overlooked. In the League an idea was again incorporated in a political organization, and another cxperiment in international co-operation was made. The tradition of the Europcan concert was strengthened, and, in spite of failure, it is upon this tradition only that in the long run the reconstructors of the world can safely build. The International Court of Justice has acquired a high reputation; the work of the expert committees in matters of health, social hygiene, economic questions. and acute refugee problerms has been of great value. A clearing-house for international projects, and a meeting-place for the statesmen, legis lators, and thinkers of the world, still cxists in the Palais des Nations. It is on the foundations of the League that ater the Second World War another international structure was crected, and it is by the history of its failure that the United Nations is trying to learn. Internal Problems 455 External problems were in many casces closcly linked with, and com plicated by, internal problems. There is hardly a state of importance that did not sufler serious internal disturbances during those years, somc cxperiencing one or more violent revolutions, others long periods of chronic disorder. A revolution of extreme violence had overthrown the Tsarist régime of Russia in 1917. On the defcat uf the Central Powers revolutions broke out all over Germany and Austria, over turning the ancient Hohenzollern and Habsburg dynasties as well as the princes of the smaller German states. Serious Communist move ments gained temporary successes there andin Hungary. In Italy the house of Savoy survived for a time, though it was completely eclipsed by the revolutionary Fascist triumph of 1922. The Balkan states were shaken by recurring agitations; the Greek monarchy, which, like the monarchics of Russia, Germany, and Austria, was made the scapegoat of national defeat, was overthrown in 1g24' after the disastrous Anatolian war with Turkey. In Turkey a spectacular Westernizing revolution, comparable to the Japanese revolution of I867, abolished the Sultanate and the Caliphate, established a republican dictatorship, and introduced the Latin alphabet, the admission of women to public life, and other Western measures. In Spain chronic disorder found a temporary remedy in the dictatorship of Primo de Rivera (1923-30), but his fall in r930, a prelude to the downfall of the monarchy in r931, accentuated the divisions and conflicts of Spanish political life. Pro vincial nationalism, native and imported anarchy, Communist and Fascist intervention, prepared the bitter and brutal civil war of 1936-39 from which the Nationalist forces, under the "Caudillo," General Franco, with Fascist and Nazi help, emerged victorious. In China war and revolution went hand in hand. Civil war in Ireland, violence and agitation in India and Palestine, broke the peace of the British Empire, while serious strikes and Labour or Communist movements shook or threatened the stability of Governments in France and Britain. It was by no means clear in what interest these revolutions were being formed and agitations conducted, what was the predominant behind them, or whether the immediate was also to be the influence ultimate beneficiary. Was it to secure nationalism or provincialism, democracy or despotism, secular materialism or freedom of thought, social welfare or predatory proletarianism, that empires were being shaken, overturned, civil and international law defied, altars degraded, thrones priests murdered, properties confiscated, order and confidence and security 'In 1g23 King Constantine was deposed in favour of George II. republic was declared, but George Il was restored after a plebiscite in In 1924 a I935 November Revolutionary Communism 456 was seen in the new answer shattered? Part of the them of unexampled ruthlessness. emerged,some ofrevolution gathered and marched from the The forces of though the interests they came to despoüsms that fromthe Right, ideological. represent Let and haps in the more cnd national camc than all the influences which may be were per From the Left Communism, the heading ofdestruction of a whole civiilization and its grouped comprehensive in their bearing (for underthey aimed at therevolutionary in their intention, theoretical new basis), objective, instinctive, predatory, and, reshaporinigginally, on a emancipating in their tvrannical in their operation. reply to the ter oristic, and From the Right came, a number of largely in challenge counter-revolutionary movements which.of Com munism, they all had national integration as a common factor, cannot single name. They included the comparatively though bemoderate under a of groupedmovement Italian Fascism and the extreme manitestations were comprehenei of German National Socialism. They too in their bearing, disciplinary and unifying in their int 'totalitarian,' tion, highly practical in their objective, opportunist, expedient, or pier meal in their and policy, dynamic in their characte. revolutionary, pr Pntly instinctive, often predatory, terroristis, and tyrannical in their operation. Though these two movements wer professedly antagonistic to cach other, and difered in their ostensihle methods, bore economic and political aims, they adopted similar tactical similar tyrannical characters, and produced closely resembling tozal: tarian despotisns. in the Revolutionary Commurism, though finding its rationalization impetus and teachings of the German Jew Karl Marx, derived initsRussia in 1g7 character from the successful Bolshevik Revolution overthrown in March and the following ycars. When Tsardom wasinstalled which oscillatcd I917 a moderate democratic Government was betwee uncertainly between Marxism and constitutional democracy, Utopianism and opportunism, between militarism and pacifism. Ater a vain attempt to conduct a war and a revolution at the same ti Kerensky's moderates were overthrown in November 1917 by, te Bolshevist party under Lenin and Trotsky, a party which, thoug aminority, was, like the Jacobins of France, one of actionhimselt and to te Lenin quite definitcly abandoned the War and devoted of extremt Revolution. He at t once turned all the doctrines andtheories with German; socialisn into legislative on the idealistic basis ofdecrees. He declared for peace no annexations and no indemnities. October 2 by the Russian calendar. 1917. 193 decrces were passed between December 31, November 8 and