GESTSOC Y36

Case Study # 5 Group Members: Bobadilla, Justine Nicole,

Group # 2 Go, Noel Eugene, Panganiban, Miguel Carlos

● Come up with clear statements about the safety and morality (acceptability) of
consuming GMOs coming from the perspectives of the big corporations,
scientists, and the general consumers or public (consider the Sub-Saharan
context).
According to Komparic (2015), from the standpoint of large businesses,
the introduction of GMOs into communities like Sub-Saharan Africa should
prioritize openness and cooperation with regional people and small-scale farmers
to ensure that GMOs do not harm them. Companies must ensure that the
introduction of GMOs respects the right of local communities to make educated
decisions about the food they consume and is consistent with their values.

GMOs may be safe for humans to consume, according to scientific

studies. However, this information needs to be understood in the context of the
unique cultural and environmental characteristics of the community. Instead of
concentrating primarily on Western scientific ideas, scientists should prioritize
research that meets the issues and goals of local populations. However, there is
still ongoing debate about GMOs' potential long-term effects on the environment,
ecosystems, and human helath.

Cultural and socioeconomic variables may impact the general public's

acceptance of GMOs. Traditional farming methods and cultural views on food
may influence how people see GMOs, claims Komparic (2015). Some people
could doubt the safety of eating genetically modified crops and see GMOs
threatening their conventional food systems. Conversely, some people could
tolerate GMOs more and see them as a viable answer to food insecurity.

In conclusion, the introduction of GMOs should prioritize local

communities' values and viewpoints, emphasizing cooperation, openness, and
adherence to the ideals of Ubuntu. In order to make sure that the introduction of
GMOs is consistent with these principles and respects the ability of local
communities to make informed decisions about the food they consume, big
businesses, scientists, and the general public all have significant responsibilities
to play.
● Reflect on Lee & Voigt’s (2020) article and pay emphasis on the political,
economic, and social dimensions of DNA profiling technologies.

The article "DNA Testing for Family Reunification and the Limitations of
Biological Truth" by Lee and Voigt (2020) explores the political, economic, and
social elements of DNA profiling technology, specifically in the context of family
reunification. DNA testing is increasingly being used for family reunification,
particularly when people are seeking asylum or refugee status. The authors,
however, emphasize that the use of DNA testing involves various ethical, legal,
and social considerations.

The authors claim that the use of DNA testing for family reunification has
political ramifications for immigration policies and practices. The use of DNA
testing might be viewed as a means for governments to shift responsibility for
family reunification to people rather than addressing systemic causes that keep
families apart. Furthermore, the use of DNA testing can create further difficulties
for people seeking asylum or refugee status, especially if they cannot obtain or
afford DNA testing. The economical aspect of DNA testing for family reunification
is also important. The cost of DNA testing can be a significant obstacle to
reuniting for individuals and families. Furthermore, the commercialization of DNA
testing may raise ethical difficulties, especially if genetic data is sold or utilized for
other purposes. Following is from the social standpoint where the authors
contend that DNA testing can have consequences for identity and belonging. The
use of DNA testing to establish biological relationships can result in a limited and
biological definition of family that does not reflect the complexity and nuances of
family relationships. Furthermore, the authors emphasize that DNA testing can
be used as an exclusionary tool, particularly if genetic data is utilized to prohibit
individuals from being considered part of a family.

In conclusion, Lee and Voigt's (2020) study emphasizes the importance of

taking into account the political, economic, and social elements of DNA profiling
technology in the context of family reunion. The use of DNA testing poses
several ethical, legal, and societal considerations, particularly when it comes to
immigration regulations and practices. The authors argue that policies and
practices that consider the intricacies of family interactions and address systemic
challenges that prohibit families from being together are needed. They also
emphasize the importance of addressing issues of inequality and the
commercialization of genetic information. It is critical to evaluate the potential
impact of DNA testing on individuals and families, and to use these technologies
responsibly and ethically.
● Argue why bioethics cannot simply be ignored and why engaging it matters.
The study of bioethics focuses on the moral and ethical ramifications of
biological and medical advancements. It focuses on issues that arise in medical
practice and scientific research, such as how to weigh the advantages of novel
treatments against their drawbacks and expenses, safeguard patients' autonomy
and privacy, and uphold the rights and dignity of everyone involved in medical
decision-making. Because bioethics raises fundamental concerns about how we
live and interact with one another, ignoring it is not an option. Whilst biological
and medical advancements have great potential to enhance our quality of life,
they also present critical ethical challenges. For instance, the development of
new medical technologies like gene editing or artificial intelligence raises
questions about how these technologies might be misused, what unexpected
repercussions they might have, and how they might affect societal inequality.

Being involved in bioethics is crucial because it enables us to create moral

frameworks and rules that can direct the ethical application of these
technologies. Considerations like autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence,
justice, and respect for people are encouraged by bioethics as we make
judgments about medical care and scientific research. By interacting with
bioethics, we can build a more just and equitable society where everyone
benefits from advancements in biology and medicine and is respected for their
dignity and rights. The field of bioethics offers a framework for moral
decision-making that can assist us in navigating the complex ethical dilemmas
that emerge in health and science and selecting the most ethically sound
applications for new technology. In conclusion, we should consider bioethics
because it addresses fundamental issues regarding how we live and interact with
one another. Participating in bioethics is crucial because it enables us to
construct moral frameworks and rules that can direct the responsible application
of biological and medical advancements and lead to a more just and equitable
society.