1

International Trade

Rebecca Rodriguez Minor

Final Essay
“United States - Mexico - Canada Agreement (USMCA)”

November 19th, 2023

Mauricio David García Buestán ID: 00427963

Sebastián Moncada Carbajal: 00442760
Glen David Brugger Rodriguez ID:00272267
 2

The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), colloquially

known as CUSMA in Canada and T-MEC in Mexico, marks a significant
milestone in the realm of international trade agreements. This essay embarks on
an exploration of the USMCA, tracing its historical roots, dissecting its key
features, presenting pertinent data, and delving into its evolution since its
inception. With an overarching aim to provide an objective analysis of the
agreement, this essay will also scrutinize the accomplishments it has yielded and
the controversies it has stirred. All of these facets will be dissected in the context
of established concepts and themes discussed in related coursework.
“The USMCA emerges from the shadows of its predecessor, the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which was established in the early
1990s. NAFTA, heralded as a groundbreaking initiative, envisaged the creation of
a unified marketplace encompassing the United States, Canada, and Mexico.”
(Office of the United States Trade Representative, n.d.)
Over time, however, the need for its modernization became apparent as
concerns about job displacement, environmental standards, and economic
disparities came to the fore. The renegotiation of NAFTA, culminating in the
USMCA, was driven by a confluence of political, economic, and social factors.
The primary objective of this essay is to provide an exhaustive
examination of the USMCA, beginning with its historical evolution. As the reader
delves into the complex realm of this trade agreement, they will gain a profound
understanding of the historical context that led to its development.
Furthermore, this essay will illuminate the key characteristics and relevant
data that define the USMCA. From tariffs and trade quotas to provisions related
to labor and the environment, the reader will gain insight into the multifaceted
structure of the agreement. The vast economic activities it encompasses will be
presented with concrete data reflecting the magnitude of the USMCA,
exemplifying the extent to which it shapes the North American trade landscape.
In its exploration of the agreement's evolution, this essay will analyze how
the USMCA has adapted and transformed since its implementation in 2020.
Global events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have introduced unexpected
 3

challenges, forcing a reconsideration of certain provisions. Furthermore, shifts in

political leadership, such as the change in the U.S. administration, have brought
forth discussions about environmental provisions and climate considerations.
The USMCA's achievements and controversies will serve as the focal
point of this analysis. While the agreement has brought about several notable
accomplishments, it has also generated its fair share of controversies. By
examining these achievements and controversies, this essay aims to provide a
balanced view of the agreement's impact and effectiveness. It will scrutinize the
extent to which the USMCA has delivered on its promises and where it may have
fallen short.
In summary, this essay embarks on a comprehensive journey through the
intricate landscape of the USMCA. It endeavors to provide a well rounded and
critical analysis of the agreement, taking into account its historical foundations,
key characteristics, evolution, achievements, and controversies. By applying
concepts and themes discussed in related coursework, this essay will offer a
balanced perspective on the USMCA, culminating in a projection for its future
and recommendations for potential improvements.
The history of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is
deeply rooted in the evolution of North American trade relations, with its origins
tracing back to the formulation of its predecessor, the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA). This comprehensive exploration of the historical
background of the USMCA provides a profound understanding of the economic
and political developments that shaped the trade dynamics of the three North
American nations. The development of the USMCA is a journey that spans
several decades, characterized by economic shifts, political negotiations, and
evolving trade priorities.
The inception of the USMCA is intrinsically tied to the early 1990s, a
period marked by the birth of NAFTA. “Conceived as a revolutionary agreement,
NAFTA was signed by the United States, Canada, and Mexico in 1992 and
officially implemented in 1994.” (USMCA: History >> GlobalEDGE: Your Source
for Global Business Knowledge, n.d.)
 4

At its core, NAFTA aimed to create a unified market, dismantling trade

barriers among the three countries with the overarching goal of fostering
economic growth and job creation.
The impact of NAFTA was palpable. Trade between the member countries
experienced a significant surge, opening new avenues for businesses to expand
and access broader markets. Industries across the board witnessed growth, and
cross-border supply chains became more intricately interwoven. The pact, in
essence, transformed the economic landscape of North America.
However, as the wheels of time turned, it became increasingly apparent
that NAFTA, despite its successes, harbored shortcomings that necessitated a
recalibration. The trade terrain had evolved, and concerns surfaced regarding the
agreement's ability to address emerging issues adequately. Critics pointed to job
losses in specific industries, imbalances in environmental regulations, and a lack
of provisions related to labor rights as pressing issues that required immediate
attention.
The journey toward renegotiating NAFTA and ushering in the USMCA was
a protracted and intricate one, marked by numerous domestic and international
developments. A pivotal force behind the renegotiation was the change in
leadership in the United States. “The election of President Donald Trump in 2016
infused a new perspective on trade agreements into the political discourse.
President Trump contended that existing trade deals, including NAFTA, were
unfair to American workers and industries, setting the stage for a reevaluation of
North American trade relations.” (SICE: Trade Agreements: Tratado Entre Los
Estados Unidos Méxicanos, Los Estados Unidos De América Y Canadá, n.d.)
Another significant catalyst for renegotiation was the escalating concern
about labor rights in Mexico. Critics argued that the lower labor costs in Mexico
had resulted in a relocation of jobs from the United States, particularly in the
manufacturing sector. Consequently, addressing labor issues became a central
focus of the renegotiation process to establish a more equitable playing field in
terms of labor costs.
 5

Environmental concerns were also pivotal in instigating the call for

renegotiation. Environmental advocates contended that NAFTA had contributed
to a race to the bottom, with Mexico's lax environmental standards attracting
industries seeking fewer regulations. This not only had environmental
consequences but also raised concerns about unfair competition among the
member nations.
The renegotiation of NAFTA and the subsequent development of the
USMCA unfolded against a backdrop of intensive negotiations and necessary
compromises. The three countries Canada, Mexico, and the United States
engaged in a series of discussions to shape the contours of the new trade
agreement. A significant aspect of this evolution was the preservation of certain
elements from NAFTA. The elimination of most tariffs on goods traded among the
member countries remained intact, a crucial component in maintaining the ease
of trade and the economic benefits derived from a tariff free environment.
However, the USMCA introduced substantial changes to the trade
landscape, signifying a departure from its predecessor. One of the most
significant alterations was the imposition of stricter rules of origin, particularly in
the automotive sector. “These rules aimed to incentivize manufacturing in North
America by requiring a higher percentage of auto parts to be produced within the
region to qualify for tariff-free trade. This provision sought to protect domestic
industries and stimulate job growth in North America.” (USMCA: History >>
GlobalEDGE: Your Source for Global Business Knowledge, n.d.)
The agreement also addressed labor and environmental standards,
recognizing the need for comprehensive reforms. Mexico, in particular, was
required to make substantial labor reforms, including the strengthening of
workers’ rights and the facilitation of more collective bargaining. This step was
viewed as essential in addressing concerns related to labor conditions and job
losses.
Furthermore, the USMCA incorporated provisions related to intellectual
property, pharmaceuticals, and digital trade. These provisions were crafted to
shield American industries and promote innovation. Intellectual property rights
 6

were reinforced, ensuring the protection and enforcement of innovative ideas.

“The pharmaceutical sector saw specific provisions designed to maintain a
competitive edge for U.S. companies.” (UNITED STATES–MEXICO–CANADA
TRADE FACT SHEET Rebalancing Trade to Support Manufacturing, n.d.)
Additionally, the inclusion of digital trade provisions reflected the
acknowledgment of the growing significance of the digital economy in the modern
world.
Most of the trade among these countries transpires within the North
American region, emphasizing the deep interdependence of their economies.
The journey from NAFTA to the USMCA serves as a testament to the
intricacies inherent in international trade agreements. It encapsulates not only a
substantial amount of negotiation and compromise but also a dynamic response
to changing economic, political, and social landscapes. As this essay proceeds to
scrutinize the achievements and controversies of the USMCA, it becomes
evident that the historical context is pivotal in comprehending the impact and
challenges faced by the agreement. The next sections will delve deeper into the
outcomes and complexities that define the USMCA's role in shaping North
American trade relations.
The United States, Mexico and Canada Agreement (USMCA) stands as a
testament to the evolution of North American trade relations, ushering in a new
era with distinctive characteristics that aim to address the shortcomings of its
predecessor, NAFTA. This comprehensive exploration of the main
characteristics, relevant data, and the evolution of the USMCA delves into the
intricacies of the trade agreement, shedding light on its provisions, economic
impact, and the dynamic changes it has undergone since its implementation in
2020.
USMCA is the free trade agreement between the United States of
America, the United Mexican States, and Canada, with the main focus on
incentivizing and promoting economic growth between the three economies. It
was made official on the first of July, 2020, making it the substitution from the
North American Free Trade Agreement. It was meant to seek the best interest of
 7

the North American workers like any businesses, farmers, and workforce in each
country. Seeking for the evolution and progression of higher paying jobs and
innovation in all three countries. On the official page, we can find the highlights
and what they are expecting from the agreement, like the creation of better
alignments and guidelines of rules of origin in all industries, with a focus on the
automobile industry. Trying to involve and upgrade the agricultural field by
helping out American farmers, and ranchers by promoting the modernizing and
strengthening food and agricultural trade between the three countries. Another
major interest the US has in this agreement is the support and protection of US
intellectual property, as a way to ensure news opportunities and trade in the US
services. The last thing they mansion is the point of view of protection and
seeking a better future taking out corruption, covering digital trade, and
regulatory practices in all types of businesses and sizes. These four arguments
are the most important reasons why USMCA is a big deal for the three countries
involved. It is a way to aim high and support each other in the way of becoming
better countries with bigger economies and ensuring the well-being of their
citizens.
“As they say on their page, their main goal is to level up and promote high
labor standards and ensure workers' rights for everyone. They've developed a
system called “RRM” which stands for Rapid Response Mechanism” (Chatzky &
Hanson, 2020)
which has the main focus on answering and taking action on workers' rights
issues in any of the three countries. All these commitments that the USA has with
Canada and Mexico are because of the business they carry with each other.
They are sellers and buyers of each other. They don't want any local business
buying or selling internationally to be affected by the wrongdoing of third parties.
Giving businesses security and someone looking for their best interest, increases
and allows people to start to seek new business opportunities, therefore, all three
economies should aim to be bigger with this trade. With this allegiance comes a
major change in all foreign trade between countries. New laws and policies are
 8

changing for the best, and old processes and systems are changing to promote
and make trade between countries as easy as possible.
The USMCA, building on the foundations laid by NAFTA, retains certain
fundamental characteristics while introducing significant changes to modernize
and adapt to the contemporary economic landscape. “One of its main features is
the preservation of the tariff-free trade zone among the three member countries
the United States, Mexico, and Canada.” (Chatzky & Hanson, 2020)
This continuation ensures the continued facilitation of cross-border
commerce, fostering economic growth and stability.
A key departure from NAFTA lies in the imposition of stricter rules of
origin, particularly evident in the automotive sector. Under the USMCA, a higher
percentage of auto parts must be produced within North America to qualify for
tariff-free trade. This provision aims to promote regional manufacturing, protect
domestic industries, and stimulate job growth within the member countries.
One of the transformative aspects of the USMCA is its emphasis on labor
standards and the push for significant reforms, particularly in Mexico. The
agreement requires Mexico to bolster workers’ rights, allowing for more collective
bargaining and creating a pathway to address concerns about labor conditions.
By addressing labor disparities, the USMCA seeks to create a more level playing
field in terms of labor costs among the member nations.
In response to growing environmental concerns, the USMCA incorporates
provisions to address environmental standards and sustainability. This is a
notable departure from NAFTA's limited environmental provisions. The
agreement strives to discourage a race to the bottom by promoting higher
environmental standards and fostering responsible practices across industries.
The USMCA includes provisions related to intellectual property,
pharmaceuticals, and digital trade, reflecting the changing dynamics of the global
economy. Intellectual property rights are reinforced to protect innovators and
encourage continued innovation. The pharmaceutical sector benefits from
provisions that maintain a competitive edge for U.S. companies. Additionally, the
inclusion of digital trade provisions acknowledges the growing importance of the
 9

digital economy, providing a framework for e-commerce and digital trade in the
modern era.
The USMCA introduces changes to the dispute resolution mechanisms
compared to NAFTA. While NAFTA's dispute settlement mechanism faced
criticism for its effectiveness, the USMCA seeks to address these concerns by
incorporating alterations that aim to streamline the dispute resolution process.
The changes are designed to provide a fair and efficient means of settling
disagreements among the member countries.
Understanding the impact of the USMCA requires a closer look at the
relevant economic data that underscores its significance. “In 2021, the combined
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the three member countries exceeded an
astounding $25 trillion.” (Office of the United States Trade Representative, n.d.)
This colossal economic output highlights the magnitude of the trade
activities within the North American region governed by the USMCA. Trade
statistics reveal the intricate web of economic interdependence among the
member nations. Most of the trade occurs within the North American region,
emphasizing the critical role played by the USMCA in fostering regional
economic integration. The agreement facilitates the movement of goods and
services, contributing to the prosperity of businesses and industries across
borders.
Since its implementation in 2020, the USMCA has undergone a dynamic
evolution, shaped by both internal and external factors. The global COVID-19
pandemic presented an unforeseen challenge, impacting supply chains and
prompting a reevaluation of certain provisions within the agreement. The
pandemic underscored the importance of resilient supply chains and cooperation
among member countries in times of crisis.
The change in leadership in the United States with the election of
President Joe Biden brought a renewed emphasis on addressing climate change
and environmental concerns. This shift in focus has led to discussions about
incorporating climate provisions into the USMCA, signaling a commitment to
environmental sustainability and global cooperation on climate related issues.
 10

The Biden administration's approach also reflects a broader commitment to a

multilateral trade agenda, distinguishing itself from the more unilateral stance of
the previous administration. This change in approach has implications for the
USMCA, as the United States seeks to engage more collaboratively with its
North American partners and the international community.
“In the realm of labor, the USMCA's impact has been notable, particularly
in Mexico. The agreement prompted significant labor reforms in Mexico, signaling
a departure from the past practices that drew criticism.” (From NAFTA to USMCA
and the Evolution of US Trade Policy, n.d.)
The changes aim to address concerns about the suppression of workers'
rights and create a more equitable environment for labor across the region.
Environmental considerations have gained prominence within the evolution of the
USMCA. The agreement's response to environmental challenges, including
provisions to discourage environmentally harmful practices, reflects a broader
recognition of the need for sustainable and responsible trade practices.
Additionally, the evolution of the USMCA has witnessed ongoing
discussions about the effectiveness of its dispute-resolution mechanisms. As
disputes arise and the need for resolution becomes apparent, the mechanisms
within the agreement continue to be subject to scrutiny and potential refinement
to ensure fair and timely resolutions. The USMCA's trajectory of evolution
underscores its adaptive nature, responding to the changing dynamics of the
global economy, political landscapes, and unforeseen challenges. As the
agreement continues to shape North American trade relations, its ability to adapt
and address emerging issues will be crucial to its sustained success.
The USMCA comes from NAFTA, the North American Free Trade
Agreement. The USMCA was planned as far as the beginning of 2018, but not
much time later in 2020 it became official. But how did we go from being NAFTA
to only the USMCA? And what triggered such a change? The Trump
administration has everything to do with this shift of way. Trump made changes to
all international policies related to the US and business procedures. Often, it is
seen as agreements looking more for the US benefits than anything else. Not
 11

only for the country, but the people doing business with Canada and Mexico. One
of the goals that the Trump administration had was the re-industrialization of the
US economy, the second goal was the re-balance of American trade, third the
pursuit of reclaiming sovereignty by not depending on useless contracts and
policies previously made before Trump's administration, fourth mention the
countering of China rapid technological growth, they saw it as a national security
threat for the US citizens, and from this technological race came the interest of
the advancement of the intellectual property and the digital economy.
With these goals, Trump wanted to have more control of the economy by
trying to have the upper hand in negotiation and the Ace side. By producing more
locally, and selling more internationally, having better technologies, and having a
better grasp of the internet economy and their risk, they saw it as a way to
ensure the balance and firmness of the US government, and the safety of the
American people.
The re-industrialization in America would mean that more local companies
would manufacture their products in America instead of outsourcing them to
countries like China or Afghanistan. This plan would create a major shift in the
rules of origin, it would create a higher standard for it to apply certain tariffs and
international policies. “The re-balancing goals have a major conflict with the other
countries, it seems like it doesn't have the best interest of all parties but the US
itself. It would extract the commercial concessions without any reciprocation.”
(UNITED STATES–MEXICO–CANADA TRADE FACT SHEET Rebalancing
Trade to Support Manufacturing, n.d.)
Examples of this could be the higher standards placed by the US that
directly affect all countries, like the dairy industry out of Canada or the
automobile in Mexico. United States decision-making makes the other countries
have trust issues on the accessibility of future market access in the US. “Given
the US Tariff Rate Quota (TRQ) design, this could mean restricted market access
at less than the nominal value of the quota. This sends a strong signal to
investors not to invest in Canada or Mexico in the hope of making substantial
 12

gains in US sales.” (From NAFTA to USMCA and the Evolution of US Trade

Policy, n.d.)
Adding extra policies or causes when doing business makes countries like
Mexico left out of business if clauses are not complied with, adding more
restrictions and obligations to Mexico and making a deal breaker. Another US
move in the fight against China in the technological market is the restriction
placed over Canada and Mexico if doing business with non-open market
economies, just like China. “it introduces a novel feature for trade agreements,
namely the section 32.10 measures that threaten loss of access to the US
market, if Canada or Mexico were to negotiate a free trade agreement with a
non-market economy” (From NAFTA to USMCA and the Evolution of US Trade
Policy, n.d.)
The USMCA's trajectory of evolution underscores its adaptive nature,
responding to the changing dynamics of the global economy, political
landscapes, and unforeseen challenges. As the agreement continues to shape
North American trade relations, its ability to adapt and address emerging issues
will be crucial to its sustained success.
The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), a successor to
the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), has been a subject of
comprehensive analysis, with both achievements and controversies shaping its
narrative since its implementation in 2020. This section delves deeply into the
notable achievements and controversies surrounding the USMCA, shedding light
on the multifaceted impact it has had on North American trade relations.
One of the primary achievements of the USMCA is the modernization of
trade rules for the digital age. “Recognizing the transformative impact of
technology on commerce, the agreement introduces provisions related to digital
trade, e-commerce, and cross border data flows.” (Conner, 2022)
This modernization ensures that North American trade remains relevant
and adaptive to the demands of the contemporary global economy.
Labor Reforms in Mexico: The USMCA has been instrumental in driving
labor reforms in Mexico. The agreement mandated significant changes to
 13

Mexican labor laws, requiring the country to strengthen workers’ rights, allow for
more collective bargaining, and address concerns related to low wages. This
achievement is crucial for creating a more level playing field in terms of labor
costs among the member countries.
Preservation of Duty-Free Access for Agricultural Products: The USMCA
preserves duty free access for a wide range of agricultural products traded
among the member countries. This achievement ensures the continued flow of
agricultural goods without tariffs, supporting farmers and promoting food security
within the North American region.
Resolution of Dairy Trade Issues: The agreement addresses long standing
issues in dairy trade, particularly between the United States and Canada. It
opens up additional market access for U.S. dairy producers in the Canadian
market, providing them with new opportunities for growth. This resolution
contributes to a more equitable and balanced trade relationship in the agricultural
sector.
Environmental Provisions: While subject to ongoing scrutiny, the USMCA's
inclusion of environmental provisions marks a step forward compared to NAFTA.
“The agreement acknowledges the interconnectedness of trade and the
environment, with provisions aimed at discouraging a race to the bottom in
environmental standards.” (Conner, 2022)
It sets the stage for further collaboration on sustainability and
environmental protection.
Intellectual Property Protection: The USMCA strengthens intellectual
property protection, a critical aspect for fostering innovation and creativity. By
ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights, the agreement provides
a framework that encourages research and development, benefiting industries
reliant on patents, copyrights, and trademarks.
Pharmaceutical Industry Provisions: The agreement includes provisions
related to the pharmaceutical industry. These provisions, while contentious, aim
to balance the interests of pharmaceutical companies and the need for affordable
 14

access to medicines. The USMCA seeks to strike a delicate equilibrium that

fosters innovation while addressing public health concerns.
Now understanding controversies, despite the inclusion of environmental
provisions, critics argue that the USMCA falls short in addressing pressing
environmental challenges adequately. Some environmental advocates contend
that the agreement lacks teeth in enforcing environmental standards and fails to
address issues such as climate change comprehensively. The controversy
surrounding the effectiveness of environmental provisions raises questions about
the commitment to sustainable trade practices.
Labor Enforcement Mechanisms: While the USMCA introduces robust
labor provisions, concerns exist about the effectiveness of enforcement
mechanisms. “Critics argue that the agreement lacks teeth in holding countries
accountable for labor violations.” (Conner, 2022)
The dispute resolution mechanisms related to labor issues have faced
skepticism, raising doubts about the extent to which the USMCA can bring about
meaningful change in labor practices.
Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: The dispute resolution mechanisms
within the USMCA have faced criticism for being less robust than those in other
trade agreements. Some argue that the mechanisms may not be sufficiently
effective in addressing disputes in a fair and timely manner. This controversy
points to potential shortcomings in the agreement's ability to resolve conflicts
among the member countries.
Intellectual Property and Access to Medicines: Provisions related to
intellectual property in the pharmaceutical industry have generated significant
controversy. Critics argue that these provisions could lead to increased
healthcare costs by delaying the entry of generic drugs into the market.
Balancing the need for innovation with ensuring affordable access to medicines
remains a delicate and contentious aspect of the USMCA.
Dispute over Steel and Aluminum Tariffs: The USMCA has not entirely
shielded North American trade from broader global trade tensions. Disputes over
steel and aluminum tariffs between the United States and Canada have
 15

persisted, revealing challenges in achieving a seamless and conflict free trade

relationship. Such trade skirmishes highlight the complexities of managing trade
relations even within a regional agreement.
Effectiveness of Rapid-Response Mechanism: The inclusion of a rapid
response mechanism to address labor violations has been both lauded and
criticized. While seen as an innovative approach to swiftly resolving labor
disputes, questions remain about the effectiveness of this mechanism in practice.
Skeptics argue that its success depends on the willingness of countries to
engage in good faith and may not be a panacea for addressing systemic labor
issues.
Concerns About Impact on Auto Industry: The stricter rules of origin in the
automotive sector, while intended to boost manufacturing in North America, have
raised concerns about their potential impact on the auto industry. Some critics
argue that these rules could lead to increased costs for automakers, potentially
affecting competitiveness and consumer prices. Striking the right balance
between promoting domestic manufacturing and ensuring industry viability
remains a contentious issue.
As the USMCA continues to shape North American trade relations, its
trajectory toward the future is nuanced. The adaptive nature of the agreement will
be crucial in addressing emerging challenges and harnessing opportunities. “The
Biden administration's emphasis on multilateralism and climate considerations
adds new dimensions to the discussions surrounding the agreement.” (SICE:
Trade Agreements: Tratado Entre Los Estados Unidos Méxicanos, Los Estados
Unidos De América Y Canadá, n.d.)
Addressing controversies requires a commitment to ongoing dialogue,
transparency, and a willingness to refine mechanisms that may fall short. The
evolving nature of global trade demands a flexible and responsive approach to
ensure the USMCA remains a catalyst for economic growth, job creation, and
sustainable practices in the years to come.
Closing the loop, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)
stands at the intersection of historical evolution, substantial achievements, and
 16

lingering controversies. Its journey from the shadows of the North American Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to the modernized framework of the USMCA reflects
a commitment to addressing the complexities of international commerce. As this
comprehensive analysis has unfolded, it becomes evident that the agreement
has both reshaped and faced challenges within North American trade relations.
The achievements of the USMCA are multifaceted. It successfully
modernized trade rules, particularly in the digital domain, acknowledging the
transformative impact of technology. Crucially, the agreement catalyzed labor
reforms in Mexico, aimed at creating a fairer playing field for workers. The
preservation of duty-free access for agricultural products, resolution of dairy trade
issues, and bolstering of intellectual property protection all contribute to the
stability and innovation of key industries.
However, controversies persist, highlighting the delicate balance required
in crafting a trade agreement. Environmental concerns underscore the need for
more robust provisions, and doubts linger about the effectiveness of labor
enforcement mechanisms. The intricacies of dispute resolution mechanisms, the
pharmaceutical industry provisions, and concerns about the impact on the auto
industry all add layers of complexity to the agreement.
Looking forward, the future trajectory of the USMCA is contingent on its
adaptive capacity. The global landscape, marked by challenges like the
COVID-19 pandemic and shifts in political leadership, necessitates ongoing
recalibration. “The Biden administration's emphasis on multilateralism and
climate considerations introduces new dimensions to the discussions
surrounding the agreement.” (Verbatim, 2019)
Adapting to these changing dynamics will be crucial for the USMCA's
continued relevance and effectiveness.
To navigate future challenges, a commitment to ongoing dialogue is
imperative. Transparent discussions addressing environmental sustainability,
labor rights, and dispute resolution mechanisms are essential. The periodic
review mechanisms embedded in the agreement provide an avenue for
continuous adaptation and improvement.
 17

In projecting the future, the success of the USMCA lies not just in its
achievements but in its ability to learn from controversies. Balancing the interests
of diverse stakeholders, fostering innovation, and ensuring equitable trade
practices are ongoing challenges. The evolving nature of global trade demands a
flexible and responsive approach to ensure the USMCA remains a catalyst for
economic growth, job creation, and sustainable practices in the interconnected
economies of the United States, Mexico, and Canada.
As nations collectively navigate the intricate terrain of international trade,
the USMCA serves as a living document that reflects aspirations, challenges,
and the potential for positive transformation. Its pages tell a story of collaboration,
negotiation, and adaptation, shaping the future of trade in North America. The
success of this agreement will ultimately hinge on the shared commitment of its
member nations to foster an environment where trade becomes a force for
economic growth, social progress, and environmental sustainability.

References
Chatzky, A., & Hanson, G. (2020, July 1). NAFTA and the USMCA: Weighing the Impact

of North American Trade. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved October 27,

2023, from https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/naftas-economic-impact

Comisión de Libre Comercio | T-MEC | Gobierno | gob.mx. (n.d.). Gobierno de México.

Retrieved November 15, 2023, from

https://www.gob.mx/t-mec/acciones-y-programas/comision-de-libre-comercio-247

174?state=published

Conner, B. (2022, June 16). USMCA at Two: How to measure North American success?

Wilson Center. Retrieved November 17, 2023, from

https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/usmca-two-how-measure-north-american-su

ccess
 18

Department of Commerce United States of America. (n.d.). USMCA. International Trade

Administration. Retrieved October 24, 2023, from https://www.trade.gov/usmca

From NAFTA to USMCA and the Evolution of US Trade Policy. (n.d.). C.D. Howe

Institute. Retrieved November 9, 2023, from

https://www.cdhowe.org/public-policy-research/nafta-usmca-and-evolution-us-tra

de-policy

Locke, G., & Paulsen, E. (2019, November 13). Locke and Paulsen: Trade deal

between US, Mexico and Canada carries big benefits – Congress should

approve it. Fox News. Retrieved November 5, 2023, from

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/paulsen-locke-congress-put-politics-aside-and-

pass-a-trade-deal

Office of the United States Trade Representative. (n.d.). Agreement between the United

States of America, the United Mexican States, and Canada 7/1/20 Text. USTR.

Retrieved October 21, 2023, from

https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/united-states-mexico-ca

nada-agreement/agreement-between

Office of the United States Trade Representative. (n.d.). United States-Mexico-Canada

Agreement | United States Trade Representative. USTR. Retrieved October 20,

2023, from

https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/united-states-mexico-ca

nada-agreement
 19

SICE: Trade Agreements: Tratado entre Los Estados Unidos Méxicanos, Los Estados

Unidos de América y Canadá. (n.d.). SICE - OAS. Retrieved November 9, 2023,

from http://www.sice.oas.org/Trade/USMCA/USMCA_ToC_PDF_s.asp

UNITED STATES–MEXICO–CANADA TRADE FACT SHEET Rebalancing Trade to

Support Manufacturing. (n.d.). USTR. Retrieved October 25, 2023, from

https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/united-states-mexico-ca

nada-agreement/fact-sheets/rebalancing

U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (n.d.). U.S. – Mexico – Canada Agreement

(USMCA). U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Retrieved October 25, 2023,

from

https://www.cbp.gov/trade/priority-issues/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreement

s/USMCA

USMCA: History >> globalEDGE: Your source for Global Business Knowledge. (n.d.).

globalEDGE. Retrieved October 27, 2023, from

https://globaledge.msu.edu/trade-blocs/usmca/history

Verbatim. (2019, June 25). C.D. Howe Institute. Retrieved November 12, 2023, from

https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/V

erbatim-Ciuriak-2019-June%2025.pdf