There are different forecasting methods that vary in cost, flexibility, skill requirements, and sophistication. A good forecasting method should have five key characteristics - it should be plausible, simple to understand, cost-effective, able to produce quick results, and accurate when evaluated against past and present performance. Management must be able to have confidence in the technique used and understand the results for proper interpretation.
There are different forecasting methods that vary in cost, flexibility, skill requirements, and sophistication. A good forecasting method should have five key characteristics - it should be plausible, simple to understand, cost-effective, able to produce quick results, and accurate when evaluated against past and present performance. Management must be able to have confidence in the technique used and understand the results for proper interpretation.
There are different forecasting methods that vary in cost, flexibility, skill requirements, and sophistication. A good forecasting method should have five key characteristics - it should be plausible, simple to understand, cost-effective, able to produce quick results, and accurate when evaluated against past and present performance. Management must be able to have confidence in the technique used and understand the results for proper interpretation.
There are different methods for estimating future demands. These
methods differ in costs, flexibility, the skills required and the degree of sophistication.
A good forecasting method should possess the following five
characteristics:
1. Plausibility: Management must be able to understand and have
confidence in the techniques used. Understanding is important for proper interpretation of the results 2. Simplicity and case of comprehension: Elaborate mathematical and econometric procedures may be judged less desirable if management does not really understand what the forecaster is doing and fails to understand the procedure 3. Economy: The cost of forecasting has to be weighed against the importance of the forecast to the operations of the firm. There is no point in pursuing very high levels of accuracy at great expenses if the forecast is of no importance to the firm. 4. Availability: the technique employed should be able to produce meaningful results quickly. If the technique takes a long time it may not be of much help to the management. 5. Accuracy: It is necessary to check the accuracy of past forecasts against present performance and of present forecast against future performance. Some comparison of the model with what actually happens and of the assumptions with what is borne out in practice is most desirable.